IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,104,481
Granted Patent B2
US 12,104,481 · App. 17/825,045 · Granted Oct 1, 2024

Automatic real time screen-out mitigation

Inventors: Srividhya Sridhar (Houston, TX); Joseph Andrew Romani (Denver, CO); Dinesh Ananda Shetty (Houston, TX)
Assignee: Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.
E21B44/005E21B34/10E21B43/267E21B47/06E21B47/09
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,104,481
App. No.
17/825,045
Granted
Oct 1, 2024
Kind
B2
Abstract

Processes for mitigating wellbore screen-out. The processes can automatically determine an onset of wellbore screen-out by analyzing corrected pressure data from the at least one pressure sensor, select at least one type of mitigation action based on the automatic determination of the onset of the wellbore screen-out, and mitigate the wellbore screen-out with the selected at least one type of mitigation action.

Claims (40)

1. A method of mitigating wellbore screen-out for a wellbore, the method comprising:

automatically determining an onset of wellbore screen-out when a time it takes for an upward trend of corrected pressure data of hydraulic fluid from a hydraulic fracturing well site to reach a maximum allowable pressure of the hydraulic fluid, relative to a time required to move one wellbore volume of the hydraulic fluid at a present slurry rate, is less than a value based on a current condition of a fracturing operation;

selecting at least one type of mitigation action based on the automatic determination of the onset of the wellbore screen-out; and

mitigating the wellbore screen-out with the selected at least one type of mitigation action.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one type of mitigation action is selected from the group consisting of:

proppant concentration adjustments;

fluid rheology adjustments by changing a concentration of friction reducer or other chemicals; and

slurry pumping rate adjustments.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the selection of the at least one type of mitigation action is based on a pressure safety window and a risk from the automatic determination of the onset of the wellbore screen-out.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the pressure safety window is a difference between a pressure of fracturing fluid measured at a surface of the wellbore and a maximum pressure of the fracturing fluid for the hydraulic fracturing well site.

5. The method of claim 3 , wherein the risk is a rate of increase in pressure of fracturing fluid.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one type of mitigation action is performed automatically.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one type of mitigation action is performed by a user.

8. A system for mitigating wellbore screen-out for a wellbore, the system comprising:

at least one surface pressure sensor; and

at least one processor configured to perform operations including:

automatically determining an onset of wellbore screen-out when a time it takes for an upward trend of corrected pressure data of hydraulic fluid from the at least one pressure sensor from a hydraulic fracturing well site to reach a maximum allowable pressure of the hydraulic fluid, relative to a time required to move one wellbore volume of the hydraulic fluid at a present slurry rate, is less than a value based on a current condition of a fracturing operation;

selecting at least one type of mitigation action based on the automatic determination of the onset of the wellbore screen-out; and

mitigating the wellbore screen-out with the selected at least one type of mitigation action.

9. The system of claim 8 , wherein the at least one type of mitigation action is selected from the group consisting of:

proppant concentration adjustments;

fluid rheology adjustments by changing a concentration of friction reducer or other chemicals; and

slurry pumping rate adjustments.

10. The system of claim 9 , wherein the selection of the at least one type of mitigation action is based on a pressure safety window and a risk from the automatic determination of the onset of the wellbore screen-out.

11. The system of claim 10 , wherein the pressure safety window is a difference between a pressure of fracturing fluid measured at a surface of the wellbore with the at least one pressure sensor and a maximum pressure of the fracturing fluid for the hydraulic fracturing wellsite.

12. The system of claim 10 , wherein the risk is a rate of increase in pressure of fracturing fluid.

13. The system of claim 8 , wherein the at least one type of mitigation action is performed automatically.

14. The system of claim 8 , wherein the at least one type of mitigation action is performed by a user.

15. A computer program product having a series of operating instructions stored on a non-transitory computer-readable medium that cause at least one processor to perform operations to mitigate wellbore screen-out for a wellbore, the operations comprising:

automatically determining an onset of wellbore screen-out when a time it takes for an upward trend of corrected pressure data of hydraulic fluid from a hydraulic fracturing well site to reach a maximum allowable pressure of the hydraulic fluid, relative to a time required to move one wellbore volume of the hydraulic fluid at a present slurry rate, is less than a value based on a current condition of a fracturing operation;

selecting at least one type of mitigation action based on the automatic determination of the onset of the wellbore screen-out; and

mitigating the wellbore screen-out with the at least one type of mitigation action.

16. The computer program product of claim 15 , wherein the at least one type of mitigation action is selected from the group consisting of:

proppant concentration adjustments;

fluid rheology adjustments by changing a concentration of friction reducer or other chemicals; and

slurry pumping rate adjustments.

17. The computer program product of claim 16 , wherein the selection of the at least one type of mitigation action is based on a pressure safety window and a risk from the automatic determination of the onset of the wellbore screen-out.

18. The computer program product of claim 17 , wherein the pressure safety window is a difference between a pressure of fracturing fluid measured at a surface of the wellbore with at least one pressure sensor and a maximum pressure of the fracturing fluid for the hydraulic fracturing well site.

19. The computer program product of claim 17 , wherein the risk is a rate of increase in pressure of fracturing fluid.

20. The computer program product of claim 15 , wherein the at least one type of mitigation action is performed automatically.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 3, 2022
From: SRIDHAR, SRIVIDHYA; ROMANI, JOSEPH ANDREW; SHETTY, DINESH ANANDA
To: HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
Reel/Frame 060095/0582 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20230383639A1 · Nov 30, 2023