IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,588,168
Granted Patent B2
US 12,588,168 · App. 17/829,984 · Granted Mar 24, 2026

Adaptive thermal control of data center and IT equipment

Inventors: Melanie Beauchemin (Mountain View, CA); Madhusudan K. Iyengar (Foster City, CA); Reza H. Khiabani (San Mateo, CA); Jeremy Rice (Austin, TX); Jeffrey Ewin (Austin, TX)
Assignee: Google LLC
H05K7/20836H05K7/20263H05K7/20272H05K7/20718
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,588,168
App. No.
17/829,984
Granted
Mar 24, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A data center thermal control system includes a local cooler configured to cool a local coolant used for cooling electronic hardware, an outer heat exchanger configured to exchange heat from fluid to outside air, and a fluid circulation system configured to convey heat from the local cooler to the outer heat exchanger by circulating at least one fluid cooling medium, the fluid circulation system including a cold portion directed to the air cooler. The thermal control system also includes one or more processors and a non-transitory computer-readable medium storing instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, would cause the one or more processors to govern the outer heat exchanger to cool fluid in the cold portion to a first target temperature during a hot season, and cool fluid in the cold portion to a lower target temperature during a cold season.

Claims (20)

1 . A data center thermal control system for cooling a fleet of electronic components, the control system comprising one or more processors and a non-transitory computer-readable medium storing instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, would cause the processors to govern the control system to cool the fleet to a different thermal margin floor during at least a portion an early failure stage than during a stable stage, wherein:

the early failure stage being a window after installation of the components during which an expected failure rate for the components, according to historical failure data, decreases at least at a first rate;

the stable stage being a window after the early failure stage during which the failure rate for the components, according to historical failure data, decreases at less than the first rate and increases at less than a second rate; and

the thermal margin is a difference between a predetermined temperature and an actual operating temperature of the component,

wherein the different thermal margin floor during at least a portion of the wear out stage is elevated than at any point during the stable stage.

2 . The control system of claim 1 , wherein the instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, would cause the processors to govern the control system to cool the fleet to a stable thermal margin floor during the stable stage and an early margin floor during the early failure stage, wherein the early margin floor is less than the stable margin floor.

3 . The control system of claim 2 , wherein the instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, would cause the processors to govern the control system to cool the fleet to the early margin floor from installation of the fleet until an adapted stable transition time and to begin cooling the fleet to at least the stable margin floor at the adapted stable transition time, wherein the adapted stable transition time is an earliest time following installation of the fleet when an actual failure rate of components among the fleet is expected to decrease by less than a predetermined rate.

4 . The control system of claim 1 , wherein the historical failure data is derived from observed failures of electronic equipment of a same type as the components before the installation.

5 . The control system of claim 1 , wherein the different thermal margin during at least a portion of the early failure stage is lower than at any point during the stable stage.

6 . The control system of claim 5 , wherein an amount of time the different thermal margin floor is kept lower is a predetermined amount of time or an amount of time corresponding to either a transition from a typical early failure stage to a typical stable stage or an actual or predicted transition from an adapted early failure stage to an adapted early stable stage.

7 . The control system of claim 1 , wherein the different thermal margin during at least a portion of the early failure stage is elevated than at any point during the stable stage.

8 . The control system of claim 7 , wherein an amount of time the different thermal margin floor is kept elevated is a predetermined amount of time or an amount of time corresponding to either a transition from a typical early failure stage to a typical stable stage or an actual or predicted transition from an adapted early failure stage to an adapted early stable stage.

9 . A data center thermal control system for cooling a fleet of electronic components, the control system comprising one or more processors and a non-transitory computer-readable medium storing instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, would cause the processors to govern the control system to cool the fleet to a different thermal margin floor during at least a portion an early failure stage than during a stable stage, wherein:

the early failure stage being a window after installation of the components during which an expected failure rate for the components, according to historical failure data, decreases at least at a first rate;

the stable stage being a window after the early failure stage during which the failure rate for the components, according to historical failure data, decreases at less than the first rate and increases at less than a second rate; and

the thermal margin is a difference between a predetermined temperature and an actual operating temperature of the component,

wherein the instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, would cause the processors to govern the control system to cool the fleet to a stable thermal margin floor during the stable stage and an early margin floor during the early failure stage, wherein the early margin floor is less than the stable margin floor,

wherein the instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, would cause the processors to govern the control system to cool the fleet to the early margin floor from installation of the fleet until an adapted stable transition time and to begin cooling the fleet to at least the stable margin floor at the adapted stable transition time, wherein the adapted stable transition time is an earliest time following installation of the fleet when an actual failure rate of components among the fleet is expected to decrease by less than a predetermined rate, and

wherein the predetermined rate is a predetermined increase rate or a predetermined decrease rate marking transitions between the early failure stage, the stable stage, and the wear out stage.

10 . The control system of claim 9 , wherein the predetermined rate comprises 1% per day, 2% per day, 3% per day, 4% per day, 5% per day, 10% per day, 15% per day, 20% per day, and 25% per day.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 15, 2022
From: BEAUCHEMIN, MELANIE; IYENGAR, MADHUSUDAN K.; KHIABANI, REZA H.; RICE, JEREMY; EWIN, JEFFREY
To: GOOGLE LLC
Reel/Frame 060206/0365 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20230397378A1 · Dec 7, 2023
References Cited (25)
US 6483334B1 · Hsieh · 2002 [cited by examiner]
US 9207993B2 · Jain · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9351431B2 · Campbell et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9654414B2 · Chatterjee et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9727432B1 · Cutforth · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20040019838A1 · Marr · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 20080147976A1 · Bienek · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20120138259A1 · Carlson · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130098599A1 · Busch et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130337273A1 · Boday · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20140343748A1 · Suzuki · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20170138628A1 · Sondur et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20200060033A1 · Adrian · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20230397378A1 · Beauchemin · 2023 [cited by examiner]
CN 102762926A · 2012 [cited by applicant]
CN 103448563A · 2013 [cited by applicant]
CN 103547122A · 2014 [cited by applicant]
CN 106415158A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
CN 112005622A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
CN 114491411A · 2022 [cited by applicant]
Arno et al. More Bang for the Data Center Buck: Savvy Technology Use Can Yield Tier 2 Facilities Nearly Equal to Tier 4. IEEE Industry Applications Magazine, IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, NJ, US, vol. 22, No. 4, Jul.… [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 22206915.5 dated Jul. 6, 2023. 17 pages. [cited by applicant]
Partial European Search Report for European Patent Applicaton No. 22206915.5 dated May 17, 2023. 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action for Taiwanese Patent Application No. 112105089 dated Jun. 5, 2025. 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 202310095872.X dated Jul. 26, 2025. 10 pages. [cited by applicant]