IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,203,890
Granted Patent B2
US 12,203,890 · App. 17/830,859 · Granted Jan 21, 2025

Acoustic resonance diagnostic method for detecting structural degradation and system applying the same

Inventors: Hung-Chih Chang (Hsinchu, TW); Yao-Long Tsai (Kaohsiung, TW); Li-Hua Wang (Hsinchu, TW)
Assignee: INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE
G01N29/12G01N29/14G01N29/348G06N3/04G06N3/08G06N20/10G01N2291/0289
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,203,890
App. No.
17/830,859
Granted
Jan 21, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

An acoustic resonance diagnostic method for detecting structural degradation is provided. The method includes steps as follows: Firstly, a training model is built using a deep neural network. At least two training acoustic signals are inputted to the training model to carry a training. A diagnostic model is built according to a result of the training using a CNN. A plurality of under-test sound wave signals are captured from an under-test section of an under-test structure. An AI is used to filter data invalid for detecting structural degradation from the under-test sound wave signals. A structural degradation state of the under-test section is determined according to a remaining portion of the under-test sound wave signals through the diagnostic model.

Claims (61)

1. An acoustic resonance diagnostic method for detecting structural degradation of an under-test section of an under-test structure, the method comprising:

building a database and storing reference acoustic signals in the database as training acoustic signals which are derived from mathematic calculations and/or based on historic acoustic data of structures similar to the under-test section;

classifying the training acoustic signals into transient training acoustic signals and steady training acoustic signals according to states of the reference acoustic signals;

capturing a plurality of under-test sound wave signals as captured under-test acoustic signals from the under-test section and storing the captured under-test acoustic signals also in the database;

using an artificial intelligence (AI) to filter out acoustic signals in the database that are invalid for detecting structural degradation of the under-test section;

building a training model using a deep neural network (DNN);

inputting at least two filtered transient training acoustic signals as training acoustic signals to the training model to carry out a training of the training model;

building a diagnostic model according to a result of the training using a convolutional neural network (CNN);

inputting a remaining portion of the filtered training acoustic signals, being the filtered steady training acoustic signals, as verifying acoustic signals to the diagnostic model, to verify that the diagnostic model has been trained thus can successfully detect transient acoustic signals, the diagnostic model then outputs detection signals and labels the detection signals as leakage frequency, metal frequency, ambient frequency, or noise frequency;

inputting the captured and filtered under-test acoustic signals to the trained diagnostic model;

determining a structural degradation state of the under-test section by comparing the inputted captured and filtered under-test acoustic signals to the labeled detection signals in the trained diagnostic model.

2. The acoustic resonance diagnostic method for detecting structural degradation according to claim 1 , wherein the step of using the artificial intelligence (AI) to filter out the acoustic signals in the database that are invalid for detecting structural degradation of the under-test section comprises:

performing an 2D graphic comparison process to compare a frequency-domain waveform of the captured under-test signals with characteristic curves of historical frequency-domain waveforms with different prototypes of structural degradation provided by historical data so as to select a plurality of frequency segments from the captured under-test acoustic signals, wherein characteristic curves of the selected frequency segments match portions of the characteristic curves in the historical frequency-domain waveforms;

applying a support vector machine (SVM) learning using a classification and/or a regression analysis to remove portions of the captured under-test acoustic signals from the selected frequency segments according to a predetermine threshold value;

reunion remaining portions of the selected frequency segments.

3. The acoustic resonance diagnostic method for detecting structural degradation according to claim 1 , further comprising providing at least one sound vibration on the under-test structure.

4. The acoustic resonance diagnostic method for detecting structural degradation according to claim 3 , wherein the at least one sound vibration has an amplitude value greater than that of the plurality of under-test sound wave signals previously captured.

5. The acoustic resonance diagnostic method for detecting structural degradation according to claim 3 , wherein the at least one sound vibration has a frequency to form a standing wave in the under-test structure.

6. The acoustic resonance diagnostic method for detecting structural degradation according to claim 5 , wherein the frequency of the standing wave is estimated using the following equation:

f

n

=

2

⁢

nV

L

;

wherein f n is the frequency of the standing wave; L is a distance between a sensing unit used to capture the plurality of under-test sound wave signals and a vibration generator for providing the at least one sound vibration; V is speed of sound; and n is a mode number of the standing wave.

7. The acoustic resonance diagnostic method for detecting structural degradation according to claim 5 , further comprising identifying a leakage position by referring to a relationship between a sound pressure change rate of the at least one sound vibration and an unit wavelength of the standing wave.

8. An acoustic resonance diagnostic system for detecting structural degradation of a plurality of under-test sections of an under-test structure, the system comprising:

a database to store reference acoustic signals as training acoustic signals which are derived from mathematic calculations and/or based on historic acoustic data of structures similar to the under-test sections, the training acoustic signals are classified into transient training acoustic signals and steady training acoustic signals according to states of the reference acoustic signals;

a plurality of sound wave sensing units, to capture a plurality of under-test sound waves as captured under-test acoustic signals from the under-test sections, the captured under-test acoustic signals are then stored also in the database;

a communication module to signal-connect the sound wave sensing units to the database;

a data pre-processing module, using an AI to filter out the acoustic signals in the database that are invalid for detecting structural degradation of the under-test sections;

an acoustic resonance diagnostic module to perform the following steps:

building a training model using a deep neural network;

inputting at least two filtered transient training acoustic signals as training acoustic signals to the training model to carry out a training of the training model;

building a diagnostic model according to a result of the training using a neural network;

inputting a remaining portion of the filtered training acoustic signals, being the

filtered steady training acoustic signals, as verifying acoustic signals to the diagnostic model, to verify that the diagnostic model has been trained thus can successfully detect transient acoustic signals, the diagnostic model then outputs detection signals and labels the detection signals as leakage frequency, metal frequency, ambient frequency, or noise frequency;

inputting the captured and filtered under-test acoustic signals to the trained diagnostic model; and

determining at least one structural degradation state of the under-test sections by comparing the inputted captured and filtered under-test acoustic signals to the labeled detection signals in the diagnostic model.

9. The acoustic resonance diagnostic system for detecting structural degradation according to claim 8 , wherein the plurality of sound wave sensing units are fixed on and/or adjacent to the under-test section.

10. The acoustic resonance diagnostic system for detecting structural degradation according to claim 8 , wherein the step of using the AI to filter out the acoustic signals in the database that are invalid for detecting structural degradation of the under-test sections comprises:

performing an 2D graphic comparison process to compare a frequency-domain waveform of the captured under-test acoustic signals with characteristic curves of historical frequency-domain waveforms with different prototypes of structural degradation provided by historical data to select a plurality of frequency segments from the captured under-test acoustic signals, wherein characteristic curves of the selected frequency segments match portions of the characteristic curves in the historical frequency-domain waveforms;

applying a support vector machine (SVM) learning using a classification and/or a regression analysis to remove portions of the captured under-test acoustic signals from the selected frequency segments according to a predetermine threshold value;

reunion remaining portions of the selected frequency segments.

11. The acoustic resonance diagnostic system for detecting structural degradation according to claim 8 , further comprising a vibration generator used to provide at least one sound vibration on the under-test structure.

12. The acoustic resonance diagnostic system for detecting structural degradation according to claim 11 , wherein the at least one sound vibration has an amplitude value greater than that of the plurality of under-test sound wave signals previously captured.

13. The acoustic resonance diagnostic system for detecting structural degradation according to claim 11 , wherein the at least one sound vibration has a frequency to form a standing wave in the under-test structure.

14. The acoustic resonance diagnostic system for detecting structural degradation according to claim 13 , wherein the frequency of the standing wave is estimated using the following equation:

f

n

=

2

⁢

nV

L

;

wherein f n is the frequency of the standing wave; L is a distance between a sensing unit used to capture the plurality of under-test sound wave signals and a vibration generator for providing the at least one sound vibration; V is speed of sound; and n is a mode number of the standing wave.

15. The acoustic resonance diagnostic system for detecting structural degradation according to claim 13 , further comprising a human-machine interface for identifying a leakage position by referring to a relationship between a sound pressure change rate of the at least one sound vibration and an unit wavelength of the standing wave.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 3, 2022
From: CHANG, HUNG-CHIH; TSAI, YAO-LONG; WANG, LI-HUA
To: INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE
Reel/Frame 060094/0210 →
Priority Claims (1)
TW 110120800 · Jun 8, 2021 · national
Continuity (3)
Continuation In Part 17405423 · Aug 18, 2021
Provisional Application 63071382 · Aug 28, 2020
Related Publication 20220291175A1 · Sep 15, 2022
References Cited (32)
US 6404343B1 · Andou et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 8296083B2 · Martin · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8665101B2 · Solomon · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20080314123A1 · Kaji et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20130298664A1 · Gillette, II · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20150185186A1 · Han et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150276545A1 · Takahashi et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20180292292A1 · Takahashi et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190017911A1 · Kiranyaz et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20220065728A1 · Chang · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220205956A1 · Stephens et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
CN 101008992A · 2007 [cited by applicant]
CN 101260978A · 2008 [cited by applicant]
CN 107802364A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
CN 109045452A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
CN 109242049B · 2019 [cited by applicant]
CN 110333088A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
CN 110755025A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
CN 111325095A · 2020 [cited by examiner]
CN 110185939B · 2021 [cited by applicant]
JP 2020128951A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
KR 20210074923A · 2021 [cited by examiner]
TW I649543B · 2019 [cited by applicant]
TW 202043954A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2020215116A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
Machine Translation of CN-111325095-A (Year: 2020). [cited by examiner]
Machine Translation of KR-20210074923-A (Year: 2021). [cited by examiner]
Taiwanese Office Action and Search Report for Taiwanese Application No. 110120800, dated Apr. 8, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Hendricks et al., “High-Speed Acoustic Impact-Echo Sounding of Concrete Bridge Decks,” Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, vol. 39, No. 58, Jul. 13, 2020, pp. 1-12, abstract provided only. [cited by applicant]
Schabowicz, “Non-Destructive Testing of Materials in Civil Engineering,” Materials, vol. 12, 3237, 2019, pp. 1-13. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/405,423, dated Nov. 4, 2024. [cited by applicant]
Zhao, “Basics of Structural Vibration Testing and Analysis, Application Note 006,” Crystal Instruments, Jul. 2017, pp. 1-18. [cited by applicant]