IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,466,875
Granted Patent B2
US 12,466,875 · App. 17/833,941 · Granted Nov 11, 2025

Supramolecular high affinity protein-binding system for purification of biomacromolecules

Inventors: Honggang Cui (Lutherville, MD); Yi Li (Baltimore, MD); Xuankuo Xu (Boxborough, MA); Lye Lin Lock (Maynard, MA); Zhengjian Li (Sudbury, MA)
Assignees: THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY; BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
C07K16/065B01D15/3809B01J20/24B01J20/28023C07K14/31
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,466,875
App. No.
17/833,941
Granted
Nov 11, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

In certain embodiments, the present invention provides novel antibody purification methods and systems using a potentially simple and cost-efficient means. In some embodiments, customized Z-33 derived from Staphylococcus aureus Protein A is used to construct immuno-amphiphile molecules which can assemble into immunofibers in aqueous solution with bioactive epitopes on the surface and have IgG binding ability.

Claims (19)

1 . A method for purifying an antibody or an Fc fusion protein, the method comprising the steps of:

a) dissolving an immuno-amphiphile in an aqueous solution at a physiological pH to provide a dissolved immuno-amphiphile; and aging the dissolved immuno-amphiphile overnight to provide immunofibers (IFs);

b) mixing a sample containing an antibody or an Fc fusion protein with the IFs, and allowing the IFs to bind the Fc portion of the antibody or Fc fusion protein to form an immunofiber-antibody complex or immunofiber-Fc fusion protein complex in a solution;

c) separating the immunofiber-antibody complex or the immunofiber-Fc fusion protein complex from the solution by adding salt and centrifugation; and

d) dissociating the IFs from the antibody or Fc fusion protein and collecting the unbound antibody or Fc fusion protein,

wherein the immuno-amphiphile comprises an antibody binding peptide and a hydrocarbon moiety;

wherein the hydrocarbon moiety is conjugated to the N-terminus of the antibody binding peptide;

wherein the antibody binding peptide consists of the amino acid sequence FNMQQQRRFYEALHDPNLNEEQRNAKIKSIRDD (SEQ ID NO: 1); and

wherein the hydrocarbon moiety is a C12 hydrocarbon chain or two C8 hydrocarbon chains.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the IFs are separated from the antibody or Fc fusion protein by lowering the pH to elution condition.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the antibody binding peptide has an α-helical conformation when in an aqueous solution at physiological pH.

4 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising pretreating the immuno amphiphile in hexafluoroisopropanol prior to dissolving the immuno-amphiphile in the aqueous solution.

5 . The method of claim 4 , further comprising removing the hexafluoroisopropanol.

6 . The method of claim 5 , wherein removing the hexafluoroisopropanol comprises evaporating the hexafluoroisopropanol.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the antibody is an IgG.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the antibody is a monoclonal antibody.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the IFs are separated from the antibody or Fc fusion protein by lowering the pH to elution condition and filtration or microfiltration.

10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the physiological pH is 7.4.

11 . The method of claim 2 , wherein lowering the pH to elution condition comprises lowering the pH to 2.8.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 3, 2022
From: LI, ZHENJIAN; XU, XUANKUO; LOCK, LYE LIN
To: BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
Reel/Frame 060704/0679 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 3, 2022
From: CUI, HONGGANG; LI, YI
To: THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
Reel/Frame 060704/0695 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 16498675
Provisional Application 62478886 · Mar 30, 2017
Related Publication 20230050031A1 · Feb 16, 2023
References Cited (126)
US 5223409A · Ladner et al. · 1993 [cited by applicant]
US 5403484A · Ladner et al. · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 5427908A · Dower et al. · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 5476996A · Wilson et al. · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 5545806A · Lonberg et al. · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5545807A · Surani et al. · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5569825A · Lonberg et al. · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5571698A · Ladner et al. · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5580717A · Dower et al. · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5625126A · Lonberg et al. · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5633425A · Lonberg et al. · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5661016A · Lonberg et al. · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5698767A · Wilson et al. · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5770429A · Lonberg et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5789650A · Lonberg et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5814318A · Lonberg et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5874299A · Lonberg et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 5877397A · Lonberg et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 5885793A · Griffiths et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 5939598A · Kucherlapati et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 5969108A · McCafferty et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6075181A · Kucherlapati et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6114598A · Kucherlapati et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6150584A · Kucherlapati et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6162963A · Kucherlapati et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6172197B1 · McCafferty et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6197927B1 · Braisted et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6521404B1 · Griffiths et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6544731B1 · Griffiths et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6555313B1 · Griffiths et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6582915B1 · Griffiths et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6593081B1 · Griffiths et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 11359005B2 · Cui · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11745165B2 · Cui · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 12357965B2 · Cui · 2025 [cited by examiner]
US 20090214421A1 · Hamada et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20110201112A1 · Rome et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20200197902A1 · Cui et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20240082816A1 · Cui · 2024 [cited by examiner]
WO 199203918A1 · 1992 [cited by applicant]
WO 199312227A1 · 1993 [cited by applicant]
WO 199425585A1 · 1994 [cited by applicant]
WO 199713852A1 · 1997 [cited by applicant]
WO 199824884A1 · 1998 [cited by applicant]
WO 199945962A1 · 1999 [cited by applicant]
WO 200114424A1 · 2001 [cited by applicant]
WO 200243478A2 · 2002 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2019036631A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
Hamley, “Self-assembly of amphiphilic peptides,” Soft Matter, 2011, vol. 7, pp. 4122-4138. [cited by examiner]
Korevaar et al., “Pathway Selection in Peptide Amphiphile Assembly,” J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, vol. 136, pp. 8540-8543. [cited by examiner]
Lin et al., “Multiwalled Nanotubes Formed by Catanionic Mixtures of Drug Amphiphiles,” ACS Nano, 2014, vol. 8, No. 12, pp. 12690-12700. [cited by examiner]
Altunbas et al., Encapsulation of curcumin in self-assembling peptide hydrogels as injectable drug delivery vehicles. Biomaterials 2011, 32 (25), 5906-14. [cited by applicant]
Chow et al., Self-assembling nanostructures to deliver angiogenic factors to pancreatic islets. Biomaterials 2010, 31 (24), 6154-61. [cited by applicant]
Koutsopoulos et al., Two-layered injectable self-assembling peptide scaffold hydrogels for long-term sustained release of human antibodies. J Control Release 2012, 160 (3), 451-8. [cited by applicant]
Lock et al., Tuning Cellular Uptake of Molecular Probes by Rational Design of Their Assembly into Supramolecular Nanoprobes. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2016, 138 (10), 3533-3540. [cited by applicant]
Cheetham et al., Supramolecular Nanostructures Formed by Anticancer Drug Assembly. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2013, 135 (8), 2907-2910. [cited by applicant]
Hu et al., Spatiotemporal control of the creation and immolation of peptide assemblies. Coordination Chemistry Reviews 2016, 320, 2-17. [cited by applicant]
Ma et al., Building nanostructures with drugs. Nano Today 2016, 11 (1), 13-30. [cited by applicant]
Black et al., Self-Assembled Peptide Amphiphile Micelles Containing a Cytotoxic T-Cell Epitope Promote a Protective Immune Response In Vivo. Adv Mater 2012, 24 (28), 3845-3849. [cited by applicant]
Shimada et al., Wormlike micelle formation in peptide-lipid conjugates driven by secondary structure transformation of the headgroups. The journal of physical chemistry. B 2009, 113 (42), 13711-4. [cited by applicant]
Trent et a., Structural properties of soluble peptide amphiphile micelles. Soft Matter 2011, 7 (20), 9572-9582. [cited by applicant]
Cui et al., Self-assembly of peptide amphiphiles: from molecules to nanostructures to biomaterials. Biopolymers 2010, 94 (1), 1-18. [cited by applicant]
Hartgerink et al., Self-assembly and mineralization of peptideamphiphile nanofibers. Science 2001, 294 (5547), 1684-1688. [cited by applicant]
Niece et al., Self-assembly combining two bioactive peptide-amphiphile molecules into nanofibers by electrostatic attraction. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2003, 125 (24), 7146-7147. [cited by applicant]
Webber et al., Development of bioactive peptide amphiphiles for therapeutic cell delivery. Acta Biomater 2010, 6 (1), 3-11. [cited by applicant]
Cui et al., Amino Acid Sequence in Constitutionally Isomeric Tetrapeptide Amphiphiles Dictates Architecture of One-Dimensional Nanostructures. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2014, 136 (35), 12461-12468. [cited by applicant]
Moyer et al., pH and Amphiphilic Structure Direct Supramolecular Behavior in Biofunctional Assemblies. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2014, 136 (42), 14746-14752. [cited by applicant]
Webber et al., Reprint of: Development of bioactive peptide amphiphiles for therapeutic cell delivery. Acta biomaterialia 2015, 23, S42-S51. [cited by applicant]
Paramonov et al., Self-assembly of peptide-amphiphile nanofibers: the roles of hydrogen bonding and amphiphilic packing. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2006, 128 (22), 7291-7298. [cited by applicant]
Arslan et al., Bioactive supramolecular peptide nanofibers for regenerative medicine. Advanced healthcare materials 2014, 3 (9), 1357-1376. [cited by applicant]
Kokkoli et al., Selfassembly and applications of biomimetic and bioactive peptide-amphiphiles. Soft Matter 2006, 2 (12), 1015. [cited by applicant]
Rudra et al., Modulating adaptive immune responses to peptide self-assemblies. Acs Nano 2012, 6 (2), 1557-1564. [cited by applicant]
Ecker et al., The therapeutic monoclonal antibody market. MAbs 2015, 7 (1), 9-14. [cited by applicant]
Low et al., Future of antibody purification. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 2007, 848 (1), 48-63. [cited by applicant]
Shukla et al., Downstream processing of monoclonal antibodies-application of platform approaches. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 2007, 848 (1), 28-39. [cited by applicant]
Deisenhofer., Crystallographic refinement and atomic models of a human Fc fragment and its complex with fragment B of protein A from [cited by applicant]
Moks et al., Staphylococcal protein A consists of five IgG-binding domains. European Journal of Biochemistry 1986, 156 (3), 637-643. [cited by applicant]
Braisted et al., Minimizing a binding domain from protein A. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 1996, 93 (12), 5688-5692. [cited by applicant]
Nilsson et al., A synthetic IgG-binding domain based on staphylococcal protein A. Protein engineering 1987, 1 (2), 107-113. [cited by applicant]
Starovasnik et al., Structural mimicry of a native protein by a minimized binding domain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 1997, 94 (19), 10080-10085. [cited by applicant]
Olszewski et al.,Folding simulations and computer redesign of protein A three-helix bundle motifs. Proteins 1996, 25. [cited by applicant]
Boutelje et al., Human immunodeficiency viral protease is catalytically active as a fusion protein: characterization of the fusion and native enzymes produced in [cited by applicant]
Hober et al., Protein A chromatography for antibody purification. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 2007, 848 (1), 40-7. [cited by applicant]
Cuatrecasas., Protein purification by affinity chromatography. J. Biol. Chem 1970, 245 (12), 3050. [cited by applicant]
Huse et al., Purification of antibodies by affinity chromatography. Journal of biochemical and biophysical methods 2002, 51 (3), 217-231. [cited by applicant]
Hassouneh et al., Elastin-like polypeptides as a purification tag for recombinant proteins. Curr Protoc Protein Sci 2010, Chapter 6, Unit 6 11. [cited by applicant]
Sheth et al., Affinity precipitation of a monoclonal antibody from an industrial harvest feedstock using an ELP-Z stimuli responsive biopolymer. Biotechnol Bioeng 2014, 111 (8), 1595-603. [cited by applicant]
Handlogten et al., Nonchromatographic affinity precipitation method for the purification of bivalently active pharmaceutical antibodies from biological fluids. Analytical chemistry 2013, 85 (10), 5271-5278. [cited by applicant]
Eisen et al., Variations in Affinities of Antibodies during the Immune Response*. Biochemistry 1964, 3 (7), 996-1008. [cited by applicant]
Madan et al., ELP-z and ELP-zz capturing scaffolds for the purification of immunoglobulins by affinity precipitation. J Biotechnol 2013, 163 (1), 10-6. [cited by applicant]
Sheth et al., Development of an ELP-Z based mAb affinity precipitation process using scaled-down filtration techniques. J Biotechnol 2014, 192 Pt A, 11-9. [cited by applicant]
Kawashima et al., EpCAM- and EGFR-targeted selective gene therapy for biliary cancers using Z33-fiber modified adenovirus. Int J Cancer 2011, 129 (5), 1244-53. [cited by applicant]
Kickhoefer et al., Targeting vault nanoparticles to specific cell surface receptors. Acs Nano 2008, 3 (1), 27-36. [cited by applicant]
Freire et al., Characterisation of ligand binding by calorimetry. In Biophysical Approaches Determining Ligand Binding to Biomolecular Targets, 2011; pp. 275-299. [cited by applicant]
Wiseman et al., Rapid measurement of binding constants and heats of binding using a new titration calorimeter. Analytical biochemistry 1989, 179 (1), 131-137. [cited by applicant]
Demers et al., Binding mechanism of an SH3 domain studied by NMR and ITC. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2009, 131 (12), 4355-4367. [cited by applicant]
Van Eldijk et al., Thermodynamic investigation of Z33-antibody interaction leads to selective purification of human antibodies. J Biotechnol 2014, 179, 32-41. [cited by applicant]
Lund et al., Exploring variation in binding of Protein A and Protein G to immunoglobulin type G by sothermal titration calorimetry. J Mol Recognit 2011, 24 (6), 945-52. [cited by applicant]
Kohler et al., Continuous cultures of fused cells secreting antibody of predefined specificity., Nature 256:495 (1975). [cited by applicant]
Clackson et al., Making antibody fragments using phage display libraries., Nature 352:624-628 (1991). [cited by applicant]
Marks et al., By-passing immunization: human antibodies from V-gene libraries displayed on phage J. Mol. Biol. 222:581-597 (1991). [cited by applicant]
Morrison et al., Chimeric human antibody molecules: mouse antigen-binding domains with human constant region domains Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81:6851-6855 (1984). [cited by applicant]
Jones et al., Replacing the complementarity-determining regions in a human antibody with those from a mouse Nature 321:522-525 (1986). [cited by applicant]
Riechmann et al., Reshaping human antibodies for therapy Nature 332:323-329 (1988). [cited by applicant]
Presta, Antibody engineering., Curr. Op. Struct. Biol. 2:593-596 (1992). [cited by applicant]
Taylor et al. A transgenic mouse that expresses a diversity of human sequence heavy and light chain Immunoglobulins (1992) Nucleic Acids Research 20:6287-6295. [cited by applicant]
Chen et al. Immunoglobulin gene rearrangement in B cell deficient mice generated by targeted deletion of the JH locus (1993) International Immunology 5: 647-656. [cited by applicant]
Palmer et al., Molecular self-assembly into one-dimensional nanostructures. Accounts of chemical research 2008, 41 (12), 1674-1684. [cited by applicant]
Tuaillon et al. Human immunoglobulin heavy-chain minilocus recombination in transgenic mice: gene-segment use In mu and gamma transcripts.(1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:3720-3724. [cited by applicant]
Choi et al., Transgenic mice containing a human heavy chain immunoglobulin gene fragment cloned in a yeast artificial chromosome (1993) Nature Genetics 4:117-123. [cited by applicant]
Chen et al., B cell development in mice that lack one or both immunoglobulin kappa light chain genes. (1993) EMBO J. 12: 821-830. [cited by applicant]
Tuaillon et al., Biased utilization of DHQ52 and JH4 gene segments in a human Ig transgenic minilocus is Independent of antigenic selection. (1994) J. Immunol. 152:2912-2920. [cited by applicant]
Taylor et al., Human immunoglobulin transgenes undergo rearrangement, somatic mutation and class switching in mice that lack endogenous IgM. (1994) International Immunology 6: 579-591. [cited by applicant]
Fishwild et al. High-avidity human IgG kappa monoclonal antibodies from a novel strain of minilocus transgenic mice. (1996) Nature Biotechnology 14: 845-851. [cited by applicant]
Jaenicke, A rapid micromethod for the determination of nitrogen and phosphate in biological material., Anal. Biochem., 61.2 (1974): 623-627. [cited by applicant]
Strable, E., et al., “Unnatural Amino Acid Incorporation into Virus-Like Particles” Bioconjug Chem. Apr. 2008 ; 19 (4): 866-875. doi: 10.1021/bc700390r. [cited by applicant]
Kenan, D., et al., “Peptide-PEG Amphiphiles as Cytophobic Coatings for Mammalian and Bacterial Cells” Chemistry & Biology 13, 695-700, Jul. 2006 DOI 10.1016/j.chembiol.2006.06.013. [cited by applicant]
Pille, J., et al., “General Strategy for Ordered Noncovalent Protein Assembly on Well-Defined Nanoscaffolds” Biomacromolecules 2013, 14, 4351-4359; dx.doi.org/10.1021/bm401291u. [cited by applicant]
Sorokina, I.A., et al., “Guidance manual, large laboratory practical course 2” Biochemistry of Proteins and Peptides, Rostov-on-Don, 2010, p. 96. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report dated Nov. 18, 2020, European Application No. 18775537.6, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Missirlis, D. et al. Mechanisms of peptide amphiphile internalization by SJSA-1 cells in vitro. Biochemistry. Apr. 21, 2009;48(15):3304-14. [cited by applicant]
Li et al. Conformation Preservation of α-Helical Peptides within Supramolecular Filamentous Assemblies. Biomacromolecules. Nov. 13, 2017;18(11):3611-3620. [cited by applicant]
Deng et al. Self-assembly of peptide-amphiphile C12-Abeta(11-17) into nanofibrils. J Phys Chem B. Jun. 25, 2009;113(25):8539-44. [cited by applicant]
Forns et al. Induction of protein-like molecular architecture by monoalkyl hydrocarbon chains. Biopolymers. Dec. 2000;54(7):531-46. [cited by applicant]
Immunoclobe: “The Art of Selecting an Epitope,” 3 Pages, [Retrieved on Sep. 23, 2021] Retrieved from URL: https://www.immunoglobe.com/epitope-selection.html. [cited by applicant]
Li Y., et al., “Bioinspired Supramolecular Engineering of Self-Assembling Immunofibers for High Affinity Binding of Immunoglobulin G,” Biomaterials, Sep. 2018, vol. 178, pp. 448-457. [cited by applicant]