IP Library Granted Patent US 12,545,955
Granted Patent B2
US 12,545,955 · App. 17/852,192 · Granted Feb 10, 2026

Analysis of a polymer

Inventors: Stuart William Reid (Oxford, GB); Gavin Harper (Oxford, GB); Clive Gavin Brown (Oxford, GB); Daniel John Turner (Oxford, GB); Andrew John Heron (Oxford, GB); Christopher James Wright (Oxford, GB)
Assignee: Oxford Nanopore Technologies PLC
C12Q1/6869G01N33/48721G16B30/00G16B30/10
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,545,955
App. No.
17/852,192
Granted
Feb 10, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A biochemical analysis system analyses polymers by taking measurements of a polymer from a sensor element comprising a nanopore during translocation of the polymer through the nanopore. When a polymer has partially translocated, the series of measurements is analysed using reference data derived from a reference sequence to provide a measure of similarity. Responsive to the measure of similarity, the sensor element may be selectively operated to eject the polymer and thereby make the nanopore available to receive a further polymer. Where the biochemical analysis system comprises an array of sensor elements and is takes measurements from sensor elements selected in a multiplexed manner, responsive to the measure of similarity, the biochemical analysis system ceases taking measurements from the currently selected sensor element and to starts taking measurements from a newly selected sensor element.

Claims (47)

1 . A method of controlling a biochemical analysis system, the method comprising:

analyzing a series of measurements obtained from a portion of a first polymer that is partially translocated through a nanopore of the biochemical analysis system, and reference data derived from at least one reference sequence of polymer units, wherein the first polymer is a polynucleotide, and the series of measurements is obtained from around 30 nucleotides or greater of the first polymer;

providing a measure of similarity during translocation between the analyzed series of measurements and the reference data; and

operating the biochemical analysis system to eject the first polymer from the nanopore responsive to the measure of similarity.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the biochemical analysis system comprises at least one sensor element that comprises the nanopore, wherein the at least one sensor element is operable to eject the first polymer that is translocating through the nanopore, and the step of operating the biochemical analysis system to eject the first polymer comprises operating the sensor element to eject the first polymer from the nanopore and accept a further polymer in the nanopore.

3 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the at least one sensor element is operable to eject the first polymer by application of an ejection bias voltage sufficient to eject the first polymer, the step of operating the sensor element to eject the first polymer from the nanopore is performed by applying an ejection bias voltage and the step of operating the sensor element to accept the further polymer in the nanopore is performed by applying a translocation bias voltage sufficient to enable translocation of the further polymer therethrough.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the biochemical analysis system comprises an array of sensor elements and is operable to take successive measurements of the first polymer from sensor elements selected in a multiplexed manner, and the step of operating the biochemical analysis system to eject the first polymer comprises operating the biochemical analysis system to cease taking measurements from the currently selected sensor element and to start taking measurements from a newly selected sensor element.

5 . The method of claim 4 , wherein the measurements comprise electrical measurements taken from the sensor elements and the biochemical analysis system is operable to take successive measurements of the first polymer from sensor elements selected in an electrically multiplexed manner.

6 . The method of claim 5 , wherein the biochemical analysis system comprises:

a detection circuit comprising a plurality of detection channels each capable of taking electrical measurements from a sensor element, the number of sensor elements in the array being greater than the number of detection channels; and

a switch arrangement capable of selectively connecting the detection channels to respective sensor elements in a multiplexed manner.

7 . The method of claim 4 , wherein the sensor elements are controllable to eject the first polymer, and the method further comprises, when operating the biochemical analysis system to cease taking measurements from the currently selected sensor element, also controlling the currently selected sensor element to eject the first polymer and thereby make the nanopore available to receive the further polymer.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one reference sequence of polymer units from which the reference data is derived is an unwanted sequence, and said step of operation to eject is performed responsive to the measure of similarity indicating that the first polymer is the unwanted sequence.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one reference sequence of polymer units from which the reference data is derived is a target, and said step of operation to eject is performed responsive to the measure of similarity indicating that the first polymer is not the target.

10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one reference sequence of polymer units from which the reference data is derived is an already measured sequence of polymer units, and said step of operation to eject is performed responsive to the measure of similarity indicating that the first polymer is the already measured sequence of polymer units.

11 . The method according claim 1 , wherein the at least one reference sequence of polymer units from which the reference data is derived comprises plural targets, and said step of operation to eject is performed responsive to the measure of similarity indicating that the first polymer is one of the targets.

12 . The method according claim 1 , wherein the reference data derived from the at least one reference sequence of polymer units represents actual or simulated measurements taken by a biochemical analysis system, and

said step of analyzing the series of measurements comprises:

comparing the series of measurements with the reference data.

13 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the reference data derived from the at least one reference sequence of polymer units represents a feature vector of time-ordered features representing characteristics of the measurements taken by a biochemical analysis system, and said step of analyzing the series of measurements comprises:

deriving, from the series of measurements, a feature vector of time-ordered features representing characteristics of the measurements, and

comparing the derived feature vector with the reference data.

14 . The method of claim 1 , wherein

the reference data derived from the at least one reference sequence of polymer units represents the identity of the polymer units of the at least one reference sequence, and

said step of analyzing the series of measurements comprises:

analyzing the series of measurements to provide an estimate of the identity of the polymer units of the sequence of around 30 nucleotides or greater of the first polymer, and

comparing the estimate with the reference data to provide the measure of similarity.

15 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the nanopore is a biological pore.

16 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the translocation of said first polymer through the nanopore is performed in a ratcheted manner.

17 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the measurements comprise electrical measurements.

18 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the method comprises, analyzing a series of measurements taken from around 30 nucleotides or greater of the first polymer as the first polymer partially translocates through the nanopore, using the reference data derived from the at least one reference sequence of polymer units to provide the measure of similarity between the sequence of the around 30 nucleotides or greater of the first polymer and the at least one reference sequence.

19 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first polymer is at least 5 kilobases long.

20 . The method of claim 19 , wherein the first polymer is at least 30 kilobases long.

21 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining a sequence of polynucleotides from the analyzed series of measurements wherein the measure of similarity is made between the determined sequence and the reference data.

22 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising obtaining the series of measurements from the first polymer during the partial translocation.

23 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the reference data is derived from plural reference sequences of polymer units.

24 . The method of claim 22 , wherein the series of measurements is obtained by taking successive measurements of the polymer as it translocates through the nanopore.

25 . The method of claim 24 , wherein the successive measurements comprise one or more groups of plural measurements that are dependent on a single k-mer without a priori knowledge of the number of measurements in each group.

26 . The method of claim 1 , wherein analyzing the series of measurements and the reference data to provide the measure of similarity comprises using a distance function to provide, as the measure of similarity, a measure of the distance between the series of measurements and the reference data.

27 . A computer-implemented method of controlling a biochemical analysis system, the method comprising the method of claim 1 .

28 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the series of measurements is a series of electrical measurements.

29 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the measurements are raw measurements, wherein the raw measurements are electrical measurements or optical measurements or a combination thereof.

30 . A biochemical analysis system configured to:

eject a first polymer from a nanopore responsive to a measure of similarity, provided during translocation, between:

(i) an analyzed series of measurements obtained from a portion of the first polymer that is partially translocated through the nanopore and

(ii) reference data derived from at least one reference sequence of polymer units;

wherein the first polymer is a polynucleotide, and the series of measurements is obtained from around 30 nucleotides or greater of the first polymer.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 26, 2022
From: REID, STUART WILLIAM; HARPER, GAVIN; BROWN, CLIVE GAVIN; TURNER, DANIEL JOHN; HERON, ANDREW JOHN; WRIGHT, CHRISTOPHER JAMES
To: OXFORD NANOPORE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
Reel/Frame 061214/0026 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Sep 26, 2022
From: OXFORD NANOPORE TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
To: OXFORD NANOPORE TECHNOLOGIES PLC
Reel/Frame 061540/0954 →
Priority Claims (3)
GB 1418366 · Oct 16, 2014 · national
GB 1418379 · Oct 16, 2014 · national
GB 1507742 · May 6, 2015 · national
Continuity (3)
Continuation 15930198 · May 12, 2020
Continuation 15519325
Related Publication 20230167494A1 · Jun 1, 2023
References Cited (234)
US 5795782A · Church et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 6128587A · Sjolander · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 7625706B2 · Akeson et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7731826B2 · Hibbs et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8324914B2 · Chen et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8452546B1 · Lathrop · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 9057102B2 · Turner et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9121064B2 · Turner et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9127313B2 · Brown et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9546400B2 · Turner et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9556480B2 · Turner et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9678056B2 · Turner et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9738929B2 · Turner et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9751915B2 · Clarke et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10131943B2 · Reid et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10260093B2 · Geiser et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10689697B2 · Reid · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 11085077B2 · Reid et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11401549B2 · Reid · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11921103B2 · Reid et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 11959906B2 · Reid et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 12216110B2 · Reid et al. · 2025 [cited by applicant]
US 12351867B2 · Reid et al. · 2025 [cited by applicant]
US 20020028458A1 · Lexow · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020197618A1 · Sampson · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20030099951A1 · Akeson et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20050159898A1 · Yasuda et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050272923A1 · Zhang et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060019259A1 · Joyce · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070161028A1 · Schwartz et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20090035777A1 · Kokoris et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100331194A1 · Turner et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110121840A1 · Sanghera et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110124518A1 · Cantor · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110226623A1 · Timp et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120071330A1 · Kokoris et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120088235A1 · Kokoris et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120160688A1 · Davis et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120316075A1 · Buzby et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130023423A1 · Kavanagh et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130071837A1 · Winters-Hilt et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130146456A1 · Gundlach et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130203610A1 · Meller et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140255918A1 · Olasagasti et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150057948A1 · Reid et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150152492A1 · Brown et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150152495A1 · Stava et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150344944A1 · Reid et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160162634A1 · Reid et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170091427A1 · Massingham · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170096703A1 · Dolan et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170219557A1 · Reid et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170233804A1 · Reid et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20190154655A1 · Reid et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190178838A1 · Barrall et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190203286A1 · Reid et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190310242A1 · Reid et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20210079460A1 · Reid et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220064724A1 · Reid et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20240264143A1 · Reid et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20250188537A1 · Reid et al. · 2025 [cited by applicant]
US 20250231171A1 · Reid et al. · 2025 [cited by applicant]
EP 1351183A2 · 2003 [cited by applicant]
EP 1544310A2 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
JP H11178575 · 1999 [cited by applicant]
JP 2002325581 · 2002 [cited by applicant]
JP 2010524436A · 2010 [cited by applicant]
JP 2010539966 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
JP 2014531901A · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2000028312 · 2000 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2000039333A1 · 2000 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2000079257A1 · 2000 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2002042496 · 2002 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2005124888 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2006028508A2 · 2006 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2006100484 · 2006 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2007117832A2 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2007137225A2 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2008092760A1 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2008102120A1 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2008102121 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2008124107 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2009020682A2 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2009035647 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2009077734A2 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2010004265 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2010004273 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2010034018A2 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2010053820A1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2010055307A1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2010086603 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2010086622 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2010109197A2 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2010117470A2 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2010122293 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2011046706A1 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2011067559 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2012005857A1 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2012021149A1 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2012033524A2 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2012107778A2 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2012109483A2 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2012135658A2 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2012138357 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2012164270A1 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2013014451 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2013041878A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2013057495A2 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2013098561A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2013098562A2 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2013109970 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2013121224 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2013123379 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2013153359 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2013159042 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2013185137A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2014013259 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2014013260 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2014013262 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2014064443 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2014064444 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2014096830A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2015055981A2 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2015140535A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2015150786A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2016034591A2 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2016059427A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2017149316A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2017149317A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2017149318A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018100370A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018203084A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2019002893A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2019006214A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2020109773A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2021255475A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion, for Application No. PCT/GB2015/053083, mailed Mar. 30, 2016. [cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/GB2015/053083, mailed Apr. 27, 2017. [cited by applicant]
[No Author Listed], Chapter 2: Polymerizer Module from Polymer. 1997. 14 pages. www.esi.umontreal.ca/accelrys/materials/insight400P/polymer/02_Polym.doc.html, Accessed May 17, 2021. [cited by applicant]
Ainsleigh et al., Hidden Gauss-Markov Models for Signal Classification. IEEE Trans Sig Proc. Jun. 2002;50(6):1355-1367. [cited by applicant]
Alcock et al., Time-series Similarity Queries Employing a Feature-Based Approach. Proceedings of the 7th Hellenic Conference on Informatics (HCI '99); University of loannina, Greece, pp. 1-9, Aug. 26-29, 1999. [cited by applicant]
Altschul et al., Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. Oct. 5, 1990;215(3):403-10. [cited by applicant]
Altschul, A protein alignment scoring system sensitive at all evolutionary distances. J Mol Evol. Mar. 1993;36(3):290-300. [cited by applicant]
Ashkenasy et al., Recognizing a single base in an individual DNA strand: a step toward DNA sequencing in nanopores. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. Feb. 18, 2005;44(9):1401-4. [cited by applicant]
Bates et al., Dynamics of DNA molecules in a membrane channel probed by active control techniques. Biophys J. 2003;84(4):2366-2372. doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(03)75042-5. [cited by applicant]
Batzoglou, Algorithmic challenges in mammalian whole-genome sequence assembly. In: Encyclopedia of genomics, proteomics and bioinformatics. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 2005. [cited by applicant]
Bell et al., DNA origami nanopores. Nano Lett. Jan. 11, 2012;12(1):512-7. doi: 10.1021/n1204098n. Epub Dec. 29, 2011. [cited by applicant]
Bokhari et al., A parallel graph decomposition algorithm for DNA sequencing with nanopores. Bioinformatics. Apr. 1, 2005;21(7):889-96. Epub Nov. 11, 2004. [cited by applicant]
Boufounos et al., Basecalling using hidden Markov models. Journal of the Franklin Institute, vol. 341 :23-36 (2004). [cited by applicant]
Braha et al., Designed protein pores as components for biosensors. Chem Biol. Jul. 1997;4(7):497-505. [cited by applicant]
Branton et al., The potential and challenges of nanopore sequencing. Nat Biotechnol. Oct. 2008;26(10):1146-53. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1495. [cited by applicant]
Butler et al., Single-molecule DNA detection with an engineered MspA protein nanopore. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Dec. 30, 2008;105(52):20647-52. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0807514106. Epub Dec. 19, 2008. [cited by applicant]
Cabello-Aguilar et al., Experimental and simulation studies of unusual current blockade induced by translocation of small oxidized PEG through a single nanopore. Phys Chem Chem Phys. Sep. 7, 2014;16(33):17883-92. doi: 1… [cited by applicant]
Case 1:17-cv-00275-LPS Document 18. Notice of subsequent events relating to Oxford's motion to dismiss (D.I. 9). Oct. 18, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Case 1:17-cv-00275-LPS Document 19. Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Inc.'s response to Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc.'s notice of subsequent events. Oct. 24, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Case 1:17-cv-00275-RGA Document 10. Oxford's opening brief in support of its motion to dismiss PacBio's complaint for patent infringement. May 8, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Case 1:17-cv-00275-RGA Document 14. PacBio's response to Oxford's motion to dismiss. Jun. 5, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Case 1:17-cv-00275-RGA Document 16. Oxford's reply brief in support of its motion to dismiss PacBio's complaint for patent infringement. Jun. 26, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Case 1:17-cv-01353-LPS Document 13. First Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement. Nov. 30, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Case 1:17-cv-01353-LPS Document 15. Plaintiff's response to Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss and Request for Scheduling Conference. Nov. 30, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Case 1:17-cv-01353-RGA Document 10. Oxford's opening brief in support of its motion to partially dismiss Pacbio's complaint for patent infringement. Nov. 16, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Chao et al., Constrained sequence alignment. Bull Math Biol. May 1993;55(3):503-24. [cited by applicant]
Churbanov et al., Duration learning for analysis of nanopore ionic current blockades. BMC Bioinformatics. Nov. 1, 2007;8 Suppl 7(Suppl 7):S14. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-S7-S14. [cited by applicant]
Clarke et al., Continuous base identification for single-molecule nanopore DNA sequencing. Nat Nanotechnol. Apr. 2009;4(4):265-70. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2009.12. Epub Feb. 22, 2009. [cited by applicant]
Dahl et al., Direct observation of translocation in individual DNA polymerase complexes. J Biol Chem. Apr. 13, 2012;287(16):13407-21. doi:10.1074/jbc.M111.338418. Epub Feb. 29, 2012. [cited by applicant]
Derrington et al., Nanopore DNA sequencing with MspA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Sep. 14, 2010;107(37):16060-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1001831107. [cited by applicant]
Devereux et al., A comprehensive set of sequence analysis programs for the VAX. Nucleic Acids Res. Jan. 11, 1984;12(1 Pt 1):387-95. [cited by applicant]
Edgar, Muscle: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. Mar. 19, 2004;32(5):1792-7. Print 2004. [cited by applicant]
EP Communication pursuant to Rule 114(2) EPC for Application No. 13706058.8 dated Oct. 19, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Ervin et al., Simultaneous alternating and direct current readout of protein ion channel blocking events using glass nanopore membranes. Anal Chem. Mar. 15, 2008;80(6):2069-76. doi: 10.1021/ac7021103. Epub Feb. 23, 2008. [cited by applicant]
Fariselli et al., A new decoding algorithm for hidden Markov models improves the prediction of the topology of all-beta membrane proteins. BMC Bioinformatics. Dec. 1, 2005;6 Suppl 4:S12. [cited by applicant]
Fennouri et al., Single molecule detection of glycosaminoglycan hyaluronic acid oligosaccharides and depolymerization enzyme activity using a protein nanopore. ACS Nano. Nov. 27, 2012;6(11):9672-8. doi: 10.1021/nn303104… [cited by applicant]
Gonzalez-Perez et al., Biomimetic triblock copolymer membrane arrays: a stable template for functional membrane proteins. Langmuir. Sep. 15, 2009;25(18):10447-50. doi: 10.1021/la902417m. [cited by applicant]
Gordon, Classification. 2nd edition. Chapman and Hall/CRC. 69-109. 1999. [cited by applicant]
Hall et al., Hybrid pore formation by directed insertion of α-haemolysin into solid-state nanopores. Nat Nanotechnol. Dec. 2010;5(12):874-7. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2010.237. Epub Nov. 28, 2010. [cited by applicant]
He et al., Controlling DNA translocation through gate modulation of nanopore wall surface charges. ACS Nano. Jul. 26, 2011;5(7):5509-18. doi: 10.1021/nn201883b. Epub Jun. 17, 2011. [cited by applicant]
Healy, Nanopore-based single-molecule DNA analysis. Nanomedicine (Lond). Aug. 2007;2(4):459-81. [cited by applicant]
Hein et al., Statistical alignment: computational properties, homology testing and goodness-of-fit. J Mol Biol. Sep. 8, 2000;302(1):265-79. [cited by applicant]
Heron et al., Simultaneous measurement of ionic current and fluorescence from single protein pores. J Am Chem Soc. Feb. 11, 2009;131(5):1652-3. doi: 10.1021/ja808128s. [cited by applicant]
Higgins et al., CLUSTAL: a package for performing multiple sequence alignment on a microcomputer. Gene. Dec. 15, 1988;73(1):237-44. [cited by applicant]
Hornblower et al., Single-molecule analysis of DNA-protein complexes using nanopores. Nat Methods. Apr. 2007;4(4):315-7. doi: 10.1038/nmeth1021. Epub Mar. 4, 2007. [cited by applicant]
Howorka et al., Nanopore analytics: sensing of single molecules. Chem Soc Rev. Aug. 2009;38(8):2360-84. doi: 10.1039/b813796j. Epub Jun. 15, 2009. [cited by applicant]
Ivanov et al., DNA tunneling detector embedded in a nanopore. Nano Lett. Jan. 12, 2011;11(1):279-85. doi: 10.1021/nl103873a. Epub Dec. 6, 2010. [cited by applicant]
Jain et al., Improved data analysis for the MinION nanopore sequencer. Nat Methods. Apr. 2015; 12(4): 351-356. EPub Feb. 15, 2015. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3290. Author Manuscript. [cited by applicant]
Karp et al., Efficient randomized pattern-matching algorithms. IBM J. Res. Development. 1987;31(2):249-260. [cited by applicant]
Kasianowicz et al., Nanoscopic porous sensors. Annu Rev Anal Chem (Palo Alto Calif). 2008;1:737-66. doi: 10.1146/annurev.anchem.1.031207.112818. [cited by applicant]
Kaxiras et al. Multiscale simulations of complex systems: computation meets reality. Sci Model Simul. 2008; 15:59-65. [cited by applicant]
Kent, BLAT—the BLAST-like alignment tool. Genome Res. Apr. 2002;12(4):656-64. [cited by applicant]
Khreich et al., A survey of techniques for incremental learning of HMM parameters. J Info Sciences. Aug. 2012;197:105-130. [cited by applicant]
Kowalczyk et al., Slowing down DNA translocation through a nanopore in lithium chloride. Nano Lett. Feb. 8, 2012;12(2):1038-44. doi: 10.1021/n1204273h. Epub Jan. 27, 2012. [cited by applicant]
Lam et al., HMMCONVERTER 1.0: a toolbox for hidden Markov models. Nucleic Acids Res. Nov. 2009;37(21):e139. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp662. [cited by applicant]
Lathrop et al., Monitoring the escape of DNA from a nanopore using an alternating current signal. J Am Chem Soc. Feb. 17, 2010;132(6):1878-85. doi:10.1021/ja906951g. [cited by applicant]
Liang et al., Bayesian Basecalling for DNA Sequence Analysis using Hidden Markov Models. Proceedings of 2006 IEEE Conference on Information Sciences and Systems, CISS, pp. 1599-1604 (2006). [cited by applicant]
Lieberman et al., Processive replication of single DNA molecules in a nanopore catalyzed by phi29 DNA polymerase. J Am Chem Soc. Dec. 22, 2010;132(50):17961-72. doi:10.1021/ja1087612. Epub Dec. 1, 2010. [cited by applicant]
Loose et al., Real-time selective sequencing using nanopore technology. Nat Methods. Sep. 2016; 13(9): 751-754. EPub Jul. 25, 2016. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3930. [cited by applicant]
Luan et al., Base-by-base ratcheting of single stranded DNA through a solid-state nanopore. Phys Rev Lett. Jun. 11, 2010;104(23):238103. Epub Jun. 10, 2010. [cited by applicant]
Luan et al., Control and reversal of the electrophoretic force on DNA in a charged nanopore. J Phys Condens Matter. Nov. 17, 2010;22(45):454123. doi:10.1088/0953-8984/22/45/454123. Epub Oct. 29, 2010. [cited by applicant]
Manrao et al., Reading DNA at single-nucleotide resolution with a mutant MspA nanopore and phi29 DNA polymerase. Nat Biotechnol. Mar. 25, 2012;30(4):349-53. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2171. [cited by applicant]
Mikheyev et al., A first look at the Oxford Nanopore MinION sequencer. Mol Ecol Resour. Nov. 2014;14(6):1097-102. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12324. Epub Sep. 24, 2014. [cited by applicant]
Montal et al., Formation of bimolecular membranes from lipid monolayers and a study of their electrical properties. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Dec. 1972;69(12):3561-6. [cited by applicant]
Muzard et al., DNA translocation and unzipping through a nanopore: some geometrical effects. Biophys J. May 19, 2010;98(10):2170-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.01.041. [cited by applicant]
Nakane et al. Nanopore sensors for nucleic acid analysis. J. Phys .: Condens. Matter 15 (2003) R1365-R1393. [cited by applicant]
Olasagasti et al., Replication of individual DNA molecules under electronic control using a protein nanopore. Nat Nanotechnol. Nov. 2010;5(11):798-806. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2010.177. Epub Sep. 26, 2010. [cited by applicant]
Panwar et al., Enzyme-modulated DNA translocation through a nanopore. J Am Chem Soc. Dec. 30, 2009;131(51):18563-70. doi: 10.1021/ja904047q. [cited by applicant]
Pylkkönen et al., Duration Modeling Techniques for Continuous Speech Recognition. Eighth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. 2004. 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Quinlan et al., C.45: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, ISBN 1-55860-238-0. Ed.:Langley. 1-114. 1993. [cited by applicant]
Schneider et al., DNA sequencing with nanopores. Nat Biotechnol. Apr. 10, 2012;30(4):326- 8. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2181. [cited by applicant]
Soni et al., Synchronous optical and electrical detection of biomolecules traversing through solid-state nanopores. Rev Sci Instrum. Jan. 2010;81(1):014301. doi: 10.1063/1.3277116. [cited by applicant]
Stoddart et al., Multiple base-recognition sites in a biological nanopore: two heads are better than one. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2010;49(3):556-9. doi: 10.1002/anie.200905483. [cited by applicant]
Stoddart et al., Nucleobase recognition in ssDNA at the central constriction of the alpha-hemolysin pore. Nano Lett. Sep. 8, 2010;10(9):3633-7. doi: 10.1021/nl101955a. [cited by applicant]
Stoddart et al., Single-nucleotide discrimination in immobilized DNA oligonucleotides with a biological nanopore. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. May 12, 2009;106(19):7702-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0901054106. Epub Apr. 20, 2009. [cited by applicant]
Suzuki et al., A New Hmnet Construction Algorithm Requiring No Contextual Factors. IEICE. Jun. 1995;E78:662-668. [cited by applicant]
Takami et al., Automatic Generation of Hidden Markov Networks by a Successive State Splitting Algorithm. IEICE. 1993;J76:2155-2164. [cited by applicant]
Thompson et al., CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. Nov. 11, 1994;22(… [cited by applicant]
Timp et al., DNA base-calling from a nanopore using a Viterbi algorithm. Biophys J. May 16, 2012;102(10):L37-9. doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2012.04.009. Epub May 15, 2012. [cited by applicant]
United States District Court for the District of Delaware Order. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office. [cited by applicant]
Warren et al., Assembling millions of short DNA sequences using SSAKE. Bioinformatics. Feb. 15, 2007;23(4):500-1. Epub Dec. 8, 2006. [cited by applicant]
Winters-Hilt et al., A novel, fast, HMM-with-Duration implementation-for application with a new, pattern recognition informed, nanopore detector. BMC Bioinformatics. Nov. 1, 2007;8 Suppl 7:S19. [cited by applicant]
Winters-Hilt et al., Highly accurate classification of Watson-Crick basepairs on termini of single DNA molecules. Biophys J. Feb. 2003;84(2 Pt 1):967-76. [cited by applicant]
Winters-Hilt, Machine learning methods for channel current cheminformatics, biophysical analysis, and bioinformatics. University of California Santa Cruz. Mar. 2003. Dissertation. 176 pages. [cited by applicant]
Zeng et al., PyroHMMvar: a sensitive and accurate method to call short indels and SNPs for Ion Torrent and 454 data. Bioinformatics. Nov. 15, 2013;29(22):2859-68. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt512. Epub Aug. 31, 2013. [cited by applicant]
Zerbino et al., Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res. May 2008;18(5):821-9. doi: 10.1101/gr.074492.107. Epub Mar. 18, 2008. [cited by applicant]
Zhu et al., Bayesian adaptive sequence alignment algorithms. Bioinformatics. 1998;14(1):25-39. [cited by applicant]
PCT/GB2015/053083, Mar. 30, 2016, International Search Report and Written Opinion. [cited by applicant]
PCT/GB2015/053083, Apr. 27, 2017, International Preliminary Report on Patentability. [cited by applicant]
Edwards et al., Real-Time Selective Sequencing with RUBRIC: Read Until with Basecall and Reference-Informed Criteria. Sci Rep. Aug. 7, 2019;9(1):11475. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47857-3. Erratum in: Sci Rep. Nov. 20, 2019… [cited by applicant]
Fariselli et al., The posterior-Viterbi: a new decoding algorithm for hidden Markov models, arXiv:q-bio/0501006v1 [q-bio.BM] Jan. 4, 2005. 23 pages. [cited by applicant]
Keyser et al., Direct force measurements on DNA in a solid-state nanopore. Nature Physics. Jul. 1, 2006;2(7):473-7. [cited by applicant]
Liu et al., Adding new chemistries to the genetic code. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:413-44. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.052308.105824. [cited by applicant]
Lu et al., Pressure-controlled motion of single polymers through solid-state nanopores. Nano Lett. Jul. 10, 2013;13(7):3048-52. doi: 10.1021/nl402052v. Epub Jun. 28, 2013. Author Manuscript, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Martin et al., Nanopore adaptive sampling: a tool for enrichment of low abundance species in metagenomic samples. Genome Biol. Jan. 24, 2022;23(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13059-021-02582-x. [cited by applicant]
Palla et al., Multiplex single-molecule kinetics of nanopore-coupled, bioRxiv, Mar. 16, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.15.993071. 38 pages. [cited by applicant]
Stanke et al., Gene prediction with a hidden Markov model and a new intron submodel. Bioinformatics. Oct. 2003;19 Suppl 2:ii215-25. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg1080. [cited by applicant]