IP Library Granted Patent US 12,614,378
Granted Patent B2
US 12,614,378 · App. 17/852,884 · Granted Apr 28, 2026

Systems and methods to process electronic images to determine histopathology quality

Inventors: Eric Robert (Quebec City, CA); George Shaikovski (London, GB); Christopher Kanan (Pittsford, NY)
Assignee: Paige.AI, Inc.
G06V10/774G06V10/469
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,614,378
App. No.
17/852,884
Granted
Apr 28, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A computer-implemented method for processing an electronic image may include receiving, by an artificial intelligence (AI) system at an electronic storage of the AI system, one or more digital whole slide images (WSIs) and extracting one or more vectors of features from one or more foreground tiles of tile images of the one or more digital WSIs. The method may include running a trained machine learning model on the one or more vectors of features and determining, based on an output of the trained machine learning model, whether one or more quality issues are present in the one or more digital WSIs.

Claims (71)

1 . A computer-implemented method for processing one or more digital whole slide images (WSIs), the method comprising:

receiving, by a trained artificial intelligence (AI) system at an electronic storage of the AI system, one or more digital WSIs associated with a tissue specimen;

breaking, by the trained AI system, the one or more digital WSIs into a plurality of tile images;

determining, by the trained AI system, one or more foreground tiles of the plurality of tile images;

extracting, by the trained AI system, a plurality of tile feature vectors for the one or more foreground tiles;

clustering, by the trained AI system, the plurality of tile feature vectors into one or more clusters;

determining, by the trained AI system, cluster membership for the one or more clusters based on clustering information determined during training of the AI system;

combining, by the trained AI system, tile feature vectors in associated clusters sharing cluster membership to generate one or more vectors of features representing a slide signature; and

generating, using the trained AI system, an inference of one or more quality issues present in the one or more digital WSIs based on the one or more vectors of features representing the slide signature.

2 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein determining the one or more foreground tiles comprises receiving a selection of the one or more foreground tiles.

3 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

removing one or more background tiles from the plurality of tile images prior to extracting the plurality of tile feature vectors from the one or more foreground tiles.

4 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining, based on the inference of the trained AI system, whether one or more quality issues are present in the one or more digital WSIs; and

predicting a type of the one or more quality issues after determining that the one or more quality issues are present.

5 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining, based on the inference of the trained AI system, whether one or more quality issues are present in the one or more digital WSIs; and

producing a visualization of a result of determining whether the one or more quality issues are present.

6 . A computer system for processing one or more digital whole slide images (WSIs), the computer system comprising:

at least one memory storing instructions; and

at least one processor configured to execute the instructions to perform operations comprising:

receiving, by a trained artificial intelligence (AI) system at an electronic storage of the AI system, one or more digital WSIs associated with a tissue specimen;

breaking, by the trained AI system, the one or more digital WSIs into a plurality of tile images;

determining, by the trained AI system, one or more foreground tiles of the plurality of tile images;

extracting, by the trained AI system, a plurality of tile feature vectors for the one or more foreground tiles;

clustering, by the trained AI system, the plurality of tile feature vectors into one or more clusters;

determining, by the trained AI system, cluster membership for the one or more clusters based on clustering information determined during training of the AI system;

combining, by the trained AI system, tile feature vectors in associated clusters sharing cluster membership to generate one or more vectors of features representing a slide signature; and

generating, using the trained AI system, an inference of one or more quality issues present in the one or more digital WSIs based on the one or more vectors of features representing the slide signature.

7 . The computer system of claim 6 , wherein determining the one or more foreground tiles comprises receiving a selection of the one or more foreground tiles prior to extracting the one or more vectors of features from the one or more foreground tiles.

8 . The computer system of claim 6 , wherein the operations further comprise:

removing one or more background tiles from the plurality of tile images prior to extracting the plurality of tile feature vectors from the one or more foreground tiles.

9 . The computer system of claim 6 , wherein the operations further comprise:

determining, based on the inference of the trained AI system, whether one or more quality issues are present in the one or more digital WSIs; and

predicting a type of the one or more quality issues after determining that the one or more quality issues are present.

10 . The computer system of claim 6 , wherein the operations further comprise:

determining, based on the inference of the trained AI system, whether one or more quality issues are present in the one or more digital WSIs; and

producing a visualization of a result of determining whether the one or more quality issues are present.

11 . A non-transitory computer-readable medium storing instructions that, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform operations for processing one or more digital whole slide images (WSIs), the operations comprising:

receiving, by a trained artificial intelligence (AI) system at an electronic storage of the AI system, one or more digital WSIs associated with a tissue specimen;

breaking, by the trained AI system, the one or more digital WSIs into a plurality of tile images;

determining, by the trained AI system, one or more foreground tiles of the plurality of tile images;

extracting, by the trained AI system, a plurality of tile feature vectors for the one or more foreground tiles;

clustering, by the trained AI system, the plurality of tile feature vectors into one or more clusters;

determining, by the trained AI system, cluster membership for the one or more clusters based on clustering information determined during training of the AI system;

combining, by the trained AI system, tile feature vectors in associated clusters sharing cluster membership to generate one or more vectors of features representing a slide signature; and

generating, using the trained AI system, an inference of one or more quality issues present in the one or more digital WSIs based on the one or more vectors of features representing the slide signature.

12 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 11 , wherein determining the one or more foreground tiles comprises receiving a selection of the one or more foreground tiles prior to extracting the one or more vectors of features from the one or more foreground tiles.

13 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 11 , wherein the operations further comprise:

removing one or more background tiles from the plurality of tile images prior to extracting the plurality of tile feature vectors from the one or more foreground tiles.

14 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 11 , wherein the operations further comprise:

determining, based on the inference of the trained AI system, whether one or more quality issues are present in the one or more digital WSIs; and

predicting a type of the one or more quality issues after determining that the one or more quality issues are present.

15 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 11 , wherein the operations further comprise:

determining, based on the inference of the trained AI system, whether one or more quality issues are present in the one or more digital WSIs; and

producing a visualization of a result of determining whether the one or more quality issues are present.

16 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining, based on the inference of the trained AI system, whether one or more quality issues are present in the one or more digital WSIs; and

generating and outputting a report indicating a result of determining whether the one or more quality issues are present.

17 . The computer system of claim 6 , wherein the operations further comprise:

determining, based on the inference of the trained AI system, whether one or more quality issues are present in the one or more digital WSIs; and

generating and outputting a report indicating a result of determining whether the one or more quality issues are present.

18 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 11 , wherein the operations further comprise:

determining, based on the inference of the trained AI system, whether one or more quality issues are present in the one or more digital WSIs; and

generating and outputting a report indicating a result of determining whether the one or more quality issues are present.

19 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining, based on the inference of the trained AI system, whether one or more quality issues are present in the one or more digital WSIs; and

storing, by the trained AI system to the electronic storage, a result of determining whether the one or more quality issues are present.

20 . The computer system of claim 6 , wherein the operations further comprise:

determining, based on the inference of the trained AI system, whether one or more quality issues are present in the one or more digital WSIs; and

storing, by the trained AI system to the electronic storage, a result of determining whether the one or more quality issues are present.

Assignments (3)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 14, 2026
From: ARES CAPITAL CORPORATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: PAIGE.AI, INC.
Reel/Frame 075589/0752 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 21, 2025
From: PAIGE.AI, INC.
To: ARES CAPITAL CORPORATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 073216/0876 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 27, 2022
From: ROBERT, ERIC; SHAIKOVSKI, GEORGE; KANAN, CHRISTOPHER
To: PAIGE.AI, INC.
Reel/Frame 060645/0672 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63203513 · Jul 26, 2021
Related Publication 20230024468A1 · Jan 26, 2023
References Cited (13)
US 10831417B1 · Su · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 11210787B1 · Godrich · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11562585B2 · Courtiol · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 12014830B2 · LeBoeuf · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20180114317A1 · Song · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20200184673A1 · Hsieh · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20230289955A1 · Xie · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20240079116A1 · Miri · 2024 [cited by examiner]
WO 2018156133A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
Wahab, Noorul, et al. “Semantic annotation for computational pathology: Multidisciplinary experience and best practice recommendations”, Arxiv.org, Cornell University Library, 201 Olin Library Cornell University Ithaca,… [cited by applicant]
Mario Plebani, “Quality Indicators to Detect Pre-Analytical Errors in Laboratory Testing,” Clin. Biochem Rev. vol. 33, 2012, available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3428256/pdf/cbr_33_3_85.pdf. [cited by applicant]
Riana Lee Yeates, An Investigation in Pre-Analytical Error in a Medium Sized Pathology Laboratory: Frequency, Origin, Type, and a Proposed Intervention, ResearchOnline@JCU, 2016, available at: https://researchonline.jcu… [cited by applicant]
Department of Health, “Review of the Review of NHS Pathology Services in England,” 2006, available at: https://www.networks.nhs.uk/nhs-networks/peninsula-pathology-network/documents/CarterReviewPathologyReport.pdf. [cited by applicant]