IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,424,328
Granted Patent B2
US 12,424,328 · App. 17/861,347 · Granted Sep 23, 2025

Comorbidity prediction from radiology images

Inventors: Oluwasanmi Koyejo (Urbana, IL); Andrew Chen (Urbana, IL); Patrick Cole (Urbana, IL); Nasir Siddiqui (Hinsdale, IL); Ayis Pyrros (Hinsdale, IL)
Assignee: The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois
G16H50/30G06T7/0012G16H30/40G16H50/20G06T2207/20081G06T2207/20084
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,424,328
App. No.
17/861,347
Granted
Sep 23, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods are provided to predict, based on chest radiographs, whether a patient suffers from any comorbidities in one or more high-level comorbidity classes, e.g., high-level hierarchical condition categories. The chest radiograph is a low-cost, minimally-invasive source of visual information that is able to accurately predict whether a subject suffers from diabetes with chronic complications, morbid obesity, congestive heart failure, specified heart arrhythmias, vascular disease, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, among other high-level comorbidity classes. The predictive methods provided herein are also able to accurately predict overall measures of health-related complications, including the risk adjustment factor. These predictive methods can be used to focus review of medical records, improving the detection of disease. Outputs generated by these methods can also be used to predict the severity of disease and/or the extent of care provided to subjects with COVID-19 or related diseases.

Claims (42)

1. A computer-implemented method comprising:

receiving a target radiographic image of a chest of a subject, wherein the subject has a specified disease or syndrome, wherein an artificial neural network (ANN) has a set of inputs and a set of outputs, wherein the ANN has been trained by a training set including a plurality of radiographic images containing features that are mapped to the set of inputs and associated with labeled values mapped to the set of outputs, wherein a subset of the radiographic images contain instances of the features that are indicative of at least one comorbidity within a particular comorbidity class and are associated with instances of the labeled values that represent the particular comorbidity class, wherein the ANN a common layer and a plurality of parallel output heads, wherein the common layer provides outputs to the plurality of parallel output heads, and wherein each output head of the plurality of parallel output heads generates, as an output, a respective one of the set of outputs;

applying the ANN to the target radiographic image to generate a set of target outputs for the target radiographic image, wherein output values of the set of target outputs indicate that the subject has at least one comorbidity in the particular comorbidity class;

based on the set of target outputs for the target radiographic image, predicting at least one of (i) a degree of severity of the specified disease or syndrome or (ii) an amount of care that the subject will receive related to the specified disease or syndrome;

based on the set of target outputs for the target radiographic image, predicting a likelihood that the subject has a specified disease or syndrome;

determining that the likelihood that the subject has the specified disease or syndrome has an intermediate value; and

responsive to determining that the likelihood that the subject has the specified disease or syndrome has an intermediate value, performing an additional diagnostic test on the subject to determine whether or to what degree the subject has the specified disease or syndrome.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein a further subset of the radiographic images contain no instances of the features that are indicative of any comorbidity within the particular comorbidity class and are not associated with any instances of the labeled values that represent the particular comorbidity class.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein a subset of the radiographic images are associated with instances of the labeled values that represent one or more of (i) at least one comorbidity within a first comorbidity class that encompasses diabetes with chronic complications, (ii) at least one comorbidity within a second comorbidity class that encompasses morbid obesity, (iii) at least one comorbidity within a third comorbidity class that encompasses congestive heart failure, (iv) at least one comorbidity within a fourth comorbidity class that encompasses specified heart arrhythmias, (v) at least one comorbidity within a fifth comorbidity class that encompasses vascular disease, or (vi) at least one comorbidity within a sixth comorbidity class that encompasses chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein a subset of the radiographic images are associated with instances of the labeled values that represent one or more of (i) at least one comorbidity within ICD10 hierarchical condition category HCC18, (ii) at least one comorbidity within ICD10 hierarchical condition category HCC22, (iii) at least one comorbidity within ICD10 hierarchical condition category HCC85, (iv) at least one comorbidity within ICD10 hierarchical condition category HCC96, (v) at least one comorbidity within ICD10 hierarchical condition category HCC108, or (vi) at least one comorbidity within ICD10 hierarchical condition category HCC111.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the labeled values mapped to the set of outputs include a numerical output that is indicative of an overall degree of medical risk.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein the numerical output that is indicative of an overall degree of medical risk is a risk adjustment factor (RAF) score.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the labeled values mapped to the set of outputs represent, respectively, whether respective subjects represented in respective radiographic images of the plurality of radiographic images have: (i) at least one comorbidity within ICD10 hierarchical condition category HCC18, (ii) at least one comorbidity within ICD10 hierarchical condition category HCC22, (iii) at least one comorbidity within ICD10 hierarchical condition category HCC85, (iv) at least one comorbidity within ICD10 hierarchical condition category HCC96, (v) at least one comorbidity within ICD10 hierarchical condition category HCC108, or (vi) at least one comorbidity within ICD10 hierarchical condition category HCC111.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein the labeled values mapped to the set of outputs additionally include a risk adjustment factor (RAF) score.

9. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

applying a plurality of different modified versions of the target radiographic image to the ANN to generate a visual map that depicts a region within the target radiographic image that is indicative of the at least one comorbidity within the particular comorbidity class, wherein each one of the different modified versions of the target radiographic image has a respective different region of the target radiographic image blanked.

10. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

applying the ANN to a particular radiographic image of the plurality of radiographic images of the training set to generate an updated set of outputs for particular radiographic image; and

updating the training set such that the particular radiographic image is associated with instances of the labeled values that reflect the updated set of outputs.

11. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

receiving a pre-determined set of outputs for the target radiographic image, wherein output values of the pre-determined set of outputs for the target radiographic image indicate that the subject does not have at least one comorbidity within the particular comorbidity class;

determining that the pre-determined set of outputs for the target radiographic image differs from the set of target outputs generated by the ANN with respect to the subject having at least one comorbidity within the particular comorbidity class; and

responsively providing an indication via a user interface that the pre-determined set of outputs for the target radiographic image differs from the set of target outputs generated by the ANN.

12. The method of claim 1 , wherein the labeled values mapped to the set of outputs include a numerical output that is indicative of an overall degree of medical risk, and wherein the method additionally comprises:

receiving a pre-determined numerical indication of the overall degree of medical risk of the subject;

determining that the pre-determined numerical indication of the overall degree of medical risk of the subject differs by more than a specified threshold amount from the output, of the set of target outputs generated by the ANN, that is indicative of the overall degree of medical risk of the subject; and

responsively providing an indication via a user interface that the pre-determined numerical indication of the overall degree of medical risk of the subject differs from the output, of the set of target outputs generated by the ANN, that is indicative of the overall degree of medical risk of the subject.

13. The method of claim 1 , wherein predicting at least one of (i) a degree of severity of the specified disease or syndrome or (ii) an amount of care that the subject will receive related to the specified disease or syndrome comprises predicting at least one of: a likelihood of mortality or a likelihood of inpatient hospitalization longer than two days.

14. The method of claim 1 , wherein predicting at least one of (i) a degree of severity of the specified disease or syndrome or (ii) an amount of care that the subject will receive related to the specified disease or syndrome comprises applying a classifier to the set of target outputs for the target radiographic image.

15. The method of claim 14 , wherein the applying the classifier to the set of target outputs for the target radiographic image comprises applying a generalized linear model to the set of target outputs for the target radiographic image.

16. The method of claim 14 , wherein applying the classifier to the set of target outputs for the target radiographic image comprises determining a weighted sum of the set of target outputs for the target radiographic image and comparing the weighted sum to a pre-specified threshold value.

17. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

applying an additional ANN to the target radiographic image to generate one or more additional outputs, wherein the additional ANN has been trained based on an additional training set that includes a plurality of training examples from people determined to have the specified disease or syndrome, and wherein predicting at least one of (i) a degree of severity of the specified disease or syndrome or (ii) an amount of care that the subject will receive related to the specified disease or syndrome based on the set of target outputs for the target radiographic image comprises predicting at least one of (i) a degree of severity of the specified disease or syndrome or (ii) an amount of care that the subject will receive related to the specified disease or syndrome based on the set of target outputs for the target radiographic image and the one or more additional outputs.

18. The method of claim 17 , wherein the one or more additional outputs of the additional ANN are indicative of at least one of a severity of lung opacity, a degree of lung opacity, or an extent of lung opacity depicted in the target radiographic image.

19. The method of claim 18 , wherein the specified disease or syndrome is SARS-CoV-2 or a variant thereof.

20. A non-transitory computer-readable medium, having stored thereon program instructions that, upon execution by a computing device, cause the computing device to perform a method comprising:

receiving a target radiographic image of a chest of a subject, wherein the subject has a specified disease or syndrome, wherein an artificial neural network (ANN) has a set of inputs and a set of outputs, wherein the ANN has been trained by a training set including a plurality of radiographic images containing features that are mapped to the set of inputs and associated with labeled values mapped to the set of outputs, wherein a subset of the radiographic images contain instances of the features that are indicative of at least one comorbidity within a particular comorbidity class and are associated with instances of the labeled values that represent the particular comorbidity class, wherein the ANN a common layer and a plurality of parallel output heads, wherein the common layer provides outputs to the plurality of parallel output heads, and wherein each output head of the plurality of parallel output heads generates, as an output, a respective one of the set of outputs;

applying the ANN to the target radiographic image to generate a set of target outputs for the target radiographic image, wherein output values of the set of target outputs indicate that the subject has at least one comorbidity in the particular comorbidity class;

based on the set of target outputs for the target radiographic image, predicting at least one of (i) a degree of severity of the specified disease or syndrome or (ii) an amount of care that the subject will receive related to the specified disease or syndrome;

based on the set of target outputs for the target radiographic image, predicting a likelihood that the subject has a specified disease or syndrome;

determining that the likelihood that the subject has the specified disease or syndrome has an intermediate value; and

responsive to determining that the likelihood that the subject has the specified disease or syndrome has an intermediate value, performing an additional diagnostic test on the subject to determine whether or to what degree the subject has the specified disease or syndrome.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 26, 2023
From: PYRROS, AYIS; SIDDIQUI, NASIR
To: DUPAGE MEDICAL GROUP, LTD.
Reel/Frame 063449/0434 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 24, 2023
From: KOYEJO, OLUWASANMI; COLE, PATRICK; CHEN, ANDREW
To: THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS
Reel/Frame 063418/0821 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 24, 2023
From: PYRROL, AYIS; SIDDIQUI, NASIR
To: DUPAGE MEDICAL GROUP, LTD.
Reel/Frame 063418/0923 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63220315 · Jul 9, 2021
Related Publication 20230016569A1 · Jan 19, 2023
References Cited (77)
US 8504392B2 · Saria · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 10269114B2 · Reicher · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20040172297A1 · Rao · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20100094649A1 · White · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20150100344A1 · Chen · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20200160301A1 · Lyman · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200265276A1 · Xu · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200357118A1 · Yao · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210042916A1 · Zhang · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20240145093A1 · Rodriguez · 2024 [cited by examiner]
Chakravarty, Arunava, et al. “Learning decision ensemble using a graph neural network for comorbidity aware chest radiograph screening.” 2020 42nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Bi… [cited by examiner]
Gong, Kuang, et al. “A multi-center study of COVID-19 patient prognosis using deep learning-based CT image analysis and electronic health records.” European journal of radiology 139 (2021): 109583. (Year: 2021). [cited by examiner]
Gude-Sampedro, Francisco, et al. “Development and validation of a prognostic model based on comorbidities to predict COVID-19 severity: a population-based study.” International journal of epidemiology 50.1 (2021): 64-74… [cited by examiner]
Bang, TJ, et al., American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria: Routine Chest Radiography, 2023. https://acsearch.acr.org/docs/69451/Narrative/. [cited by applicant]
Bretz, F., Maurer, W., Brannath, W., Posch, M., A graphical approach to sequentially rejective multiple test procedures, Stat Med. 2009; 28: 586-604. [cited by applicant]
Gallino A, Aboyans V, Diehm C, et al. Non-coronary atherosclerosis. Eur Heart J May 2014;35(17):1112-1119. [cited by applicant]
Henkel, RJ, Maryland, PA. The risks and rewards of value-based reimbursement. Front Health Serv Manage 2015;32(2):3-16. [cited by applicant]
Joseph NP, Reid NJ, Som A, et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in disease severity on admission chest radiographs among patients admitted with confirmed coronavirus disease 2019: a retrospective cohort study. Radiology… [cited by applicant]
Kerr IH. The preoperative chest X-ray. Br J Anaesth. 1974;46(8):558-563. [cited by applicant]
Khanna, K., et al., Who Are You? Bayesian Prediction of Racial Category Using Surname and Geolocation website. Updated May 17, 2021. Accessed Jun. 30, 2021. https://github.com/kosukeimai/wru. [cited by applicant]
Ortega P, Martinez G, Diamond L. Language and health equity during COVID-19: lessons and opportunities. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2020;31(4):1530-1535. [cited by applicant]
Robert Graham Center. Social Deprivation Index (SDI) website. Accessed Jun. 30, 2021. https://www.graham-center.org/rgc/maps-data-tools/sdi/social-deprivation-index.html. [cited by applicant]
Schachterle, S.E., Hurley, S., Liu, Q. et al. An Implementation and Visualization of the Tree-Based Scan Statistic for Safety Event Monitoring in Longitudinal Electronic Health Data. Drug Saf 42, 727-741 (2019). https:/… [cited by applicant]
Schut RA. Racial disparities in provider-patient communication of incidental medical findings. Soc Sci Med. Apr. 6, 2021;277:113901. [cited by applicant]
Straw I. The automation of bias in medical Artificial Intelligence (AI): Decoding the past to create a better future. Artif Intell Med Nov. 2020;110:101965. [cited by applicant]
Ward JB, Gartner DR, Keyes KM, Fliss MD, McClure ES, Robinson WR. How do we assess a racial disparity in health? Distribution, interaction, and interpretation in epidemiological studies. Ann Epidemiol Jan. 2019;29:1-7. [cited by applicant]
Webb Hooper M, Nápoles AM, Pérez-Stable EJ. COVID-19 and racial/ethnic disparities. JAMA 2020;323(24):2466-2467. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.8598. [cited by applicant]
2019 model software/icd-10 mappings. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Web site. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Health-Plans/MedicareAdvtgSpecRateStats/Risk-Adjustors-Items/RiskModel2019. Accessed Feb. 23, 2021. [cited by applicant]
Adar A, Onalan O, Keles H, Cakan F, Kokturk U. Relationship between aortic arch calcification, detected by chest x-ray, and renal resistive index in patients with hypertension. MPP. 2019;28(2):133-40. [cited by applicant]
Argyriou A, Evgeniou T, Pontil M. Convex multi-task feature learning. Mach Learn. Dec. 2008;73(3):243-72. [cited by applicant]
Brady AP, Bello JA, Derchi LE, et al. Radiology in the era of value-based healthcare: A multi-society expert statement from the ACR, CAR, ESR, IS3R, RANZCR, and RSNA. Radiology 2021;298(3):486-491. [cited by applicant]
Captum ⋅ model interpretability for pytorch. https://captum.ai/ Accessed Feb. 23, 2021. [cited by applicant]
Caruana R. Multitask learning: a knowledge-based source of inductive bias. In: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning. Amherst, MA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann Publish… [cited by applicant]
Chen T, Guestrin C. Xgboost: a scalable tree boosting system. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining [Internet]. San Francisco, California, USA: Associatio… [cited by applicant]
Cohen J, Chester: A Web Delivered Locally Computed Chest X-Ray Disease Prediction System, Feb. 2, 2020, arXiv:1901.11210v3, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1901.11210. [cited by applicant]
Collobert R, Weston J. A unified architecture for natural language processing: deep neural networks with multitask learning. In: Proceedings of the 25th international conference on Machine learning—ICML '08 [Internet]. … [cited by applicant]
De Groot V, Beckerman H, Lankhorst GJ, Bouter LM. How to measure comorbidity. a critical review of available methods. J Clin Epidemiol. Mar. 2003;56(3):221-9. [cited by applicant]
DeLong Elisabeth R., David M. DeLong and Daniel L. Clarke-Pearson “Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach”. Biometrics 1988; 44, 837-845. [cited by applicant]
Dodge S, Karam L. Understanding how image quality affects deep neural networks. Arxiv 1604.04004 [preprint] http://arxiv.org/abs/1604.04004Posted Apr. 21, 2016. Accessed Feb. 23, 2021.24. [cited by applicant]
Gupta RK, Marks M, Samuels TH, et al. Systematic evaluation and external validation of 22 prognostic models among hospitalised adults with COVID-19: An observational cohort study. European Respiratory Journal 2020; 56. [cited by applicant]
Harutyunyan H, Khachatrian H, Kale DC, Ver Steeg G, Galstyan A. Multitask learning and benchmarking with clinical time series data. Scientific Data. Jun. 17, 2019;6(1):96. [cited by applicant]
Holm, S. “A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure”. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 1979; 6 (2): 65-70. [cited by applicant]
Hosmer. Applied logistic regression, 3rd edition. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley; 2013. [cited by applicant]
Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. The Lancet. Feb. 15, 2020;395(10223):497-506. [cited by applicant]
Irvin, et al., CheXpert: A Large Chest Radiograph Dataset with Uncertainty Labels and Expert Comparison, Jan. 21, 2019, arXiv:1901.07031v1, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1901.07031. [cited by applicant]
Juhnke C, Bethge S, Mühlbacher AC. A review on methods of risk adjustment and their use in integrated healthcare systems. Int J Integr Care [Internet]. [cited Nov. 17, 2020];16(4). Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.n… [cited by applicant]
Karargyris A, Kashyap S, Wu JT, Sharma A, Moradi M, Syeda-Mahmood T. Age prediction using a large chest X-ray dataset. arXiv: 190306542 [cs] [Internet]. Mar. 8, 2019 [cited Nov. 17, 2020]; Available from: http://arxiv.o… [cited by applicant]
Ke G, Meng Q, Finley T, Wang T, Chen W, Ma W, et al. Lightgbm: a highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 2017;30:3146-54. [cited by applicant]
Kim HW, Capaccione KM, Li G, Luk L, Widemon RS, Rahman O, et al. The role of initial chest X-ray in triaging patients with suspected COVID-19 during the pandemic. Emerg Radiol. Jun. 22, 2020;1-5. [cited by applicant]
Kim YS, Park HY, Yun K-H, Park H, Cheong JS, Ha YS. Association of aortic knob calcification with intracranial stenosis in ischemic stroke patients. J Stroke. May 2013;15(2):122-5. [cited by applicant]
King Jr JT, Yoon JS, Rentsch CT, et al. Development and validation of a 30-day mortality index based on pre-existing medical administrative data from 13,323 COVID-19 patients: The Veterans Health Administration COVID-19… [cited by applicant]
Kingma DP, Ba J. Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. arXiv: 14126980 [cs] [Internet]. Jan. 29, 2017 [cited Nov. 17, 2020]; Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6980. [cited by applicant]
Liaw A, Wiener M. Classification and regression by randomForest. R news. 2002;2(3):18-22. [cited by applicant]
Liu R, Lehman J, Molino P, Such FP, Frank E, Sergeev A, et al. An intriguing failing of convolutional neural networks and the coordconv solution. arXiv:180703247 [cs, stat] [Internet]. Dec. 3, 2018 [cited Nov. 17, 2020]… [cited by applicant]
Lu MT, Ivanov A, Mayrhofer T, Hosny A, Aerts HJWL, Hoffmann U. Deep learning to assess longterm mortality from chest radiographs. JAMA Netw Open. Jul. 19, 2019;2(7):e197416. [cited by applicant]
Ma X, Ng M, Xu S, Xu Z, Qiu H, Liu Y, et al. Development and validation of prognosis model of mortality risk in patients with COVID-19. Epidemiology & Infection [Internet]. 2020 ed [cited Nov. 17, 2020];148. Available f… [cited by applicant]
Mamlin BW, Heinze DT, McDonald CJ. Automated extraction and normalization of findings from cancer-related free-text radiology reports. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003;2003:420-4. PMID: 14728207; PMCID: PMC1479955. [cited by applicant]
Mandal AK, Tagomori GK, Felix RV, Howell SC. Value-based contracting innovated Medicare advantage healthcare delivery and improved survival. Am J Manag Care 2017;23(2):e41-e49. PMID: 28245661. [cited by applicant]
Mosley DG, Peterson E, Martin DC. Do hierarchical condition category model scores predict hospitalization risk in newly enrolled Medicare advantage participants as well as probability of repeated admission scores? J Am … [cited by applicant]
Pan F, Ye T, Sun P, et al. Time course of lung changes at chest CT during recovery from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Radiology 2020;295(3):715-721. [cited by applicant]
Prokhorenkova L, Gusev G, Vorobev A, Dorogush AV, Gulin A. CatBoost: unbiased boosting with categorical features. In: Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Montréal, … [cited by applicant]
Rajpurkar P, Irvin J, Ball RL, Zhu K, Yang B, et al. (2018) Deep learning for chest radiograph diagnosis: A retrospective comparison of the CheXNeXt algorithm to practicing radiologists. PLOS Medicine 15(11): e1002686. … [cited by applicant]
Richardson S, Hirsch JS, Narasimhan M, Crawford JM, McGinn T, Davidson KW, et al. Presenting characteristics, comorbidities, and outcomes among 5700 patients hospitalized with covid-19 in the new york city area. JAMA. M… [cited by applicant]
Robinson JC. Medicare Advantage reimbursement to physicians. JAMA Intern Med 2017;177(9):1295-1296. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.2689. PMID: 28692717. [cited by applicant]
Rubin GD. Costing in radiology and health care: Rationale, relativity, rudiments, and realities. Radiology 2017;282(2):333-347. [cited by applicant]
Ruder, S., An Overview of Multi-Task Learning in Deep Neural Networks. CoRR 1706.05098, 2017, http://arxiv.org/abs/1706.05098. [cited by applicant]
Safavian SR, Landgrebe D. A survey of decision tree classifier methodology. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. May 1991;21(3):660-74. [cited by applicant]
Schalekamp S, Huisman M, van Dijk RA, Boomsma M f., Freire Jorge P j., de Boer W s, et al. Modelbased prediction of critical illness in hospitalized patients with covid-19. Radiology. Aug. 13, 2020;202723. [cited by applicant]
Selvaraju RR, Cogswell M, Das A, Vedantam R, Parikh D, Batra D. Grad-cam: visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization. Int J Comput Vis. Feb. 2020;128(2):336-59. [cited by applicant]
Tallam H, Elton DC, Lee S, Wakim P, Pickhardt PJ, Summers RM. Fully Automated Abdominal CT Biomarkers for Type 2 Diabetes Using Deep Learning. Radiology. Apr. 5, 2022:211914. doi: 10.1148/radiol.211914. Epub ahead of pr… [cited by applicant]
Toussie D, Voutsinas N, Finkelstein M, Cedillo MA, Manna S, Maron SZ, et al. Clinical and chest radiography features determine patient outcomes in young and middle-aged adults with covid-19. Radiology. Oct. 2020;297(1):… [cited by applicant]
Wang L, Wong A. Covid-net: a tailored deep convolutional neural network design for detection of covid-19 cases from chest x-ray images. arXiv:200309871 [cs, eess] [Internet]. May 11, 2020 [cited Nov. 17, 2020]; Availabl… [cited by applicant]
Williamson EJ, Walker AJ, Bhaskaran K, et al. Factors associated with COVID-19-related death using OpenSAFELY. Nature 2020;584(7821):430-436. [cited by applicant]
Wynants L, Calster BV, Collins GS, Riley RD, Heinze G, Schuit E, et al. Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of covid-19: systematic review and critical appraisal. BMJ [Internet]. Apr. 7, 2020 [cited Nov. 17, 2… [cited by applicant]
Yang J, Zheng Y, Gou X, Pu K, Chen Z, Guo Q, et al. Prevalence of comorbidities and its effects in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Infect Dis. May 2020;94:91-5. [cited by applicant]
Yu C, Lei Q, Li W, Wang X, Liu W, Fan X, et al. Clinical characteristics, associated factors, and predicting covid-19 mortality risk: a retrospective study in wuhan, china. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Aug. … [cited by applicant]
Zhang Z. Multivariable fractional polynomial method for regression model. Ann Transl Med. May 2016;4(9):174. doi: 10.21037/atm.2016.05.01. PMID: 27275487; PMCID: PMC4876277. [cited by applicant]