IP Library › Granted Patent US 11,947,678
Granted Patent B2
US 11,947,678 · App. 17/868,943 · Granted Apr 2, 2024

Systems and methods for evaluating data access signature of third-party applications

Inventors: Milos Dunjic (Oakville, CA); David Samuel Tax (Toronto, CA); Arthur Carroll Chow (Markham, CA); Anthony Haituyen Nguyen (Toronto, CA)
Assignee: The Toronto-Dominion Bank
G06F21/577G06F11/3664G06F11/3688G06F2221/033
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,947,678
App. No.
17/868,943
Granted
Apr 2, 2024
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for evaluating security of third-party applications includes: launching, in an automated test environment, a test instance of a first application; determining a data access pattern for the first application of accessing a protected remote server based on detecting data retrieval operations of retrieving data from the protected remote server by the test instance and determining application states of the first application associated with the detected data retrieval operations; and providing the data access pattern for the first application on a client device.

Claims (38)

1. A computing system, comprising:

a processor; and

a memory coupled to the processor, the memory storing computer-executable instructions that, when executed by the processor, configure the processor to:

launch, in an automated test environment, a test instance of a first application;

determine a data access pattern for the first application of accessing user account data at a protected remote server based on detecting data retrieval operations of retrieving data from the protected remote server by the test instance and determining application states of the first application associated with the detected data retrieval operations; and

provide the data access pattern for the first application on a client device.

2. The computing system of claim 1 , wherein the instructions, when executed, are to further configure the processor to:

create a test user account associated with the protected remote server, the test user account including fake user account data;

receive, from the first application, a request to obtain account data for a user account associated with the protected remote server; and

provide, to the first application, a first data set in response to the request, the first data set including at least the fake user account data of the test user account.

3. The computing system of claim 2 , wherein the first data set includes fake historical transactions data associated with the test user account, the fake historical transactions data including data for at least one fake transfer operation of transferring value to or from the test user account.

4. The computing system of claim 1 , wherein the instructions, when executed, are to further configure the processor to determine an execution state of the first application at a time of detecting a data retrieval operation of the test instance.

5. The computing system of claim 4 , wherein determining the execution state of the first application comprises determining that the first application is not being executed, and wherein the instructions, when executed, are to further configure the processor to determine a frequency of data retrieval by the first application from the protected remote server.

6. The computing system of claim 4 , wherein determining the execution state of the first application comprises determining that the first application is being executed, and wherein the instructions, when executed, are to further configure the processor to determine that a data retrieval operation is performed by the first application only in response to a user-initiated action in the first application.

7. The computing system of claim 6 , wherein the user-initiated action in the first application comprises a user selection of a functionality associated with the first application.

8. The computing system of claim 1 , wherein the instructions, when executed, are to further configure the processor to:

cause the first application to perform a plurality of predetermined operations; and

determine that at least one data retrieval operation is performed by the first application in response to select ones of the plurality of predetermined operations.

9. The computing system of claim 1 , wherein the instructions, when executed, are to further configure the processor to assign, to the first application, a risk score that is based on the data access pattern for the first application.

10. The computing system of claim 1 , wherein the automated test environment comprises an emulator for an operating system associated with the first application.

11. A processor-implemented method, comprising:

launching, in an automated test environment, a test instance of a first application;

determining a data access pattern for the first application of accessing a protected remote server based on detecting data retrieval operations of retrieving data from the protected remote server by the test instance and determining application states of the first application associated with the detected data retrieval operations; and

providing the data access pattern for the first application on a client device.

12. The method of claim 11 , further comprising:

creating a test user account associated with the protected remote server, the test user account including fake user account data;

receiving, from the first application, a request to obtain account data for a user account associated with the protected remote server; and

providing, to the first application, a first data set in response to the request, the first data set including at least the fake user account data of the test user account.

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein the first data set includes fake historical transactions data associated with the test user account, the fake historical transactions data including data for at least one fake transfer operation of transferring value to or from the test user account.

14. The method of claim 11 , further comprising determining an execution state of the first application at a time of detecting a data retrieval operation of the test instance.

15. The method of claim 14 , wherein determining the execution state of the first application comprises determining that the first application is not being executed, and wherein the method further comprises determining a frequency of data retrieval by the first application from the protected remote server.

16. The method of claim 14 , wherein determining the execution state of the first application comprises determining that the first application is being executed, and wherein the method further comprises determining that a data retrieval operation is performed by the first application only in response to a user-initiated action in the first application.

17. The method of claim 16 , wherein the user-initiated action in the first application comprises a user selection of a functionality associated with the first application.

18. The method of claim 11 , further comprising:

causing the first application to perform a plurality of predetermined operations; and

determining that at least one data retrieval operation is performed by the first application in response to select ones of the plurality of predetermined operations.

19. The method of claim 11 , further comprising assigning, to the first application, a risk score that is based on the data access pattern for the first application.

20. The method of claim 11 , wherein the automated test environment comprises an emulator for an operating system associated with the first application.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 20, 2022
From: DUNJIC, MILOS; TAX, DAVID SAMUEL; CHOW, ARTHUR CARROLL; NGUYEN, ANTHONY HAITUYEN
To: THE TORONTO-DOMINION BANK
Reel/Frame 060562/0886 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation 16578717 · Sep 23, 2019
Related Publication 20220366058A1 · Nov 17, 2022
Cited By (1)
US 12,665,890