IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,273,406
Granted Patent B2
US 12,273,406 · App. 17/871,556 · Granted Apr 8, 2025

User-defined quality of experience (QoE) prioritizations

Inventors: Giovanna Carofiglio (Paris, FR); Giulio Grassi (Paris, FR); Enrico Loparco (Boulogne-Billancourt, FR); Michele Papalini (Issy les Moulineaux, FR); Jacques Samain (Paris, FR)
Assignee: Cisco Technology, Inc.
H04L65/80H04L65/65H04L65/762H04N21/44213
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,273,406
App. No.
17/871,556
Granted
Apr 8, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method includes, at a media bridge configured to distribute a plurality of media streams among a plurality of client devices connected to the media bridge over a network during a real-time communication (RTC) instance, receiving a plurality of quality of experience (QoE) preferences from the plurality of client devices via the media bridge, the plurality of QoE preferences being transmitted as a real-time transport protocol (RTP) control protocol (RTCP) extension header of a transmitted data packet. The method also includes receiving a plurality of QoE metrics at the media bridge, and in response to a determination that a degradation in network conditions of the network has occurred, downgrading at least one of the plurality of media streams based on the plurality of QoE preferences.

Claims (44)

1. A method comprising:

establishing a real-time communication (RTC) session between a first client device and a second client device connected over one or more networks;

causing presentation of a user interface element on a display of the first client device, the user interface element configured to receive input indicating a quality of experience (QoE) preference of a user of the first client device;

receiving user input provided via the user interface element indicating the QOE preference of the user, the QoE preference indicating a priority of the user that performance of a particular application-layer metric of the RTC session is optimized; and

adjusting a network characteristic of the RTC session based at least in part on the QoE preference such that performance of the particular application-layer metric of the RTC session is optimized.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the user interface element is presented at one or more of a first time associated with at least one of establishment of the RTC session, a second time associated with a third client device connecting to the RTC session, a third time associated with determining that network conditions degraded, or a fourth time associated with a degradation in QoE being expected.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the QoE preference is at least one a resolution of a media stream of the RTC session, a smoothness of the media stream, or a reliability of the media stream.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the user input indicates a plurality of QoE preferences that define ranking of different application-layer metrics of the RTC session that are to be prioritized.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein adjusting the network characteristic of the RTC session includes adjusting a media stream dynamically during transmission of the media stream.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

the first client device has established a plurality of media streams with other client devices; and

the QoE preference indicates that performance of a particular media stream of the plurality of media streams is to be prioritized over performances of other media streams of the plurality of media streams.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising sending the QoE preference from the first client device and to the second client device.

8. A system comprising:

one or more processors; and

one or more non-transitory computer-readable media storing computer-executable instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform operations comprising:

establishing a real-time communication (RTC) session between a first client device and a second client device connected over one or more networks;

causing presentation of a user interface element on a display of the first client device, the user interface element configured to receive input indicating a quality of experience (QoE) preference of a user of the first client device;

receiving user input provided via the user interface element indicating the QOE preference of the user, the QoE preference indicating a priority of the user that performance of a particular application-layer metric of the RTC session is optimized; and

optimizing performance of the particular application-layer metric of the RTC session based at least in part on the QoE preference.

9. The system of claim 8 , wherein the user interface element is presented at one or more of a first time associated with at least one of establishment of the RTC session, a second time associated with a third client device connecting to the RTC session, a third time associated with determining that network conditions degraded, or a fourth time associated with a degradation in QoE being expected.

10. The system of claim 8 , wherein the QoE preference is at least one a resolution of a media stream of the RTC session, a smoothness of the media stream, or a reliability of the media stream.

11. The system of claim 8 , wherein the user input indicates a plurality of QoE preferences that define ranking of different application-layer metrics of the RTC session that are to be prioritized.

12. The system of claim 8 , the operations further comprising:

determining that performance of a network characteristic of the RTC session has degraded,

wherein optimizing the performance of the particular application-layer metric of the RTC session is performed in response to determining that the performance has degraded.

13. The system of claim 8 , wherein:

the first client device has established a plurality of media streams with other client devices; and

the QoE preference indicates that performance of a particular media stream of the plurality of media streams is to be prioritized over performances of other media streams of the plurality of media streams.

14. The system of claim 8 , the operations further comprising sending the QoE preference from the first client device and to the second client device.

15. A method comprising:

establishing a real-time communication (RTC) session between a first client device and a second client device connected over one or more networks;

causing presentation of a user interface element on a display of the first client device, the user interface element configured to receive input indicating a quality of experience (QoE) preference of a user of the first client device;

receiving user input provided via the user interface element indicating the QOE preference of the user, the QoE preference indicating a priority of the user that performance of a particular application-layer metric of the RTC session is optimized; and

adjusting a network characteristic of the RTC session based at least in part on the QoE preference such that performance of the particular application-layer metric of the RTC session is optimized.

16. The method of claim 15 , wherein the user interface element is presented at one or more of a first time associated with at least one of establishment of the RTC session, a second time associated with a third client device connecting to the RTC session, a third time associated with determining that network conditions degraded, or a fourth time associated with a degradation in QoE being expected.

17. The method of claim 15 , wherein:

the RTC session is used to communicate a video media stream between the first client device and the second client device; and

the QoE preference indicates a video media characteristic that is to be prioritized.

18. The method of claim 15 , wherein the user input indicates a plurality of QoE preferences that define ranking of different application-layer metrics of the RTC session that are to be prioritized.

19. The method of claim 15 , wherein adjusting the network characteristic of the RTC session includes adjusting a media stream dynamically during transmission of the media stream.

20. The method of claim 15 , wherein:

the first client device has established a plurality of media streams with other client devices; and

the QoE preference indicates that performance of a particular media stream of the plurality of media streams is to be prioritized over performances of other media streams of the plurality of media streams.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 22, 2022
From: CAROFIGLIO, GIOVANNA; GRASSI, GIULIO; LOPARCO, ENRICO; PAPALINI, MICHELE; SAMAIN, JACQUES
To: CISCO TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Reel/Frame 060598/0112 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation 17316328 · May 10, 2021
Related Publication 20220360618A1 · Nov 10, 2022
References Cited (20)
US 8862659B2 · Blanchard et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 10230679B1 · Kielhofner et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10455194B1 · Yang et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20010052012A1 · Rinne et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 20050232284A1 · Karaoguz et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20130107741A1 · Huang · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130159498A1 · Funge et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130208663A1 · Kanniappan et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130265446A1 · Nicas et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140016464A1 · Shirazipour et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140132703A1 · Li et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140201329A1 · Himayat et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150200974A1 · Pearce · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20190132219A1 · Gandhi · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190222491A1 · Tomkins et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
Ammar et al., “Quality of Experience-Assessment of WebRTC Based Video Communication,” European Research Consortium for Informatics and Mathematics, Apr. 4, 2016, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/316,328, mailed on Sep. 20, 2021, Carofiglio, “User-Defined Quality of Experience (QOE) Prioritizations”, 14 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/316,328, mailed Mar. 24, 2022, Carofiglio, “User-Defined Quality of Experience (QOE) Prioritization”, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/316,328, mailed on May 5, 2022, Carofiglio, “User-Defined Quality of Experience (QOE) Prioritizations”, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Vucic et al., “QOE Evaluation of WebRTC-Based Mobile Multiparty Video Calls in Light of Different Video Codec Settings,” EEEE. org, published Jul. 3-5, 2019, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]