IP Library › Granted Patent US 11,896,877
Granted Patent B2
US 11,896,877 · App. 17/881,997 · Granted Feb 13, 2024

Golf ball

Inventors: Hideo Watanabe (Saitamaken, JP); Akira Kimura (Saitamaken, JP)
Assignee: BRIDGESTONE SPORTS CO., LTD.
A63B37/00922A63B37/0063A63B37/0064A63B37/0065A63B37/0075A63B37/0089A63B37/0096C08L9/00C08L2207/53
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,896,877
App. No.
17/881,997
Granted
Feb 13, 2024
Kind
B2
Abstract

In a golf ball for professional golfers and skilled amateurs which has a single-layer core, a cover and at least one intermediate layer therebetween, the sphere obtained by encasing the core with the intermediate layer (intermediate layer-encased sphere) and the ball have a surface hardness relationship which satisfies the condition: (surface hardness of intermediate layer-encased sphere)>(surface hardness of ball). The core has a diameter of from 35.5 to 39.5 mm and a distinctive hardness profile that satisfies specific conditions. The ball is endowed with both an excellent flight performance and excellent durability to repeated impact.

Claims (26)

1. A golf ball comprising a single-layer core, a cover and at least one intermediate layer interposed between the core and the cover, wherein the sphere obtained by encasing the core with the intermediate layer (intermediate layer-encased sphere) and the ball have a surface hardness relationship therebetween which satisfies the condition:

(surface hardness of intermediate layer-encased sphere)>(surface hardness of ball);

the core has a diameter of from 35.5 to 39.5 mm and a corresponding radius; and the core has a hardness profile which satisfies the following conditions:

( H 75− H 50)>( H 25− H 0)>( H 100− H 87.5)>( H 50− H 25)

23.0≥( H 87.5− H 0)≥17.0

absolute value of ( H 87.5− H 0)/( H 50− H 0)≥3.0,

where H100 is the Shore C hardness at a surface of the core, H87.5 is the Shore C hardness at a position 87.5% of the core radius outward from a center of the core, H75 is the Shore C hardness at a position 75% of the core radius outward from the core center, H62.5 is the Shore C hardness at a position 62.5% of the core radius outward from the core center, H50 is the Shore C hardness at a position 50% of the core radius outward from the core center, H37.5 is the Shore C hardness at a position 37.5% of the core radius outward from the core center, H25 is the Shore C hardness at a position 25% of the core radius outward from the core center, H12.5 is the Shore C hardness at a position 12.5% of the core radius outward from the core center and H0 is the Shore C hardness at the core center.

2. The golf ball of claim 1 which satisfies the condition:

0≤( H 100− H 87.5)≤3.0.

3. The golf ball of claim 1 which satisfies the condition:

4.0≤( H 75− H 50)≤9.0.

4. The golf ball of claim 1 which satisfies the condition:

−1.05≤( H 50− H 25)≤1.0.

5. The golf ball of claim 1 which satisfies the condition:

3.0≤( H 25− H 0)≤6.0.

6. The golf ball of claim 1 , wherein the core has a deflection of from 2.5 to 3.5 mm when compressed under a final load of 1,275 N (130 kgf) from an initial load of 98 N (10 kgf) and the ball has a deflection of from 2.1 to 2.8 mm when compressed under a final load of 1,275 N (130 kgf) from an initial load of 98 N (10 kgf).

7. The golf ball of claim 1 wherein, letting CL1 be the coefficient of lift measured at a Reynolds number of 80,000 and a spin rate of 2,000 rpm and CL2 be the coefficient of lift measured at a Reynolds number of 70,000 and a spin rate of 1,900, CL1 and CL2 satisfy the condition:

0.900≤ CL 2/ CL 1.

8. The golf ball of claim 1 wherein, letting CL3 be the coefficient of lift measured at a Reynolds number of 200,000 and a spin rate of 2,500 rpm and CL4 be the coefficient of lift measured at a Reynolds number of 120,000 and a spin rate of 2,250, CL3 and CL4 satisfy the condition:

1.250≤ CL 4/ CL 3≤1.300.

9. The golf ball of claim 1 , wherein the core is a material molded under heat from a rubber composition comprising:

(A) a base rubber,

(B) an organic peroxide,

(C) water or a metal monocarboxylate or both, and

(D) sulfur.

10. The golf ball of claim 9 , wherein components (C) and (D) have a weight ratio (D)/(C) therebetween which is from 0.02 to 0.20.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 5, 2022
From: WATANABE, HIDEO; KIMURA, AKIRA
To: BRIDGESTONE SPORTS CO., LTD.
Reel/Frame 060732/0898 →
Priority Claims (1)
JP 2021-137782 · Aug 26, 2021 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20230082849A1 · Mar 16, 2023
Cited By (1)
US 12,465,818