IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,579,651
Granted Patent B2
US 12,579,651 · App. 17/886,027 · Granted Mar 17, 2026

Impeded diffusion fraction for quantitative imaging diagnostic assay

Inventors: Dariya I. Malyarenko (Ann Arbor, MI); Scott D. Swanson (Ann Arbor, MI); Thomas L. Chenevert (Ann Arbor, MI)
Assignee: REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN
G06T7/0016A61B5/4842A61B5/4848G01R33/56341G06T2207/10088G06T2207/30068G06T2207/30081G06T2207/30096
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,579,651
App. No.
17/886,027
Granted
Mar 17, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods and systems are provided for analyzing diffusion weighted images (DWI) using impeded diffusion fraction models for quantitative imaging diagnostic assay of cancer, such as glandular tissue cancers. The Impeded diffusion fraction models are tissue and cancer independent and generate a single score representative of multi-compartment diffusion fractions occurring within each voxel of a DWI image.

Claims (150)

1 . A computer-implemented method of analyzing diffusion weighted images, the computer-implemented method comprising:

receiving, at one or more processors, diffusion weighted image (DWI) data corresponding to a sample of an imaged tissue and identifying within the DWI data a region of interest comprising one or more voxels, the region of interest spanning at least partially a tissue region within the sample;

applying, using the one or more processors, the DWI data corresponding to the region of interest to an impeded diffusion fraction model and, from applying the impeded diffusion fraction model, determining an impeded diffusion fraction for each of the one or more voxels in the region of interest, the impeded diffusion fraction model being a multi-compartment model of water coordination by macromolecules agnostic to tissue compartment origin and applicable across multiple tissue compartments using a fixed rate for free diffusion and order of magnitude scaling constraints for vascular diffusion and coordinated diffusion;

from the impeded diffusion fraction of the one or more voxels, identifying the presence and/or severity of a pathology in the imaged tissue; and

generating, using the one or more processors and the identified presence and/or severity of the pathology in the imaged tissue, a pathology determination image indicating a location of the presence and/or the severity of the pathology within the region of interest.

2 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the multiple tissue compartments comprise a cellular compartment, a free water compartment, and a vascular compartment.

3 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the impeded diffusion fraction model comprises an expression for nonlinear impeded diffusion fraction (IDF):

S

b

S

0

≈

F

f

⁢

E

f

+

(

1

-

F

p

-

F

f

)

⁢

E

c

;

E

f

=

exp

⁢

(

-

b

⁢

D

f

)

;

E

c

≈

exp

⁢

(

-

b

⁢

F

fc

⁢

D

f

)

;

IDF

=

1

-

F

p

-

F

f

-

F

f

⁢

c

where Sb is the DWI signal intensity as a function of b-value, S0 is signal intensity at b=0, b are three or more b-values between 0.1 and 2 ms/μm2 (one or more>1 ms/μm2) Df is free diffusion rate, Fp is a pseudo diffusion fraction corresponding to a vascular compartment, Ff is a free water fraction, and Ffc is an uncoordinated water fraction in a cellular compartment.

4 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the impeded diffusion fraction model comprises an expression for a linear impeded diffusion fraction (IDFL):

log

⁢

(

S

b

S

0

)

=

C

1

+

C

2

·

b

;

F

fc

=

-

C

2

/

D

f

;

F

c

=

exp

⁢

(

C

1

)

;

IDF

L

=

exp

⁢

(

C

1

)

+

C

2

/

D

f

where Sb is the DWI signal intensity as a function of b-value, S0 is signal intensity at b=0, C1 is the linear fit intercept, C2 is a linear fit slope, b are two or more b-values between 0.6 and 2 ms/μm2 (one or more>1 ms/μm2) linear fit intercept, Df is free diffusion rate, and Fc is cellular fraction, for each of the one of more voxels.

5 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the impeded diffusion fraction model comprises an nonlinear fit impeded diffusion fraction.

6 . The computer-implemented method of claim 5 , wherein the nonlinear fit impeded diffusion fraction comprises fit constraints.

7 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the impeded diffusion fraction model comprises a linear fit impeded diffusion fraction.

8 . The computer-implemented method of claim 7 , wherein the linear fit impeded diffusion fraction comprises fit constraints.

9 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the DWI data comprises image data of the sample and comprising a plurality of voxels, the method further comprising:

prior to applying the DWI data to the impeded diffusion fraction model, identifying from the plurality of voxels, voxels satisfying a threshold voxel signal threshold condition and applying, as the DWI data, those voxels satisfying the threshold voxel signal threshold condition.

10 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the DWI data comprises image data of the sample and comprising a plurality of voxels, the method further comprising:

prior to applying the DWI data to the impeded diffusion fraction model, identifying from the plurality of voxels, voxels corresponding to a boundary region between normal tissue and lesion indicating tissue, and excluding, from the DWI data, those voxels corresponding to the boundary region.

11 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the DWI data comprises a plurality of voxels and wherein identifying the presence of a pathology in the imaged tissue comprises:

determining the impeded diffusion fraction for each of a plurality of voxels, determining a statistical summary metric of impeded diffusion fraction from the plurality of impeded diffusion fractions, and identifying the presence of the pathology from the summary metric for impeded diffusion fraction.

12 . The computer-implemented method of claim 11 , wherein the statistical summary metric for the plurality of voxels within region of interest is any mathematical histograms characteristic (moment), or percentiles.

13 . The computer-implemented method of claim 11 , wherein identifying the presence of a pathology in the imaged tissue comprises: determining if the impeded diffusion fraction is above a threshold value of the statistical summary metric, the threshold value corresponding to the presence of the pathogen.

14 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein identifying the presence of a pathology in the imaged tissue-comprises: determining if the impeded diffusion fraction is above a threshold value, the threshold value corresponding to the presence of the pathogen.

15 . The computer-implemented method of claim 14 , wherein the threshold value is determined from retrospective DWI analysis and adjusted for acquisition protocol bias in T1 and T2 weighting and b-range.

16 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the pathogen is cancer.

17 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the pathogen is cancer severity.

18 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the pathology is cancer and the sample is taken from disease tissue, the method further comprising, after performing a treatment on the subject:

receiving, at one or more processors, subsequent DWI data corresponding to a subsequent sample taken from the disease tissue, and identifying within the subsequent DWI data one or more voxels corresponding to the region of interest;

applying, using the one or more processors, the subsequent DWI data to the impeded diffusion fraction model and determining the presence of a change in the impeded diffusion fraction from the impeded diffusion fraction determined from the DWI data; and

from the presence of the change in the impeded diffusion fraction, determining an efficacy of the treatment on the subject.

19 . The computer-implemented method of claim 16 , wherein the cancer is prostate cancer, breast cancer, or pancreatic cancer.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 19, 2024
From: MALYARENKO, DARIYA I.; SWANSON, SCOTT D.; CHENEVERT, THOMAS L.
To: REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN
Reel/Frame 066491/0310 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63260185 · Aug 11, 2021
Related Publication 20230053434A1 · Feb 23, 2023
References Cited (35)
US 20120280686A1 · White · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20160139226A1 · Manikis · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170124294A1 · Perez · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180271373A1 · Kim · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190150822A1 · Wang · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20210104045A1 · Blamire · 2021 [cited by examiner]
Garcia-Figueiras et al., “How clinical imaging can assess cancer biology,” Insights Into Imaging, Springer Open Access, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-019-0703-0. (Year: 2019). [cited by examiner]
Panagiotaki et al., “Noninvasive Quantification of Solid Tumor Microstructure Using VERDICT MRI,” Cancer Res Apr. 1, 2014; 74 (7): 1902-1912. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-2511. (Year: 2014). [cited by examiner]
Hill et al., “Non-Invasive Prostate Cancer Characterization with Diffusion-Weighted MRI: Insight from In silico Studies of a Transgenic Mouse Model,” Frontiers in Oncology, Dec. 1, 2017, vol. 7, Article 290, 10.3389/fon… [cited by examiner]
Auffenberg et al., A Roadmap for Improving the Management of Favorable Risk Prostate Cancer, J. Urol., 198(6):1220-1222 (2017). [cited by applicant]
Barkovich et al., A Systematic Review of the Existing Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 (PI-RADSv2) Literature and Subset Meta-Analysis of PI-RADSv2 Categories Stratified by Gleason Scores, American J… [cited by applicant]
Bojorquez et al., What are normal relaxation times of tissues at 3 T?, Magn. Reson. Imag., 35:69-80 (2017). [cited by applicant]
Carlin et al., Probing structure of normal and malignant prostate tissue before and after radiation therapy with luminal water fraction and diffusion-weighted MRI, Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 50 (2) : 619-627… [cited by applicant]
Chatterjee et al., Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer with Noninvasive Estimation of Prostate Tissue Composition by Using Hybrid Multidimensional MR Imaging: A Feasibility Study, Radiol., 287(3):864-873 (2018). [cited by applicant]
Dyvorne et al., Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion imaging of the liver: Optimal b-value subsampling and impact on parameter precision and reproducibility, European Journal of Radiology, 83 (12) : 2109-2113 (2014). [cited by applicant]
Gilani et al., A Model Describing Diffusion in Prostate Cancer, Magn. Reson. Med., 78(1):316-326 (2017). [cited by applicant]
Hectors et al., Advanced Diffusion-weighted Imaging Modeling for Prostate Cancer Characterization: Correlation with Quantitative Histopathologic Tumor Tissue Composition—A Hypothesis-generating Study, Radiology, 286 (3)… [cited by applicant]
Holz et al., Temperature-dependent self-diffusion coefficients of water and six selected molecular liquids for calibration in accurate 1H NMRPFG measurements, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2 (20) : 4740-4742 (200… [cited by applicant]
Hurrell et al., Optimized b-value selection for the discrimination of prostate cancer grades, including the cribriform pattern, using diffusion weighted imaging, Journal of Medical Imaging, 5 (1) : 011004(1-16) (2018). [cited by applicant]
Iima et al., Clinical Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Diffusion MR Imaging: Past, Present, and Future, Radiology, 278 (1) : 13-32 (2016). [cited by applicant]
Inaba, Quantitative Measurements of Prostatic Blood Flow and Blood Volume by Positron Emission Tomography. J. Urol., 148:1457-1460 (1992). [cited by applicant]
Jensen et al., MRI quantification of non-Gaussian water diffusion by kurtosis analysis, NMR in Biomedicine, 23 (7) : 698-710 (2010). [cited by applicant]
Johnston et al., VERDICT MRI for Prostate Cancer: Intracellular Volume Fraction versus Apparent Diffusion Coefficient, Radiol., 291(2):391-397 (2019). [cited by applicant]
McHugh et al., Towards a ‘resolution limit’ for DW-MRI tumor microstructural models: A simulation study investigating the feasibility of distinguishing between microstructural changes, Magn. Reson. Med., 81(4):2288-2301… [cited by applicant]
Panagiotaki et al., Microstructural characterization of normal and malignant human prostate tissue with vascular, extracellular, and restricted diffusion for cytometry in tumours magnetic resonance imaging, Investigativ… [cited by applicant]
Pierpaoli et al., Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) Water Solutions as Isotropic Phantoms for Diffusion MRI Studies, International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 17 (1) : 1414 page (2019). [cited by applicant]
Polnaszek et al., Self-Diffusion of Water at the Protein Surface: A Measurement, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 106:428-429 (1984). [cited by applicant]
Pullens et al., Technical Note: A safe, cheap, and easy-to-use isotropic diffusion MRI phantom for clinical and multicenter studies, Med. Phys., 44(3):1063-1070 (2017). [cited by applicant]
Purysko et al., PI-RADS Version 2: A Pictorial Update, RadioGraphics, 36(5):1354-1372 (2016). [cited by applicant]
Rashid et al., Novel use for polyvinylpyrrolidone as a macromolecular crowder for enhanced extracellular matrix deposition and cell proliferation, Tissue Engineering Part C: Methods, 20 (12) : 994-1002 (2014). [cited by applicant]
Rosenkrantz et al., Body diffusion kurtosis imaging: Basic principles, applications, and considerations for clinical practice, Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 42 (5) : 1190-1202 (2015). [cited by applicant]
Shankar et al., Temporary Health Impact of Prostate MRI and Transrectal Prostate Biopsy in Active Surveillance Prostate Cancer Patients, J. Urol., 148:1457-1460 (1992). [cited by applicant]
Stanisz et al., T1, T2 Relaxation and Magnetization Transfer in Tissue at 3T, Magn. Reson. Med., 54(3):507-12 (2005). [cited by applicant]
Swanson et al., Tunable diffusion kurtosis in lamellar vesicle suspensions toward development of quantitative phantom surrogate of tumor microenvironment, Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance … [cited by applicant]
Trovato et al., Diffusion within the Cytoplasm: A Mesoscale Model of Interacting Macromolecules, Biophysical journal, 107 (11) : 2579-2591 (2014). [cited by applicant]