IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,738,342
Granted Patent B2
US 12,738,342 · App. 17/886,742 · Granted Sep 15, 2026

Systems and methods for artificial intelligence-guided biomolecule design and assessment

Inventors: Joshua Laniado (Los Angeles, CA); Julien Jorda (Los Angeles, CA); Matthias Maria Alessandro Malago (Santa Monica, CA); Thibault Marie Duplay (Los Angeles, CA); Mohamed El Hibouri (Los Angeles, CA); Lisa Juliette Madeleine Barel (Los Angeles, CA)
Assignee: Pythia Labs, Inc.
G16B15/20G16B15/30G16B40/20
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,738,342
App. No.
17/886,742
Granted
Sep 15, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Described herein are systems and methods for designing and testing custom biologic molecules in silico which are useful, for example, for the treatment, prevention, and diagnosis of disease. In particular, in certain embodiments, the biomolecule engineering technologies described herein employ artificial intelligence (AI) software modules to accurately predict performance of candidate biomolecules and/or portions thereof with respect to particular design criteria. In certain embodiments, the AI-powered modules described herein determine performance scores with respect to design criteria such as binding to a particular target. AI-computed performance scores may, for example, be used as objective functions for computer implemented optimization routines that efficiently search a landscape of potential protein backbone orientations and binding interface amino-acid sequences. By virtue of their modular design, AI-powered scoring modules can be used separately, or in combination, such as in a pipeline approach where different structural features of a custom biologic are optimized in succession.

Claims (44)

1 . A method for designing a custom biologic structure for binding to a target via an artificial intelligence (AI)-powered scaffold docker module, the method comprising:

(a) generating, by a processor of a computing device, a candidate scaffold model, wherein the candidate scaffold model is a representation of at least a portion of a candidate peptide backbone, wherein the candidate peptide backbone is a prospective backbone of the custom biologic structure being designed and wherein the candidate scaffold model (i) comprises representations of peptide backbone atoms identifying types and locations of peptide backbone atoms, but (ii) excluding side chains;

(b) generating, by the processor, for the candidate scaffold model, a plurality of prospective scaffold-target complex models, each representing at least a portion of a complex comprising the target and the candidate peptide backbone at a particular pose with respect to the target;

(c) for each of the plurality of prospective scaffold-target complex models, determining, by the processor, a scaffold pose score, wherein determining the scaffold pose score for each particular one of the one or more prospective scaffold-target complex models comprises:

generating, based on the particular scaffold-target complex model, a corresponding representation; and

using the corresponding representation as input to a machine learning model that determines, as output, the scaffold pose score for the particular scaffold-target complex model, said machine learning model having been trained using representations of native scaffold-target complex models, each representing a peptide backbone of a particular protein and/or peptide, as oriented at a particular pose with respect to a target, in an existing native protein-protein and/or protein-peptide example complex, and wherein the scaffold pose score is a likelihood that the particular scaffold-target complex model represents a native complex;

(d) selecting, by the processor, a subset of the plurality of prospective scaffold-target complex models using the determined scaffold pose scores; and

(e) providing the selected subset of prospective scaffold-target complex models for use in designing the custom biologic structure for binding to the target.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein step (e) comprises populating at least an interface region of one or more of the selected subset of prospective scaffold-target complex models with amino acid side chains to generate one or more ligand models for use in designing the custom biologic structure.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the target is a molecule associated with a particular disease.

4 . The method of claim 1 , comprising identifying, by the processor, an interface sub-region of the particular prospective scaffold-target complex model, the interface sub-region comprising representations of atoms of the candidate peptide backbone and/or target located in proximity to an interface between the candidate peptide backbone and/or target.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the candidate scaffold model includes, for at least a portion of amino acid sites of the candidate backbone, a first side chain atom as a placeholder of potential side chains to be added.

6 . The method of claim 5 , wherein for each of the portion of amino acid sites, the first side chain atom is a beta-carbon atom or a hydrogen atom.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the machine learning model is or comprises a neural network.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein step (a) comprises generating the candidate scaffold model by:

accessing a structural model of a template biologic; and

stripping at least a portion of amino acid side chain atoms from the structural model of the template biologic to generate the candidate scaffold model.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the candidate scaffold model is a computationally generated backbone representing a candidate backbone not necessarily occurring in nature.

10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the machine learning model is or comprises a neural network having been trained using training data comprising:

(A) a plurality of native complex models, each native complex model representing at least a portion of a native complex; and

(B) a plurality of artificially generated variant complex models.

11 . A system for designing a custom biologic structure for binding to a target via an artificial intelligence (AI)-powered scaffold docker module, the system comprising:

a processor of a computing device; and

a memory having instructions stored thereon, wherein the instructions, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to:

(a) generate a candidate scaffold model, wherein the candidate scaffold model is a representation of at least a portion of a candidate peptide backbone, wherein the candidate peptide backbone is a prospective backbone of the custom biologic structure being designed and wherein the candidate scaffold model (i) comprises representations of peptide backbone atoms identifying types and locations of peptide backbone atoms, but (ii) excluding side chains;

(b) generate, for the candidate scaffold model, a plurality of prospective scaffold-target complex models, each representing at least a portion of a complex comprising the target and the candidate peptide backbone at a particular pose with respect to the target;

(c) for each of the plurality of prospective scaffold-target complex models, determine a scaffold pose score, wherein determining the scaffold pose score for each particular one of the plurality of prospective scaffold-target complex models comprises:

generating, based on the particular scaffold-target complex model, a corresponding representation; and

using the corresponding representation as input to a machine learning model that determines, as output, the scaffold pose score for the particular scaffold-target complex model, said machine learning model having been trained using representations of native scaffold-target complex models, each representing a peptide backbone of a particular protein and/or peptide, as oriented at a particular pose with respect to a target, in an existing native protein-protein and/or protein-peptide example complex, and wherein the scaffold pose score is a likelihood that the particular scaffold-target complex model represents a native complex;

(d) select a subset of the plurality of prospective scaffold-target complex models using the determined scaffold pose scores; and

(e) provide the selected subset of prospective scaffold-target complex models for use in designing the custom biologic structure for binding to the target.

12 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the instructions, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to, in step (e), populate at least an interface region of one or more of the selected subset of prospective scaffold-target complex models with amino acid side chains to generate one or more ligand models for use in designing the custom biologic structure.

13 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the target is a molecule associated with a particular disease.

14 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the instructions cause the processor to identify an interface sub-region of the particular prospective scaffold-target complex model, the interface sub-region comprising representations of atoms of the candidate peptide backbone and/or target located in proximity to an interface between the candidate peptide backbone and/or target.

15 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the candidate scaffold model includes, for at least a portion of amino acid sites of the candidate backbone, a first side chain atom as a placeholder of potential side chains to be added.

16 . The system of claim 15 , wherein for each of the portion of amino acid sites, the first side chain atom is a beta-carbon atom or a hydrogen atom.

17 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the machine learning model is or comprises a neural network.

18 . The system of claim 11 , wherein, at step (a), the instructions cause the processor to generate the candidate scaffold model by:

accessing a structural model of a template biologic; and

stripping at least a portion of amino acid side chain atoms from the structural model of the template biologic to generate the candidate scaffold model.

19 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the candidate scaffold model is a computationally generated backbone representing a candidate backbone not necessarily occurring in nature.

20 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the machine learning model is or comprises a neural network having been trained using training data comprising:

(A) a plurality of native complex models, each native complex model representing at least a portion of a native complex; and

(B) a plurality of artificially generated variant complex models.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 24, 2022
From: PYTHIA INCORPORATED LIMITED
To: PYTHIA LABS, INC.
Reel/Frame 061296/0457 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 24, 2022
From: LANIADO, JOSHUA; JORDA, JULIEN; MALAGO, MATTHIAS MARIA ALESSANDRO; DUPLAY, THIBAULT MARIE; EL HIBOURI, MOHAMED; BAREL, LISA JULIETTE MADELEINE
To: PYTHIA INCORPORATED LIMITED
Reel/Frame 060881/0412 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 17384104 · Jul 23, 2021
Provisional Application 63224801 · Jul 22, 2021
Related Publication 20230034425A1 · Feb 2, 2023
References Cited (148)
US 5526281A · Chapman et al. · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 9296802B2 · Choi et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9373059B1 · Heifets et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 11256994B1 · Bucher et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11450407B1 · Laniado et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11742057B2 · Laniado et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11869629B2 · Laniado et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 12027235B1 · El Hibouri et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20020072864A1 · Lacroix et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020133297A1 · Yang et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020147547A1 · Desjarlais · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020177170A1 · Luo et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20040199334A1 · Kovesdi et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20120239367A1 · Tong et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130330335A1 · Bremel et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20150134315A1 · Sarmiento · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160300127A1 · Heifets · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20180260517A1 · Blattner et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180285731A1 · Heifets et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180341754A1 · Fan et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190272887A1 · Feinberg et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190325986A1 · Agarwal et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200342953A1 · Morrone et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210249105A1 · Madani et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210304847A1 · Senior et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220165366A1 · Zubarev et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220375538A1 · Das et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230022022A1 · Laniado et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230040576A1 · Laniado et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230083810A1 · Xu et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20240038337A1 · Laniado et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240096444A1 · Laniado et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240212785A1 · El Hibouri et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240355412A1 · Duplay et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240355413A1 · Duplay et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240371462A1 · Duplay et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
EP 3739589A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
KR 20210145059A · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2013040142A2 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2016086185A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018213767A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2020123302A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2023004116A1 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2024145068A2 · 2024 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2024216084A1 · 2024 [cited by applicant]
Anand, N.; Eguchi, R.; Huang, P.-S. Fully Differentiable Full-Atom Protein Backbone Generation. In ICLR 2019 Workshop: Deep Generative Models for Highly Structured Data; New Orleans, LA, 2019; pp. 1-10. [cited by examiner]
Andrusier, N.; Mashiach, E.; Nussinov, R.; Wolfson, H. J. Principles of Flexible Protein-Protein Docking. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics 2008, 73 (2), 271-289. [cited by examiner]
Gray, J. J.; Moughon, S.; Wang, C.; Schueler-Furman, O.; Kuhlman, B.; Rohl, C. A.; Baker, D. Protein-Protein Docking with Simultaneous Optimization of Rigid-Body Displacement and Side-Chain Conformations. Journal of Mol… [cited by examiner]
Huang, S.-Y. Search Strategies and Evaluation in Protein-Protein Docking: Principles, Advances and Challenges. Drug Discovery Today 2014, 19 (8), 1081-1096. [cited by examiner]
Meng, X.-Y.; Zhang, H.-X.; Mezei, M.; Cui, M. Molecular Docking: A Powerful Approach for Structure-Based Drug Discovery. CAD 2011, 7 (2), 146-157. [cited by examiner]
Zhou, P.; Wang, C.; Ren, Y.; Yang, C.; Tian, F. Computational Peptidology: A New and Promising Approach to Therapeutic Peptide Design. Current Medicinal Chemistry 2013, 20 (15), 1985-1996. [cited by examiner]
Huang, P.-S.; Ban, Y.-E. A.; Richter, F.; Andre, I.; Vernon, R.; Schief, W. R.; Baker, D. RosettaRemodel: A Generalized Framework for Flexible Backbone Protein Design. PLoS ONE 2011, 6 (8), e24109. [cited by examiner]
Kurcinski, M.; Kolinski, A. Hierarchical Modeling of Protein Interactions. Journal of Molecular Modeling 2007, 13 (6-7), 691-698. [cited by examiner]
Liu, Y.; Kuhlman, B. RosettaDesign Server for Protein Design. Nucleic Acids Research 2006, 34 (Web Server), W235-W238. [cited by examiner]
International Search Report for PCT/US2022/038014, filed Jul. 22, 2022, 4 pages, (mailed Nov. 15, 2022). [cited by applicant]
Senior, A.W. et al., Protein structure prediction using multiple deep neural networks in the 13th Critical Assessment of Protein Structure Prediction (CASP13), Proteins, 87(12):1141-1148 (2019). [cited by applicant]
Tien, M.Z. et al., Maximum allowed solvent accessibilites of residues in proteins, PLoS One, 8(11):e80635 (2013), 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Written Opinion for PCT/US2022/038014, filed Jul. 22, 2022, 8 pages, (mailed Nov. 15, 2022). [cited by applicant]
Satorras, V.G. et al., E(n) Equivariant Graph Neural Networks, Proc. 38th Int. Conf. Machine Learning, PMLR, 139, 10 pages, (2021). [cited by applicant]
Shrake, A. and Rupley, J.A., Environment and exposure to solvent of protein atoms. Lysozyme and insulin, J. Mol. Biol., 79(2):351-371 (1973). [cited by applicant]
Anand, N. et al., Protein Sequence Design With a Learned Potential, bioRxiv 2020.01.06.895466; 23 pages, (2020), doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.06.895466. [cited by applicant]
Gainza, P. et al., De novo design of site-specific protein interactions with learned surface fingerprints, bioRxiv preprint, 41 pages, (2022). [cited by applicant]
Gainza, P. et al., Deciphering interaction fingerprints from protein molecular surfaces using geometric deep learning, Nat. Methods, 17(2):184-192 (2020). [cited by applicant]
Ashtawy, Hossam Mohamed Farg., A Comparative Study of Machine-learning-based Scoring Functions in Predicting Protein-ligand Binding Affinity. Michigan State University. Electrical Engineering, 149 pages, (2011). [cited by applicant]
Cao, L. et al., De novo design of picomolar SARS-CoV-2 miniprotein inhibitors, Science, 370(6515):426-431, (2020). [cited by applicant]
Chevalier, A., et al., Massively parallel de novo protein design for targeted therapeutics, Nature 550:74-79, (2017). [cited by applicant]
Collaborative Computational Project, No. 4, The CCP4 Suite: Programs for Protein Crystallography, Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. D50:760-763 (1994). [cited by applicant]
Dauparas, J. et al., Robust deep learning based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN, bioRxiv preprint, 33 pages, (2022). [cited by applicant]
Dhariwal, P. and Nichol, A., Diffusion models beat GANs on image synthesis, arXiv preprint, 44 pages, (2021). [cited by applicant]
Gorski, K.M., et al., HEALPix—a Framework for high resolution discretization, and fast analysis of data distributed on the sphere, 622:759-771, (2005). [cited by applicant]
Hassan-Harrirou, H., et al., RosENet: Improving Binding Affinity Prediction by Leveraging Molecular Mechanics Energies with an Ensemble of 3D Convolutional Neural Networks, J. Chem. Inf. Model, 60(6):2791-2802, (2020). [cited by applicant]
Hsu, C. et al., Learning inverse folding from millions of predicted structures, bioRxiv preprint, 22 pages, (2022). [cited by applicant]
Ingraham, J. et al., Generative Models for Graph-Based Protein Design, 33rd Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2019), Vancouver, Canada, 12 pages, (2019). Retrieved online at: <https://proceedi… [cited by applicant]
Jiménez, J. et al., KDEEP: Protein-Ligand Absolute Binding Affinity Prediction via 3D-Convolutional Neural Networks, J. Chem. Inf. Model, 58(2):287-296, (2018). [cited by applicant]
Liu, Y. et al., Rotamer-free protein sequence design based on deep learning and self-consistency, Nature Computational Science, 19 pages, (2022). [cited by applicant]
McPartlon, M. et al., A deep SE(3)-equivariant model for learning inverse protein folding, bioRxiv preprint, 18 pages, (2022). [cited by applicant]
Pierce, B.G., et al., Accelerating Protein Docking in ZDOCK Using an Advanced 3D Convolution Library, PLoS ONE, e24657, 6(9):1-6, (2011). [cited by applicant]
Ragoza, M. et al., Protein-Ligand Scoring with Convolutional Neural Networks, J. Chem. Inf. Model, 57(4):942-957, (2017). [cited by applicant]
Shapovalov, M.S., and Dunbrack, R.L., Jr., A smoothed backbone-dependent rotamer library for proteins derived from adaptive kernel density estimates and regressions, Structure, 19(6):844-858, <https://www.cell.com/struc… [cited by applicant]
Strokach, A. et al., Fast and Flexible Protein Design Using Deep Graph Neural Networks, Cell Syst., 11(4):402-411, (2020). [cited by applicant]
The CCP4 Suite, Computer programs for protein crystallography, Overview and Manual, 130 pages,_Feb. 2006. [cited by applicant]
Wallach, I., et al., AtomNet: A Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Bioactivity Prediction in Structure-based Drug Discovery, 1-11, (2015). [cited by applicant]
Winn, M.D., et al., Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments, Acta Crystallogr. Section D, Biological Crystallography, ISSN 0907-4449, D67:235-242, (2011). [cited by applicant]
Yang, J. et al., Improved protein structure prediction using predicted interresidue orientations, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 117(3):1496-1503, (2020). [cited by applicant]
Yang, K. et al., Masked inverse folding with sequence transfer for protein representation learning, bioRxiv preprint, 16 pages, (2022). [cited by applicant]
Yershova, A., et al., Generating uniform incremental grids on SO(3) Using the Hopf Fibration, The Internation Journal of Robotics Research, 29:(7):801-812, (2010). [cited by applicant]
Zhang, Z. et al., Protein representation learning by geometric structure pretraining, arXiv preprint, 25 pages, (2022). [cited by applicant]
Lim, J. et al., Scaffold-based molecular design with a graph generative model, arXiv:1905.1369, 33 pages, (2019). [cited by applicant]
Lim, J. et al., Scaffold-based molecular design with a graph generative model, Chem. Sci., 11(4):1153-1164 (2020). [cited by applicant]
Lipman, Y. et al., Flow Matching for Generative Modeling, arXiv Preprint, available online at <https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.02747v1>, 24 pages, (Oct. 6, 2022). [cited by applicant]
Vaswani, A. et al., Attention Is All You Need, arXiv Preprint, available online at https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762, 15 pages, (Dec. 6, 2017). [cited by applicant]
Abdin, O. et al., PepNN: a deep attention model for the identification of peptide binding sites, Commun. Biol., 5(1):503 (2022). [cited by applicant]
Anand, N. and Achim, T., Protein Structure and Sequence Generation with Equivariant Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models, arXiv preprint, 18 pages, (2022), retrieved online at: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2205.15019.pdf. [cited by applicant]
Anand, N. and Huang, P., Generative modeling for protein structures, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 31 (NeurIPS 2018), 12 pages, (2018). [cited by applicant]
Bennett, N.R. et al., Atomically accurate de novo design of single-domain antibodies, bioRxiv preprint, 30 pages, (2024), retrieved online at: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.03.14.585103v1.full.pdf. [cited by applicant]
Berkholz, D.S. et al., Conformation Dependence of Backbone Geometry in Proteins, Structure, 17(10):1316-1325 (2009). [cited by applicant]
Bose, A.J. et al., SE(3)-Stochastic Flow Matching for Protein Backbone Generation, arXiv Preprint, available online at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.02391v1, 30 pages, (Oct. 3, 2023). [cited by applicant]
Campbell, A. et al., Generative Flows on Discrete State-Spaces: Enabling Multimodal Flows with Applications to Protein Co-Design, arXiv preprint, 52 pages, (2024), retrieved online at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.04997. [cited by applicant]
Chen, R.T.Q. and Lipman, Y., Riemannian Flow Matching on General Geometries, arXiv Preprint, available online at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.03660v1, 16 pages, (Feb. 7, 2023). [cited by applicant]
Darcet, T. et al., Vision Transformers Need Registers, arXiv Preprint, available online at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.16588, 16 pages, (Sep. 28, 2023). [cited by applicant]
Dauparas, J. et al., Robust deep learning-based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN, Science, 378(6615):49-56 (2022). [cited by applicant]
Jing, B. et al., AlphaFold Meets Flow Matching for Generating Protein Ensembles, 37th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2023), 13 pages, (2023). [cited by applicant]
Jing, B. et al., AlphaFold Meets Flow Matching for Generating Protein Ensembles, arXiv preprint, 26 pages, (2024), retrieved online at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.04845. [cited by applicant]
Jumper, J. et al., Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold, With Supplementary Information, Nature, 596(7873):583-589 (2021). [cited by applicant]
Lei, Y. et al., A deep-learning framework for multi-level peptide-protein interaction prediction, Nat. Commun., 12(1):5465 (2021). [cited by applicant]
Lin, Y. and Alquraishi, M., Generating Novel, Designable, and Diverse Protein Structures by Equivariantly Diffusing Oriented Residue Clouds, arXiv preprint, 25 pages, (2023), retrieved online at: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2… [cited by applicant]
Lin, Z. et al., Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic-level protein structure with a language model, Science, 379(6637):1123-1130 (2023). [cited by applicant]
Lipman, Y. et al., Flow Matching for Generative Modeling, Version 2 (V2), arXiv Preprint, available online at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.02747, 28 pages, (Feb. 8, 2023). [cited by applicant]
Liu, X., Implementation of structural bioinformatics in thromboinflammation studies, Maastricht University Doctoral Thesis, 161 pages, (2021). [cited by applicant]
McPartlon, M. and Xu, J., An end-to-end deep learning method for rotamer-free protein side-chain packing, bioRxiv preprint, 29 pages, (2022), retrieved online at: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.03.11.48381… [cited by applicant]
Meli, R. et al., Scoring Functions for Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction using Structure-Based Deep Learning: A Review, Front. Bioinform., 2:885983 (2022). [cited by applicant]
Nguyen, T. et al., GraphDTA: predicting drug-target binding affinity with graph neural networks, Bioinformatics, 37(8):1140-1147 (2021). [cited by applicant]
Peebles, W. and Xie, S., Scalable Diffusion Models with Transformers, arXiv Preprint, available online at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.09748, 25 pages, (Mar. 2, 2023). [cited by applicant]
Serrano, L., A friendly introduction to Recurrent Neural Networks, YouTube screen captures, 4 pages, (2017), retrieved online at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UNmqTiOnRfg. [cited by applicant]
Shi, W. et al., Graphsite: Ligand-binding site classification using Deep Graph Neural Network, bioRxiv preprint, 13 pages, (2021), retrieved online at: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.06.471420v1.full.pd… [cited by applicant]
Stark, H. et al., Dirichlet Flow Matching with Applications to DNA Sequence Design, arXiv preprint, 19 pages, (2024), retrieved online at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.05841. [cited by applicant]
Su, J. et al., RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embedding, arXiv Preprint, available online at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.09864, 14 pages, (Aug. 9, 2022). [cited by applicant]
Trippe, B.L. et al., Diffusion probabilistic modeling of protein backbones in 3D for the motif-scaffolding problem, arXiv Preprint, available online at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.04119, 30 pages, (Mar. 20, 2023). [cited by applicant]
Van Hall-Beauvais, A.K., De novo designed proteins: a study in engineering novel folds and functions, 183 pages, (2023). [cited by applicant]
Wang, C. et al., Proteus: pioneering protein structure generation for enhanced designability and efficiency, bioRxiv preprint, 13 pages, (2024), retrieved online at: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.02.10.57… [cited by applicant]
Watson, J.L. et al., De novo design of protein structure and function with RFdiffusion, Nature, 620(7976):1089-1100 (2023). [cited by applicant]
Yim, J. et al., Fast protein backbone generation with SE(3) flow matching, arXiv Preprint, available online at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.05297, 8 pages, (Oct. 10, 2023). [cited by applicant]
Yim, J. et al., Improved motif-scaffolding with SE(3) flow matching, arXiv preprint, 22 pages, (2024), retrieved online at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.04082. [cited by applicant]
Yim, J. et al., SE(3) diffusion model with application to protein backbone generation, arXiv preprint, 39 pages, (2023), retrieved online at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.02277. [cited by applicant]
Zhang, Y. and Skolnick, J., Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality, Proteins, 57(4):702-710 (2004). [cited by applicant]
Zhang, Y. et al., DiffPack: A Torsional Diffusion Model for Autoregressive Protein Side-Chain Packing, 37th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2023), 23 pages, (submitted Jun. 1, 2023, revised … [cited by applicant]
Chen, R.T.Q. et al., Neural Ordinary Differential Equations, arXiv: 1806.07366, 18 pages, (2019). [cited by applicant]
Anand, R. et al., RNA-Frameflow: Flow Matching for de novo 3D RNA Backbone Design, arXiv, 17 pages, (2024), retrieved online at: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2406.13839. [cited by applicant]
Avdeyev, P. et al., Dirichlet Diffusion Score Model for Biological Sequence Generation, arXiv, 26 pages, (2023), retrieved online at: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.10699. [cited by applicant]
Boll, B. et al., Generative Assignment Flows for Representing and Learning Joint Distributions of Discrete Data, arXiv, 30 pages, (2024), retrieved online at: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2406.04527. [cited by applicant]
Boll, B. et al., Generative Modeling of Discrete Joint Distributions by E-Geodesic Flow Matching on Assignment Manifolds, arXiv, 13 pages, (2024), retrieved online at: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2402.07846. [cited by applicant]
Campbell, A. et al., Generative Flows on Discrete State-Spaces: Enabling Multimodal Flows with Applications to Protein Co-Design, arXiv, 60 pages, (2024), retrieved online at: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2402.04997. [cited by applicant]
Cheng, C. et al., Categorical Flow Matching on Statistical Manifolds, arXiv, 23 pages, (2024), retrieved online at: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2405.16441. [cited by applicant]
Davis, O. et al., Fisher Flow Matching for Generative Modeling over Discrete Data, arXiv, 23 pages, (2024), retrieved online at: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2405.14664. [cited by applicant]
Dunn, I. and Koes, D.R., Mixed Continuous and Categorical Flow Matching for 3D De Novo Molecule Generation, arXiv, 19 pages, (2024), retrieved online at: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2404.19739. [cited by applicant]
Gat, I. et al., Discrete Flow Matching, arXiv, 37 pages, (2024), retrieved online at: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2407.15595. [cited by applicant]
Guo, X. et al., Generating tertiary protein structures via interpretable graph variational autoencoders, Bioinform. Adv., 1(1):vbab036 (2021). [cited by applicant]
Huang, H. et al., G-VAE, a Geometric Convolutional VAE for ProteinStructure Generation, arXiv, 14 pages, (2021). [cited by applicant]
Jing, B. et al., AlphaFold Meets Flow Matching for Generating Protein Ensembles, arXiv, 27 pages, (2024), retrieved online at: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2402.04845. [cited by applicant]
Lee, S.L. and Kim, P.M., FlowPacker: Protein side-chain packing with torsional flow matching, bioRxiv preprint, 14 pages, (2024), retrieved online at: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.07.05.602280v1.full.pdf. [cited by applicant]
Lin, H. et al., PPFlow: Target-Aware Peptide Design with Torsional Flow Matching, bioRxiv preprint, 18 pages, (2024), retrieved online at: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.03.07.583831v1.full.pdf. [cited by applicant]
Luo, S. et al., Antigen-Specific Antibody Design and Optimization with Diffusion-Based Generative Models for Protein Structures, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 (NeurIPS 2022), 14 pages, (2022). [cited by applicant]
Nisonoff, H. et al., Unlocking Guidance for Discrete State-Space Diffusion and Flow Models, arXiv, 47 pages, (2024), retrieved online at: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2406.01572v1. [cited by applicant]
Quijano-Rubio, A. et al., The advent of de novo proteins for cancer immunotherapy, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 56:119-128 (2020). [cited by applicant]
Schoeder, C.T. et al., Modeling Immunity with Rosetta: Methods for Antibody and Antigen Design, Biochemistry, 60(11):825-846 (2021). [cited by applicant]
Song, Y. et al., Equivariant Flow Matching with Hybrid Probability Transport for 3D Molecule Generation, arXiv, 20 pages, (2023), retrieved online at: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2312.07168. [cited by applicant]
Stark, H. et al., Dirichlet Flow Matching with Applications to DNA Sequence Design, arXiv, 19 pages, (2024), retrieved online at: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2402.05841. [cited by applicant]
Stark, H. et al., Harmonic Self-Conditioned Flow Matching for Multi-Ligand Docking and Binding Site Design, arXiv, 27 pages, (2024), retrieved online at: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2310.05764. [cited by applicant]