Accelerating application modernization
Various embodiments of the present technology generally relate to the characterization and improvement of software applications. More specifically, some embodiments relate to systems and methods for modeling code behavior and generating new versions of the code based on the code behavior models. In some embodiments, a method of improving a codebase includes recording a run of the existing code, characterizing the code behavior via one or more models, prototyping new code according to a target language and target environment, deploying the new code to the target environment, and comparing the behavior of the new code to the behavior of the existing code. In some implementations, generating new code based on the behavior models includes using one or more machine learning techniques for code generation based on the target language and environment.
1. A computer-implemented method of updating software code, the method comprising:
recording a run of existing code written in a first programming language;
interrogating the recording to generate a behavior model of the run, wherein the behavior model represents a behavior of the existing code, and wherein interrogating the recording comprises:
identifying and labeling one or more functional areas of the existing code,
identifying decision points and code branches between functional areas of the existing code, and
identifying one or more code paths connecting steps performed by the existing code;
providing the behavior model and a target programming language as input to an artificial intelligence algorithm trained to generate new code based on the input, wherein:
the new code, when executed, mimics the behavior of the existing code,
the new code is written in the target programming language, and
the target programming language is a different programming language than the first programming language;
receiving, as output from the artificial intelligence algorithm, the new code; and
deploying the new code to a target environment.
2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:
generating a graphical depiction of the behavior model.
3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:
generating an architecture depiction of the existing code, wherein the architecture depiction depicts one or more features of the existing code.
4. The computer-implemented method of claim 3 , wherein generating the architecture depiction further comprises generating a high-level view of the existing code by rolling up the one or more code paths.
5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:
characterizing the existing code based on the behavior model, wherein characterizing the existing code based on the behavior model comprises:
characterizing one or more features of the existing code; and
characterizing one or more of dependencies, logic, and data queries.
6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:
recording a run of the new code;
interrogating the recording of the run of the new code to generate a second behavior model of the run of the new code; and
generating a graphical depiction of the behavior model and the second behavior model.
7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:
comparing behavior of the new code to one or more of the behavior of the existing code, predicted behavior of the new code, and desired behavior of the new code.
8. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:
recording a run of a second version of the existing code;
interrogating the recording of the run of the second version to generate a second behavior model; and
generating a graphical depiction of the behavior model and the second behavior model.
9. A system comprising:
one or more processors; and
a memory having program instructions stored thereon that, upon execution by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to:
record a run of existing code written in a first programming language,
interrogate the recording to generate a behavior model of the run, wherein the behavior model represents a behavior of the existing code, and wherein interrogating the recording comprises:
identifying and labeling one or more functional areas of the existing code;
identifying decision points and code branches between functional areas of the existing code; and
identifying one or more code paths connecting steps performed by the existing code,
provide the behavior model and a target programming language as input to an artificial intelligence algorithm trained to generate new code based on the input, wherein:
the new code, when executed, mimics the behavior of the existing code;
the new code is written in the target programming language; and
the target programming language is a different programming language than the first programming language,
receive, as output from the artificial intelligence algorithm, the new code, and
deploy the new code to a target environment.
10. The system of claim 9 , wherein the memory comprises further program instructions that, upon execution by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to:
generate a graphical depiction of the behavior model.
11. The system of claim 9 , wherein the memory comprises further program instructions that, upon execution by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to:
generate an architecture depiction of the existing code, wherein the architecture depiction depicts one or more features of the existing code.
12. The system of claim 11 , wherein the program instructions to generate the architecture depiction comprise further program instructions that, upon execution by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to:
generate a high-level view of the existing code by rolling up the one or more code paths.
13. The system of claim 9 , wherein the memory comprises further program instructions that, upon execution by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to:
characterize one or more features of the existing code; and
characterize one or more of dependencies, logic, and data queries.
14. The system of claim 9 , wherein the memory comprises further program instructions that, upon execution by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to:
record a run of the new code;
interrogate the recording of the run of the new code to generate a second behavior model of the run of the new code; and
generate a graphical depiction of the behavior model and the second behavior model.
15. The system of claim 9 , wherein the memory comprises further program instructions that, upon execution by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to:
compare behavior of the new code to one or more of the behavior of the existing code, predicted behavior of the new code, and desired behavior of the new code.
16. The system of claim 9 , wherein the program instructions to generate the behavior model comprise further program instructions that, upon execution by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to:
record a run of a second version of the existing code;
interrogate the recording of the run of the second version to generate a second behavior model; and
generate a graphical depiction of the behavior model and the second behavior model.
17. A computer-readable storage device having stored thereon instructions that, upon execution by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to:
record a run of existing code written in a first programming language;
interrogate the recording to generate a behavior model of the run, wherein the behavior model represents a behavior of the existing code, and wherein interrogating the recording comprises:
identifying one or more functional areas of the existing code,
identifying decision points and code branches between functional areas of the existing code, and
identifying one or more code paths connecting steps performed by the existing code;
provide the behavior model and a target programming language as input to an artificial intelligence algorithm trained to generate new code based on the input, wherein:
the new code, when executed, mimics the behavior of the existing code,
the new code is written in the target programming language, and
the target programming language is a different programming language than the first programming language; and
deploy the new code to a target environment.
18. The computer-readable storage device of claim 17 , having stored thereon further instructions that, upon execution by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to:
generate a graphical depiction of the behavior model.
19. The computer-readable storage device of claim 17 , having stored thereon further instructions that, upon execution by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to:
generate an architecture depiction of the existing code, wherein the architecture depiction depicts one or more features of the existing code.
20. The computer-readable storage device of claim 19 , wherein the instructions to generate the architecture depiction comprise further instructions that, upon execution by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to:
generate a high-level view of the existing code by rolling up the one or more code paths.