Using historical data for subrogation on a distributed ledger
Systems and methods are disclosed with respect to using a blockchain for managing the subrogation claim process related to a vehicle accident, in particular, utilizing historical data related to a vehicle or vehicle collisions as part of the subrogation process. An exemplary embodiment may include receiving historical sensor data, such as image, audio, telematics, and/or autonomous vehicle data, associated with a past vehicle collision; inputting the historical sensor data into a machine learning program to determine data relevant to a past vehicle collision; receiving current sensor data associated with a current vehicle collision; inputting the current sensor data into the machine learning program to determine data relevant to the current vehicle collision; and determining a percentage of fault of the vehicle collision for one or more autonomous vehicles, autonomous vehicle systems, and/or drivers based upon, at least in part, analysis of the historical sensor data and the current sensor data.
1. A computer-implemented method of handling an insurance claim via a shared ledger, the method comprising:
receiving, at one or more processors, historical sensor data associated with a past vehicle collision;
inputting, at the one or more processors, the historical sensor data into an algorithm, the algorithm being a machine learning algorithm that is trained by the historical sensor data to determine a percentage of fault for human drivers or self-driving vehicles;
receiving, at the one or more processors, current sensor data associated with a vehicle collision;
inputting, at the one or more processors, the current sensor data into the machine learning algorithm to determine a percentage of fault of the current vehicle collision for a human driver or a self-driving vehicle;
adding, at the one or more processors, a block to a blockchain with an indication of the determined percentage of fault determined by the trained machine learning algorithm; and
automatically processing and/or adjusting, at the one or more processors, an insurance claim via the blockchain.
2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:
receiving, at the one or more processors, an electronic arbitration demand associated with the vehicle collision; and
generating, at the one or more processors, a recommendation based upon, at least in part, analysis of the percentage of fault and the electronic arbitration demand.
3. The computer-implemented method of claim 2 , further comprising:
generating, at the one or more processors, a new block including the recommendation or a link thereto; and
adding, at the one or more processors, the new block to the blockchain.
4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the sensor data is generated by smart infrastructure or by a vehicle not involved in the vehicle collision.
5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the sensor data includes telematics data collected by another vehicle in the vicinity of the vehicle collision.
6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:
receiving, at the one or more processors, an electronic notification of the vehicle collision generated by the vehicle from analysis of sensor data generated by one or more vehicle-mounted sensors.
7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:
receiving, at the one or more processors, an electronic notification of the vehicle collision generated by the vehicle from analysis of image data generated by one or more vehicle-mounted sensors or cameras.
8. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:
receiving, at the one or more processors, an electronic notification of the vehicle collision generated by the vehicle from analysis of telematics data generated by one or more vehicle-mounted sensors.
9. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:
receiving, at the one or more processors, an electronic notification of the vehicle collision generated by the vehicle from analysis of sensor data generated by one or more vehicle-mounted sensors, and sensor or other data, such as telematics data, received from the vehicle and one or more nearby vehicles in the vicinity of the vehicle collision location.
10. A computer-implemented method of handling an insurance claim via a shared ledger, the method comprising:
receiving, at one or more processors, historical sensor data associated with a past vehicle collision;
inputting, at the one or more processors, the historical sensor data into an algorithm, the algorithm being a machine learning algorithm that is trained by the historical sensor data to: (i) determine a percentage of fault for human drivers or self-driving vehicles, and (ii) determine data relevant to a past vehicle collision;
receiving, at the one or more processors, current sensor data associated with a current vehicle collision;
inputting, at the one or more processors, the current sensor data into the machine learning algorithm to determine: (i) that a vehicle was under autonomous control before, during, and/or after the current vehicle collision, and (ii) a percentage of fault for the vehicle determined to be under autonomous control;
adding, at the one or more processors, a block to a blockchain with an indication of the determined percentage of fault for the vehicle determined to be under autonomous control; and
automatically processing and/or adjusting, at the one or more processors, an insurance claim via the blockchain.
11. The computer-implemented method of claim 10 , further comprising:
receiving, at the one or more processors, an electronic arbitration demand associated with the vehicle collision; and
generating, at the one or more processors, a recommendation based upon, at least in part, analysis of the percentage of fault and the electronic arbitration demand.
12. The computer-implemented method of claim 11 , further comprising:
generating, at the one or more processors, a new block including the recommendation or a link thereto; and
adding, at the one or more processors, the new block to the blockchain.
13. The computer-implemented method of claim 10 , wherein the sensor data is generated by smart infrastructure or by a vehicle not involved in the vehicle collision.
14. The computer-implemented method of claim 10 , wherein the sensor data includes telematics data collected by the vehicle, a mobile device traveling within the vehicle, another vehicle in the vicinity of the vehicle collision, or combinations thereof.
15. A computer system for providing data relevant to collisions and subrogation claims by interacting with a distributed ledger maintained by a plurality of participants, the system comprising:
a network interface configured to interface with one or more processors;
one or more sensors;
a memory configured to store non-transitory computer executable instructions and configured to interface with the one or more processors; and
the one or more processors configured to interface with the memory, wherein the one or more processors are configured to execute the non-transitory computer executable instructions to cause the one or more processors to:
receive historical sensor data associated with a past vehicle collision;
input the historical sensor data into a machine learning algorithm to train the machine learning algorithm to determine a percentage of fault for human drivers or self-driving vehicles;
receive current sensor data associated with a current vehicle collision;
input the current sensor data into the machine learning algorithm to determine a percentage of fault of the current vehicle collision for a human driver or a self-driving vehicle;
add a block to a blockchain with an indication of the determined percentage of fault determined by the trained machine learning algorithm; and
automatically process and/or adjust, at the one or more processors, an insurance claim via the blockchain.
16. The system of claim 15 , wherein the one or more processors are further configured to execute the non-transitory computer executable instructions to cause the one or more processors to:
receive an electronic arbitration demand associated with the vehicle collision; and
generate a recommendation based upon, at least in part, analysis of the percentage of fault and the electronic arbitration demand.
17. The system of claim 16 , wherein the one or more processors are further configured to execute the non-transitory computer executable instructions to cause the one or more processors to:
generate a new block including the recommendation or a link thereto; and
add the new block to the blockchain.
18. The system of claim 15 , wherein the sensor data is generated by smart infrastructure or by a vehicle not involved in the vehicle collision.
19. The system of claim 15 , wherein the one or more processors are further configured to execute the non-transitory computer executable instructions to cause the one or more processors to:
receive an electronic notification of the vehicle collision generated by the vehicle from analysis of sensor data generated by one or more vehicle-mounted sensors.
20. The system of claim 15 , wherein:
the processor is further configured to execute the non-transitory computer executable instructions to cause the processor to add, to the blockchain, an additional block including an electronic subrogation demand;
the electronic subrogation demand is based on the determined percentage of fault, and wherein the electronic subrogation demand includes one or more line items directed to medical expenses; and
the processor is further configured to execute the non-transitory computer executable instructions to cause the processor to add, to the blockchain, a block including a hash of the electronic subrogation demand.