IP Library Granted Patent US 12,585,147
Granted Patent B2
US 12,585,147 · App. 17/898,147 · Granted Mar 24, 2026

Parallel microcavity trimming by structured-laser illumination

Inventors: Christopher Louis Panuski (Somerville, MA); Ian Robert Christen (Cambridge, MA); Dirk Robert Englund (Brookline, MA)
Assignee: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
G02F1/025B23K26/362B23K2101/40
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,585,147
App. No.
17/898,147
Granted
Mar 24, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods and systems are described for precisely adjusting characteristics of microfabricated devices after device fabrication. The adjustments can be carried out in parallel on a plurality of the microfabricated devices. By carrying out the adjustment process, uniformity of feature sizes to a few picometers (one standard deviation) and corresponding uniformity of operating characteristics for a plurality of microfabricated devices are possible.

Claims (20)

1 . A method for adjusting characteristics of a plurality of microfabricated devices in parallel, the method comprising:

measuring an initial characteristic of each microfabricated device of the plurality of microfabricated devices;

determining, based on the initial characteristics for each microfabricated device, a target characteristic;

selecting two or more microfabricated devices from among the plurality of microfabricated devices whose characteristics should be adjusted toward the target characteristic;

directing a plurality of optical beams onto the two or more microfabricated devices to thereby adjust in parallel the characteristics of the two or more microfabricated devices toward the target characteristic;

measuring in parallel an adjusted characteristic of each microfabricated device of the two or more microfabricated devices; and

determining whether the adjusted characteristics measured for the two or more microfabricated devices are within an acceptable range of values.

2 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

heating the two or more microfabricated devices with the plurality of optical beams; and

forming a layer of oxide on each microfabricated device of the two or more microfabricated devices.

3 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the layer of oxide has a same thickness on each microfabricated device of the two or more microfabricated devices that have their characteristics adjusted in parallel.

4 . The method of claim 2 , further comprising limiting a number of the selected two or more microfabricated devices that border a non-selected microfabricated device of the plurality of microfabricated devices to reduce unwanted oxidation of the non-selected microfabricated device.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein each microfabricated device of the plurality of microfabricated devices comprises an optical waveguide.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein each microfabricated device of the plurality of microfabricated devices comprises an optical modulator having a micro-ring resonator and the characteristic is a resonant frequency of the micro-ring resonator.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein each microfabricated device of the plurality of microfabricated devices comprises an optical microcavity formed in a semiconductor layer and the characteristic is a resonant wavelength of the optical microcavity.

8 . The method of claim 7 , wherein the acceptable range of values is a standard deviation of the resonant wavelengths measured for each optical microcavity, the standard deviation having a value between 1 picometer (pm) and 100 pm.

9 . The method of claim 7 , wherein the acceptable range of values is a standard deviation of the resonant wavelengths measured for each optical microcavity, the standard deviation having a value between 1 pm and 20 pm.

10 . The method of claim 7 , wherein the acceptable range of values is a standard deviation of the resonant wavelengths measured for each optical microcavity, the standard deviation having a value between 1 pm and 5 pm.

11 . The method of claim 7 , further comprising waiting for a period of time after exposing in parallel each microfabricated device of the two or more microfabricated devices to allow moisture to re-adsorb to the optical microcavity.

12 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising forming the plurality of optical beams from a single optical beam using a phase mask, such that each optical beam of the plurality of optical beams has a same power level to within 5% of an average power level for the plurality of optical beams.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 7, 2022
From: PANUSKI, CHRISTOPHER LOUIS; CHRISTEN, IAN ROBERT; ENGLUND, DIRK ROBERT
To: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
Reel/Frame 061346/0869 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20240069368A1 · Feb 29, 2024
References Cited (36)
US 8077313B2 · Furuki · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 9638632B2 · Bornhop · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 11022826B2 · Panuski et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20180217412A1 · Koponen · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20210240016A1 · Panuski et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
Asano et al. “Photonic crystal nanocavity with a Q factor exceeding eleven million.” Optics express 25.3 (2017): 1769-1777. [cited by applicant]
Benea-Chelmus et al. “Electro-optic spatial light modulator from an engineered organic layer.” Nature communications 12.1 (2021): 1-10. [cited by applicant]
Chen et al. “Selective tuning of high-Q silicon photonic crystal nanocavities via laser-assisted local oxidation.” Optics express 19.13 (2011): 12480-12489. [cited by applicant]
Chung et al. “A monolithically integrated large-scale optical phased array in silicon-on-insulator CMOS.” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits 53.1 (2017): 275-296. [cited by applicant]
Hassan et al. “Ultra-high frame rate digital light projector using chipscale LED-on-CMOS technology.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.13586 (2021), 20 pages. [cited by applicant]
Horie et al. “High-speed, phase-dominant spatial light modulation with silicon-based active resonant antennas.” Acs Photonics 5.5 (2017): 1711-1717. [cited by applicant]
Hornbeck “128× 128 deformable mirror device.” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices 30.5 (1983): 539-545. [cited by applicant]
Hu et al. “Experimental realization of deep-subwavelength confinement in dielectric optical resonators.” Science advances 4.8 (2018): eaat2355, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Kim et al. “A single-chip optical phased array in a wafer-scale silicon photonics/CMOS 3D-integration platform.” IEEE Journal of solid-state circuits 54.11 (2019): 3061-3074. [cited by applicant]
Lee et al. “Local tuning of photonic crystal nanocavity modes by laser-assisted oxidation.” Applied Physics Letters 95.19 (2009): 191109, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
Li et al. “Electrically-controlled digital metasurface device for light projection displays.” Nature communications 11.1 (2020): 1-7. [cited by applicant]
Lie et al. “High pressure oxidation of silicon in dry oxygen.” Journal of The Electrochemical Society 129.12 (1982): 2828 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Mcknight et al. “256× 256 liquid-crystal-on-silicon spatial light modulator.” Applied Optics 33.14 (1994): 2775-2784. [cited by applicant]
Minkov et al. “Automated optimization of photonic crystal slab cavities.” Scientific reports 4.1 (2014): 1-8. [cited by applicant]
Minkov et al. “Photonic crystal slab cavity simultaneously optimized for ultra-high Q/V and vertical radiation coupling.” Applied Physics Letters 111.13 (2017): 131104, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Nozaki et al. “Sub-femtojoule all-optical switching using a photonic-crystal nanocavity.” Nature Photonics 4.7 (2010): 477-483. [cited by applicant]
Panuski et al. “A full degree-of-freedom photonic crystal spatial light modulator.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.10302 (2022), 25 pages. [cited by applicant]
Park et al. “All-solid-state spatial light modulator with independent phase and amplitude control for three-dimensional LiDAR applications.” Nature nanotechnology 16.1 (2021): 69-76. [cited by applicant]
Peng et al. “Design of high-speed phase-only spatial light modulators with two-dimensional tunable microcavity arrays.” Optics express 27.21 (2019): 30669-30680. [cited by applicant]
Piccardo et al. “Roadmap on multimode light shaping.” Journal of Optics 24.1 (2021): 013001, 54 pages. [cited by applicant]
Poulton et al. “8192-element optical phased array with 100° steering range and flip-chip CMOS.” Cleo: QELS_Fundamental Science. Optical Society of America, 2020, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
Rogers et al. “A universal 3D imaging sensor on a silicon photonics platform.” Nature 590.7845 (2021): 256-261. [cited by applicant]
Shaltout et al. “Spatiotemporal light control with active metasurfaces.” Science 364.6441 (2019): eaat3100 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Shirmanesh et al. “Electro-optically tunable multifunctional metasurfaces.” ACS nano 14.6 (2020): 6912-6920. [cited by applicant]
Shuai et al. “Coupled bilayer photonic crystal slab electro-optic spatial light modulators.” IEEE Photonics Journal 9.2 (2017): 1-11. [cited by applicant]
Smolyaninov et al. “Programmable plasmonic phase modulation of free-space wavefronts at gigahertz rates.” Nature Photonics 13.6 (2019): 431-435. [cited by applicant]
Sun et al. “Large-scale nanophotonic phased array.” Nature 493.7431 (2013): 195-199. [cited by applicant]
Tzang et al. “Wavefront shaping in complex media with a 350 kHz modulator via a 1D-to-2D transform.” Nature Photonics 13.11 (2019): 788-793. [cited by applicant]
Wang et al. “2D broadband beamsteering with large-scale MEMS optical phased array.” Optica 6.5 (2019): 557-562. [cited by applicant]
Wang et al. “Optically reconfigurable metasurfaces and photonic devices based on phase change materials.” Nature photonics 10.1 (2016): 60-65. [cited by applicant]
Yang et al. “High speed optical phased array using high contrast grating all-pass filters.” Optics express 22.17 (2014): 20038-20044. [cited by applicant]