IP Library Granted Patent US 11,933,767
Granted Patent B2
US 11,933,767 · App. 17/902,609 · Granted Mar 19, 2024

Microtexture region characterization systems and methods

Inventors: Yong Tian (Avon, CT); Ronald Roberts (Ames, IA); Dan Barnard (Ames, IA)
Assignees: RTX CORPORATION; IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION, INC.
G01N29/4445G01N29/043G01N29/07G01N29/4427G01N29/50G01N2291/0234G01N2291/0289
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,933,767
App. No.
17/902,609
Granted
Mar 19, 2024
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present disclosure provides methods and systems for the characterization of a potential microtexture region (MTR) of a sample, component, or the like. The methods may include determining a threshold width of spatial correlation coefficient and/or a threshold spatial correlation coefficient slope for an actual MTR, characterizing a potential MTR as an actual MTR or a defect, characterizing an actual MTR as an acceptable MTR or not, and/or characterizing various components with potential MTRs as defective or not. The characterization may include calculating a width of spatial correlation coefficient and/or a spatial correlation coefficient slope of the potential MTR and comparing the width of spatial correlation coefficient to a threshold width of spatial correlation coefficient and/or comparing the spatial correlation coefficient slope to a threshold spatial correlation coefficient slope for the potential MTR to be characterized as an actual MTR or a defect (crack).

Claims (12)

1. A method, comprising:

scanning a batch of components with an ultrasonic transducer to form a scanned data set for each of the batch of components;

determining a microtexture level indicator for each of a plurality of regions for each of the batch of components based on the scanned data set for each of the batch of components;

separating a portion of the batch of components in response to each of the portion of the batch of components including one or more potential microtexture regions (MTRs) from the batch of components, wherein each of the one or more potential MTRs is determined based on the microtexture level indicator, each of the one or more potential MTRs including an area of interest;

analyzing a spatial correlation coefficient profile of each of the one or more potential MTRs along an elongation direction relative to the area of interest;

characterizing each of the one or more potential MTRs for each of the portion of the batch of components as an actual MTR, a rejectable MTR, or a defect; and

scrapping a component of the portion of the batch of components in response to at least one of the one or more potential MTRs of the component being characterized as the defect or the rejectable MTR.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the microtexture level indicator comprises at least one of an average peak factor, a standard deviation of peak amplitudes, and a baseband bandwidth.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein each of the one or more potential MTRs is determined by calculating the microtexture level indicator or possessing at least one of a rejectable indication or a marginally rejectable indication that resulted from an ultrasonic crack inspection.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein each of the one or more potential MTRs is determined in response to at least one of a high amplitude spot in an area with MTR content as identified by the microtexture level indicator, the rejectable indication, or the marginally rejectable indication as defined by comparing a maximum amplitude at the potential MTR to an established threshold amplitude in the ultrasonic crack inspection.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein analyzing the spatial correlation coefficient profile for each of the one or more potential MTRs further comprises comparing a width of spatial correlation coefficient of the area of interest with a threshold width of spatial correlation coefficient for the potential MTR to be characterized as the actual MTR.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein analyzing the spatial correlation coefficient profile for each of the one or more potential MTRs further comprises comparing a spatial correlation coefficient slope from the area of interest to an adjacent position with a threshold spatial correlation coefficient slope for the potential MTR to be characterized as the actual MTR, and wherein analyzing the spatial correlation coefficient profile further comprises comparing a width of spatial correlation coefficient of the potential MTR with a second threshold width of spatial correlation coefficient for the actual MTR to be characterized as an acceptable MTR.

Assignments (4)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jul 27, 2023
From: RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
To: RTX CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 064402/0837 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 14, 2022
From: ROBERTS, RONALD; BARNARD, DAN
To: IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION, INC.
Reel/Frame 061093/0585 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Sep 2, 2022
From: UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
To: RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 061362/0028 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 2, 2022
From: TIAN, YONG
To: UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 061376/0467 →
Continuity (3)
Division 16818946 · Mar 13, 2020
Provisional Application 62897887 · Sep 9, 2019
Related Publication 20230003694A1 · Jan 5, 2023