IP Library Granted Patent US 12,731,022
Granted Patent B2
US 12,731,022 · App. 17/920,778 · Granted Sep 8, 2026

Misalignment-resilient diffractive optical neural networks

Inventors: Aydogan Ozcan (Los Angeles, CA); Deniz Mengu (Los Angeles, CA); Yair Rivenson (Los Angeles, CA)
Assignee: THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
G06N3/067G06N3/0675
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,731,022
App. No.
17/920,778
Granted
Sep 8, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A diffractive optical neural network includes one more layers that are resilient to misalignments, fabrication-related errors, detector noise, and/or other sources of error. A diffractive optical neural network model is first trained with a computing device to perform a statistical inference task such as image classification (e.g., object classification). The model is trained using images or training optical signals along with random misalignments of the plurality of layers, fabrication-related errors, input plane or output plane misalignments, and/or detector noise, followed by computing an optical output of the diffractive optical neural network model through optical transmission and/or reflection resulting from the diffractive optical neural network and iteratively adjusting complex-valued transmission and/or reflection coefficients for each layer until optimized transmission/reflection coefficients are obtained. Once the model is optimized, the physical embodiment of the diffractive optical neural network is manufactured.

Claims (39)

1 . A method of forming a diffractive optical neural network comprising one or more layers that are resilient to misalignments, fabrication-related errors, detector noise, and/or other sources of error comprising:

training with a computing device a diffractive optical neural network model to perform one or more specific optical functions for a transmissive and/or reflective optical neural network having one or more optically transmissive and/or optically reflective physical features located in different two dimensional locations in each of the one or more layers, wherein the training comprises feeding an input plane of the diffractive optical neural network model with training images or training optical signals along with random misalignments of the one or more diffractive layers, fabrication-related errors, input plane or output plane misalignments, and/or detector noise, followed by computing an optical output of the diffractive optical neural network model through optical transmission and/or reflection resulting from the optical neural network and iteratively adjusting complex-valued transmission and/or reflection coefficients for each layer until optimized transmission/reflection coefficients are obtained; and

manufacturing or having manufactured a physical embodiment of the diffractive optical neural network comprising at least one transmissive and/or reflective layers having physical features that match the optimized transmission/reflection coefficients obtained by the training of diffractive optical neural network model.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the random misalignments comprise displacement vectors in an x, y, and/or z directions for one or more of the layers and/or displacement vectors in the input plane and/or output plane, wherein x, y, and z are directions in three-dimensional space.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein one or more of the layers comprise reconfigurable spatial light modulators.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the random misalignment comprises in-plane rotation of one or more of the layers, input plane, and/or output plane.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the fabrication-related errors comprise additive printing or 3D fabrication errors.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the physical embodiment of the diffractive optical neural network has an inference performance that is within a range of the inference performance of an equivalent diffractive optical neural network that does not have any misalignments, fabrication-related errors, and/or other sources of error taken into account during training.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the physical diffractive optical neural network outputs an optical image and/or optical signal to one or more optical detectors.

8 . The method of claim 7 , wherein the one or more optical detectors comprise one or more optical detectors specifically assigned to a particular object, image, or data class.

9 . The method of claim 7 , the one or more optical detectors output signal(s) or data to a trained electronic neural network.

10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the physical diffractive optical neural network outputs an optical image or optical signal to a plurality of groups of optical detectors configured to sense the output optical images or output optical signals, wherein each group of optical detectors comprises at least one optical detector configured to capture a virtually positive signal from the output optical images or output optical signals and at least one optical detector configured to capture a virtually negative signal from the output optical images or output optical signals.

11 . The method of claim 10 , wherein the virtually positive and virtually negative signals are used to calculate a differential signal for an input optical image or signal input to the physical diffractive optical neural network to perform an inference and/or classification task.

12 . A diffractive optical neural network comprising one or more layers that are resilient to misalignments, fabrication-related errors, detector noise, and/or other sources of error comprising:

one or more optically transmissive layers arranged in an optical path, each of the one or more optically transmissive layers comprising a plurality of physical features formed on or within the one or more optically transmissive layers and having different complex-valued transmission coefficients as a function of lateral coordinates across each layer, wherein the one or more optically transmissive layers and the plurality of physical features thereon collectively define a trained mapping function between an input optical image or input optical signal to the one or more optically transmissive layers and an output optical image or output optical signal created by optical diffraction through the one or more optically transmissive layers, the trained mapping function being resilient to one or more of: misalignment of one or more of the optically transmissive layers, misalignment of an input plane, misalignment of an output plane, fabrication-related errors in the optically transmissive layers and/or in the diffractive network, detector noise, and/or other sources of error; and

one or more optical detectors configured to capture the output optical image or output optical signal resulting from the one or more optically transmissive layers.

13 . The diffractive optical neural network of claim 12 , wherein one or more of the layers comprise reconfigurable spatial light modulators.

14 . The diffractive optical neural network of claim 12 , wherein the misalignment(s) and/or fabrication-related errors comprise displacement vectors in an x, y, and/or z directions for one or more of the layers and/or displacement vectors in the input plane and/or the output plane, wherein x, y, and z are directions in three-dimensional space.

15 . The diffractive optical neural network of claim 12 , wherein the misalignment(s) comprises in-plane rotation of one or more of the layers, the input plane, and/or the output plane.

16 . The diffractive optical neural network of claim 12 , wherein the fabrication-related errors comprise additive printing or 3D fabrication errors.

17 . The diffractive optical neural network of claim 12 , wherein the diffractive optical neural network has an inference performance that is within a range of the inference performance of an equivalent diffractive optical neural network that does not have any misalignments, fabrication-related errors, and/or other sources of error taken into account during training.

18 . The diffractive optical neural network of claim 12 , wherein the diffractive optical neural network outputs an optical image and/or optical signal to one or more optical detectors.

19 . The diffractive optical neural network of claim 18 , wherein the one or more optical detectors comprise one or more optical detectors specifically assigned to a particular object, image, or data class.

20 . The diffractive optical neural network of claim 18 , further comprising a trained electronic neural network, wherein the one or more optical detectors output signal(s) or data to the trained electronic neural network.

21 . The diffractive optical neural network of claim 12 , wherein the diffractive optical neural network outputs an optical image or optical signal to a plurality of groups of optical detectors configured to sense the output optical images or output optical signals, wherein each group of optical detectors comprises at least one optical detector configured to capture a virtually positive signal from the output optical images or output optical signals and at least one optical detector configured to capture a virtually negative signal from the output optical images or output optical signals.

22 . The diffractive optical neural network of claim 12 , wherein the virtually positive and virtually negative signals are used to calculate a differential signal for an input optical image or signal input to the diffractive optical neural network to perform an inference and/or classification task.

23 . A diffractive optical neural network comprising one or more layers that are resilient to misalignments, fabrication-related errors, detector noise, and/or other sources of error comprising:

one or more optically reflective layers arranged along an optical path, each of the one or more optically reflective layers comprising a plurality of physical features formed on or within the one or more optically reflective layers, wherein the one or more optically reflective layers and the plurality of physical features collectively define a trained mapping function between an input optical image or input optical signal to the one or more optically reflective layers and an output optical image or output optical signal from the one or more optically reflective layers, the trained mapping function being resilient to one or more of: misalignment of one or more of the optically reflective layers, misalignment of an input plane, misalignment of an output plane, fabrication-related errors in the optically reflective layers and/or the diffractive network, detector noise, and/or other sources of error; and

one or more optical detectors configured to capture the output optical image or output optical signal from the one or more optically reflective layers.

24 . The diffractive optical neural network of claim 23 , wherein one or more of the layers comprise reconfigurable spatial light modulators.

25 . The diffractive optical neural network of claim 23 , wherein the misalignment(s) and/or fabrication-related errors comprise displacement vectors in an x, y, and/or z directions for the one or more layers and/or displacement vectors in the input plane and/or the output plane, wherein x, y, and z are directions in three-dimensional space.

26 . The diffractive optical neural network of claim 23 , wherein the misalignment(s) comprises in-plane rotation of the one or more layers, the input plane, and/or the output plane.

27 . The diffractive optical neural network of claim 23 , wherein the fabrication-related errors comprise additive printing or 3D fabrication errors.

28 . The diffractive optical neural network of claim 23 , wherein the diffractive optical neural network has an inference performance that is within a range of the inference performance of an equivalent diffractive optical neural network that does not have any misalignments, fabrication-related errors, and/or other sources of error taken into account during training.

29 . The diffractive optical neural network of claim 23 , wherein the diffractive optical neural network outputs an optical image and/or optical signal to one or more optical detectors.

30 . The diffractive optical neural network of claim 29 , wherein the one or more optical detectors comprise one or more optical detectors specifically assigned to a particular object, image, or data class.

31 . The diffractive optical neural network of claim 29 , further comprising a trained electronic neural network, wherein the one or more optical detectors output signal(s) or data to the trained electronic neural network.

32 . The diffractive optical neural network of claim 23 , wherein the diffractive optical neural network outputs an optical image or optical signal to a plurality of groups of optical detectors configured to sense the output optical images or output optical signals, wherein each group of optical detectors comprises at least one optical detector configured to capture a virtually positive signal from the output optical images or output optical signals and at least one optical detector configured to capture a virtually negative signal from the output optical images or output optical signals.

33 . The diffractive optical neural network of claim 23 , wherein the virtually positive and virtually negative signals are used to calculate a differential signal for an input optical image or signal input to the diffractive optical neural network to perform an inference and/or classification task.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 22, 2022
From: OZCAN, AYDOGAN; MENGU, DENIZ; RIVENSON, YAIR
To: THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Reel/Frame 061504/0424 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63029268 · May 22, 2020
Related Publication 20230162016A1 · May 25, 2023
References Cited (98)
US 4963725A · Hong et al. · 1990 [cited by applicant]
US 5080464A · Toyoda · 1992 [cited by applicant]
US 5095459A · Ohta et al. · 1992 [cited by applicant]
US 5255362A · Brandstetter et al. · 1993 [cited by applicant]
US 5440671A · Shiratani et al. · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 5842191A · Stearns · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 6445470B1 · Jenkins et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 7512473B2 · Nakao · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7512573B2 · Martinez · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 10217023B1 · Rubin · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 11017309B2 · Roques-Carmes et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11392830B2 · Ozcan et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11694082B2 · Ozcan et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20020027712A1 · Soskind · 2002 [cited by examiner]
US 20100209830A1 · Carcasi et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20170351293A1 · Carolan et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20190205946A1 · Mellina · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200327403A1 · Du et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210142170A1 · Ozcan et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220253685A1 · Ozcan et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220366253A1 · Ozcan et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2019200289 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2020247828A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2021050550A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2021231139A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2022006018A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2022056422A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2022087345A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
Vincent et al. 2008. Extracting and composing robust features with denoising autoencoders. In Proceedings of the 25th international conference on Machine learning (ICML '08). Association for Computing Machinery, New Yor… [cited by examiner]
Xue et al. “Reliable deep-learning-based phase imaging with uncertainty quantification,” Optica 6, 618-629 (2019) (Year: 2019). [cited by examiner]
Keith M. Hinrichs, John J. Piotrowski, “Neural networks for faster optical alignment,” Opt. Eng. 59(7) 074107 (Jul. 31, 2020) https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.59.7.074107 (Year: 2020). [cited by examiner]
Response to the extended European search report dated Mar. 10, 2025 for European Patent Application No. 21808927.4, Applicant: The Regents of University of California, (5 pages). [cited by applicant]
PCT International Search Report for PCT/US2021/033771, Applicant: The Regents of the University of California, Form PCT/ISA/210 and 220, dated Sep. 10, 2021 (3 pages). [cited by applicant]
PCT Written Opinion of the International Search Authority for PCT/US2021/033771, Applicant: The Regents of the University of California, Form PCT/ISA/237, dated Sep. 10, 2021 (6 pages). [cited by applicant]
Jingxi Li et al., Class-specific differential detection in diffractive optical neural networks improves inference accuracy, Advanced Photonics, 1 (4), 046001 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.AP.1.4.046001. [cited by applicant]
J. Bueno et al., Reinforcement learning in a large-scale photonic recurrent neural network, Optica, vol. 5, No. 6, Jun. 2018, pp. 756-760. [cited by applicant]
Julie Chang et al., Hybrid optical-electronic convolutional neural networks with optimized diffractive optics for image classification, Scientific Reports, (2018) 8:12324, DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-30619-y, (10 pages). [cited by applicant]
J. Feldmann et al., All-optical spiking neurosynaptic networks with self-learning capabilities, Nature (May 2019) 569 (7755) 208-214, DOI:10.1038/s41586-019-1157-8. [cited by applicant]
Guy Van der Sande et al., Advances in photonic reservoir computing, Nanophotonics 2017; 6(3): 561-576. [cited by applicant]
Jonathan K. George et al., Neuromorphic photonics with electro-absorption modulators, Optics Express, vol. 27, No. 4, (Feb. 18, 2019) 5181-5191. [cited by applicant]
Yann LeCun et al., Gradient-Based Learning Applied to Document Recognition, Proc. of the IEEE, Nov. 1998 (46 pages). [cited by applicant]
Jingxi Li et al., Class-specific Differential Detection in Diffractive Optical Neural Networks Improves Inference Accuracy, (2021), (21 pages). [cited by applicant]
Xing Lin et al., All-optical machine learning using diffractive deep neural networks, Science, 10.1126/science.aat8084 (2018). [cited by applicant]
Yi Luo et al., Design of task-specific optical systems using broadband diffractive neural networks, Light: Science & Applications (2019) 8:112. [cited by applicant]
Alireza Marandi et al., Network of Time-Multiplexed Optical Parametric Oscillators as a Coherent Ising Machine, arXiv:1407.2871v1 [quant-ph] Jul. 10, 2014, (23 pages). [cited by applicant]
Armin Mehrabian et al., PCNNA: A Photonic Convolutional Neural Network Accelerator, arXiv:1807.08792v1 [cs.ET] Jul. 23, 2018, (5 pages). [cited by applicant]
Deniz Mengu et al., Analysis of Diffractive Optical Neural Networks and Their Integration with Electronic Neural Networks, IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron (2020) 26(1), DOI:10.1109/JSTQE.2019.2921376. [cited by applicant]
Mario Miscuglio et al., All-Optical Nonlinear Activation Function for Photonic Neural Networks, Optical Society of America, (2018), (13 pages). [cited by applicant]
Antonio Ribeiro et al., Demonstration of a 4 x 4-port universal linear circuit, Optica, vol. 3, No. 12, (Dec. 2016), 1348-1357. [cited by applicant]
Bhavin J. Shastri et al., Principles of Neuromorphic Photonics: A Volume in the Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science, Second Edition, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327229989 (Jan. 2018), (38 pages). [cited by applicant]
Alexander N. Tait et al., Neuromorphic photonic networks using silicon photonic weight banks, Scientific Reports, (2017) 7:7430, DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-07754-z, (10 pages). [cited by applicant]
Han Xiao et al., Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for BenchmarkingMachine Learning Algorithms, arXiv:1708.07747v2 [cs.LG] (Sep. 15, 2017), (6 pages). [cited by applicant]
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability (Chapter I of the Patent Cooperation Treaty) for PCT/US2021/033771, Applicant: The Regents of the University of California, Form PCT/IB/326 and 373, dated Dec. 1, 20… [cited by applicant]
Bagherian, H. et al., On-Chip Optical Convolutional Neural Networks, arXiv:1808.03303v2 [cs.ET] Aug. 16, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Brunner, D. et al., Parallel photonic information processing at gigabyte per second data rates using transient states, Nature Communications, 4:1364, DOI: 10.1038/ncomms2368, www.nature.com/naturecommunications. [cited by applicant]
Bueno, J. et al., Reinforcement Learning in a large scale photonic Recurrent Neural Network, arXiv:1711.05133v2 [cs.NE] Nov. 15, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Chakraborty, I. et al., Toward Fast Neural Computing using All-Photonic Phase Change Spiking Neurons, arXiv:1804.00267v2 [cs.ET] Aug. 28, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Chang, J. et al., Hybrid optical-electronic convolutional neural networks with optimized diffractive optics for image classification, Scientific Report (2018) 8:12324, DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-30619-y. [cited by applicant]
Chen, Y. et al., Deep Learning-Based Classification of Hyperspectral Data, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, vol. 7, No. 6, Jun. 2014. [cited by applicant]
Cignoni, P. et al., MeshLab: an Open-Source Mesh Processing Tool, Eurographics Italian Chapter Conference (2008). [cited by applicant]
Farhat, N. H. et al., Optical implementation of the Hopfield model, May 15, 1985, vol. 24, No. 10, Applied Optics, 1469-1475. [cited by applicant]
Girshick, R. et al., Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation Tech report (v5), arXiv:1311.2524v5 [cs.CV] Oct. 22, 2014. [cited by applicant]
Golik, P. et al., Cross-Entropy vs. Squared Error Training: a Theoretical and Experimental Comparison, Human Language Technology and Pattern Recognition, Computer Science Department, RWTH Aachen University, 52056 Aachen… [cited by applicant]
Grischkowsky, D. et al., Far-infrared time-domain spectroscopy with terahertz beams of dielectrics and semiconductors, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B/vol. 7, No. 10/Oct. 1990. [cited by applicant]
Hermans, M. etal., Trainable & Dynamic Computing: Error Backpropagation Through Physical Media, arXiv:1407.6637v1 [cs.NE] Jul. 24, 2014. [cited by applicant]
Hughes, T.W. et al., Training of photonic neural networks through in situ backpropagation, arXiv:1805.09943v1 [physics.optics] May 25, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Kazhdan, M. et al., Screened Poisson Surface Reconstruction, ACM Transactions on Graphics, vol. VV, No. N, Article XXX, Publication date: 2013. [cited by applicant]
Khorasaninejad, M. et al., Metalenses at visible wavelengths: Diffraction-limited focusing and subwavelength resolution imaging, sciencemag.org, Science, Jun. 3, 2016, vol. 352, Issue 6290, 1190-1194. [cited by applicant]
Kildishev, A. V. et al., Planar Photonics with Metasurfaces, Science 339, 1232009 (2013). DOI: 10.1126/science.1232009. [cited by applicant]
Kingma, D. P. et al., ADAM: a Method for Stochastic Optimization, arXiv:1412.6980v9 [cs.LG] Jan. 30, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Lecun, Y. et al., GradientBased Learning Applied to Document Recognition, Proc. of the IEEE, Nov. 1998 (46 bages). [cited by applicant]
Lin, X. et al., All-optical machine learning using diffractive deep neural networks, Science 361, 1004-1008 (2018), Sep. 7, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Psaltis, D. et al., Optical information processing based on an associative-memory model of neural nets with thresholding and feedback, Optics Letters, vol. 10, No. 2, Feb. 1985. [cited by applicant]
Psaltis, D. et al., Adaptive optical networks using photorefractive crystals, Applied Optics, vol. 27, No. 9, May 1, 1988. [cited by applicant]
Shastri, B. et al., Principles of Neuromorphic Photonics, arXiv:1801.00016v1 [cs.ET] Dec. 29, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Shen, Y. et al., Deep Learning with Coherent Nanophotonic Circuits, arXiv:1610.02365v1 [physics.optics] Oct. 7, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Srivastava, N. et al., Dropout: A Simple Way to Prevent Neural Networks from Overfitting, Journal of Machine Learning Research 15 (2014) 1929-1958 Submitted Nov. 2013; Published Jun. 2014. [cited by applicant]
Tang, Y. et al., Deep Learning using Linear Support Vector Machines, arXiv:1306.0239v4 [cs.LG] Feb. 21, 2015. [cited by applicant]
Trabelsi, C. et al., Deep Complex Networks, arXiv:1705.09792v4 [cs.NE] Feb. 25, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Wagner, K. et al., Multilayer optical learning networks, Dec. 1, 1987, vol. 26, No. 23, Applied Optics, 5061-5076. [cited by applicant]
Wan, Li et al., Regularization of Neural Networks using DropConnect, Proceedings of the 30 th International Conference on Machine Learning, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 2013. [cited by applicant]
Wang, Z. et al., Image Quality Assessment: From Error Visibility to Structural Similarity, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 13, No. 4, Apr. 2004. [cited by applicant]
Weverka, R. T. et al., Fully interconnected, two-dimensional neural arrays using wavelength-multiplexed volume holograms, Optics Letters, vol. 16, No. 11, Jun. 1, 1991. [cited by applicant]
Xiao, Y. et al., Nonlinear Metasurface Based on Giant Optical Kerr Response of Gold Quantum Wells, ACS Photonics, 5(5), May 1, 2018, DOI:10.1021/acsphotonics.7b01140. [cited by applicant]
Yin, X. et al., Artificial Kerr-type medium using metamaterials, Apr. 9, 2012, vol. 20, No. 8, Optics Express, 8543-8550. [cited by applicant]
PCT International Search Report for PCT/US2019/027275, Applicant: The Regents of the University of California, Form PCT/ISA/210 and 220, dated Aug. 19, 2019 (5 pages). [cited by applicant]
PCT Written Opinion of the International Search Authority for PCT/US2019/027275, Applicant: The Regents of the University of California, Form PCT/ISA/237, dated Aug. 19, 2019 (9 pages). [cited by applicant]
Javidi, B. et al., Optical implementation of neural networks for face recognition by the use of nonlinear joint transform correlators, Applied Optics, vol. 34, No. 20, Jul. 10, 1995, 3950-3962. [cited by applicant]
Jutamulia, S. et al., Overview of hybrid optical neural networks, Optics & Laser Technology, vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 59-72, 1996. [cited by applicant]
Psaltis, D. et al., Holography in artificial neural networks. Nature. 343, 325-330 (1990). [cited by applicant]
Soures, N. et al., Neuro-MMI: A Hybrid Photonic-Electronic Machine Learning Platform. In 2018 IEEE Photonics Society Summer Topical Meeting Series (SUM); 2018; pp. 187-188. [cited by applicant]
Yu, F. T. S., II Optical Neural Networks: Architecture, Design and Models. In Progress in Optics; Wolf, E., Ed.; Elsevier, 1993; vol. 32, pp. 61-144. [cited by applicant]
Yu, F. et al., Flat optics with designer metasurfaces. Nature Materials. 13, 139-150 (2014). [cited by applicant]
Caulfield, H.J. et al., Optical Neural Networks. Proc. IEEE 1989, 77 (10), 1573-1583. [cited by applicant]
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability (Chapter I of the Patent Cooperation Treaty) for PCT/US2019/027275, Applicant: The Regents of the University of California, Form PCT/IB/326 and 373, dated Oct. 22, 2… [cited by applicant]
The extended European search report dated Jun. 28, 2024 for European Patent Application No. 21808927.4, Applicant: The Regents of University of California, (10 pages). [cited by applicant]
Yi Luo et al., Broadband Diffractive Neural Networks, 2020 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO), OSA, May 10, 2020, pp. 1-2, XP033824502. [cited by applicant]
Passalis Nikolaos et al., Training Deep Photonic Convolutional Neural Networks with Sinusoidal Activation, IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence, IEEE, vol. 5, No. 3, Jun. 28, 2019, pp. 384-… [cited by applicant]