IP Library Granted Patent US 12,366,493
Granted Patent B2
US 12,366,493 · App. 17/927,565 · Granted Jul 22, 2025

Determining residual tension in threaded fasteners

Inventors: Armita Mohammadian (Raleigh, NC); Gaofeng Sha (Copley, OH); Joshua Scott (Raleigh, NC); Ethan Loewenthal (Durham, NC); Klarissa Ramos (Raleigh, NC); Ashtad Javanmardi (Raleigh, NC); Akash Nikam (Knightdale, NC); Ziad Siddique (Cary, NC); J. Darrin Holt (Raleigh, NC)
Assignee: Predictant LLC
G01L5/24E21D21/02
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,366,493
App. No.
17/927,565
Granted
Jul 22, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present disclosure provides systems and methods for determining residual tension of a target bolt. An example method may include modeling ratios of times-of-flight of longitudinal waves and times-of-flight of shear waves as a function of tension for a plurality of test bolts. The modeling may include receiving data from longitudinal wave and shear wave transducers, analyzing the data to assess certain quality characteristics, and using a machine learning algorithm to create the model. The example method may further include determining a ratio of a time-of-flight of longitudinal waves and a time-of-flight of shear waves in a target bolt. The example method may further include determining residual tension in the target bolt based on the model and the ratio of a time-of-flight of longitudinal waves and time-of-flight of shear waves in the target bolt.

Claims (39)

1. A method of determining residual tension in a target bolt, the method comprising:

modeling ratios of times-of-flight of longitudinal waves and times-of-flight of shear waves as a function of tension for a plurality of test bolts;

determining a ratio of a time-of-flight of longitudinal waves and a time-of-flight of shear waves in a target bolt; and

determining residual tension in the target bolt based on the model and the ratio of a time-of-flight of longitudinal waves and time-of-flight of shear waves in the target bolt.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein modeling ratios of times-of-flight of longitudinal waves and times-of-flight of shear waves as a function of tension for a plurality of test bolts comprises:

determining, for each test bolt in the plurality of test bolts:

one or more times-of-flight of ultrasonic (UT) longitudinal waves in the test bolt corresponding to one or more levels of tension;

one or more times-of-flight of UT shear waves in the test bolt corresponding to the one or more levels of tension; and

ratios of the one or more times-of-flight of UT longitudinal waves and the one or more times-of-flight of UT shear waves at each of the one or more levels of tension.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein determining the one or more times-of-flight of UT longitudinal waves in the test bolt corresponding to one or more levels of tension comprises:

for each of the one or more levels of tension:

receiving, from a transducer, raw data relating to reflections of UT longitudinal waves in the test bolt, wherein the raw data comprises at least a first echo and a second echo; and

evaluating the raw data to determine that it satisfies a first set of criteria.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein at least one criterion of the first set of criteria is that the first echo arrives within an expected time range.

5. The method of claim 3 , wherein at least one criterion of the first set of criteria is that a time separating an overall maximum peak and an overall minimum peak for the first echo, or a time separating an overall maximum peak and an overall minimum peak for the second echo, or both, are below a threshold.

6. The method of claim 3 further comprising evaluating the raw data by calculating one or more times-of-flight of longitudinal waves from the raw data and determining that the one or more times-of-flight meet a second set of criteria.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein at least one criterion of the second set of criteria is that the times-of-flight are within an expected range.

8. The method of claim 6 , wherein at least one criterion of the second set of criteria is that each time-of-flight does not deviate from any other time-of-flight by an amount greater than a threshold.

9. The method of claim 2 , wherein determining one or more times-of-flight of UT shear waves in the test bolt corresponding to one or more levels of tension comprises:

for each of the one or more levels of tension:

receiving, from a transducer, raw data relating to reflections of UT shear waves in the test bolt, wherein the raw data comprises at least a first echo and a second echo; and

evaluating the raw data to determine that it satisfies a first set of criteria.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein at least one criterion of the first set of criteria is that the first echo arrives within an expected time range.

11. The method of claim 9 , wherein at least one criterion of the first set of criteria is that a time separating an overall maximum peak and an overall minimum peak for the first, or a time separating an overall maximum peak and an overall minimum peak for the second echo, or both, are below a threshold.

12. The method of claim 9 further comprising evaluating the raw data by calculating one or more times-of-flight of shear waves from the raw data and determining that the one or more times-of-flight meet a second set of criteria.

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein at least one criterion of the second set of criteria is that the times-of-flight are within an expected range.

14. The method of claim 12 , wherein at least one criterion of the second set of criteria is that each time-of-flight does not deviate from any other time-of-flight by an amount greater than a threshold.

15. The method of claim 2 , wherein determining, for each of the plurality of test bolts, ratios of the one or more times-of-flight of UT longitudinal waves and the one or more times-of-flight of UT shear waves comprises:

analyzing the one or more times-of-flight of UT longitudinal waves to identify which times-of-flight are suitable for calculating a longitudinal wave time-of-flight, wherein the suitable times-of-flight are those times-of-flight that meet a third set of criteria;

analyzing the one or more times-of-flight of UT shear waves to identify which times-of-flight are suitable for calculating a shear wave time-of-flight, wherein the suitable times-of-flight are those times-of-flight that meet the third set of criteria;

determining that the number of suitable times-of-flight of UT longitudinal waves is above a threshold;

determining that the number of suitable times-of-flight of UT shear waves is above a threshold;

calculating an average longitudinal wave time-of-flight based on the suitable times-of-flight of UT longitudinal waves;

calculating an average shear wave time-of-flight based on the suitable times-of-flight of UT shear waves; and

calculating a ratio of the average longitudinal wave time-of-flight and the average shear wave time-of-flight.

16. The method of claim 15 , wherein the third set of criteria for longitudinal waves comprises determining that a difference between the maximum time-of-flight of UT longitudinal waves and the minimum time-of-flight of UT longitudinal waves is below a threshold.

17. The method of claim 15 , wherein the third set of criteria for longitudinal waves comprises dividing the one or more times-of-flight of UT longitudinal waves into two or more groups and determining which group contains the most times-of-flight.

18. The method of claim 15 , wherein the third set of criteria for shear waves comprises determining that a difference between the maximum time-of-flight of UT shear waves and the minimum time-of-flight of UT shear waves is below a threshold.

19. The method of claim 15 , wherein the third set of criteria for shear waves comprises dividing the one or more times-of-flight of UT shear waves into two or more groups and determining which group contains the most times-of-flight.

Assignments (4)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 5, 2025
From: FDH INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES, LLC
To: PREDICTANT LLC
Reel/Frame 070416/0038 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 24, 2025
From: MOHAMMADIAN, ARMITA; SHA, GAOFENG; SCOTT, JOSHUA; LOEWENTHAL, ETHAN; RAMOS, KLARISSA; JAVANMARDI, ASHTAD; NIKAM, AKASH; SIDDIQUE, ZIAD; HOLT, J. DARRIN
To: FDH INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES, LLC
Reel/Frame 070304/0565 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Feb 24, 2025
From: PREDICTANT, LLC
To: FDH INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES, LLC
Reel/Frame 070305/0001 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Feb 24, 2025
From: FDH INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES, LLC
To: PREDICTANT, LLC
Reel/Frame 070721/0625 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63031524 · May 28, 2020
Related Publication 20230213401A1 · Jul 6, 2023
References Cited (33)
US 4014208A · Moore et al. · 1977 [cited by applicant]
US 4333351A · Bickford · 1982 [cited by applicant]
US 6327912B2 · Basile et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6769957B2 · Buttram · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 8511165B2 · Lopez Jauregui · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20110296922A1 · Ali · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120222485A1 · Stickel · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120224456A1 · Visser et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130000245A1 · Tarr · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20150039764A1 · Beloglazov et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20190052240A1 · An et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190203599A1 · Sun et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190311301A1 · Pyati · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20230141264A1 · Sands · 2023 [cited by examiner]
BR 122022020567B1 · 2023 [cited by examiner]
CN 110501108A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
CN 111191742A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
EP 1447661A1 · 2004 [cited by applicant]
KR 100819147B1 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
KR 102323547B1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2017063098A1 · 2017 [cited by examiner]
WO 2017143456A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018032106A1 · 2018 [cited by examiner]
WO 2021037964A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
PCT, Extended European Search Report regarding PCT Application No. PCT/US2021034614, dated May 10, 2024, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
PCT, International Search Report regarding PCT Application No. PCT/US23/63628, dated Oct. 24, 2023, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
PCT, Written Opinion regarding PCT Application No. PCT/US23/63628, dated Oct. 24, 2023, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2021/034614 dated Aug. 15, 2021, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Albert C. Holt et al., “An Ultrasonic Technique For Axial Bolt-Stress Determination”, JAG Industries and Univ. of CA., pp. 1549-1557. [cited by applicant]
Kim Nohyu et al. “Measuement of Axial Stress Using Mode-Converted Ultrasound”, NDT & E International, vol. 42, Issue 3, Apr. 2009, pp. 164-169. [cited by applicant]
Qinxue Pan et al., “Research Review of Principles and Methods for Ultrasonic Measurement of Axial Stress in Bolts”, Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering (2020) 33:11, pp. 1-16, https://doi.org/10.1186/s10033-020-04… [cited by applicant]
Xiao Li et al., “The Nondestructive Evaluation of Axial Stress of a Bolt in Situ By Combination of Shear and Longitudinal Wave”, School of Mechanical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, No. 5 and Department of… [cited by applicant]
Malik Shubham et al., “XGBoost: A Deep Drive into Boosting (Introduction Documentation)”, Technical Report, Feb. 2020, Research Gate, pp. 1-22. [cited by applicant]