IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,190,559
Granted Patent B2
US 12,190,559 · App. 17/933,128 · Granted Jan 7, 2025

System and method for prioritizing similarities and differences during responses to incidents based on incident context

Inventors: Filip Norys (Chrzanow, PL); Sebastian Mroz (Cracow, PL); Krzysztof Lubas (Cracow, PL); Grzegorz Gosztyla (Cracow, PL); Pawel G Nowicki (Wegrzce, PL)
Assignee: MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC.
G06V10/761G06V10/776G06V20/52G10L25/51G06V40/10G06V40/20
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,190,559
App. No.
17/933,128
Granted
Jan 7, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Techniques for prioritizing similarities and differences during responses to incidents based on incident context are provided. Video and audio of an initial response to a first incident at an incident location is monitored. A context for the initial response is created. Video and audio of a subsequent response to a second incident at the incident location is monitored. The video and audio of the initial response and the subsequent response is compared. A machine learning model prioritizes the similarities and differences between the video and audio based on the context. The similarities and differences between the video and audio are provided to a subsequent responder based on the prioritization.

Claims (55)

1. A method comprising:

monitoring, with a first body worn camera, video of an initial response to a first incident at an incident scene;

monitoring audio communications of at least one initial responder to the incident scene;

creating a context for the initial response based on the video from the first body worn camera and the audio communications of the at least one initial responder;

monitoring with a second body worn camera, video of a subsequent response to a second incident at the incident scene;

monitoring audio communications of at least one subsequent responder to the incident scene;

comparing the first and second body worn camera video to identify similarities and differences between the first and second body worn camera video;

comparing the audio communication of the at least one initial and subsequent responders to identify similarities and differences between the audio communication of the at least one initial and subsequent responders;

prioritizing, by a machine learning model, the similarities and differences between the video and audio based on the context; and

providing the similarities and differences between the video and audio to the at least one subsequent responder based on the prioritization.

2. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

receiving feedback from the at least one subsequent responder, the feedback indicating if the prioritization of the similarities and differences between the video and audio based on the context was correct; and

updating the machine learning model based on the feedback.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein the feedback further includes feedback indicating if the provided similarities and differences were relevant.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein the context includes at least one of type of incident, time between the initial and subsequent incidents, and type of responder.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein the similarities and differences include at least one of number of incident participants, identities of incident participants, and behavior of incident participants.

6. The method of claim 1 wherein the similarities and differences include at least one of physical items present at the incident scene and location of physical items at the incident scene.

7. The method of claim 1 wherein the first body worn camera and the second body worn camera are the same camera and the at least one initial responder and the at least one subsequent responder are the same responder.

8. A system comprising:

a processor; and

a memory coupled to the processor, the memory containing a set of instructions thereon that when executed by the processor cause the processor to:

monitor, with a first body worn camera, video of an initial response to a first incident at an incident scene;

monitor audio communications of at least one initial responder to the incident scene;

create a context for the initial response based on the video from the first body worn camera and the audio communications of the at least one initial responder;

monitor with a second body worn camera, video of a subsequent response to a second incident at the incident scene;

monitor audio communications of at least one subsequent responder to the incident scene;

compare the first and second body worn camera video to identify similarities and differences between the first and second body worn camera video;

compare the audio communication of the at least one initial and subsequent responders to identify similarities and differences between the audio communication of the at least one initial and subsequent responders;

prioritize, by a machine learning model, the similarities and differences between the video and audio based on the context; and

provide the similarities and differences between the video and audio to the at least one subsequent responder based on the prioritization.

9. The system of claim 8 further comprising instructions to:

receive feedback from the at least one subsequent responder, the feedback indicating if the prioritization of the similarities and differences between the video and audio based on the context was correct; and

update the machine learning model based on the feedback.

10. The system of claim 8 wherein the feedback further includes feedback indicating if the provided similarities and differences were relevant.

11. The system of claim 8 wherein the context includes at least one of type of incident, time between the initial and subsequent incidents, and type of responder.

12. The system of claim 8 wherein the similarities and differences include at least one of number of incident participants, identities of incident participants, and behavior of incident participants.

13. The system of claim 8 wherein the similarities and differences include at least one of physical items present at the incident scene and location of physical items at the incident scene.

14. The system of claim 8 wherein the first body worn camera and the second body worn camera are the same camera and the at least one initial responder and the at least one subsequent responder are the same responder.

15. A non-transitory processor readable medium containing a set of instructions thereon that when executed by a processor cause the processor to:

monitor, with a first body worn camera, video of an initial response to a first incident at an incident scene;

monitor audio communications of at least one initial responder to the incident scene;

create a context for the initial response based on the video from the first body worn camera and the audio communications of the at least one initial responder;

monitor with a second body worn camera, video of a subsequent response to a second incident at the incident scene;

monitor audio communications of at least one subsequent responder to the incident scene;

compare the first and second body worn camera video to identify similarities and differences between the first and second body worn camera video;

compare the audio communication of the at least one initial and subsequent responders to identify similarities and differences between the audio communication of the at least one initial and subsequent responders;

prioritize, by a machine learning model, the similarities and differences between the video and audio based on the context; and

provide the similarities and differences between the video and audio to the at least one subsequent responder based on the prioritization.

16. The medium of claim 15 further comprising instructions to:

receive feedback from the at least one subsequent responder, the feedback indicating if the prioritization of the similarities and differences between the video and audio based on the context was correct; and

update the machine learning model based on the feedback.

17. The medium of claim 15 wherein the feedback further includes feedback indicating if the provided similarities and differences were relevant.

18. The medium of claim 15 wherein the context includes at least one of type of incident, time between the initial and subsequent incidents, and type of responder.

19. The medium of claim 15 wherein the similarities and differences include at least one of number of incident participants, identities of incident participants, and behavior of incident participants.

20. The medium of claim 15 wherein the similarities and differences include at least one of physical items present at the incident scene and location of physical items at the incident scene.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 19, 2022
From: NORYS, FILIP; MROZ, SEBASTIAN; LUBAS, KRZYSZTOF; GOSZTYLA, GRZEGORZ; NOWICKI, PAWEL
To: MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC.
Reel/Frame 061129/0072 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20240096053A1 · Mar 21, 2024
References Cited (17)
US 8200011B2 · Eaton et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 9820120B2 · deCharms · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 10354141B2 · Spengler et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10388132B2 · Cutcher et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10398970B2 · Gault et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10459827B1 · Aghdaie et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 11589289B2 · Frusina · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20040223054A1 · Rotholtz · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20160180239A1 · Frankel et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20230190100A1 · Stump · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230210372A1 · Alam · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20240046642A1 · Jorasch · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240298084A9 · Huang · 2024 [cited by examiner]
KR 20150029006A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO 2010077979A2 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
Haziq Igram Bin Mohammed Shafri, et al.: “Dynamic Video Analytics Rules based on Human Conversation”, U.S. Appl. No. 17/446,627, filed Sep. 1, 2021, all pages. [cited by applicant]
Janusz Szuba, et al.: “Video-Based Public Safety Incident Prediction System and Method Therefor”, U.S. Appl. No. 17/661,919, filed May 4, 2022, all pages. [cited by applicant]