IP Library Granted Patent US 12,371,020
Granted Patent B2
US 12,371,020 · App. 17/943,803 · Granted Jul 29, 2025

Vehicle-based stop-and-go mitigation system

Inventors: Yashar Zeiynali Farid (Mountain View, CA); Kentaro Oguchi (Mountain View, CA)
Assignees: TOYOTA MOTOR ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING NORTH AMERICA, INC.; TOYOTA JIDOSHA KABUSHIKI KAISHA
B60W30/18018B60W30/16B60W2520/10B60W2554/4042B60W2554/802B60W2720/10
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,371,020
App. No.
17/943,803
Granted
Jul 29, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems and methods are provided for activating mitigation strategies to reduce or eliminate the stop-and-go traffic. Mitigation strategies can be applied to reduce stop-and-go traffic or prevent a control vehicle from experiencing stop-and-go traffic. The control vehicle can predict when to apply mitigation strategies based on sensor data that can be applied to generate a trajectory for the control vehicle or a preceding vehicle.

Claims (46)

1. A method comprising:

determining a first stop-and-go wave based on trajectory of a control vehicle and determining a time threshold for the first stop-and-go wave;

based on the first stop-and-go wave and the time threshold, determining that the control vehicle is entering a deceleration phase of a second stop-and-go wave;

activating a mitigation strategy within the control vehicle;

operating the control vehicle in accordance with the mitigation strategy; and

deactivating the mitigation strategy after a cruise time threshold or a cruise distance threshold has elapsed.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining a reference speed for operating the control vehicle.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein determining a reference speed for operating the control vehicle comprises setting the reference speed at an initial speed and updating the reference speed after a stop-and-go wave.

4. The method of claim 2 , wherein the reference speed is based on the first stop-and-go wave and time threshold.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the cruise time threshold and the cruise distance threshold are determined by:

determining that the control vehicle is entering a cruise phase; and

measuring the time at which the control vehicle travels in the cruise phase.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein the cruise time threshold or the cruise distance threshold is based on a maximum cruise time period or a maximum wavelength.

7. A vehicle, comprising:

at least one gap detection sensor;

a processor; and

a memory coupled to the processor to store instructions, which when executed by the processor, cause the processor to:

determine a first stop-and-go wave based on trajectory of a control vehicle and determine a time threshold for the first stop-and-go wave;

based on the first stop-and-go wave and time threshold, determine that a preceding vehicle is entering a deceleration phase of a second stop-and-go wave;

determine a threshold distance between the vehicle and the preceding vehicle at which to activate a mitigation strategy;

activate the mitigation strategy when a distance between the vehicle and the preceding vehicle is equal to or less than the threshold distance;

operate the vehicle in accordance with the mitigation strategy; and

deactivating the mitigation strategy after a cruise time threshold or a cruise distance threshold has elapsed.

8. The vehicle of claim 7 , wherein the instructions further cause the processor to determine a reference speed for operating the vehicle.

9. The vehicle of claim 8 , wherein the instructions further cause the processor to set the reference speed at an initial speed and update the reference speed after a stop-and-go wave.

10. The vehicle of claim 8 , wherein the reference speed is based on the first stop-and-go wave and time threshold.

11. The vehicle of claim 8 , wherein the threshold distance is determined by the reference speed, the time threshold, and a minimum desired gap with the preceding vehicle.

12. The vehicle of claim 11 , wherein the minimum desired gap is determined by the reference speed, a minimum gap between vehicles during stopped traffic, and a minimum time gap with the preceding vehicle.

13. The vehicle of claim 7 , wherein the instructions further cause the processor to:

determine that the preceding vehicle is entering a cruise phase; and

measure the time at which the preceding vehicle travels in the cruise phase.

14. The vehicle of claim 13 , wherein the cruise time threshold or the cruise distance threshold is based on a maximum cruise time period or a maximum wavelength.

15. A non-transitory machine-readable medium having instructions stored therein, which when executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform operations, the operations comprising:

receiving data from a plurality of sensors to track a control vehicle's position over time and determining a trajectory;

determining a first stop-and-go wave based on the trajectory and determining a time threshold for the first stop-and-go wave;

based on the first stop-and-go wave and time threshold, determining that the control vehicle is entering a deceleration phase of a second stop-and-go wave;

activating a mitigation strategy within the control vehicle;

operating the control vehicle in accordance with the mitigation strategy;

determining that the control vehicle is entering a cruise phase;

measuring the time at which the control vehicle travels in the cruise phase; and

deactivating the mitigation strategy after a cruise time threshold or a cruise distance threshold.

16. The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the operations further comprise determining a reference speed for operating the control vehicle.

17. The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 16 , wherein determining a reference speed for operating the control vehicle comprises setting the reference speed at an initial speed and updating the reference speed after a stop-and-go wave.

18. The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 16 , wherein the reference speed is based on the first stop-and-go wave and time threshold.

19. The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the cruise time threshold or the cruise distance threshold is based on a maximum cruise time period or a maximum wavelength.

20. The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the first stop-and-go wave comprises a deceleration phase, a stopped vehicle phase, an acceleration phase, and a cruise phase.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 2, 2025
From: TOYOTA MOTOR ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING NORTH AMERICA, INC.
To: TOYOTA JIDOSHA KABUSHIKI KAISHA
Reel/Frame 072139/0403 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 13, 2022
From: ZEIYNALI FARID, YASHAR; OGUCHI, KENTARO
To: TOYOTA MOTOR ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING NORTH AMERICA, INC.; TOYOTA JIDOSHA KABUSHIKI KAISHA
Reel/Frame 061079/0695 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20240083432A1 · Mar 14, 2024
References Cited (46)
US 5283575A · Kao · 1994 [cited by applicant]
US 6862524B1 · Nagda · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6867733B2 · Sandhu · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 11042163B2 · Chen · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11493926B2 · He · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11814079B2 · Dagan · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 12091025B2 · Kwon · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20160055744A1 · Branson · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20200242922A1 · Dulberg · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210201669A1 · Mitra · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220388505A1 · Sharma Banjade · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230058169A1 · Cella · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230150502A1 · Dickson · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230316920A1 · Di Cairano · 2023 [cited by examiner]
USDOT, “Freight Performance Measure Approaches for Bottlenecks, Arterials, and Linking Volumes to Congestion Report,” Aug. 2015, 104 pages (https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/41268/dot_41268_DS1.pdf). [cited by applicant]
Čičič et al., “Platoon-Actuated Variable Area Mainstream Traffic Control for Bottleneck Decongestion,” European Journal of Control, Elsevier, Jun. 14, 2022, 8 pages (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcon.2022.100687). [cited by applicant]
Čičič et al., “Coordinating Vehicle Platoons for Highway Bottleneck Decongestion and Throughput Improvement,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 23(7):8959-8971, Jun. 24, 2021, 13 pages (https://do… [cited by applicant]
Ibrahim et al., “Control of Platooned Vehicles in Presence of Traffic Shock Waves,” 2019 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC), Oct. 29, 2019, 8 pages (http://www.es.ele.tue.nl/˜tbasten/papers/ITSC19… [cited by applicant]
Zheng et al., “Freeway Traffic Oscillations: Microscopic Analysis of Formations and Propagations using Wavelet Transform,” 19th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory, 17(2011):717-731 (https://doi… [cited by applicant]
Sugiyama et al., “Traffic Jams without Bottlenecks—Experimental Evidence for the Physical Mechanism of the Formation of a Jam,” New Journal of Physics, 10(2008):033001, Mar. 4, 2008, 8 pages (https://iopscience.iop.org/… [cited by applicant]
Beaty, “Traffic ‘Experiments’ and a Cure for Waves & Jams,” 1998 (http://www.amasci.com/amateur/traffic/trafexp.html). [cited by applicant]
Cui et al., “Stabilizing Traffic Flow via a Single Autonomous Vehicle: Possibilities and Limitations,” 2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), Jun. 13, 2017, pp. 1336-1341 (https://lab-work.github.io/download/Cui… [cited by applicant]
Li et al., “Stop-and-Go Traffic Analysis: Theoretical Properties, Environmental Impacts and Oscillation Mitigation,” Transportation Research Part B, 70(2014):319-339 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2014.09.014). [cited by applicant]
Stern et al., “Dissipation of Stop-And-Go Waves via Control of Autonomous Vehicles: Field Experiments,” Transportation Research, Part C, Emerging Technologies, 89(C):205-221, Apr. 2018 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.201… [cited by applicant]
Wu et al., “Stabilizing Traffic with Autonomous Vehicles,” 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), May 2018, pp. 6012-6018 (https://uclalemur.com/publications/wu2018icra.pdf). [cited by applicant]
Goulet et al., “Impacts of Distributed Speed Harmonization and Optimal Maneuver Planning on Multi-Lane Roads,” 2020 IEEE Conference on Control Technology and Applications (CCTA), Aug. 2020, pp. 305-311 (https://www.osti… [cited by applicant]
Suriyarachchi et al., “Shock Wave Mitigation in Multi-Lane Highways Using Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communication,” 2021 IEEE 94th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2021-Fall), 7 pages (https://nileshsuri.github.io/files/con… [cited by applicant]
Xie et al., “Cooperative Driving Strategies of Connected Vehicles for Stabilizing Traffic Flow,” Transportmetrica B: Transport Dynamics, 8(1):166-181 (https://doi.org/10.1080/21680566.2020.1728590). [cited by applicant]
Di Vaio et al., “Cooperative Shock Waves Mitigation in Mixed Traffic Flow Environment,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 20(12):4339-4353, Dec. 2019 (https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2018.2883485). [cited by applicant]
Hale et al., “Introduction of Cooperative Vehicle-to-Infrastructure Systems to Improve Speed Harmonization,” USDOT, Federal Highway Administration, Mar. 2016, 54 pages (https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/ope… [cited by applicant]
Kates et al., “Flow Stabilization and Enhanced Traffic Performance using Inter-Vehicle Communication and Distributed Intelligence,” 13th World Congress and Exhibition on Intelligent Transport Systems and Services, Oct. … [cited by applicant]
Learn et al., “Freeway Speedharmonization Experiment Using Connected and Automated Vehicles,” IET Intelligent Transport Systems, Jan. 22, 2018, 12(5):319-326 (https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-its.2017.0149). [cited by applicant]
Farid et al., “Systems and Methods for Mitigating Lane-Change Disturbance Based on Cooperative Maneuvering,” pending U.S. Appl. No. 17/830,776. [cited by applicant]
Farid et al., “Systems and Methods for Planning Lane-Change Actions Considering Traffic Stability in Target Lane,” U.S. Appl. No. 17/842,065. [cited by applicant]
Malikopoulos et al., “Optimal Control for Speed Harmonization of Automated Vehicles,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 20(7):2405-2417, Sep. 13, 2018 (https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/ielaam/6979/8746… [cited by applicant]
Li et al., “Cooperative Perception for Estimating and Predicting Microscopic Traffic States to Manage Connected and Automated Traffic,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 23(8):13694-13707, Nov. 30… [cited by applicant]
Yuan et al., “Real-Time Lagrangian Traffic State Estimator for Freeways,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 13(1)59-70, Jan. 9, 2012 (https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2011.2178837). [cited by applicant]
Čičič et al., “Modelling and Lagrangian Control of Mixed Traffic: Platoon Coordination, Congestion Dissipation and State Reconstruction,” Doctoral Thesis in Electrical Engineering, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sto… [cited by applicant]
Kreidieh et al., “Dissipating Stop-and-Go Waves in Closed and Open Networks via Deep Reinforcement Learning,” 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), Nov. 2018, pp. 1475-1480 (ht… [cited by applicant]
Guo et al., “Merging and Diverging Impact on Mixed Traffic of Regular and Autonomous Vehicles,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 22(3):1639-1649, Apr. 29, 2020 (https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2020.… [cited by applicant]
Wu et al., “Flow: A Modular Learning Framework for Mixed Autonomy Traffic,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 38 (2):1270-1286, Jul. 16, 2021 (https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2021.3087314). [cited by applicant]
Wu et al., “Flow: Architecture and Benchmarking for Reinforcement Learning in Traffic Control,” arXiv:1710.05465v1 [cs.AI], Oct. 16, 2017 (https://flow-project.github.io/papers/1710.05465.pdf). [cited by applicant]
Zhu et al., “Merging Control Strategies of Connected and Autonomous Vehicles at Freeway On-Ramps: A Comprehensive Review,” Journal of Intelligent and Connected Vehicles, 5(2):99-111, Apr. 11, 2022 (https://www.emerald.c… [cited by applicant]
Ni et al., “Multivehicle Cooperative Lane Change Control Strategy for Intelligent Connected Vehicle,” Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2020:8672928, pp. 1-10, Feb. 28, 2020 (https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8672928). [cited by applicant]
Qu et al., “Jointly Dampening Traffic Oscillations and Improving Energy Consumption with Electric, Connected and Automated Vehicles: A Reinforcement Learning Based Approach,” Applied Energy, 257(2020):114030, Jan. 1, 20… [cited by applicant]
Gunter et al., “Model-Based String Stability of Adaptive Cruise Control Systems Using Field Data,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 5(1):90-99, Nov. 22, 2019 (https://doi.org/10.1109/TIV.2019.2955368). [cited by applicant]
Cited By (1)
US 12,673,678