IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,742,385
Granted Patent B2
US 12,742,385 · App. 17/969,393 · Granted Sep 22, 2026

Method for processing sampled proppant during hydraulic fracturing

Inventors: Debotyam Maity (Elk Grove Village, IL); Jordan Ciezobka (Addison, IL)
Assignee: GTI ENERGY
E21B49/005C09K8/80G01N23/2251G01N33/2823E21B43/267G01N2001/1025G01N2223/616
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,742,385
App. No.
17/969,393
Granted
Sep 22, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for processing proppant from a well. A plurality of proppant samples are collected during drilling of a well for imaging analysis. In addition to imaging analysis a further correction factor is determined for the samples using additional analysis on a portion of the samples. Determining and applying the correction factor to the imaging results provides a more accurate proppant log. The additional analysis can be by scanning electron microscopy, such as for differentiating the silicon proppant particles from other elemental particles resulting from the drilling.

Claims (45)

1 . A method for processing proppant from a well, the method comprising the steps of:

collecting a plurality of proppant samples during drilling of a well;

imaging the plurality of proppant samples collected to obtain baseline proppant values within the plurality of proppant samples;

analyzing a sample subset of the plurality of proppant samples to determine an elemental composition of the sample subset to distinguish proppant from other mineral particles in the sample subset, wherein the analyzing includes imaging the sample subset using an imaging technique that generates elemental composition information;

determining a correction factor from the elemental composition, wherein the correction factor is an element ratio of proppant to calcium and/or barium in the sample subset of the plurality of proppant samples; and

applying the correction factor to the imaging results to correct the baseline proppant values.

2 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining the elemental composition with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of the sample subset.

3 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining a distance zone within the well for the sample subset; and

applying the correction factor to all proppant samples within the distance zone.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the correction factor is a correction curve.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the correction factor is an element ratio of silicon to calcium and/or barium in the sample subset of the plurality of proppant samples.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein applying the correction factor comprises adjusting an imaging element ratio in the imaging results as a function of the element ratio of the correction factor.

7 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising

normalizing the correction factor as a function of a rate of drilling or penetration at a time of the sample collection.

8 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining a number of proppant particles in the sample subset within each of a plurality of particle size ranges; and

interpreting hydraulic fractures as a function of a particle size distribution within the sample subset.

9 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining a source of proppant in the sample subset as a function of proppant particle size within the sample subset.

10 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

collecting the sample subset at one of a mud and cuttings inlet, a liquids and fine solids discharge, and/or a cuttings discharge of a hydraulic fracturing mud cleaner or shale shaker.

11 . A method for processing proppant from a well, the method comprising the steps of:

collecting a plurality of proppant samples during drilling of a well;

imaging the plurality of proppant samples collected to obtain baseline proppant values within the plurality of proppant samples;

establishing proppant log data of the baseline proppant values;

analyzing at least a sample subset of the plurality of proppant samples by applying scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to the sample subset to obtain a SEM elemental composition analysis of the sample subset to distinguish proppant from other mineral particles in the sample subset;

generating a regression model correction factor by comparing the imaging results to the SEM elemental analysis; and

validating or correcting the proppant log data with the regression model correction factor.

12 . The method of claim 11 , further comprising:

applying the correction factor to a proppant log; and

producing a corrected proppant log.

13 . The method of claim 11 , further comprising:

determining a distance zone within the well for each of the proppant samples; and

applying the correction factor to all proppant samples within the distance zone.

14 . The method of claim 11 , wherein the correction factor is an element ratio of silicon to calcium and/or barium in the at least a sample subset.

15 . The method of claim 11 , wherein applying the correction factor comprises adjusting an imaging element ratio in the imaging results as a function of the element ratio of the correction factor.

16 . The method of claim 11 , further comprising:

normalizing the correction factor as a function of a rate of drilling or penetration at a time of the sample collection.

17 . The method of claim 11 , further comprising:

determining a number of proppant particles in the at least a sample subset within each of a plurality of particle size ranges; and

interpreting hydraulic fractures as a function of the particle size distribution within the at least a sample subset.

18 . The method of claim 11 , further comprising:

determining a source of proppant in the at least a sample subset as a function of proppant particle size within the at least a sample subset.

Assignments (2)
CONFIRMATORY LICENSE Recorded Mar 20, 2023
From: GAS TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE
To: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Reel/Frame 063117/0646 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 29, 2022
From: MAITY, DEBOTYAM; CIEZOBKA, JORDAN
To: GTI ENERGY
Reel/Frame 062235/0828 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63257858 · Oct 20, 2021
Related Publication 20230123954A1 · Apr 20, 2023
References Cited (20)
US 11492900B2 · Wright · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20020118406A1 · Huang · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20080210421A1 · Wilson et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20100313645A1 · Doman et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20140014348A1 · Mahoney et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140182841A1 · Lecerf et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20160283651A1 · Knight et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20180223641A1 · Ciezobka · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20210332700A1 · Pelletier · 2021 [cited by examiner]
Maity et al., “Assessment of In-Situ Proppant Placement in SRV Using Through-Fracture Core Sampling at HFTS.” Paper presented at the SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, USA, Jul.… [cited by examiner]
King, George, “Utilizing Fluid & Proppant Tracer Results to Analyze Multi-Fractured Well Flow Back in Shales: A Framework for Optimizing Fracture Design and Application,” SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, … [cited by applicant]
Palisch, T., “Far-Field Proppant Detection Using Electromagnetic Methods-Latest Field Results,” SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference and Exhibition, No. SPE-184880-MS, Jan. 24, 2017, (16 pages). [cited by applicant]
PCT International Search Report, Form PCT/ISA/210, for International Application PCT/US2022/47216, Oct. 20, 2022 (5 pages). [cited by applicant]
PCT Written Opinion of International Searching Authority, Form PCT/ISA/237, for International Application PCT/US2022/47216, Oct. 20, 2022 (6 pages). [cited by applicant]
Maity et al. “A Systematic Interpretation of Subsurface Proppant Concentration from Drilling Mud Returns: Case Study from Hydraulic Fracturing Test Site in Delaware Basin,” Unconventional Resources Technology Conference… [cited by applicant]
Maity et al. “Assessment of In-situ Proppant Placement in SRV Using Through-Fracture Core Sampling at HETS” Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Jul. 23-25, 2018, URL:https://onepetro.org/URTECONF/proceedings… [cited by applicant]
https://carboceramics.com/products/proppant-technologies/fracture-evaluation, Evaluate Perforation Cluster Efficiency & Near-Wellbore Connectivity. [cited by applicant]
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107048, Zhao Bochao, “Tracer cluting proppants for hydraulic fracture characterization” Hildebrand Department of Petroleum & Geosystems Engineering, University of Texas, Journal of … [cited by applicant]
https://doi.org/10.2118/140105-MS, King E.George, Utilizing Fluid & Proppant Tracer Results to Analyze Multi-Fractured Well Flow Back in Shales: A Framework for Optimizing Fracture Design and Application, Paper presente… [cited by applicant]
https://doi.org/10.2118/184880-MS, Palisch .T, “Far-Field Proppant Detection Using Electromagnetic Methods-Latest Field Results,” Paper presented at SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference and Exhibition, No. SPE… [cited by applicant]