IP Library Patent Application 17971030
Patent Application
App. No. 17/971,030

Local Idle Time Utilization in Centrally Controlled Mobile Robots

Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US None
App. No.
17/971,030
Abstract

A method includes: storing, at a mobile robot, a local repository of self-assigned task definitions; determining, at a processor of the mobile robot, that a local activity metric associated with tasks assigned to the mobile robot by a central server meets an idle criterion; in response to determining that the local activity metric meets the idle criterion, selecting, by the processor, one of the self-assigned task definitions from the local repository; and initiating execution of a self-assigned task corresponding to the selected self-assigned task definition at the mobile robot.

Claims (69)

1 . A method, comprising:

storing, at a mobile robot, a local repository of self-assigned task definitions;

determining, at a processor of the mobile robot, that a local activity metric associated with tasks assigned to the mobile robot by a central server meets an idle criterion;

in response to determining that the local activity metric meets the idle criterion, selecting, by the processor, one of the self-assigned task definitions from the local repository; and

initiating execution of a self-assigned task corresponding to the selected self-assigned task definition at the mobile robot.

2 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising: sending an indication of the selected self-assigned task definition to the central server.

3 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

after initiating execution of the selected self-assigned task, and prior to completion of the selected self-assigned task, receiving a task assignment from the central server; and

interrupting execution of the selected self-assigned task.

4 . The method of claim 3 , further comprising, prior to interrupting execution of the selected self-assigned task:

determining that a remaining execution time for the selected self-assigned task exceeds a threshold.

5 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising, prior to determining that the local activity metric meets the idle criterion, generating the local activity metric by:

determining an idle time period elapsed since completion of a latest task assigned to the mobile robot by the central server, without receipt of a further task assignment from the central server;

wherein determining that the local activity metric meets the idle criterion includes determining that the idle time period exceeds a threshold idle time period.

6 . The method of claim 5 , wherein the threshold idle time period is predetermined.

7 . The method of claim 5 , further comprising:

collecting, prior to generating the local activity metric, historical data defining previous idle time periods at the mobile robot; and

dynamically determining the threshold idle time period based on the historical data.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein each self-assigned task definition identifies a corresponding one of a plurality of subsystems of the mobile robot;

wherein the local activity metric meeting the idle criterion corresponds to one of the subsystems; and

wherein selecting the one of the self-assigned task definition includes restricting the selection to self-assigned task definitions identifying the one of the subsystems.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein selecting the one of the self-assigned task definitions from the local repository includes prioritizing the self-assigned task definitions according to at least one of:

(i) a location of the mobile robot;

(ii) a predetermined frequency of each self-assigned task;

(iii) time periods elapsed since respective previous performances of each self-assigned task;

(iv) a priority indicator included in at least one of the self-assigned task definitions;

(v) expected completion times of the self-assigned task;

(vi) a battery charge level of the mobile robot.

10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the self-assigned task definitions include at least one of:

(i) a mapping task for a region of a facility in which the mobile robot is deployed;

(ii) a calibration task;

(iii) a data processing task; and

(iv) traveling to an area of the facility and generating output indicating that the mobile robot is available for task assignment.

11 . A mobile robot, comprising:

a memory storing a local repository of self-assigned task definitions;

a locomotive assembly;

a communications interface communicatively connecting the mobile robot with a central server; and

a processor configured to:

determine that a local activity metric associated with tasks assigned to the mobile robot by the central server meets an idle criterion;

in response to determining that the local activity metric meets the idle criterion, select one of the self-assigned task definitions from the local repository; and

initiate execution of a self-assigned task corresponding to the selected self-assigned task definition at the mobile robot.

12 . The mobile robot of claim 11 , wherein the processor is further configured to: send an indication of the selected self-assigned task to the central server.

13 . The mobile robot of claim 11 , wherein the processor is further configured to:

after initiating execution of the selected self-assigned task, and prior to completion of the selected self-assigned task, receive a task assignment from the central server; and

interrupt execution of the selected self-assigned task.

14 . The mobile robot of claim 13 , wherein the processor is further configured, prior to interrupting execution of the selected self-assigned task, to:

determine that a remaining execution time for the selected self-assigned task exceeds a threshold.

15 . The mobile robot of claim 11 , wherein the processor is further configured, prior to determining that the local activity metric meets the idle criterion, to generate the local activity metric by:

determining an idle time period elapsed since completion of a latest task assigned to the mobile robot by the central server, without receipt of a further task assignment from the central server;

wherein the processor is configured to determine that the local activity metric meets the idle criterion by determining that the idle time period exceeds a threshold idle time period.

16 . The mobile robot of claim 15 , wherein the threshold idle time period is predetermined.

17 . The mobile robot of claim 15 , wherein the processor is further configured to:

collect, prior to generating the local activity metric, historical data defining previous idle time periods at the mobile robot; and

determine the threshold idle time period based on the historical data.

18 . The mobile robot of claim 11 , wherein each self-assigned task definition identifies a corresponding one of a plurality of subsystems of the mobile robot;

wherein the local activity metric meeting the idle criterion corresponds to one of the subsystems; and

wherein the processor is further configured to select the one of the self-assigned task definition by restricting the selection to self-assigned task definitions identifying the one of the subsystems.

19 . The mobile robot of claim 11 , wherein the processor is further configured to select the one of the self-assigned task definitions from the local repository by prioritizing the self-assigned task definitions according to at least one of:

(i) a location of the mobile robot;

(ii) a predetermined frequency of each self-assigned task definition;

(iii) time periods elapsed since respective previous performances of each self-assigned task definition;

(iv) a priority indicator included in at least one of the self-assigned task definitions;

(v) expected completion times of the self-assigned task definitions;

(vi) a battery charge level of the mobile robot.

20 . The mobile robot of claim 11 , wherein the self-assigned task definitions include at least one of:

(i) a mapping task for a region of a facility in which the mobile robot is deployed;

(ii) a calibration task;

(iii) a data processing task; and

(iv) traveling to an area of the facility and generating output indicating that the mobile robot is available for task assignment.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 17, 2026
From: ZEBRA TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
To: SKILD-FETCH LLC
Reel/Frame 075403/0946 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 5, 2023
From: WISE, MELONEE; HOY, AARON; KING, DEREK; ANGELI, MICAELA; SHAH, CHINMAY
To: ZEBRA TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 063545/0364 →