IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,203,893
Granted Patent B2
US 12,203,893 · App. 17/976,156 · Granted Jan 21, 2025

Fluid density from tunable acoustic impedance matching

Inventor: Rocco DiFoggio (Houston, TX)
Assignee: BAKER HUGHES OILFIELD OPERATIONS LLC
G01N29/24E21B49/081G01N29/024G01N29/028G01N2291/018G01N2291/02818
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,203,893
App. No.
17/976,156
Granted
Jan 21, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Downhole tools for measuring properties of a fluid include a sample chamber configured to receive the fluid, a field responsive material (“FRM”) arranged with an interface between the field responsive material and the fluid under test in the sample chamber. The field responsive material is tunable to change an acoustic impedance of the field responsive material in response to application of an applied field. A field generator is arranged in relation to the field responsive material, the field generator configured to generate and apply a field to the field responsive material. An acoustic transducer is arranged to direct acoustic energy into and through the field responsive material toward the interface between the field responsive material and the fluid and configured to detect reflections of acoustic energy that reflect from the interface.

Claims (40)

1. A downhole tool for measuring properties of a fluid, the downhole tool comprising:

a sample chamber configured to receive the fluid;

a field responsive material arranged with an interface between the field responsive material and the fluid in the sample chamber, wherein the field responsive material is tunable to change an acoustic impedance of the field responsive material in response to application of an applied field;

a field generator arranged in relation to the field responsive material, the field generator configured to generate and apply a field to the field responsive material; and

an acoustic transducer arranged to direct acoustic energy into and through the field responsive material toward the interface between the field responsive material and the fluid and configured to detect reflections of acoustic energy that reflect from the interface.

2. The downhole tool of claim 1 , further comprising:

a controller in operable communication with the field generator, the controller configured to cause generation of different strength fields from the field generator.

3. The downhole tool of claim 2 , wherein the controller is configured to perform a sweep operation to change the field strength to determine a minimum reflection of acoustic energy from the interface.

4. The downhole tool of claim 1 , wherein the field responsive material is a magnetorheological material.

5. The downhole tool of claim 4 , wherein the field generator is configured to generate a magnetic field that is applied to the magnetorheological material to change an acoustic impedance thereof.

6. The downhole tool of claim 1 , wherein the field responsive material is an electrorheological material.

7. The downhole tool of claim 6 , wherein the field generator is configured to generate an electric field that is applied to the electrorheological material to change an acoustic impedance thereof.

8. The downhole tool of claim 1 , further comprising:

a fluid interface member arranged at the interface between the field responsive material and the fluid in the sample chamber.

9. The downhole tool of claim 1 , further comprising:

a transducer interface member arranged at an interface between the acoustic transducer and the field responsive material.

10. The downhole tool of claim 1 , further comprising:

a sampling probe member arranged to extract a fluid from a downhole formation and direct said extracted fluid to the fluid sample chamber.

11. A method for determining fluid properties with a downhole tool having a sample chamber, a field responsive material, an acoustic transducer, and a field generator, the method comprising:

filling the sample chamber with a fluid;

applying a field to the field responsive material, using the field generator, to cause an acoustic impedance of the field responsive material to change to a predetermined acoustic impedance;

directing acoustic energy through the field responsive material, from the acoustic transducer to an interface between the field responsive material and the fluid in the sample chamber;

monitoring acoustic energy reflections from the interface to determine an acoustic impedance of the fluid in the sample chamber;

changing the applied field to alter the acoustic impedance of the field responsive material;

determining an acoustic impedance of the field responsive material that has a minimum amount of acoustic energy reflection; and

obtaining an acoustic impedance of the fluid in the sample chamber from the determined acoustic impedance of the field responsive material.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the field responsive material is a magnetorheological material.

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein the field generator is configured to generate a magnetic field that is applied to the magnetorheological material to change an acoustic impedance thereof.

14. The method of claim 11 , wherein the field responsive material is an electrorheological material.

15. The method of claim 14 , wherein the field generator is configured to generate an electric field that is applied to the electrorheological material to change an acoustic impedance thereof.

16. The method of claim 11 , wherein the steps of applying a field, directing acoustic energy, and monitoring acoustic energy reflections is performed in a stepwise manner with the changing of the applied field to find a minimum reflection of the acoustic energy.

17. The method of claim 11 , further comprising:

measuring a sound speed of the fluid using a sound speed sensor tool; and

calculating a fluid mass density from the measured sound speed and the obtained acoustic impedance of the fluid in the sample chamber.

18. The method of claim 11 , further comprising:

obtaining acoustic reflection information during monitoring of the acoustic energy reflections;

applying a best fit polynomial to the acoustic reflection information; and

obtaining a first derivative of the best fit polynomial and determining where said first derivative crosses zero to obtain the fluid acoustic impedance of the fluid in the sample chamber.

19. The method of claim 11 , wherein the applied field is selected to achieve an acoustic impedance of the field responsive material between 0.8 Mrayls and 1.8 Mrayls.

20. The method of claim 11 , wherein the acoustic impedance of the fluid in the sample chamber is equal to the acoustic impedance of the field responsive material when the acoustic energy reflections are at a minimum.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 28, 2022
From: DIFOGGIO, ROCCO
To: BAKER HUGHES OILFIELD OPERATIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 061583/0001 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20240142411A1 · May 2, 2024
References Cited (35)
US 5741962A · Birchak et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 6480118B1 · Rao · 2002 [cited by examiner]
US 7024917B2 · DiFoggio · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7523646B2 · Klun · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7614302B2 · DiFoggio · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7614312B2 · DiFoggio · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7921691B2 · DiFoggio · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 9594057B2 · DiFoggio · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20050204808A1 · DiFoggio · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20070227241A1 · DiFoggio · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20090187391A1 · Wendt · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20150204819A1 · DiFoggio · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160025884A1 · DiFoggio · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20200209193A1 · Swett · 2020 [cited by examiner]
Chen et al., “A Review of Tunable Acoustic Metamaterials”; Applied Sciences; Aug. 28, 2018; 21 pages. [cited by applicant]
Cheng et al.; “Sound insulation effect of magnetorheological fluid as a function of magnetic field strength and direction”;Materials Research Letters, 10:5, 310-317, DOI: 10.1080/21663831.2022.2050431 (2022). [cited by applicant]
Dawson et al., “Acoustic Impedance Matching with Porous Aluminium”; IEEE Sensors 2009 Conference; Oct. 2009; 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ding, et al. “The energy reflection coefficient of electrorheological fluid with continuously changing acoustic impedance”; Int J Mech Mater Des 6, 135-145 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10999-010-9115-5; 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Dong et al., “Electroheological Elastomers”; INTECH; http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.68396; 2017; 19 pages. [cited by applicant]
Dong et al.; “Electrorheological Characteristics of Poly(diphenylamine)/magnetite Composite-Based Suspension”; Materials; Deptember 2019; 18 pages. [cited by applicant]
Guicking et al., “Electrorheological Fluids as an Electrically Controllable Acoustic Medium: I. Experimental Arrangement and Application to an Absorber of Underwater Sound”; ACUSTICA, vol. 88 (2002), 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2023/077850; Date of Search: Feb. 22, 2024; 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Kim et al., “Material characterization of ER fluids at high frequency”; Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 267, Issue 1, Oct. 9, 2003; pp. 57-65. [cited by applicant]
Kim et al., “Material characterization of MR fluid at high frequencies”; Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 283, Issues 1-2, May 6, 2005; pp. 121-133. [cited by applicant]
Korobko et al.; “Influence of an external electric field on the propagation of ultrasound in electrorheological suspensions”; Journal of Engineering Physics 48, 153-157 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00871863; 5 page… [cited by applicant]
Li et al,. “The control of ultrasonic transmission by the metamaterials structure of electrorheological fluid and metal foam”; iopscience.iop.org; Aug. 2017; 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
Liu et al., “Electrorheology of filled silicone elastomers”; Journal of Rheology vol. 45, Issue 3(2001); https://doi.org/10.1122/1.1366716; Abstract (2 pages). [cited by applicant]
Roy et al., “Ultrasonic propagation in electrorheological suspensions”; The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 87, S85 (1990); doi: 10.1121/1.2028401. [cited by applicant]
Shen et al.; “Acoustic velocity and attenuation coefficient of magnetorheological fluidsunder electromagnetic fields”; Applied Acoustics, vol. 107, Jun. 2016, pp. 27-33. [cited by applicant]
Sun et al, “Deformation Dependent Sound Absorption Property of a Novel Magnetorheological Membrane Sound Absorber”; Frontiers in Material; Oct. 30, 2020; 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Tam et al., “New Electrorheological Fluid: Theory and Experiment”; Physical Review Letters, vol. 78, No. 15, Apr. 14, 1997; 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Wang et al. “Measurement of acoustic velocity and attenuation of electrorheological fluids”; Spawda, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Wang et al., “Performance evaluation of electrorheological fluid using acoustic method”; Smart Materials and Structures, vol. 25, No. 12; Nov. 10, 2016; Abstract (1 page). [cited by applicant]
Wang et al., “The shear wave properties of ERF”; Spawda 2015; Abstract (3 pages). [cited by applicant]
Yu et al., “Distance Characteristics of Sound Wave Attenuation in ER Fluids”; Telkominka, vol. 11, No. 2, Feb. 2013; 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Cited By (1)
US 12,687,525