IP Library Granted Patent US 12,442,739
Granted Patent B2
US 12,442,739 · App. 17/976,269 · Granted Oct 14, 2025

Device and method for evaluating the susceptibility of hot cracking in additive manufacturing

Inventor: Sindo Kou (Madison, WI)
Assignee: Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation
G01N3/08B29C64/245B29C64/393B33Y50/02B22F10/25B22F10/28B22F12/30B23K26/342B29C64/153B33Y10/00B33Y30/00B33Y40/00G01N2203/0017G01N2203/0057G01N2203/0244G01N2203/0282
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,442,739
App. No.
17/976,269
Granted
Oct 14, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A device and method are provided for evaluating the susceptibility of hot cracking in an additive manufacturing process. A first end of a substrate is interconnected to a base and one of the base and a deposition device is moved in a first direction and the second end of the substrate is pulled. A powder is dispensed at a selected rate and an energy bean having an adjustable power density is direct at the powder to melt the powder to form a material which is deposited as a layer of a material on the substrate. During the deposition process or during the deposition of the material on a subsequent substrate, one or more parameters/conditions are varied to determine the point at which hot cracking occurs during the deposition process.

Claims (58)

1. A device for evaluating the susceptibility of hot cracking in an additive manufacturing process, comprising:

a deposition device configured to deposit a layer of a material on a substrate;

a base in spaced relation to the deposition device and being configured to support the substrate;

a first connection arrangement connectable to the base and adapted for interconnecting to a first end of the substrate to the base;

a second connection arrangement slidably supported on the base and being connectable to a second end of the substrate;

a drive mechanism operatively connected to one of the base and the deposition device and being configured to axially move the one of the base and the deposition device in a selected direction at a speed as the layer of material is being deposited on the substrate; and

a puller mechanism operatively connected to the second connection arrangement, the puller mechanism pulling the second connection arrangement away from the first connection arrangement.

2. The device of claim 1 wherein the first connection arrangement includes a pin threadable into the base at a first location, the pin configured to pass through a corresponding first aperture in the first end of the substrate and into the base to interconnect the substrate to the base.

3. The device of claim 1 wherein the second connection arrangement includes:

a slider configured for slidable linear movement along the base; and

a pin threadable into the slider, the pin configured to pass through a corresponding aperture in a second end of the substrate and into the slider to interconnect the substrate to the slider.

4. The device of claim 1 further comprising a central processing unit operatively connected to the drive mechanism, the central processing unit configured to control the speed of the one of the base and the deposition device in the selected direction.

5. The device of claim 1 further comprising a central processing unit operatively connected to the puller mechanism, the central processing unit configured to control a speed at which the second connection arrangement is pulled away from the first connection arrangement.

6. The device of claim 1 further comprising a central processing unit operatively connected to the puller mechanism, the central processing unit configured to control a force at which the second connection arrangement is pulled away from the first connection arrangement.

7. The device of claim 1 wherein the speed at which the drive mechanism axially moves the one of the base and the deposition device in the selected direction is adjustable.

8. The device of claim 1 wherein the puller mechanism pulls the second connection arrangement at a selected speed, the selected speed being adjustable.

9. The device of claim 1 wherein the puller pulls the second connection arrangement with a selected force, the selected force being adjustable.

10. The device of claim 1 wherein the deposition device includes:

a dispenser configured to dispense a powder at a selected rate; and

an energy beam generator configured to generate an energy beam having an adjustable power density, the energy beam being directable at the powder to melt the powder and form the material.

11. A method for evaluating the susceptibility of hot cracking in an additive manufacturing process, comprising the steps: interconnecting a first end of a substrate to a base; moving one of the base and a deposition device in a first direction; depositing a layer of a material on the substrate with the deposition device; pulling a second end of the substrate in a second direction; and evaluating the layer of material deposited on the substrate for hot cracking.

12. The method of claim 11 comprising the additional step of heating the substrate prior to the step of depositing the layer of material on the substrate.

13. The method of claim 11 wherein the deposition device includes:

a dispenser configured to dispense a powder a selected rate, the powder having a particle size; and

an energy beam generator configured to generate an energy beam having an adjustable power density, the energy beam being directable at the powder to melt the powder and form the material.

14. The method of claim 13 wherein:

the substrate is a first substrate;

the one of the base and the deposition device is moved in the first direction at a velocity;

after the layer of material is deposited on the first substrate, conducting the additional steps of:

disconnecting the first end of the first substrate from the base;

interconnecting a first end of a second substrate to the base;

moving at least one of the base and a deposition device in the first direction;

depositing a layer of the material on the second substrate; and

pulling a second end of the second substrate in the second direction;

wherein after the layer of material is deposited on the first substrate, varying at least one of the velocity at which the one of the base and the deposition device is moved, a velocity at which the second end of the substrate in pulled in the second direction; a force with which the second end of the second substrate in pulled in the second direction, the selected rate at which the powder is dispensed, the particle size of the powder, and the power density of the energy beam, for the second substrate.

15. The method of claim 14 comprising the additional step of evaluating the layer of material deposited on the second substrate for hot cracks.

16. The method of claim 14 comprising the additional steps of:

comparing the layers of material deposited on the first and second of substrates; and

determining a preferable additive manufacturing process in response to the comparison of the layers of material deposited on the first and second substrates.

17. The method of claim 13 wherein the selected rate at which the powder is dispensed, the particle size of the powder, and the power density of the energy beam is varied as the layer of the material is deposited on the substrate.

18. The method of claim 11 wherein at least one of a velocity at which the one of the base and the deposition device is moved, a velocity at which the second end of the substrate is pulled in the second direction; and a force with which the second end of the substrate is pulled in the second direction is varied as the layer of the material is deposited on the substrate.

19. The method of claim 11 wherein the first direction and the second direction are the same.

20. A method for evaluating the susceptibility of hot cracking in an additive manufacturing process, comprising the steps: providing a substrate; interconnecting a first end of the substrate to a base; moving one of the base and a deposition device in a first direction at a velocity; dispensing a powder at a selected rate; generating an energy beam having an adjustable power density, the energy beam being directable at the powder to melt the powder and form a material; depositing a layer of the material on the substrate; pulling a second end of the substrate in a second direction; and evaluating the layer of material deposited on the substrate for hot cracking.

21. The method of claim 20 comprising the additional step of heating the substrate prior to the step of depositing the layer of material on the substrate.

22. The method of claim 20 wherein the substrate is one of a plurality of substrates and wherein the method further comprises:

for each additional substrate of the plurality of substrates, repeating the steps of:

interconnecting a first end of the additional substrate to a base;

moving one of the base and the deposition device in the first direction at the velocity;

dispensing the powder at the selected rate;

directing the energy beam at the powder to melt the powder and form the material;

depositing a layer of the material on the additional substrate;

pulling a second end of the substrate in a second direction; and

varying at least one of the velocity at which the at least one of the base and the deposition device is moved, a velocity at which the second end of the additional substrate in pulled in the second direction, a force with which the second end of the additional substrate in pulled in the second direction, the selected rate at which the powder is dispensed, a particle size of the powder, and the power density of the energy beam.

23. The method of claim 22 comprising the additional steps of:

comparing the layers of material deposited on the plurality of substrates; and

determining a preferable additive manufacturing process in response to the comparison of the layers of material deposited on the plurality of substrates.

24. The method of claim 20 wherein at least one of the velocity at which the one of the base and the deposition device is moved, a velocity at which the second end of the substrate is pulled in the second direction, a force with which the second end of the substrate is pulled in the second direction, the selected rate at which the powder is dispensed, the particle size of the powder, and the power density of the energy beam is varied as the layer of the material is deposited on the substrate.

25. The method of claim 20 wherein the first direction and the second direction are the same.

Assignments (2)
CONFIRMATORY LICENSE Recorded Jan 29, 2025
From: WISCONSIN ALUMNI RESEARCH FOUNDATION
To: NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Reel/Frame 070054/0014 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 25, 2023
From: KOU, SINDO
To: WISCONSIN ALUMNI RESEARCH FOUNDATION
Reel/Frame 062485/0854 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20240139811A1 · May 2, 2024
References Cited (15)
US 11660818B2 · Weaver · 2023 [cited by examiner]
CN 111272872A · 2020 [cited by examiner]
CN 112139656A · 2020 [cited by examiner]
CN-111272872-A, English Translation (Year: 2020). [cited by examiner]
CN-112139656-A, English Translation (Year: 2020). [cited by examiner]
K.A. Yushchenko et al., “Comparative evaluation of sensitivity of welded joints on alloy Inconel 690 to hot cracking,” The Paton Welding Journal (Scientific and Technical), Nov. 2011 #11, pp. 2-7. [cited by applicant]
V.D. Poznyakov et al., “Influence of technological factors on resistance to delayed fracture of butt joints of rail steel in arc welding,” The Paton Welding Journal (Scientific and Technical), Nov. 2011 #11, pp. 8-11. [cited by applicant]
V.S. Kuchuk-Yatsenko, “Flash-butt welding of high-temperature nickel alloy using nano-structured foils,” The Paton Welding Journal (Scientific and Technical), Nov. 2011 #11, pp. 12-14. [cited by applicant]
V.N. Shlepakov et al., “Development of flux-cored wire for arc welding of high-strength steel of bainite class,” The Paton Welding Journal (Scientific and Technical), Nov. 2011 #11, pp. 15-18. [cited by applicant]
Ya.P. Lazorenko et al., “Analysis of spectrum of the welding arc light for monitoring of arc welding (Review),” The Paton Welding Journal (Scientific and Technical), Nov. 2011 #11, pp. 19-21. [cited by applicant]
L.M. Lobanov et al., “In-process quality control of welded panels of alloy VT20 using method of electron shearography,” The Paton Welding Journal (Scientific and Technical), Nov. 2011 #11, pp. 22-27. [cited by applicant]
N.M. Makhlin et al., “Single- and multioperator systems for automatic welding of position butt joints of nuclear power plant piping,” The Paton Welding Journal (Industrial), Nov. 2011 #11, pp. 28-36. [cited by applicant]
I.I. Zaruba et al., “Ways of increasing the technological efficiency of rectifiers for mechanized welding and surfacing (Review),” The Paton Welding Journal (Industrial), Nov. 2011 #11, pp. 37-40. [cited by applicant]
O.K. Makovetskaya et al., “State-of-the-art and prospects of market of steel and welding equipment in China (Review),” The Paton Welding Journal (Industrial), Nov. 2011 #11, pp. 41-45. [cited by applicant]
V.A. Kolyada, “System of video observation of the process of TIG welding of titanium structures,” The Paton Welding Journal (Brief Information), Nov. 2011 #11, pp. 46-48. [cited by applicant]