IP Library Granted Patent US 11,848,933
Granted Patent B1
US 11,848,933 · App. 17/977,175 · Granted Dec 19, 2023

Systems and methods for an entity to control information exchange

Inventors: Daniel James Carroll (Prairie Village, KS); Aaron August Sloup (Olathe, KS)
Assignee: THE & COMPANY
H04L63/10G06F21/62H04L63/0407H04L63/06G06F2221/2141G06Q20/22
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,848,933
App. No.
17/977,175
Granted
Dec 19, 2023
Kind
B1
Abstract

Systems and methods that provide access to users of a network system via a unique identity key that controls access and permission rights of outside entities as controlled by the entity itself. The system assigns unique identity to a unique entity. The key is responsible for facilitating preferred access types and information accessed by outside entities, and acts as a signal for action, interaction and experience within the System as well as third party platforms. Each interaction within the system includes a requesting entity's proxy (‘REP’) sending an information access request (‘IAR’) to the deciding entity's proxy (‘DEP’) via a network. This IAR is routed to the correct DEP via the unique identifier. The DEP applies access preferences to allow or deny the IAR, in part or completely. If allowed or partially allowed, the DEP returns information to the REP.

Claims (28)

1. A non-transitory computer readable medium storing an application for a computing device, the application including instructions executable by a processor of an electronic device operated by a Deciding Entity to cause the electronic device to:

establish a Deciding Entity's Proxy (“DEP”) within a network system for the Deciding Entity, the DEP including a unique identifying access key ID;

receive an information access request (IAR) at the electronic device operated by the Deciding Entity from a Requesting Entity to the DEP via the unique identifying access key ID associated with the DEP;

determine, by the DEP as operating on the electronic device operated under the control of the Deciding Entity, whether to grant or deny the IAR based upon a review of rules assigned to the DEP; and

send information responsive to the IAR to the Requesting Entity only if the IAR is determined to be granted.

2. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 1 , wherein the IAR is generated by a Requesting Entity's Proxy (“REP”) established within the network system.

3. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 2 , wherein the information responsive to the IAR if the IAR is determined to be granted is sent to the REP.

4. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 1 , wherein the unique identifying access key ID includes an alpha-numeric string beginning with the symbol “&”, and further wherein following the “&” symbol, each combination of characters will be unique among all Entities within the network.

5. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 1 , wherein the unique identifying access key ID is not indefinitely tied to any other identifier associated with the Deciding Entity.

6. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 1 , wherein the unique identifying access key ID accesses DEP-related information residing within and outside the network system.

7. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 1 , wherein the unique identifying access key ID is electronically linked to instructions for preferred types of access and relationships with other unique identifying access key IDs as unique nodes within the network system.

8. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 1 , wherein the unique identifying access key ID is electronically linked to instructions for unique identifying elements of the DEP that serve as proof of identity of the DEP within and outside the network system.

9. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 1 , wherein the unique identifying access key ID carries instructions for preferred types of access and relationships with Requesting Entities sending information access.

10. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 1 , wherein the unique identifying access key ID and corresponding linked rules facilitates asymmetric relationships in which access rights and permissions are not equally shared by both the DEP and a Requesting Entity.

11. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 1 , wherein the DEP determines access rights and permissions for internet search and browser-based requests for access.

12. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 1 , wherein the Deciding Entity is at least one of a person, a non-person, a multi-person, and a multi-non-person entity.

13. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 2 , wherein the unique identifying access key ID obstructs an REP from accessing the Deciding Entity associated with the DEP if access rights have not been granted.

14. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 1 , wherein the unique identifying access key ID facilitates interactions within the network system and with third party platforms.

15. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 1 , wherein the unique identifying access key ID facilitates interactions within the network system and when embedded in other applications and software development kits (SDK).

16. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 1 , wherein the unique identifying access key ID instigates payment-by-presence processes as informed by access rights and permissions.

17. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 1 , wherein the unique identifying access key ID instigates identification processes in physical proximity to a Requesting Entity.

18. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 1 , wherein rules assigned to the DEP evolve contextually based on at least one factor selected from the group consisting of time, place, and preference.

19. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 1 , wherein rules assigned to the DEP apply to at least one contextual activity selected from the group consisting of meetings, events, and gatherings.

20. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 1 , wherein the IAR is received by the DEP from the Requesting Entity without passing through a central server.

21. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 1 , wherein the application is programmed to:

access stored contact information for the Deciding Entity including at least one of an email address and phone number for the Deciding Entity;

identify a potential need for updating the stored contact information; and

prompt the Deciding Entity to consider the identified potential need for updating the stored contact information.

Assignments (2)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jun 15, 2023
From: DIEM AI, LLC
To: THE & COMPANY
Reel/Frame 064005/0279 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 31, 2022
From: CARROLL, DANIEL JAMES; SLOUP, AARON AUGUST
To: DIEM AI, LLC
Reel/Frame 061593/0608 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation 16598934 · Oct 10, 2019
Provisional Application 62743648 · Oct 10, 2018