IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,275,154
Granted Patent B2
US 12,275,154 · App. 17/985,215 · Granted Apr 15, 2025

Robots and methods for protecting fragile components thereof

Inventor: Connor Shannon Richard (Vancouver, CA)
Assignee: Sanctuary Cognitive Systems Corporation
B25J9/1674B25J9/161B25J9/1664B25J13/08B25J15/0009B25J15/0019B25J15/024B25J19/0075B25J19/0091B25J19/02B62D57/032
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,275,154
App. No.
17/985,215
Granted
Apr 15, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present disclosure relates to protecting fragile members of robots from damage during fall events. In response to detecting a fall event, a fragile member of a robot can be actuated to a defensive configuration to avoid or reduce damage. An actuatable protective member can be actuated to protect a fragile member to avoid or reduce damage to the fragile member. Actuatable protective members can be dedicated protective members, or can be other members of the robot which serve different functionality outside of a fall event but act as a protective member during a fall event.

Claims (49)

1. A robot comprising:

a body;

at least one actuatable member comprising an arm member including an elbow portion;

a fragile member comprising a hand-shaped end effector coupled to the body by the arm member;

at least one processor;

at least one sensor communicatively coupled to the at least one processor;

at least one non-transitory processor-readable storage medium communicatively coupled to the at least one processor, the at least one non-transitory processor-readable storage medium storing processor-executable instructions which, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the robot to:

detect, by the at least one processor, a fall event of the body based on sensor data from the at least one sensor; and

in response to detecting the fall event;

actuate the hand-shaped end effector to move towards the body in a defensive configuration which protects the fragile member from damage during the fall event; and

actuate the arm member to extend the elbow portion away from the body in a protective configuration which protects the fragile member from damage during the fall event.

2. The robot of claim 1 , wherein the defensive configuration is a contracted configuration.

3. The robot of claim 1 , wherein:

the hand-shaped end effector comprises a plurality of finger-shaped members coupled to a palm-shaped member; and

the defensive configuration is a fist-shaped configuration.

4. The robot of claim 1 , wherein;

the processor-executable instructions which, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the robot to actuate the arm member to extend the elbow portion away from the body in a protective configuration cause the elbow portion of the arm member to brace the body during the fall event.

5. The robot of claim 1 , wherein:

the arm member comprises at least one support member; and

the processor-executable instructions which, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the robot to actuate the arm member to extend the elbow portion away from the body in a protective configuration cause the support member to extend from a stowed configuration to a support configuration which braces the fragile member during the fall event.

6. The robot of claim 1 , wherein:

the fragile member includes a plurality of fragile members;

the at least one actuatable member includes a plurality of actuatable members; and

the processor-executable instructions-which, when executed by the at least one processor, further cause the robot to: actuate each actuatable member of the plurality of actuatable members to a respective protective configuration which protects a respective fragile member of the plurality of fragile members from damage during the fall event.

7. The robot of claim 1 , wherein the defensive configuration is a contracted configuration, and the protective configuration is an extended configuration.

8. The robot of claim 1 , wherein:

the hand-shaped member includes two hand-shaped members; and

the at least one arm member includes two arm members.

9. The robot of claim 1 , further comprising at least one support structure coupled to the at least one actuatable member which protects the at least one actuatable member from damage during the fall event.

10. The robot of claim 9 , wherein the at least one support structure is selected from a group of structures consisting of:

at least one pad;

at least one pedestal; and

at least one spring.

11. The robot of claim 9 , wherein;

the at least one support structure comprises at least one elbow pad positioned at or proximate the elbow portion.

12. The robot of claim 11 , wherein the processor-executable instructions, when executed by the at least one processor, further cause the robot to, in response to detecting the fall event:

actuate the elbow pad to cover the elbow portion.

13. The robot of claim 9 , wherein:

the support structure is actuatable between a stowed configuration in which the support structure is stowed, and a support configuration in which the support structure supports the at least one actuatable member; and

the processor-executable instructions, when executed by the at least one processor, further cause the robot to, in response to detecting the fall event, actuate the at least one support structure from the stowed configuration to the support configuration.

14. The robot of claim 1 , wherein the at least one sensor comprises at least one sensor selected from a group of sensors consisting of:

an accelerometer;

a gyroscope;

an inertial measurement unit;

a visual sensor;

a LIDAR sensor;

an audio sensor; and

a tactile sensor.

15. The robot of claim 1 , further comprising two actuatable leg members, wherein the two actuatable leg members are actuatable to move the robot by bipedal motion.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 11, 2025
From: SHANNON, CONNOR RICHARD
To: SANCTUARY COGNITIVE SYSTEMS CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 070468/0327 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63278817 · Nov 12, 2021
Related Publication 20230150135A1 · May 18, 2023
References Cited (15)
US 6902015B2 · Furuta et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 9193403B2 · Yun et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9429948B2 · Gouaillier · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20120245735A1 · Lee · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20130231822A1 · Gouaillier · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20140288705A1 · Yun · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20170043486A1 · Laville · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20230014536A1 · Kamon · 2023 [cited by examiner]
WO 2015169894A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020060267A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
Liu, Dongdong, Yuhang Lin, and Vikram Kapila. “A rollover strategy for wrist damage reduction in a forward falling humanoid.” 2021 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation (ICMA). IEEE, 2021. [cited by examiner]
Li, Qingqing, et al. “A minimized falling damage method for humanoid robots.” International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems 14.5 (2017): 1729881417728016. [cited by examiner]
Cui, Da, et al. “Human inspired fall arrest strategy for humanoid robots based on stiffness ellipsoid optimisation.” Bioinspiration & biomimetics 16.5 (2021): 056014. [cited by examiner]
Ha, Sehoon, and C. Karen Liu. “Multiple contact planning for minimizing damage of humanoid falls.” 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, 2015. [cited by examiner]
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, International Search Report, PCT/CA2022/051670, Feb. 1, 2023. [cited by applicant]