IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,565,119
Granted Patent B2
US 12,565,119 · App. 17/996,877 · Granted Mar 3, 2026

Method for monitoring ageing of a battery unit

Inventor: Hamed Hooshyar (Gothenburg, SE)
Assignee: VOLVO TRUCK CORPORATION
B60L58/16G01R31/392H02J7/005
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,565,119
App. No.
17/996,877
Granted
Mar 3, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for monitoring battery ageing of a battery unit in an energy storage system of a vehicle or vessel. The method includes predicting an expected service life of the battery unit based on at least information relating to a planned usage of the battery unit, during usage of the battery unit, obtaining operational data relating to an actual usage of the battery unit, predicting an actual service life of the battery unit based on at least the obtained operational data, comparing the predicted actual service life with the predicted expected service life, thus obtaining a comparison result; determining whether a predetermined notification criterion is fulfilled based on the comparison result, generating a notification to a user of the battery unit at least if the predetermined notification criterion is fulfilled.

Claims (25)

1 . A method for monitoring battery ageing of a battery unit in an energy storage system of a vehicle or a vessel, the method comprising:

predicting an expected service life of the battery unit based on at least information relating to a planned usage of the battery unit, wherein predicting the expected service life of the battery unit comprises:

creating a set of battery usage classifications, wherein each battery usage classification is associated with at least one set of predefined operating parameter ranges,

for each battery usage classification, determining at least one expected ageing curve associated with each battery usage classification,

classifying the planned usage of the battery unit in accordance with the set of battery usage classifications,

wherein the prediction of the expected service life is determined based on the at least one expected ageing curve of the battery usage classification associated with the classified planned usage,

during usage of the battery unit, obtaining operational data relating to an actual usage of the battery unit,

predicting an actual service life of the battery unit based on at least the obtained operational data, wherein predicting the actual service life of the battery unit comprises classifying the actual usage of the battery unit in accordance with the set of battery usage classifications, the predicted actual service life of the battery unit being determined based on the at least one expected ageing curve of the battery usage classification associated with the classified actual usage,

comparing the predicted actual service life with the predicted expected service life, thus obtaining a comparison result;

determining whether a predetermined notification criterion is fulfilled based on the comparison result,

generating a notification to a user of the battery unit if the predetermined notification criterion is fulfilled.

2 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein determining the at least one expected ageing curve comprises simulating ageing of the battery unit for operating parameter values within the at least one set of predefined operating parameter ranges.

3 . The method according to claim 2 , wherein the simulation of ageing is performed based on battery cell operational data obtained in battery cell tests, wherein the battery cell tests are carried out for at least one type of battery cell comprised in the battery unit.

4 . The method according to claim 2 , wherein the set of battery usage classifications comprises at least three different classifications.

5 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the predetermined notification criterion is considered fulfilled if the battery usage classification associated with the classified actual usage differs from the battery usage classification associated with the classified planned usage.

6 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the predetermined notification criterion is considered fulfilled if the predicted actual service life deviates from the predicted expected service life by at least a predetermined amount.

7 . The method according to claim 6 , further comprising:

if the predetermined notification criterion is fulfilled, determining a reason for the deviation in the predicted actual service life from the predicted expected service life based on at least the obtained operational data.

8 . The method according to claim 1 , further comprising:

providing information to the user of the battery unit relating to the predicted actual service life of the battery unit.

9 . A non-transitory computer readable medium carrying a computer program comprising program code for performing the method according to claim 1 when said program code is run on a computer.

10 . A control unit configured to perform the method according to claim 1 .

11 . A battery management system for an energy storage system comprising the control unit according to claim 10 .

12 . A hybrid vehicle, comprising an energy storage system and a control unit according to claim 10 .

13 . A fully electrified vehicle, comprising an energy storage system and a control unit according to claim 10 .

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 3, 2024
From: HOOSHYAR, HAMED
To: VOLVO TRUCK CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 066002/0197 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20230150396A1 · May 18, 2023
References Cited (30)
US 8035395B2 · Suzuki · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 9878631B2 · Hyde · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 9895991B2 · Kim · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 10488467B2 · Lee · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 11226374B2 · Severson · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11346891B2 · Gorrachategui · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11408942B2 · Liu · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11809255B2 · Hooshyar · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 12187138B2 · Altaf · 2025 [cited by examiner]
US 12252021B2 · Altaf · 2025 [cited by examiner]
US 12320854B2 · Altaf · 2025 [cited by examiner]
US 20080186028A1 · Jones et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090205890A1 · Diegelmann et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20150239365A1 · Hyde et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160221465A1 · Kratzer et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20200020178A1 · Fröhner · 2020 [cited by examiner]
CN 102749589A · 2012 [cited by applicant]
CN 105301510A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
CN 106772100A · 2017 [cited by examiner]
CN 105301510B · 2017 [cited by examiner]
CN 111044927A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
JP 2004191152A · 2004 [cited by examiner]
JP 3792874B2 · 2006 [cited by examiner]
JP 2018179733A · 2018 [cited by examiner]
SE 541804C2 · 2019 [cited by examiner]
WO 2016112926A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019199219A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion in corresponding International Application No. PCT/EP2020/061263 mailed Jan. 20, 2021 (10 pages). [cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on Patentability in corresponding International Application No. PCT/EP2020/061263 mailed Apr. 13, 2022 (7 pages). [cited by applicant]
Chinese Office Action dated Jan. 24, 2025 in corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 202080099991.7, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]