IP Library Granted Patent US 12,732,309
Granted Patent B2
US 12,732,309 · App. 17/997,719 · Granted Sep 8, 2026

Efficient uplink hybrid automatic repeat request feedback for point to multipoint transmissions

Inventors: David Navrátil (Helsinki, FI); David Bhatoolaul (Swindon, GB); Rapeepat Ratasuk (Inverness, IL); Fasil Berhanu Tesema (Munich, DE); Volker Pauli (Ansbach, DE)
Assignee: Nokia Technologies Oy
H04L1/1854H04L1/1812H04L1/1896H04W24/02
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,732,309
App. No.
17/997,719
Granted
Sep 8, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

An apparatus including at least one processor and at least one memory including computer program code. The at least one memory and the computer program code are configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the apparatus at least to identify at least one of a plurality of user equipment based on a pre-determined channel quality. A determination is made that point-to-point efficiency is greater than point-to-multipoint efficiency. At least one identified UE with worse channel condition is switched from point-to-multipoint to point-to-point.

Claims (46)

1 . An apparatus, comprising:

at least one processor; and

at least one memory including computer program code;

the at least one memory and the computer program code configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the apparatus at least to:

receive aggregated feedback configured for point-to-multipoint from a plurality of user equipment, wherein the aggregated feedback includes at least one extensive negative acknowledgement from one user equipment of the plurality of user equipment in a worse channel condition, wherein the worse channel condition corresponds to a user equipment that produces Hybrid Automatic Repeat reQuests-Negative Acknowledgements (HARQ NACKs) for which an estimated retransmission delay is determined to cause a greatest number of violations of a quality-of-service (QoS) delay budget requirement of the service;

identify the one user equipment of the plurality of user equipment with the worse channel condition;

determine that point-to-point efficiency is greater than point-to-multipoint efficiency for the one user equipment; and

switch the one user equipment from point-to-multipoint to point-to-point when the point-to-point efficiency is greater than the point-to-multipoint efficiency.

2 . The apparatus of claim 1 , further comprising:

transmit at least one reconfiguration message to the one user equipment.

3 . An apparatus, comprising:

at least one processor; and

at least one memory including computer program code;

the at least one memory and the computer program code configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the apparatus at least to:

determine at least one aggregated feedback timing for at least one single cell point-to-multipoint bearer;

transmit at least one notification to a plurality of user equipment with the determined at least one aggregated feedback timing;

receive aggregated feedback comprising at least one of hybrid automatic repeat request acknowledgement or negative acknowledgement from the plurality of user equipment receiving the at least one single cell point-to-multipoint bearer;

receive at least one negative acknowledgement that is an extensive negative acknowledgement in the aggregated feedback from one user equipment of the plurality of user equipment in a worse channel condition, wherein the worse channel condition corresponds to a user equipment that produces Hybrid Automatic Repeat reQuests-Negative Acknowledgements (HARQ NACKs) for which an estimated retransmission delay is determined to cause a greatest number of violations of a quality-of-service (QoS) delay budget requirement of the service;

identify the one user equipment in the worse channel condition; and

adjust the at least one aggregated feedback timing based on the quality of service delay budget requirement of the service.

4 . An apparatus, comprising:

at least one processor; and

at least one memory including computer program code;

the at least one memory and the computer program code configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the apparatus at least to:

receive at least one notification from at least one network entity with aggregate feedback timing;

transmit at least one aggregated feedback comprising at least one of hybrid automatic repeat request acknowledgement or negative acknowledgement feedback;

transmit at least one extensive negative acknowledgement in the aggregated feedback to the at least one network entity from one user equipment of a plurality of user equipment in a worse channel condition, wherein the worse channel condition corresponds to a user equipment that produces Hybrid Automatic Repeat reQuests-Negative Acknowledgements (HARQ NACKs) for which an estimated retransmission delay is determined to cause a greatest number of violations of a quality-of-service (QoS) delay budget requirement of the service; and

adjust at least one aggregated feedback timing based on the quality of service delay budget requirement of the service.

5 . The apparatus of claim 4 , wherein the at least one notification is in response to determination, by the at least one network entity, determining that point-to-point spectral efficiency is higher than point-to-multipoint spectral efficiency.

6 . The apparatus of claim 5 , further comprising: wherein the at least one processor, further causes the apparatus at least to switch from point-to-multipoint to point-to-point in response to the at least one notification.

7 . A method, comprising:

receiving, by a network entity, aggregated feedback configured for point-to-multipoint from a plurality of user equipment, wherein the aggregated feedback includes at least one extensive negative acknowledgement from one user equipment of the plurality of user equipment in a worse channel condition, wherein the worse channel condition corresponds to a user equipment that produces Hybrid Automatic Repeat reQuests-Negative Acknowledgements (HARQ NACKs) for which an estimated retransmission delay is determined to cause a greatest number of violations of a quality-of-service (QoS) delay budget requirement of the service;

identifying, by the network entity, the one user equipment;

determining, by the network entity, that point-to-point efficiency is greater than point-to-multipoint efficiency for the one user equipment; and

switching, by the network entity, the one user equipment from point-to-multipoint to point-to-point when the point-to-point efficiency is greater than the point-to-multipoint efficiency.

8 . The method of claim 7 , further comprising:

transmitting, by the network entity, at least one reconfiguration message to the one user equipment.

9 . A method, comprising:

determining, by a network entity, at least one aggregated feedback timing for at least one single cell point-to-multipoint bearer;

transmitting, by the network entity, at least one notification to a plurality of user equipment with the determined at least one aggregated feedback timing;

receiving, by the network entity, aggregated feedback comprising at least one of hybrid automatic repeat request acknowledgement or negative acknowledgement from the plurality of user equipment receiving the at least one single cell point-to-multipoint bearer;

receiving at least one extensive negative acknowledgement in the aggregated feedback from one user equipment of the plurality of user equipment in a worse channel condition, wherein the worse channel condition corresponds to a user equipment that produces Hybrid Automatic Repeat reQuests-Negative Acknowledgements (HARQ NACKs) for which an estimated retransmission delay is determined to cause a greatest number of violations of a quality-of-service (QoS) delay budget requirement of the service;

identifying the one user equipment in the worse channel condition; and

adjusting the at least one aggregated feedback timing based on the quality of service delay budget requirement of the service.

10 . The method of claim 9 , further comprising:

determining, by the network entity, the aggregate feedback timing based on: quality of service requirement, delay budget, the received hybrid automatic repeat request acknowledgement or negative acknowledgement, capacity of feedback channel, and scheduling of the at least one single cell point-to-multipoint bearer.

Assignments (4)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 6, 2023
From: NOKIA SOLUTIONS AND NETWORKS OY
To: NOKIA TECHNOLOGIES OY
Reel/Frame 062593/0980 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 6, 2023
From: NAVRÁTIL, DAVID; BHATOOLAUL, DAVID; RATASUK, RAPEEPAT
To: NOKIA TECHNOLOGIES OY
Reel/Frame 062593/0915 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 6, 2023
From: BERHANU TESEMA, FASIL; PAULI, VOLKER
To: NOMOR RESEARCH GMBH
Reel/Frame 062593/0931 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 6, 2023
From: NOMOR RESEARCH GMBH
To: NOKIA SOLUTIONS AND NETWORKS OY
Reel/Frame 062593/0964 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20230179343A1 · Jun 8, 2023
References Cited (33)
US 8687607B2 · Casaccia · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 9001777B2 · Zhang · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 9820259B2 · Wang · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 12316459B2 · Ijaz · 2025 [cited by examiner]
US 20070189207A1 · Sammour et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080256409A1 · Oran et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20130315124A1 · Rapaport et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20190007170A1 · Sun · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190103947A1 · Park · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190222967A1 · Ratilainen et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200059327A1 · Kini et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200099476A1 · Park · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200314027A1 · Deschenes · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210028890A1 · Rico Alvarino · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210068003A1 · Kadiri · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210282115A1 · Sengupta · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220217506A1 · Xu · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230007444A1 · Byun · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230388755A1 · Ganesan · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20250373888A1 · Wang · 2025 [cited by examiner]
WO 2019099670A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020068973A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021087855A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
“New Work Item on NR support of Multicast and Broadcast Services”, 3GPP TSG RAN Meeting #86, RP-193248, Agenda: 9.1.2, Huawei, Dec. 9-12, 2019, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Study on single-cell point-to-multipoint transmission for E-UTRA (Release 13)… [cited by applicant]
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; NR; Physical layer procedures for control (Release 16)”, 3GPP TS 38.213, V16.0.0, Dec. 2019, pp. 1-146. [cited by applicant]
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Study on RAN-centric data collection and utilization for LTE and NR (Release 16)”, 3GPP TR 37.816, V16.0.0, Jul. 2019, pp. 1-35. [cited by applicant]
“IEEE 802.3”, Wikipedia, Retrieved on Nov. 16, 2022, Webpage available at : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.3. [cited by applicant]
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; System architecture for the 5G System (5GS); Stage 2 (Release 16)”, 3GPP TS 23.501, V16.4.0, Mar. 2020, pp. 1-430. [cited by applicant]
Yu Lien et al., “3GPP NR Sidelink Transmissions Toward 5G V2X”, IEEE Access, vol. 8, Feb. 13, 2020, pp. 35368-35382. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for corresponding Patent Cooperation Treaty Application No. PCT/US2020/033465, dated Mar. 30, 2021, 19 pages. [cited by applicant]
“GCSE TR 23.768 current solutions evaluations and near term goals”, SA WG2 Meeting #98, S2-132689, Agenda: 6.5, Nokia Siemens Networks, Jul. 15-19, 2013, pp. 1-6. [cited by applicant]
Office action received for corresponding European Patent Application No. 20731673.8, dated Feb. 14, 2025, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]