IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,492,427
Granted Patent B2
US 12,492,427 · App. 18/001,933 · Granted Dec 9, 2025

Multiplex method for detecting different analytes in a sample

Inventors: Andreas Geipel (Mettmann, DE); Frank Reinecke (Essen, DE); Christian Korfhage (Langenfeld, DE)
Assignee: Resolve BioSciences GmbH
C12Q1/6841C12Q1/682C12Q1/6876G01N1/30G01N33/56961C12Q2600/16
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,492,427
App. No.
18/001,933
Granted
Dec 9, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

The technology provided herein relates to multiplex methods and kits for detecting different analytes in a sample in parallel by sequential signal-encoding of said analytes, as well as in vitro methods for screening, identifying and/or testing a substance and/or drug and in vitro methods for diagnosis of a disease, and an optical multiplexing system.

Claims (14)

1 . A method of assigning coded fluorescence patterns to a plurality of target analytes in a sample, comprising: subjecting the sample to a plurality of detection rounds, each detection round comprising: contacting the sample to a decoding oligonucleotide probe population comprising decoding oligonucleotide probes that each recruit, by reverse complementary base pairing, one translator connector element comprising a fluorescence moiety signal element selected from at least two distinct populations of fluorescence moieties to at least some of the plurality of target analytes; wherein the decoding oligonucleotide probes do not directly bind target analytes; and wherein the decoding oligonucleotide probes are recruited to their target analytes by analyte specific probes, each analyte specific probe having an identifier element that is reverse complementary to a portion of at least one decoding oligonucleotide; contacting the sample to the at least two populations of translator connector elements differing in their fluorescence moieties, wherein the at least two populations of translator connector element differ in fluorescence moiety from one another; assaying for fluorescence in the sample; removing the decoding oligonucleotide probe population and the translator connector elements after each round of the assaying without removing the analyte specific probes, by heating the sample until base pairings in the decoding oligonucleotide probe population are destabilized but base pairings between the analyte specific probes and the analytes remain intact; wherein the decoding oligonucleotide probes of the decoding oligonucleotide probe population vary across the plurality of detection rounds causing the translator connector element comprising a fluorescence moiety signal element recruited to a target analyte to vary in fluorescence moiety across the plurality of detection rounds; and wherein the translator connector elements differing in their fluorescence moieties do not vary in composition across the plurality of detection rounds; wherein a fluorescence pattern at an analyte position in the sample is specified by order of decoding oligonucleotide probe addition to the sample.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein a number of patterns detectable increases exponentially with a number of detection rounds.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the translator connector elements do not comprise nucleic acid tags that are specific to the target analytes.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein separate aliquots of common translator connector elements are used across multiple detection rounds.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of detection rounds comprises at least 5 detection rounds.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the method comprises use of no more than two populations of translator connector elements.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the analyte specific probes comprise oligo-tagged antibodies.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the analyte specific probes comprise binding element portions that are reverse complementary to adjacent regions of a nucleotide analyte target, and identifier element portions that identify the target analyte for binding by at least some of the decoding oligonucleotide probes.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein a signal element fluorescence moiety of the translator connector elements is reverse complementary to a portion of a subset of the decoding oligonucleotide probes, causing members of a population of the translator connector elements sharing a common fluorescence moiety to be recruited to a plurality of target analytes tagged by distinct analyte specific probes differing in their identifier elements.

10 . The method of claim 9 , wherein members of a population of the translator connector elements do not specifically bind an analyte in the absence of a decoding oligonucleotide probe.

11 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the order of delivery of decoding oligonucleotide probes that bind an analyte specific probe identifier element assigns a coded fluorescence pattern to the target analyte that specifically identifies the analyte.

12 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the order of delivery decoding oligonucleotide probes that bind an analyte specific probe identifier element assigns a coded fluorescence pattern to the target analyte that uniquely identifies the analyte.

13 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the coded fluorescence pattern is not determined by a linear series of binding sites on the analyte.

14 . The method of claim 1 , wherein assigning coded fluorescence patterns to a plurality of target analytes distinguishes at least 1,000 target analytes using no more than two populations of fluorophore labeled translator connector elements.

Assignments (3)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 21, 2024
From: RESOLVE BIOSCIENCES GMBH
To: GLOBAL LOAN AGENCY SERVICES GMBH
Reel/Frame 068361/0639 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 11, 2023
From: GEIPEL, ANDREAS
To: RESOLVE BIOSCIENCES GMBH
Reel/Frame 063285/0405 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 10, 2023
From: REINECKE, FRANK; KORFHAGE, CHRISTIAN
To: RESOLVE BIOSCIENCES GMBH
Reel/Frame 063274/0144 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation In Part PCTEP2020067010 · Jun 18, 2020
Provisional Application 63127910 · Dec 18, 2020
Provisional Application 63129942 · Dec 23, 2020
Related Publication 20230227907A1 · Jul 20, 2023
References Cited (91)
US 7189509B2 · Shao et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 10227639B2 · Levner et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10457980B2 · Cai et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 11021737B2 · Church et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11473129B2 · Cai et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20150105298A1 · Czaplinski · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160369329A1 · Cai et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170212983A1 · Cai · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180142286A1 · Dunaway et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190218608A1 · Daugharthy · 2019 [cited by examiner]
EP 0611828A1 · 1994 [cited by applicant]
EP 2794928A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
EP 2992115A2 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
EP 3626833A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
EP 3720972A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
EP 3891297A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO 2003083440A2 · 2003 [cited by applicant]
WO 2007001986A2 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
WO 2011038403A1 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO 2011048184A1 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO 2011112634A2 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO 2012003742A1 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO 2013096851A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO 2013157821A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO 2014182528 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016011429A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016081740A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016201142A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017189525A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017201073A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018005336A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018026873A1 · 2018 [cited by examiner]
WO 2018044939A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018094385A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019113547A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019222178A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020093019A2 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020117713A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020123742A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020163397A2 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020240025A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021021982A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021067475A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021108370A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021108459A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021119402A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021247618A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021258024A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
Shah et al. In Situ Transcription Profiling of Single Cells Reveals Spatial Organization of Cells in the Mouse Hippocampus. Neuron. Oct. 19, 2016;92(2):342-357. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.10.001. PMID: 27764670; PMCID: … [cited by examiner]
“Daphnis et al., Hum Reprod, Jan. 2005, vol. 20(1): pp. 129-137, Detailed FISH analysis of day 5 human embryos reveals the mechanisms leading to mosaic aneuploidy”. [cited by applicant]
Almstrand et al., Appl Environ Microbiol, Oct. 2013, vol. 79(19): pp. 5978-5987, New methods for analysis of spatial distribution and coaggregation of microbial populations in complex biofilms. [cited by applicant]
Chen et al., Sci, Apr. 9, 2015: pp. 1-21 Spatially resolved, highly multiplexed RNA profiling in single cells; publishedApr. 24, 2015. [cited by applicant]
Choi et al., ACS NANO, May 27, 2014, vol. 8(5): pp. 4284-4294, Next-generation in situ hybridization chain reaction: Higher gain, lower cost, greater durability. [cited by applicant]
Choi et al., Development, Jun. 15, 2018, vol. 145(12): pp. 1-10 Third-generation in situ hybridization chain reaction: multiplexed, quantitative, sensitive, versatile, robust; published Jun. 15, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Choi et al., Nat Biotechnol, Nov. 2010, vol. 28(11): pp. 1208-1212 “Programmable in situ amplification for multiplexedimaging of mRNA expression”; available May 1, 2011. [cited by applicant]
Eng et al., Nature, Sep. 25, 2019, Transcriptome-scale super-resolved imaging in tissues by RNA seqFISH+. [cited by applicant]
Epstein et al., Cytometry, 1995, vol. 21: pp. 378-381 Reutilization of previously hybridized slides for fluorescence in situ hybridization. [cited by applicant]
Fields et al., eLife, 2019 ; 8:e42823 “A multiplexed DNA FISH strategy for assessing genome architecture inCaenorhabditis elegans”; published May 14, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Gasparini et al. Research Square (2006) doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.361 “Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for DNA replication origins” published Oct. 27, 2006. [cited by applicant]
Gerner et al. Immunity 37(2):364-376 August (2012) “Histo-Cytometry: in situ multiplex cell phenotyping, quantification, and spatial analysis applied to dendritic cell subset micro-anatomy in lymph nodes”; available onl… [cited by applicant]
Henegariu et al. Nature Genetics vol. 23, p. 263 (1999) Colour-changing karyotyping: an alternative to M-FISH/SKY; published Nov. 1999. [cited by applicant]
Kishi et al, Nature Methods vol. 16, pp. 533-544, Jun. 2019 “SABER amplifies FISH: enhanced multiplexed imagingof RNA and DNA in cells and tissues” published online May 20, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Kris et al. Plant Physiology vol. 144 pp. 1256-1266 (2007) “High-Throughput, High-Sensitivity Analysis of GeneExpression in [cited by applicant]
Lubeck et al., Nat Meth, Apr. 2014, vol. 11(4): pp. 360-361 “Single cell in situ RNA profiling by sequentialhybridization”; published Mar. 28, 2014. [cited by applicant]
Lubeck et al., Nat Meth, Jul. 31, 2012, vol. 9(7): pp. 743-748 Single-cell systems biology by super-resolution imaging and combinatorial labeling. [cited by applicant]
Mali et al Nature Methods vol. 10 No. 5 pp. 403 (2013) “Barcoding cells using cell-surface programmable DNA-binding domains” published online Mar. 17, 2013. [cited by applicant]
Mateo et al., Nature, Apr. 2019, vol. 568: pp. 49-54 “Visualizing DNA folding and RNA in embryos at single-cellresolution”; available Sep. 18, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Miner et al., Nucl Acid res, 2004, vol. 32(17): pp. e135, Mulecular barcodes detect redundancy and contamination in hairpin-bisulfite PCR. [cited by applicant]
Moffitt et al., PNAS, Sep. 27, 2016, vol. 113(39): pp. 11046-11051 “High-throughput single-cell gene-expressionprofiling with multiplexed error-robust fluorescence in situ hybridization”; published online Sep. 13, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Mokros et al., Genome, 2006, vol. 49: pp. 1036-1042 Identification of chromosomal fusion sites in [cited by applicant]
Mudiyanselage et al., Methods 2019, vol. 161, pp. 24-34 “Second generation fluorogenic RNA-based sensors” available online Jan. 17, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Muller et al., Chromosome Res, vol. 10(3): pp. 223-232 Towards unlimited colors for fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH). [cited by applicant]
https://www.molecularcatalog.abbott/int/en/Vysis-MultiVysion-PGT-Multi-color-Probe; 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
P.M. Nederlof et al., Cytometry 11:126-131 (1990), Multiple Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization. [cited by applicant]
Player et al., J Histochem Cytochem, 2001, vol. 49(5): pp. 603-611 “Single-copy gene detection using branchedDNA (bDNA) in situ hybridization”; published May 1, 2001. [cited by applicant]
Rimsza et al. Clinical Cancer Research 17(11) p. 3727 (2011) “Accurate Classification of Diffuse Large B-CellLymphoma into GerminalCenter and Activated B-Cell Subtypes Using a Nuclease Protection Assay on Formalin-Fixed… [cited by applicant]
Rouhanifard et al. Nature Biotech vol. 37 pp. 84-91 “ClampFISH detects individual nucleic acid molecules; usingclick chemistry-based amplification” published online Nov. 12, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Shah et al., Cell, Jul. 12, 2018, vol. 174(2): pp. 363-376 Dynamics and spatial genomics of the nascent transcriptomeby intron seqFISH; available Jul. 12, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Shah et al., Neuron, Oct. 19, 2016, vol. 92: pp. 342-357 “In situ transcription profiling of single cells reveals spatialorganization of cells in the mouse hippocampus”; published Oct. 19, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Sun et al., Nanomaterials (Basel) vol. 9 “Intracellular imaging with genetically encoded RNA-based molecularsensors” published Feb. 8, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Suppl. material: Almstrand et al., Appl Environ Microbiol, Oct. 2013, vol. 79(19): pp. 5978-5987 New methods for analysis of spatial distribution and coaggregation of microbial populations in complex biofilms. [cited by applicant]
Takei et al. BioRxiv preprint: doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.29.403055 “Global architecture of the nucleus in single cells byDNA seqFISH+ and multiplexed immunofluorescence” published online Nov. 30, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Takei, Nature, Jul. 27, 2021, Integrated spatial genomics reveals global architecture of single nuclei. [cited by applicant]
Uher et al., RBM, 2009, vol. 19(4): pp. 539-546, Non-informative results and monosomies in PGD: The importance of a third round of re-hybridization. [cited by applicant]
Wang et al., J Mol Diagn, Jan. 2012, vol. 14(1): pp. 22-29 “A novel in situ RNA analysis platform for formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues” published Jan. 2012. [cited by applicant]
Weremowicz et al, Prenatal Diagnosis 2006 vol. 26, pp. 1042-1050 “Validation of DNA probes forpreimplementation genetic diagnosis (PGD) by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)” published online Sep. 4, 2006. [cited by applicant]
Xia et al. Sci Rep vol. 9, p. 7721 (2019) “Multiplexed detection of RNA using MERFISH and branched DNAamplification” published online May 22, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Zhen et al., Prenat Diagn, 1998, vol. 18: pp. 1181-1185, Poly-FISH: A technique of repeated hybridizations that improves cytogenetic analysis of fetal cells in maternal blood. [cited by applicant]
Zheng et al. PLoS Biology 17(12) e3000569. doi.org/10.1371/journal. pbio.3000569 (2019) “A new branchedproximity hybridization assay for the quantificationof nanoscale proteinprotein proximity.” Published online Dec. 11… [cited by applicant]
A.P.K.K. Karunanayake Mudiyanselage et al., “Second-generation” fluorogenic RNA-based sensors, Elsevier Methods, 2019; 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Hildyard, et al., Multiplex in situ hybridization within a single transcript: RNAscope reveals dystrophin mRNA dynamics, PLOS One | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239467 Sep. 24, 2020; 29 pages. [cited by applicant]