IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,749,011
Granted Patent B2
US 12,749,011 · App. 18/002,271 · Granted Sep 29, 2026

Distributed computer system and method of operation thereof

Inventors: Jonathan Ward (Bury St Edmunds, GB); Marcin Abram (Bury St Edmunds, GB); Daniel Honerkamp (Bury St Edmunds, GB)
G06N20/00G06Q20/02H04L9/008G06Q2220/00
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,749,011
App. No.
18/002,271
Granted
Sep 29, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Disclosed is a distributed computer system that includes a plurality of worker nodes that are coupled together via a data communication network to exchange data therebetween, wherein collective learning of the worker nodes is managed within the distributed computer system. The distributed computer system comprises a data processing arrangement operable to cluster the plurality of worker nodes into one or more clusters, wherein worker nodes of a given cluster train a computing model by employing a respective secondary distributed ledger. The collective learning from the plurality of worker nodes is coordinated using the distributed ledger arrangement.

Claims (44)

1 . A distributed computer system to enable training of at least one computing model, the system comprising:

a plurality of worker nodes coupled via a data communication network, each worker node comprising at least one processor and a local database configured to process and store data;

a distributed ledger arrangement configured to coordinate operation of the system;

at least one secondary distributed ledger configured to coordinate collective learning of the plurality of worker nodes; and

one or more processors configured to execute instructions to:

cluster the plurality of worker nodes into one or more clusters by:

processing encrypted data associated with the worker nodes using a homomorphic encryption algorithm;

transmitting the encrypted data to at least one other worker node and receiving encrypted model predictions from the at least one other worker node; and

determining loss values based on the encrypted data and the encrypted model predictions for use in clustering the plurality of worker nodes;

synchronize, via a cross-ledger validation protocol, records between the distributed ledger arrangement and the at least one secondary distributed ledger;

execute, at the at least one secondary distributed ledger, at least one computer protocol for the collective learning of the plurality of worker nodes; and

cause the plurality of worker nodes within a given cluster to train the at least one computing model using information comprised in the at least one secondary distributed ledger,

wherein the clustering is performed before starting training of the at least one computing model.

2 . The distributed computer system of claim 1 , wherein the data processing arrangement is configured to cluster the plurality of worker nodes into one or more clusters based on estimated generalization performance of a shared classifier on a task associated with the worker nodes.

3 . The distributed computer system of claim 1 , wherein the system is configured to initiate the secondary distributed ledger by employing at least one of: staking of tokens in the distributed ledger, smart contract, off-chain contractual agreements.

4 . The distributed computer system of claim 1 , wherein each of the secondary distributed ledgers is configured to store cryptographically signed records pertaining to the respective computing model, worker nodes associated therewith, and a contribution of each of the worker nodes in their respective cluster in relation to training the respective computing model.

5 . The distributed computer system of claim 1 , wherein the data processing arrangement is configured to validate a given block in the distributed ledger arrangement when the given block is referenced by a block that has been notarized by a majority of the plurality of worker nodes.

6 . The distributed computer system of claim 1 , wherein the data processing arrangement is configured to employ verifiable delay functions to space a timing of block production according to a priority of each worker node within a given cluster.

7 . The distributed computer system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to apply the homomorphic encryption algorithm to model-update data vectors generated by the plurality of worker nodes prior to transmission of the encrypted data between worker nodes for determining the loss values used in clustering the plurality of worker node.

8 . The distributed computer system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to generate a matrix of loss values representing model performance across pairs of worker nodes and to cluster the plurality of worker nodes based on the generated matrix of loss values.

9 . The distributed computer system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to:

transmit encrypted data from a first worker node to a second worker node;

process the encrypted data at the second worker node using a machine learning model associated with the second worker node to generate encrypted model predictions; and

transmit the encrypted model predictions to the first worker node.

10 . A method for operating a distributed computer system to enable training of at least one computing model, wherein the distributed computer system comprises a plurality of worker nodes that are coupled via a data communication network to exchange data therebetween, each worker node comprising at least one processor and a local database configured to process and store data therein, and wherein operation of the distributed computer system is coordinated by a distributed ledger arrangement, the method comprising:

clustering the plurality of worker nodes into one or more clusters by:

processing encrypted data associated with the worker nodes using a homomorphic encryption algorithm;

transmitting the encrypted data to at least one other worker node and receiving encrypted model predictions from the at least one other worker node; and

determining loss values based on the encrypted data and the encrypted model predictions for use in clustering the plurality of worker nodes;

synchronizing, via a cross-ledger validation protocol, records between the distributed ledger arrangement and at least one secondary distributed ledger;

executing, at the at least one secondary distributed ledger, at least one computer protocol for collective learning of the plurality of worker nodes; and

training the at least one computing model at the plurality of worker nodes within a given cluster using information comprised in the at least one secondary distributed ledger,

wherein the clustering is performed before starting training of the at least one computing model.

11 . The method of claim 10 , wherein the method comprises clustering the plurality of worker nodes into one or more clusters based on estimated generalization performance of a shared classifier on a task associated with the worker nodes.

12 . The method of claim 10 , wherein the method comprises initiating at least one secondary distributed ledger by employing at least one of: staking of tokens in the distributed ledger arrangement, smart contract logic, off-chain contractual agreements.

13 . The method of claim 10 , wherein each of the secondary distributed ledgers stores cryptographically signed records pertaining to the respective computing model, worker nodes associated therewith, and a contribution of each of the worker nodes in the respective cluster to train the respective computing model.

14 . The method of claim 10 , wherein the method comprises validating a given block in the distributed ledger arrangement when the given block is referenced by a block that has been notarized by a majority of the plurality of worker nodes.

15 . The method of claim 10 , wherein the method comprises employing verifiable delay functions to space a timing of block production according to a priority of each worker node within a given cluster.

16 . The method of claim 10 , further comprising checking finality of the distributed ledger arrangement and the at least one secondary distributed ledger and relaying the information between the distributed ledger arrangement and the at least one secondary distributed ledger.

17 . The method of claim 10 , further comprising generating a matrix of loss values representing model performance across pairs of worker nodes and clustering the plurality of worker nodes based on the generated matrix of loss values.

18 . The method of claim 10 , further comprising:

transmitting encrypted data from a first worker node to a second worker node;

processing the encrypted data at the second worker node using a machine learning model associated with the second worker node to generate encrypted model predictions; and

transmitting the encrypted model predictions to the first worker node.

Assignments (2)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 25, 2023
From: UVUE LTD
To: SHEIKH, HUMAYUN MUNIR
Reel/Frame 065337/0089 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 25, 2023
From: UVUE LTD
To: SHEIKH, HUMAYUN MUNIR
Reel/Frame 065346/0001 →
Priority Claims (2)
EP 20020289 · Jun 22, 2020 · regional
EP 20020400 · Sep 7, 2020 · regional
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20230316127A1 · Oct 5, 2023
References Cited (17)
US 11218293B2 · Manamohan · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20190236598A1 · Padmanabhan · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190334708A1 · Carpov · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190370334A1 · Bhowmick · 2019 [cited by examiner]
WO 2020030936A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020035831A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
Felix Sattler, Klaus-Robert Müller, Wojciech Samek, Clustered Federated Learning: Model-Agnostic Distributed Multi-Task Optimization under Privacy Constraints [retrieved on Sep. 26, 2025] Retrieved from the Internet <UR… [cited by examiner]
Amritraj Singh, Kelly Click, Reza M. Parizi, Qi Zhang, Ali Dehghantanha, Kim-Kwang Raymond Choo, Sidechain technologies in blockchain networks: An examination and state-of-the-art review, Journal of Network and Computer… [cited by examiner]
Ambili, K. N., M. Sindhu, and M. Sethumadhavan. “On Federated and Proof Of Validation Based Consensus Algorithms In Blockchain.” IOP Conference Series. Materials Science and Engineering. vol. 225. No. 1. IOP Publishing,… [cited by examiner]
6. Boneh, Dan, et al. “Verifiable delay functions.” Annual international cryptology conference. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. (Year: 2018). [cited by examiner]
P. Gai, A. Kiayias and D. Zindros, “Proof-of-Stake Sidechains,” 2019 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), San Francisco, CA, USA, 2019, pp. 139-156, doi: 10.1109/SP.2019.00040 . . . (Year: 2019). [cited by examiner]
Ghosh, Avishek, et al. “An Efficient Framework for Clustered Federated Learning.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.04088 (2020) (Year: 2020). [cited by examiner]
Chiraag et al. published “Gazelle: A Low Latency Framework for Secure Neural Network Inference”, in Cornell University Library, 201 Olin Library Cornell University Ithaca, NY 14853 onJan. 16, 2018, 17 pages. [cited by applicant]
Shayan et al. published “Biscotti: A Ledger for Private and Secure Peer-to-Peer Machine Learning”, in The University of British Columbia (Vancouver) on Dec. 12, 2019, Version 4, 20 pages. [cited by applicant]
Liu et al. published “Blockchain and Machine Learning for Communications and Networking Systems”, in IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 22, No. 2, Second Quarter on Feb. 24, 2020, pp. 1392-1431. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report issued in EP Patent Application No. EP20020400.6, on Mar. 1, 2021, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority mailed in International Patent Application PCT/IB2021/055429, on Oct. 12, 2021, 13 pages. [cited by applicant]