IP Library Granted Patent US 12,519,311
Granted Patent B2
US 12,519,311 · App. 18/009,197 · Granted Jan 6, 2026

Hybridized transmission switching for contingency management in electric power systems

Inventors: Siddharth Suryanarayanan (Brookings, SD); Tanveer Hussain (Brookings, SD); S M Shafiul Alam (Idaho Falls, ID)
H02J3/00125H02J3/0012H02J3/14H02J3/381H02J2203/10H02J2310/60
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,519,311
App. No.
18/009,197
Granted
Jan 6, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Disclosed herein are systems and methods to perform hybridized transmission switching of an electric power system to avoid exceeding line ratings and minimize load shedding.

Claims (43)

1 . A computerized method of hybridized transmission switching for contingency management of an electric power system, comprising:

determining, by a computer executing an optimal power flow algorithm, dispatchable loads on an electric power system undergoing one or more contingencies and a need for load shedding in order to stabilize the electric power system;

identifying, by the computer, one or more load shedding busses (LSBs) in the electric power system for the load shedding;

determining, by the computer, one or more transmission lines connected to the LSBs that are operating at or above a threshold percent of an emergency line rating for the transmission lines;

determining, by the computer, from a line outage distribution factor (LODF) matrix of the electric power system, a list of N transmission lines of the electric power system that if removed from the electric power system would result in a counter-flow in the determined one or more transmission lines connected to the LSBs that are operating at or above the threshold percent of the emergency line rating for the transmission lines, where N is greater than or equal to 1;

determining, by the computer, for each transmission line (n) in the list of N transmission lines of the electric power system that if removed from the electric power system would result in the counter-flow in the determined one or more transmission lines connected to the LSBs that are operating at or above the threshold percent of the emergency line rating for the transmission lines, by the computer executing the optimal power flow algorithm for dispatchable loads on the electric power system with each transmission line (n) of the N list of transmission lines individually and independently removed from the electric power system, a value of load-shedding for stabilizing the electric power system with transmission line (n) removed from the electric power system and repeating this step for all N transmission lines so that each of the N transmission lines is correlated with a load shedding value; and

selecting, by the computer, one of the transmission lines (n) from the list of N transmission lines for switching based on the selected transmission line having the minimal load shedding value.

2 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising the computer sending a signal to a control system to remove the selected transmission line from the electric power system.

3 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the control system comprises a supervisory control and data acquisition system (SCADA), an automated transmission system,—a smart-grid system digital relays, or circuit breakers.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the optimal power flow algorithm comprises direct-current optimal power flow (DCOPF) or alternating-current optimal power flow (ACOPF).

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the threshold percent of the emergency line rating for the transmission lines comprises 99 percent of the emergency line rating for the transmission lines.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the method ends if it is determined by the computer that there is no need for load shedding in order to stabilize the electric power system.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein if it is determined, by the computer, that none of the one or more transmission lines connected to the LSBs are operating at or above the threshold percent of the emergency line rating for the transmission lines; then:

determining, by the computer, if any one or more of the transmission lines that comprise the electric power system are operating at or above the threshold percent of the emergency line rating for the transmission lines;

determining, by the computer, from the line outage distribution factor (LODF) matrix of the electric power system, a list of N transmission lines of the electric power system that if removed from the electric power system would result in a counter-flow in the determined any one or more transmission lines that comprise the electric power system that are operating at or above the threshold percent of the emergency line rating for the transmission lines, where N is greater than or equal to 1;

determining, by the computer, for each transmission line (n) in the list of N transmission lines of the electric power system that if removed from the electric power system would result in the counter-flow in the determined any one or more transmission lines that comprise the electric power system that are operating at or above the threshold percent of the emergency line rating for the transmission lines, by the computer executing the optimal power flow algorithm for dispatchable loads on the electric power system with each transmission line (n) of the N list of transmission lines individually and independently removed from the electric power system, a value of load-shedding for stabilizing the electric power system with transmission line (n) removed from the electric power system and repeating this step for all N transmission lines so that each of the N transmission lines is correlated with a load shedding value; and

selecting, by the computer, one of the transmission lines (n) from the list of N transmission lines for switching based on the selected transmission line having the minimal load shedding value.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the method ends if it is determined by the computer that none of the transmission lines that comprise the electric power system are operating at or above the threshold percent of the emergency line rating for the transmission lines.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein any transmission line that would create an islanding condition is not included in the list of N transmission lines.

10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more contingencies comprises a loss of one or more generators and/or a loss of one or more non-radial transmission lines.

11 . A system for hybridized transmission switching for contingency management of an electric power system, comprising:

an electric power system comprised of a plurality of generators, busses, radial and non-radial transmission lines;

a processor in communication with a memory, wherein the processor executes computer-executable instructions stored on the memory, said instructions causing the processor to:

receive an indication that the electric power system is undergoing one or more contingencies;

determine by executing an optimal power flow algorithm, dispatchable loads on the electric power system while the electric power system is undergoing the one or more contingencies and a need for load shedding in order to stabilize the electric power system;

identify one or more load shedding busses (LSBs) in the electric power system for the load shedding;

determine one or more non-radial transmission lines connected to the LSBs that are operating at or above a threshold percent of an emergency line rating for the transmission lines;

determine, from a line outage distribution factor (LODF) matrix of the electric power system, a list of N non-radial transmission lines of the electric power system that if removed from the electric power system would result in a counter-flow in the determined one or more non-radial transmission lines connected to the LSBs that are operating at or above the threshold percent of the emergency line rating for the transmission lines, where N is greater than or equal to 1;

determine, for each transmission line (n) in the list of N non-radial transmission lines of the electric power system that if removed from the electric power system would result in the counter-flow in the determined one or more non-radial transmission lines connected to the LSBs that are operating at or above the threshold percent of the emergency line rating for the transmission lines, by executing the optimal power flow algorithm for dispatchable loads on the electric power system with each transmission line (n) of the N list of non-radial transmission lines individually and independently removed from the electric power system, a value of load-shedding for stabilizing the electric power system with transmission line (n) removed from the electric power system and repeating this step for all N non-radial transmission lines so that each of the N non-radial transmission lines is correlated with a load shedding value; and

selecting one of the transmission lines (n) from the list of N non-radial transmission lines for switching based on the selected transmission line having the minimal load shedding value.

12 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the electric power system further comprises a control system, wherein the processor sends a signal to the control system to remove the selected transmission line from the electric power system.

13 . The system of claim 12 , wherein the control system comprises a supervisory control and data acquisition system (SCADA), an automated transmission system, a smart-grid system, digital relays, or circuit breakers.

14 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the optimal power flow algorithm comprises direct-current optimal power flow (DCOPF) or alternating-current optimal power flow (ACOPF).

15 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the threshold percent of the emergency line rating for the transmission lines comprises 99 percent of the emergency line rating for the transmission lines.

16 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the processor takes no further actions if it is determined that there is no need for load shedding in order to stabilize the electric power system.

17 . The system of claim 11 , wherein if it is determined, by the processor, that none of the one or more non-radial transmission lines connected to the LSBs are operating at or above the threshold percent of the emergency line rating for the transmission lines; then:

determining, by the processor, if any one or more of the non-radial transmission lines that comprise the electric power system are operating at or above the threshold percent of the emergency line rating for the transmission lines;

determining, by the processor, from the line outage distribution factor (LODF) matrix of the electric power system, a list of N non-radial transmission lines of the electric power system that if removed from the electric power system would result in a counter-flow in the determined any one or more non-radial transmission lines that comprise the electric power system that are operating at or above the threshold percent of the emergency line rating for the transmission lines, where N is greater than or equal to 1;

determining, by the processor, for each transmission line (n) in the list of N non-radial transmission lines of the electric power system that if removed from the electric power system would result in the counter-flow in the determined any one or more non-radial transmission lines that comprise the electric power system that are operating at or above the threshold percent of the emergency line rating for the transmission lines, by the processor executing the optimal power flow algorithm for dispatchable loads on the electric power system with each transmission line (n) of the N list of non-radial transmission lines individually and independently removed from the electric power system, a value of load-shedding for stabilizing the electric power system with transmission line (n) removed from the electric power system and repeating this step for all N non-radial transmission lines so that each of the N non-radial transmission lines is correlated with a load shedding value; and

selecting, by the processor, one of the transmission lines (n) from the list of N non-radial transmission lines for switching based on the selected transmission line having the minimal load shedding value.

18 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the processor takes no further action if it is determined that none of the non-radial transmission lines that comprise the electric power system are operating at or above the threshold percent of the emergency line rating for the transmission lines.

19 . The system of claim 11 , wherein any transmission line that would create an islanding condition is not included in the list of N non-radial transmission lines.

20 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the one or more contingencies comprises a loss of one or more generators and/or a loss of one or more non-radial transmission lines.

Assignments (4)
CONFIRMATORY LICENSE Recorded Apr 17, 2024
From: COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION
To: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Reel/Frame 067131/0788 →
CONFIRMATORY LICENSE Recorded Jun 21, 2023
From: BATTELLE ENERGY ALLIANCE IDAHO NATL LAB
To: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Reel/Frame 064068/0724 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 8, 2022
From: ALAM, S M SHAFIUL
To: BATTELLE ENERGY ALLIANCE, LLC
Reel/Frame 062032/0173 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 8, 2022
From: SURYANARAYANAN, SIDDHARTH; HUSSAIN, TANVEER
To: COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION
Reel/Frame 062032/0197 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63037158 · Jun 10, 2020
Related Publication 20230216294A1 · Jul 6, 2023
References Cited (58)
US 8738191B2 · Aivaliotis · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 9705329B2 · Khandelwal · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 11474279B2 · Sun · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11527889B2 · Ghosh · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20060187600A1 · Brown et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20110066301A1 · Donolo · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20170045558A1 · Kuroda et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20200153250A1 · Price · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210028623A1 · Rudez · 2021 [cited by examiner]
CA 2743667A1 · 2010 [cited by examiner]
CA 2779307C · 2020 [cited by examiner]
CA 3059517C · 2021 [cited by examiner]
CN 110135489A · 2019 [cited by examiner]
CN 110797863A · 2020 [cited by examiner]
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Aug. 5, 2021, received in connection with corresponding International Patent Application No. PCT/US2021/026540. [cited by applicant]
Li, M., et al., “Corrective Line Switching With Security Constraints for the Base and Contingency Cases,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 27, No. 1, 2012, pp. 125-133. [cited by applicant]
Mogaka, L.O., et al., “Power Prioritization and Load Shedding in an Island with RESs Using ABC Algorithm,” Journal of Engineering, vol. 2020, Article ID 8131952, 2020, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
A. R. Escobedo, E. Moreno-Centeno, and K. W. Hedman, “Topology control for load shed recovery,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 908-916, Mar. 2014. [cited by applicant]
X. Li, P. Balasubramanian, M. Sahraei-Ardakani, M. Abdi-Khorsand, K. W. Hedman, and R. Podmore, “Real-time contingency analysis with corrective transmission switching,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 32, No. 4… [cited by applicant]
S. A. Sadat and M. Sahraei-Ardakani, “Reducing the risk of cascading failures via transmission switching,” arXiv preprint arXiv 1810.00651, 2018. [cited by applicant]
R. D. Zimmerman, C. E. Murillo-Sanchez (2019). Matpower (Version 7.0) [Software]. Available: https://matpower.org. [cited by applicant]
R. D. Zimmerman, C. E. Murillo-Sanchez, and R. J. Thomas, “Matpower: Steady-State Operations, Planning and Analysis Tools for Power Systems Research and Education,” Power Systems, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 26, No. 1, p… [cited by applicant]
CASE39 Power flow data for 39 bus New England system. https://matpower.org/docs/ref/matpower5.0/case39.html Generated on Mon Jan. 26, 2015. [cited by applicant]
S. A. Blumsack, Network Topologies and Transmission Investment Under Electric-Industry Restructuring, pp. 1-283, May 2006. [cited by applicant]
M. Soroush and J. D. Fuller, “Accuracies of Optimal Transmission Switching Heuristics Based on DCOPF and ACOPF,” in IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 924-932, Mar. 2014. [cited by applicant]
J. Carpentier, “Contribution á l'étude du dispatching économique,” Bulletin de la Société Française des Électriciens, ser. 8, vol. 3, pp. 431-447, 1962. [cited by applicant]
J. Carpentier, “Optimal power flows,” International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, vol. 1, Issue 1, pp. 3-15, Apr. 1979. [cited by applicant]
V.M. da Costa, N. Martins, J.L.R. Pereira, “Developments in the Newton Raphson Power Flow Formulation Based on Current Injections,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 1320-1326, Nov. 1999. [cited by applicant]
V.M. da Costa and A.L.S. Rosa, “A Comparative Analysis of Different Power Flow Methodologies,” IEEE Transmission & Distribution Conference and Exposition: Latin America, Bogota, Aug. 13-15, 2008. [cited by applicant]
H.W. Dommel, W.F. Tinney, and W.L. Powell, “Further Developments in Newton's method for power system applications,” IEEE Winter Power Meeting, Conference Paper No. 70 CP 161-PWR, Jan. 1970, cited in V.M. da Costa, N. Ma… [cited by applicant]
U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration (EIA), International Energy Statistics, 2012, available at http://www.eia.gov/cfapps/ipdbproject/IEDIndex3.cfm?tid=2&pid=2&aid=2. [cited by applicant]
Wholesale Market Data, 2012, available at http://www.eia.gov/electricity/wholesale/. [cited by applicant]
FERC Staff, “Principles for Efficient and Reliable Reactive Power Supply and Consumption,” available at http://www.https://www.ferc.gov/sites/default/files/2020-04/20050310144430-02-04-05-reactive-power.pdf, Feb. 2005. [cited by applicant]
FERC Joint Boards on Security Constrained Economic Dispatch, “Study and Recommendations Regarding Security Constrained Economic Dispatch (SCED) in the Northeast by the Joint Board on Economic Dispatch for the Northeast … [cited by applicant]
FERC Staff, “Recent ISO Software Enhancements and Future Modeling Plans,” available at http://www.ferc.gov/industries/electric/indus-act/rto/rto-iso-soft-2011.pdf, Nov. 2011. [cited by applicant]
FERC and NERC staff, “Arizona-Southern California Outages on Sep. 8, 2011: Causes and Recommendations,” pp. 23-59, Apr. 2012. [cited by applicant]
FERC Order, Midwest Independent System Operator, 138 FERC ¶ 61,235, FERC Docket ER12-678 (2012). [cited by applicant]
A. Gómez Expósito, E. Romero Ramos, “Augmented Rectangular Load Flow Model,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 271-274, May 2002. [cited by applicant]
H.H. Happ, “Optimal Power Dispatch—A Comprehensive Survey,” IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, vol. PAS-96, No. 3, pp. 841-844, May/Jun. 1977. [cited by applicant]
I.A. Hiskens and R.J. Davy, “Exploring the Power Flow Solution Space Boundary,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 389-395, Aug. 2001. [cited by applicant]
M. Huneault and F.D. Galiana, “A Survey of the Optimal Power Flow Literature,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 6 No. 2, May 1991, pp. 762-770. [cited by applicant]
Q.Y. Jiang, H.D. Chiang, C.X. Guo, Y.J. Cao, “Power-current hybrid rectangular formulation for interior-point optimal power flow,” Institute of Engineering and Technology (IET) Generation, Transmission and Distribution,… [cited by applicant]
W.M. Lin, C.H. Huang, T.S. Zhan, “A Hybrid Current-Power Optimal Power Flow Technique,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 177-185, Feb. 2008. [cited by applicant]
J.A. Momoh, R.J. Koessler, M.S. Bond, B. Stott, D. Sun, A. Papalexopoulos, P. Ristanovic, “Challenges to Optimal Power Flow,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 444-447, Feb. 1997. [cited by applicant]
R.P. O'Neill, “The IV Formulation of the ACOPF and its Linearizations,” FERC Technical conference to discuss opportunities for increasing real-time and day-ahead market efficiency through improved software , available a… [cited by applicant]
R. P. O'Neill, T. Dautel and E. Krall, Recent ISO Software Enhancements and Future Software and Modeling Plans, Staff Report, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, available at http://www.ferc.gov/industries/electric/in… [cited by applicant]
J. Peschon, D.S. Piercy, W.F. Tinney, O.J. Tveit, M. Cuénod, “Optimum Control of Reactive Power Flow,” IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, vol. PAS-87, No. 1, pp. 40-48, Jan. 1968. [cited by applicant]
PJM, “PJM's Striving for Perfect Dispatch Nets Nearly $200 Million in Savings,” News Release, Jan. 19, 2012, available at https://www.pjm.com/˜/media/about-pjm/newsroom/2012-releases/20120119-perfect-dispatch-news-relea… [cited by applicant]
J. Riquelme Santos, A. Gómez Expósito, J.L. Martínez Ramos. “Slack Bus Selection to Minimize the System Power Imbalance in Load-Flow Studies.” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 19(2), May 2004. 987-995. [cited by applicant]
A.M. Sasson and F.J. Jaimes, “Digital Methods Applied to Power Flow Studies,” IEEE Trans. on Power Apparatus and Systems, vol. 86, No. 7, pp. 860-867, Jul. 1967. [cited by applicant]
A. Schecter, “Exploration of the ACOPF Feasible Region for the Standard IEEE Test Set,” FERC Technical conference to discuss opportunities for increasing real-time and day-ahead market efficiency through improved softwa… [cited by applicant]
R.B. Squires, “Economic Dispatch of Generation Directly from Power System Voltages and Admittances,” AIEE Trans. vol. 79, pt. III, pp. 1235-1244, 1961. [cited by applicant]
W.O. Stadlin and D.L. Fletcher, “Voltage Versus Reactive Current Model for Dispatch and Control,” IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, vol. PAS-101, No. 10, pp. 3751-3760, Oct. 1982. [cited by applicant]
B. Stott, “Review of Load-Flow Calculation Methods,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 62 No. 7, pp. 916-929, Jul. 1974. [cited by applicant]
B. Stott, O. Alsac, and A.J. Monticelli, “Security Analysis and Optimization,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 75, No. 12, pp. 1623-1644, 1987. [cited by applicant]
Y. Tao and A.P.S. Meliopoulous , “Optimal Power Flow via Quadratic Power Flow,” IEEE Power Systems Conference and Exposition, Phoenix, May 2011. [cited by applicant]
W.F. Tinney, J.M. Bright, K.D. Demaree, B.A. Hughes, “Some Deficiencies in Optimal Power Flow,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 676-683, May 1988. [cited by applicant]
J.B. Ward and H.W. Hale, “Digital Computer Solution of Power Flow Problems,” Trans. AIEE (Power Apparatus and Systems), vol. 75, pp. 398-404, Jun. 1956. [cited by applicant]