IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,392,889
Granted Patent B2
US 12,392,889 · App. 18/012,965 · Granted Aug 19, 2025

Target detection method for ground-penetrating radar and associated radar

Inventors: Raffaele D'Errico (Grenoble, FR); Jean-Baptiste Dore (Grenoble, FR); Gloria Makhoul (Grenoble, FR); Luc Maret (Grenoble, FR)
Assignee: COMMISSARIAT A L'ENERGIE ATOMIQUE ET AUX ENERGIES ALTERNATIVES
G01S13/885G01S7/411
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,392,889
App. No.
18/012,965
Granted
Aug 19, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for detecting at least one target buried in an area of the ground, using a ground-penetrating radar, the method includes the steps of: acquiring a measurement of a signal transmitted by each transmitting antenna and reflected in the area of the ground, converting an estimate, into the frequency domain, of the propagation channel for each pair consisting of a transmitting antenna and of a receiving antenna, defining a first hypothesis H0 corresponding to an absence of target in the area of the ground, defining a second hypothesis H1 corresponding to the presence of at least one target in the area of the ground, performing a test of the likelihood ratio between the likelihood of the channel matrix under the second hypothesis H1 and the likelihood of the channel matrix under the first hypothesis H0, in order to conclude whether a target is present at a given position in the area of the ground.

Claims (29)

1. A method for detecting at least one target buried in an area of the ground, using a ground-penetrating radar, the radar comprising at least one transmitting antenna and at least one receiving antenna, the method comprising the steps of:

acquiring, on each receiving antenna, a measurement of a signal transmitted by each transmitting antenna and reflected in the area of the ground,

determining, on the basis of said measurements, an estimate, in the frequency domain, of the propagation channel for each pair consisting of a transmitting antenna and of a receiving antenna, said estimates being grouped together in a channel matrix having a first dimension which is equal to the number of receiving antennas, a second dimension which is equal to the number of transmitting antennas and a third dimension which is equal to the number of frequencies,

defining a first hypothesis H0 corresponding to an absence of target in the area of the ground, the channel matrix under this first hypothesis being modeled by noise,

defining a second hypothesis H1 corresponding to the presence of at least one target in the area of the ground, the channel matrix under this second hypothesis being modeled by a propagation channel model depending at least on the characteristics of the transmitting antennas and of the receiving antennas and on the signal propagation losses in the ground,

performing a test of the likelihood ratio between the likelihood of the channel matrix under the second hypothesis H1 and the likelihood of the channel matrix under the first hypothesis H0, in order to conclude whether a target is present at a given position in the area of the ground.

2. The detection method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the step of performing a test of the likelihood ratio between the first hypothesis H0 and the second hypothesis H1 comprises the sub-steps of:

determining at least one estimator of the maximum likelihood of the position and of the radar cross section of a target, under the second hypothesis H1,

determining the likelihood of the channel matrix under the second hypothesis H1 for each estimator,

determining the likelihood of the channel matrix under the first hypothesis H0,

comparing the ratio between the two likelihoods with a predetermined detection threshold in order to deduce therefrom the presence or the absence of a target for each estimated position.

3. The detection method as claimed in claim 2 , wherein the step of determining at least one estimator of the maximum likelihood of the position and of the radar cross section of a target, under the second hypothesis H1, is performed by searching for at least one extremum of a function of three variables depending on the position of a target in the area of the ground, on the radar cross section of a target and on a coefficient of signal transmission losses in the area of the ground.

4. The detection method as claimed in claim 3 , wherein the search for at least one extremum of said function of three variables is performed by:

determining an estimator of the maximum likelihood of the radar cross section by calculating a normalized correlation between the channel matrix and a loss matrix including the transfer functions of the transmitting and receiving antennas, the signal propagation losses in free space and in the area of the ground,

searching for at least one extremum according to the position and the loss coefficient of said function evaluated for the estimated radar cross section.

5. The detection method as claimed in claim 4 , wherein the likelihood of the channel matrix under the second hypothesis H1 is determined by an extremum of said function.

6. The detection method as claimed in claim 2 , wherein the likelihood of the channel matrix under the first hypothesis H0 is determined at least by calculating the energy of the channel matrix.

7. The detection method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein a target position is searched for in a two- or three-dimensional grid (G1, G2) having a defined initial pitch, the method being iterated over several iterations, reducing the area and the initial pitch in each iteration.

8. The detection method as claimed in claim 1 , comprising the steps of:

converting the propagation channel estimates for each pair consisting of a transmitting antenna and of a receiving antenna, into the time domain,

applying a filter to the estimates in the form of time windowing,

converting the filtered estimates into the frequency domain,

grouping together the filtered estimates in a channel matrix.

9. The detection method as claimed in claim 8 , wherein the time windowing is defined so as to filter the contributions of the signals corresponding to a distance interval between the radar and the area of the ground.

10. The detection method as claimed in claim 9 , the method being repeated for several different filters so as to cover the entire area of the ground.

11. The detection method as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising a step of canceling the contribution of a target detected in the measurements of acquired signals, for example by means of an echo cancellation algorithm, the method being iterated over several successive iterations, canceling in each new iteration the echo of the target detected in the previous iteration.

12. A ground-penetrating radar comprising at least one transmitting antenna and at least one receiving antenna and a device for detecting at least one target buried in an area of the ground configured to execute the steps of the detection method as claimed in claim 1 .

13. A non-transitory tangible computer-accessible storage medium having stored thereon a computer program for executing the method as claimed in claim 1 , when the computer program is executed by a computer.

14. A non-transitory processor-readable storage medium, on which is stored instructions for executing the method as claimed in claim 1 , when the instructions are executed by a processor.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 15, 2023
From: D'ERRICO, RAFFAELE; DORE, JEAN-BAPTISTE; MAKHOUL, GLORIA; MARET, LUC
To: COMMISSARIAT A L'ENERGIE ATOMIQUE ET AUX ENERGIES ALTERNATIVES
Reel/Frame 062713/0634 →
Priority Claims (1)
FR 2006870 · Jun 30, 2020 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20230266461A1 · Aug 24, 2023
References Cited (30)
US 4783753A · Crimmins · 1988 [cited by examiner]
US 4839654A · Ito · 1989 [cited by examiner]
US 5327139A · Johnson · 1994 [cited by examiner]
US 5977905A · Le Chevalier · 1999 [cited by examiner]
US 6466155B2 · Taylor · 2002 [cited by examiner]
US 6700526B2 · Witten · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 7173560B2 · Li · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 7511654B1 · Goldman · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 7834801B2 · Waite · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 8618976B2 · Paglieroni · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 10175350B1 · Tsokos · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20060087471A1 · Hintz · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20120206293A1 · Nguyen · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20130082862A1 · Paglieroni · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20140191899A1 · Pickle · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140240162A1 · Debroux · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150268218A1 · Troxler · 2015 [cited by examiner]
Ho, et al., “A linear prediction land mine detection algorithm for hand held ground penetrating radar”, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 40, Issue 6, pp. 1374-1384, 2002. [cited by applicant]
Ho, et al., “An Investigation of Using the Spectral Characteristics From Ground Penetrating Radar for Landmine/Clutter Discrimination”, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 46, Issue 4, pp. 1177-1191… [cited by applicant]
Pambudi, et al., “Minimax Robust Landmine Detection Using Forward-Looking Ground-Penetrating Radar”, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 58, Issue 7, pp. 5032-5041, Jul. 2020. [cited by applicant]
Hoarau, et al., “Robust adaptive detection of buried pipes using GPR”, Signal Processing, vol. 132, pp. 293-305, Mar. 2017. [cited by applicant]
Ambrosanio, et al., “The tomographic approach to ground-penetrating radar for underground exploration and monitoring”, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 36, Issue 4, pp. 62-73, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Chong, “Signal processing for MIMO radars : detection under gaussian and non-gaussian environments and application to STAP”, Thesis, 2011. [cited by applicant]
Hogbom, “Aperture Synthesis with a Non-Regular Distribution of Interferometer Baselines”, Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement, vol. 15, pp. 417-426, Jun. 1974. [cited by applicant]
Marpaung, et al., “A comparative study of migration algorithms for Uwb Gpr images in SISO-SAR and MIMO-array configurations”, 2014 15th International Radar Symposium (IRS), pp. 1-4, 2014. [cited by applicant]
Zeng, et al., “Improvement of target imaging quality by multi-polarization MIMO GPR”, 2012 14th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR), pp. 119-124, 2012. [cited by applicant]
Zhuge, et al., “Three-dimensional near-field mimo array imaging using range migration techniques”, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 21, No. 6, pp. 3026-3033, 2012. [cited by applicant]
Byrd, et al., “A Trust Region Method Based on Interior Point Techniques for Nonlinear Programming.” Mathematical Programming, vol. 89, No. 1, 2000, pp. 149-185. [cited by applicant]
Byrd, et al., “An Interior Point Algorithm for Large-Scale Nonlinear Programming”, SIAM Journal on Optimization, vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 877-900, 1999. [cited by applicant]
Coleman, et al., “An Interior, Trust Region Approach for Nonlinear Minimization Subject to Bounds”, SIAM Journal on Optimization, vol. 6, pp. 418-445, 1996. [cited by applicant]