IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,254,870
Granted Patent B2
US 12,254,870 · App. 18/033,243 · Granted Mar 18, 2025

Acoustic-based linguistically-driven automated text formatting

Inventors: Julie A. Van Dyke (New Haven, CT); Michael Gorman (Edina, MN); Mark Lacek (Minneapolis, MN)
Assignee: Cascade Reading, Inc.
G10L15/1822G10L13/02G10L15/02G10L15/05G10L25/90G10L25/93
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,254,870
App. No.
18/033,243
Granted
Mar 18, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems and techniques for acoustic-based linguistically-driven automated text formatting of acoustic input are described herein. An audio sample may be obtained that includes multiple words from human speech. The audio sample may be processed to determine a linguistic relationship of the words from the acoustic properties of the words. Based on the determined linguistic relationships, data such as an acoustical language model is generated to enable an arrangement of the words into a cascade format (e.g., a cascade format that establishes horizontal displacement and vertical displacement among the multiple words). A cascaded text output may be provided from the acoustical language model or other types of related data.

Claims (75)

1. A method for generating a text arrangement from acoustic input, comprising:

obtaining an audio sample that includes multiple speech segments providing words from human speech;

identifying acoustic properties of the words from the audio sample using an acoustic analyzer provided by an audio processing service, wherein the acoustic properties are identified from an acoustic signal of the audio sample, and wherein the acoustic analyzer extracts at least one waveform from the acoustic signal;

computing respective measurements of the acoustic properties for each of the words, using the acoustic analyzer, based on direct measurement of the acoustic signal or comparisons within the acoustic signal captured from the at least one waveform;

generating an acoustic language model in a computer-readable data structure to represent a linguistic relationship of the words, based on the acoustic properties of the words from the audio sample, wherein the linguistic relationship of the words is determined from the respective measurements of the acoustic properties; and

outputting data to arrange the words into a cascade format, based on the linguistic relationship, wherein the cascade format establishes horizontal displacement and vertical displacement among the words.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the linguistic relationship of the words is determined by applying at least one acoustically-defined cuing rule to respective words, based on the acoustic properties of the respective words.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the acoustic properties of the words include at least one of: pitch values; intensity; duration; or pauses between the words.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein a respective property of the acoustic properties is used to determine constituency and dependency of respective words in at least one sentence of the words.

5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

obtaining a text sample that includes a text string of the words;

aligning the text string to the at least one waveform; and

identifying the words from the audio sample based on the aligning.

6. The method of claim 5 , further comprising:

performing speech recognition on the audio sample to generate the text sample.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the speech recognition identifies boundaries of multiple sentences among the words.

8. The method of claim 5 , wherein the linguistic relationship of the words is determined using constituency parsing and dependency parsing of the text string.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the constituency parsing generates constituency data for the text string that defines constituents of the text string based on an X-bar schema, and

wherein to arrange the words into the cascade format includes use of the constituency data.

10. The method of claim 8 , wherein the dependency parsing generates dependency data for the text string that defines dependencies of the text string based on sentence structure, and

wherein to arrange the words into the cascade format includes use of the dependency data.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein computing the respective measurements of the acoustic properties for each of the words includes computing measurement values for pitch, slope, normalized duration, and normalized intensity for each of the words, wherein the computed measurement values are derived from the acoustic properties of the words; and

wherein the linguistic relationship among each of the words is determined using the computed measurement values for each of the words.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein computing the respective measurements of the acoustic properties for each of the words includes computing measurement values for pause durations between words, pitch slope changes, word elongations, and intensity changes, between at least two of the words; and

wherein the linguistic relationship among each of the words is determined using the computed measurement values between the at least two of the words.

13. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

displaying feedback for the audio sample, based on comparison of the cascade format to a target cascade format, the target cascade format generated from linguistically-driven text formatting.

14. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

causing a display of the words in the cascade format, wherein the horizontal displacement is provided in the display from the use of indentation, and wherein the vertical displacement is provided in the display from the use of line breaks.

15. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

generating a new audio sample, based on the cascade format, using a voice synthesis engine.

16. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium comprising instructions, wherein the instructions, when executed by a computing device, cause the computing device to perform operations comprising:

obtaining an audio sample that includes multiple speech segments providing words from human speech;

identifying acoustic properties of the words from the audio sample using an acoustic analyzer provided by an audio processing service, wherein the acoustic properties are identified from an acoustic signal of the audio sample, and wherein the acoustic analyzer extracts at least one waveform from the acoustic signal;

computing respective measurements of the acoustic properties for each of the words, using the acoustic analyzer, based on direct measurement of the acoustic signal or comparisons within the acoustic signal captured from the at least one waveform;

generating an acoustic language model in a computer-readable data structure to represent a linguistic relationship of the words, based on the acoustic properties of the words from the audio sample, wherein the linguistic relationship of the words is determined from the respective measurements of the acoustic properties; and

outputting data to arrange the words into a cascade format, based on the linguistic relationship, wherein the cascade format establishes horizontal displacement and vertical displacement among the words.

17. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 16 , the operations further comprising:

obtaining a text sample that includes a text string of the words;

aligning the text string to the at least one waveform; and

identifying the words from the audio sample based on the aligning.

18. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 17 , the operations further comprising:

performing speech recognition on the audio sample to generate the text sample;

wherein the speech recognition identifies boundaries of multiple sentences among the words.

19. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 17 ,

wherein the linguistic relationship of the words is determined using constituency parsing and dependency parsing of the text string;

wherein the constituency parsing generates constituency data for the text string that defines constituents of the text string based on an X-bar schema, and wherein to arrange the words into the cascade format includes use of the constituency data;

wherein the dependency parsing generates dependency data for the text string that defines dependencies of the text string based on sentence structure, and

wherein to arrange the words into the cascade format includes use of the dependency data.

20. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 16 , wherein computing the respective measurements of the acoustic properties for each of the words includes computing measurement values for pitch, slope, normalized duration, and normalized intensity for each of the words, wherein the computed measurement values are derived from the acoustic properties of the words;

wherein the acoustic properties of the words include at least one of: pitch values; intensity; duration; or pauses between the words; and

wherein the linguistic relationship among each of the words is determined using the computed measurement values for each of the words.

21. A device, comprising:

processing circuitry; and

a memory device including instructions embodied thereon, wherein the instructions, which when executed by the processing circuitry, configure the processing circuitry to:

obtain an audio sample that includes multiple speech segments providing words from human speech;

identify acoustic properties of the words from the audio sample using an acoustic analyzer provided by an audio processing service, wherein the acoustic properties are identified from least one waveform an acoustic signal of the audio sample, and wherein the acoustic analyzer extracts at least one waveform from the acoustic signal;

compute respective measurements of the acoustic properties for each of the words, using the acoustic analyzer, based on direct measurement of the acoustic signal or comparisons within the acoustic signal captured from the at least one waveform;

generate an acoustic language model in a computer-readable data structure to represent a linguistic relationship of the words, based on the acoustic properties of the words from the audio sample, wherein the linguistic relationship of the words is determined from the respective measurements of the acoustic properties; and

output data to arrange the words into a cascade format, based on the linguistic relationship, wherein the cascade format establishes horizontal displacement and vertical displacement among the words.

22. The device of claim 21 , wherein the instructions further configure the processing circuitry to:

obtain a text sample that includes a text string of the words;

align the text string to the at least one waveform; and

identify the words from the audio sample based on the aligning.

23. The device of claim 22 , wherein the instructions further configure the processing circuitry to:

perform speech recognition on the audio sample to generate the text sample;

wherein the speech recognition identifies boundaries of multiple sentences among the words.

24. The device of claim 22 ,

wherein the linguistic relationship of the words is determined using constituency parsing and dependency parsing of the text string;

wherein the constituency parsing generates constituency data for the text string that defines constituents of the text string based on an X-bar schema, and wherein to arrange the words into the cascade format includes use of the constituency data;

wherein the dependency parsing generates dependency data for the text string that defines dependencies of the text string based on sentence structure, and

wherein to arrange the words into the cascade format includes use of the dependency data.

25. The device of claim 21 , wherein to compute the respective measurements of the acoustic properties for each of the words includes to compute measurement values for pitch, slope, normalized duration, and normalized intensity for each of the words, wherein the computed measurement values are derived from the acoustic properties of the words;

wherein the acoustic properties of the words include at least one of: pitch values; intensity; duration; or pauses between the words; and

wherein the linguistic relationship among each of the words is determined using the computed measurement values for each of the words.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 22, 2023
From: VAN DYKE, JULIE A.; GORMAN, MICHAEL; LACEK, MARK
To: CASCADE READING, INC.
Reel/Frame 063720/0747 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63262166 · Oct 6, 2021
Related Publication 20240257802A1 · Aug 1, 2024
References Cited (209)
US 4889422A · Pavlidis · 1989 [cited by applicant]
US 5778402A · Gipson · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5802533A · Walker · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 6088711A · Fein et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6279017B1 · Walker · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6568939B1 · Edgar · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 7036075B2 · Walker · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7069508B1 · Bever et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7346489B1 · Bever et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7743324B1 · Bever et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7765471B2 · Walker · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 7823061B2 · Chan · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7861163B2 · Walker · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8019590B1 · Kinder · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8190419B1 · Kinder · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8200487B2 · Peters et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8209601B2 · Bever et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8306356B1 · Bever et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8332221B2 · Peters et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8418057B2 · Knight et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8442814B2 · Ceusters et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8731905B1 · Tsang et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8918718B2 · Burgess · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9026907B2 · Lum · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9069731B2 · Stern et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9128906B2 · Peters et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9292494B2 · Ceusters et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9378201B2 · Kinder · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9390080B2 · Walker · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9430555B2 · Duncan et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9478146B2 · Skinner et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9529795B2 · Kondadadi et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9672788B2 · Rosen et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9916295B1 · Crawford · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9940317B2 · Walker · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9953026B2 · Kinder · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10062295B2 · Puvanachandran et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10102182B2 · Lum · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10180936B2 · Mcclintock et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10303742B2 · Joshi · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10311135B1 · Yang · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10515138B2 · Walker · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10650089B1 · Walker · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11170154B1 · Van Dyke et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11200413B2 · Burdick · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11734491B2 · Van Dyke et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 12086532B2 · Gorman et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20030093275A1 · Polanyi · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20060129922A1 · Walker · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20080222518A1 · Walker · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20100128042A1 · Confrey et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100332217A1 · Wintner et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20120303371A1 · Labsky · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20130035961A1 · Yegnanarayanan · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130041685A1 · Yegnanarayanan · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130297347A1 · Cardoza · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20150213634A1 · Karmarkar et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150262580A1 · Bisani et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150286618A1 · Walker · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150348538A1 · Donaldson · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160062982A1 · Wroczynski et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160111016A1 · Govindaraj et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160188558A1 · Shikawa et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170046311A1 · Walker · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170097987A1 · Bao et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170097988A1 · Bao et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170358238A1 · Casutt · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180096625A1 · Kochura et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180253280A1 · Kawahara · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190019509A1 · Lee · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190087239A1 · Adibowo · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190236085A1 · Galitsky · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200097502A1 · Trim · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200243076A1 · Kim · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200286463A1 · Galitsky · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210019364A1 · Govindjee et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210056263A1 · Xia et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210056952A1 · Van Der Ploeg · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210073302A1 · Srinivasaraghavan · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210173893A1 · Luo · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210200965A1 · Yerli · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210225358A1 · Monge Alvarez · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210295829A1 · Noel · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210327415A1 · Park · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220051665A1 · Bade · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220059077A1 · Thomson · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220068279A1 · Embar · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220115018A1 · Desserrey · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220335203A1 · Van Dyke et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230123328A1 · Gorman et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230315558A1 · Saxena et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230351090A1 · Van Dyke et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
AU 2022255037B2 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
CN 112686051A · 2021 [cited by applicant]
CN 115769219A · 2023 [cited by applicant]
CN 117561516A · 2024 [cited by applicant]
DE 212021000356U1 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
DE 112022002081T5 · 2024 [cited by applicant]
EP 0917698B1 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
IN 202317076513 · 2024 [cited by applicant]
JP H04348464A · 1992 [cited by applicant]
JP 2000516002A · 2000 [cited by applicant]
JP 2024511893A · 2024 [cited by applicant]
JP 7541422B2 · 2024 [cited by applicant]
JP 2024152832 · 2024 [cited by applicant]
KR 20150107178A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
KR 20160115566A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2017058298A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2021207422A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2022217087A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2023059818A1 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/233,339, Examiner Interview Summary mailed Aug. 20, 2021”, 3 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/233,339, Non Final Office Action mailed Jun. 24, 2021”, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/233,339, Notice of Allowance mailed Sep. 17, 2021”, 5 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/233,339, Response filed Sep. 3, 2021 to Non Final Office Action mailed Jun. 24, 2021”, 19 pages. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/453,763, Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 19, 2022”, 7 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/453,763, Notice of Allowance mailed Apr. 3, 2023”, 9 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/453,763, Preliminary Amendment filed Feb. 23, 2022”, 9 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/453,763, Response filed Mar. 20, 2023 to Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 19, 2022”, 9 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/917,171 Preliminary Amendment filed Oct. 5, 2022”, 6 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/917,171, Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 9, 2023”, 51 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/917,171, Response filed Jun. 9, 2023 to Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 9, 2023”, 10 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2021/026270, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Oct. 20, 2022”, 9 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2021/026270, International Search Report mailed Aug. 2, 2021”, 3 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2021/026270, Written Opinion mailed Aug. 2, 2021”, 7 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2022/024070, International Search Report mailed Jul. 25, 2022”, 5 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2022/024070, Written Opinion mailed Jul. 25, 2022”, 4 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“Software—Stanford Parser”, The Stanford Natural Language Processing Group, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: https://nlp.stanford.edu/software/lex-parser.shtml>, (Accessed May 30, 2023), 14 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“Universal Dependency Relations”, UD version 2, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: https://universaldependencies.org/u/dep/index.html>, (Accessed May 30, 2023), 3 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Arlot, Sylvain, et al., “A survey of cross-validation procedures for model selection”, Statistics Surveys, vol. 4, (2010), 40-79. [cited by applicant]
Arsi, Hiba, et al., “Using Machine Learning Algorithms for Breast Cancer Risk Prediction and Diagnosis”, Procedia Computer Science, 83, (2016), 1064-1069. [cited by applicant]
Beckman, Mary E, “The Parsing of Prosody”, Language and Cognitive Processes, 11:1-2, (1996), 17-67. [cited by applicant]
Bone, Daniel, et al., “Use of machine learning to improve autism screening and diagnostic instruments: effectiveness, efficiency, and multi-instrument fusion”, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, vol. 57, Issue … [cited by applicant]
Breen, Mara, et al., “Acoustic correlates of information structure”, Language and Cognitive Processes, 25:7, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2010.504378>, (2010), 1044-109… [cited by applicant]
Chomsky, Carol, “Reading, Writing and Phonology”, Harvard Educational Review, 40(2), (1970), 287-309. [cited by applicant]
Cooper, William, et al., “Acoustical aspects of contrastive stress in question-answer contexts”, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 77(6), (1985), 2142-2156. [cited by applicant]
Cooper, William, et al., “Syntax and Speech”, Cognitive Science Series, vol. 3. Harvard University Press, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: https://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674283947>, (1980),… [cited by applicant]
Craven, Timothy C., “Graphic display of larger sentence dependency structures”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science 42, No. 5, (1991), 323-331. [cited by applicant]
Eady, Stephen, et al., “Speech intonation and focus location in matched statements and questions”, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 80(2), (1986), 402-415. [cited by applicant]
Fougeron, Cecile, et al., “Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains”, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 101, No. 6,, (1997), 3728-3740. [cited by applicant]
Fry, D B, “Duration and Intensity as Physical Correlates of Linguistic Stress”, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 27(4), (Jul. 1955), 765-768. [cited by applicant]
Guyon, Isabelle, et al., “Gene Selection for Cancer Classification using Support Vector Machines”, Machine Learning, vol. 46, Issue 1-3, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:10124873027… [cited by applicant]
Hoeks, John, et al., “Processing Coordinated Structures in Context: The Effect of Topic-Structure on Ambiguity Resolution”, Journal of Memory and Language, 46, (2002), 99-119. [cited by applicant]
Huang, C, et al., “An assessment of support vector machines for land cover classification”, International Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 23, Issue 4, (2002), 725-749. [cited by applicant]
Jackendoff, Ray, “”, X Syntax: A study of Phrase Structure, 248 pages, Cambridge, Mass. MIT Press, (1977), 132 pgs. [cited by applicant]
James, Gareth, et al., “Chapter 5 Resampling Methods”, An Introduction to Statistical Learning: with Applications in R, Springer Texts in Statistics, (2013), 175-201. [cited by applicant]
Kaan, Edith, et al., “L2 Prediction during complex sentence processing”, J Cult Cogn Sci., 3, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41809-019-00038- 0>, (2019), 203-216. [cited by applicant]
Kerkhofs, Roel, et al., “Discourse, Syntax, and Prosody: The Brain Reveals an Immediate Interaction”, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19:9. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, (2007), 1421-1434. [cited by applicant]
Klatt, Dennis, “Vowel lengthening is syntactically determined in a connected discourse”, Journal of Phonetics, 3, (1975), 129-140. [cited by applicant]
Kochanski, G, et al., “Loudness predicts prominence: Fundamental frequency lends little”, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 118(2), (Aug. 2005), 1038-1054. [cited by applicant]
Lehiste, Iise, “Rhythmic units and syntactic units in production and perception”, J. Acoustic. Soc. Am., 54(5), (1973), 1228-1234. [cited by applicant]
Lehiste, Iise, et al., “Role of duration in disambiguating syntactically ambiguous sentences”, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 60(5), (Nov. 1976), 1199-1202. [cited by applicant]
Lehiste, Ilse, “Influence of fundamental frequency pattern on the perception of duration”, Journal of Phonetics, 4, (1976), 113-117. [cited by applicant]
Lieberman, Philip, “Some Acoustic Correlates of Word Stress in American English”, J. Acoust. Soc. Am.,32(4), (Apr. 1960), 451-454. [cited by applicant]
Miller, Justin, et al., “A Longitudinal Study of the Development of Reading Prosody as a Dimension of Oral Reading Fluency in Early Elementary School Children”, Read Res Q., 43(4), pp. 336-354, (2008), 29 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Pierrehumbert, Janet, “The Phonology and Phonetics of English Intonation (Thesis)”, MIT, (1980), 401 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Price, Patti, et al., “The Use of Prosody in Syntactic Disambiguation”, (1991), 372-377. [cited by applicant]
Street, Lynn, “Acoustic determinants of phrase boundary perception”, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 64(6), (1978), 1582-1592. [cited by applicant]
Tate, Tamara, et al., “Visual-Syntactic Text Format: Improving Adolescent Literacy”, Scientific Studies of Reading, 23(4), [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4vw2g0m6>, (2019),… [cited by applicant]
Turk, Alice, et al., “Multiple targets of phrase-final lengthening in American English words”, Journal of Phonetics 35, (2007), 445-472. [cited by applicant]
Turk, Alice, et al., “The domain of accentual lengthening in American English”, Journal of Phonetics, 25, (1997), 25-41. [cited by applicant]
Vapnik, Vladimir, “An Overview of Statistical Learning Theory”, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 10, No. 5, (Sep. 1999), 988-999. [cited by applicant]
Walker, Randall, et al., “Live Ink®: Brain-Based Text Formatting Raises Standardized Reading Test Scores”, National Educational Computing Conference, (2005), 35 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Walker, Randall C, et al., “Visual-syntactic text formatting: Theoretical basis and empirical evidence for impact on human reading”, In IEEE International Professional Communication Conference, (2007), 1-14. [cited by applicant]
Walker, Stan, et al., “Visual-Syntactic Text Formatting: A New Method to Enhance Online Reading”, Reading Online, ISSN, [Online] Retrieved from the internet: <http://www.liveink.com/VSTF_ReadingOnline_IRA_2005_Walker.pd… [cited by applicant]
Warschauer, Mark, et al., “Transforming Digital Reading with Visual-Syntactic Text Formatting”, Alt Call Journal ISSN vol. 7 No. 3, (Jun. 2011), 255-269. [cited by applicant]
Watson, Duane, et al., “The Role of Syntactic Obligatoriness in the Production of Intonational Boundaries.”, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol. 32, No. 5, [Online]. Retrieved from … [cited by applicant]
Wightman, Colin, et al., “Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodic phrase boundaries”, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 91(3), (Mar. 1992), 1707-1717. [cited by applicant]
“Canadian Application Serial No. 3,214,349, Examiners Rule 86(2) Report mailed Nov. 2, 2023”, 6 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“Korean Application Serial No. 10-2023-7038709, Voluntary Amendment Filed Nov. 9, 2023”, w english claims, 29 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/917,171, Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 4, 2023”, 74 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2023-562214, Voluntary Amendment Filed Nov. 29, 2023”, w english claims, 11 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“Remote Access to Natural Language Parsing and Enhanced Text Presentation Technology for improved Reading”, Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) program, [Online] Retri… [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 18/346,609, Third-Party Submission Under 37 CFR 1.290 mailed Dec. 31, 2023”, 7 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/917,171, Third-Party Submission Under 37 CFR 1.290, mailed Nov. 13, 2023”, 6 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Chomsky, Noam, “Syntactic Structures”, The Mouton Co. Publishers, The Hague, Netherlands. ISBN 90 279, (1957), 7 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Jablonkai, R Reka, “The Routledge Handbook of Corpora and English Language Teaching and Learning”, Chapter 32, Section4; Visual Syntactic Text formatting and Syntactic Processing, Professor of Applied Linguistics and As… [cited by applicant]
Kuncoro, Adhiguna, “What Do Recurrent Neural Network Grammars Learn About Syntax?”, arXiv: 1611.05774v2, (Jan. 10, 2017), 10 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Milekic, Slavoljub, “Using gaze actions to interact with a display”, U.S. Pat. No. 7,561,143B1, Application granted. Independent Claims 1, 21, 22, (Jul. 14, 2009), 22 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Rayner, Keith, “The Role of Eye Movements in Learning to Head and Reading Disability”, Remedial and Special Education, 6(6), [Online] Retrieved from the internet:https: doi.org 10.1177 074193258500600609, 8 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2022/045924, International Search Report mailed Jan. 26, 2023”, 3 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2022/045924, Written Opinion mailed Jan. 26, 2023”, 3 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/453,763, Corrected Notice of Allowability mailed Jul. 27, 2023”, 5 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/917,171, Examiner Interview Summary mailed Aug. 9, 2023”, 3 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/917,171, Final Office Action mailed Jul. 13, 2023”, 92 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/917,171, Response filed Oct. 10, 2023 to Final Office Action mailed Jul. 13, 2023”, 13 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“Canadian Application Serial No. 3,214,349, Voluntary Amendment Filed Oct. 5, 2023”, 14 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2022/024070, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Oct. 19, 2023”, 6 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/917,171, Corrected Notice of Allowability mailed Apr. 3, 2024”, 2 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/917,171, Examiner Interview Summary mailed Feb. 14, 2024”, 2 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/917,171, Notice of Allowance mailed Mar. 25, 2024”, 7 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/917,171, Notice of Allowance mailed Jul. 29, 2024”, 5 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/917,171, Response filed Feb. 29, 2024 to Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 4, 2023”, 15 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/917,171, Supplemental Amendment filed Mar. 8, 2024”, 10 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 18/346,609, Preliminary Amendment filed Aug. 9, 2024”, 9 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“Canadian Application Serial No. 3,214,349, Response filed Feb. 26, 2024 to Examiners Rule 86(2) Report mailed Nov. 2, 2023”, 11 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“Chinese Application Serial No. 202280034092.8, Voluntary Amendment Filed May 28, 2024”, w/ english claims, 14 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2022/045924, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Apr. 18, 2024”, 6 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“Israel Application Serial No. 307467, Office Action mailed Jun. 3, 2024”, 7 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2023-562214, Notification of Reasons for Rejection mailed May 14, 2024”, W/English Translation, 6 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2023-562214, Response filed Jun. 26, 2024 to Notification of Reasons for Rejection mailed May 14, 2024”, w/ english claims, 11 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“Korean Application Serial No. 10-2023-7038709, Notice of Preliminary Rejection mailed Apr. 12, 2024”, w/ English Translation, 16 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“Korean Application Serial No. 10-2023-7038709, Response filed Aug. 1, 2024 to Notice of Preliminary Rejection mailed Apr. 12, 2024”, w/ english claims, 46 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Frey, Aline, et al., “Perceptual span, visual span, and visual attention span: Three potential ways to quantify limits on visual processing during reading”, Visual Cognition, vol. 26, No. 6, (May 11, 2018), 412-429. [cited by applicant]
Gao, Wei, et al., “Visual-Syntactic Text Formatting: Developing EFL Learners' Reading Fluency Components”, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 51, (2022), 707-727. [cited by applicant]
Ozaki, Sachiko, et al., “The effects of digital scaffolding on adolescent English reading in Japan: An experimental study on visual-syntactic text formatting”, The Jalt Call Journal: Regular Papers, vol. 16, No. 3, (202… [cited by applicant]
Park, Youngmin, et al., “Scaffolding learning of language structures with visual-syntactic text formatting”, British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 0 No. 2018, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: https… [cited by applicant]
Reichle, Erik, et al., “The E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26, (2003), 445-476. [cited by applicant]
Veldre, Aaron, et al., “Understanding the Visual Constraints on Lexical Processing: New Empirical and Simulation Results”, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, vol. 152, No. 3. American Psychological Association… [cited by applicant]
Cited By (1)
US 12,456,002