IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,573,031
Granted Patent B2
US 12,573,031 · App. 18/037,992 · Granted Mar 10, 2026

Automatic detection of erosions and ulcers in Crohn's capsule endoscopy

Inventors: João Pedro Sousa Ferreira (Oporto, PT); Miguel José Da Quinta E Costa De Mascarenhas Saraiva (Oporto, PT); Hélder Manuel Casal Cardoso (Valbom Gondomar, PT); Manuel Guilherme Goncalves De Macedo (Oporto, PT); João Pedro Lima Afonso (Mazedo Moncao, PT); Ana Patricia Ribeiro Andrade (Oporto, PT); Renato Manue Natal Jorge (Oporto, PT); Marco Paulo Lages Parente (Oporto, PT)
Assignee: Digestaid—Artificial Intelligence Development, LDA
G06T7/0012A61B1/041G06T2207/10068G06T2207/20081G06T2207/20084G06T2207/30028G06T2207/30096
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,573,031
App. No.
18/037,992
Granted
Mar 10, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present invention relates to a computer-implemented method capable of automatically detecting small bowel and colonic ulcers and erosions in Crohn's capsule endoscopy image data, by classifying pixels as lesion or non-lesion, using a convolutional image feature extraction step followed by a classification step and indexing such lesions in the set of one or more classes.

Claims (22)

1 . A computer-implemented method capable of automatically identifying erosions and ulcers in colon capsule colonoscopy medical images by classifying the pixels as erosions or ulcers comprising:

selecting a number of subsets of all colon capsule colonoscopy images, each of said subsets comprising only images from the same patient;

selecting another subset as validation set, wherein the another subset does not overlap chosen images in previously selected subsets;

pre-training of each chosen subset with one of a plurality of combinations of convolutional neural network image feature extraction component, followed by a subsequent classification neural network component for pixel classification as erosions and ulcers, wherein said pre-training;

stops early when the scores do not improve over a given number of epochs, namely three;

evaluates the performance of each of the combinations;

is repeated on new, different subsets, with another networks combination and training hyperparameters, wherein such new combination considers a higher number of dense layers if a f1-metric is low and fewer dense layers if the f1-metric suggests overfitting;

selecting the architecture combination that performs best during pre-training;

fully training and validating during training the selected architecture combination using the entire set of colon capsule colonoscopy images to obtain an optimized architecture combination;

prediction of erosions and ulcers using said optimized architecture combination for classification;

receiving the classification output of the prediction by an output collect module with means of communication to a third-party capable of performing validation by interpreting the accuracy of the classification output and of correcting a wrong prediction, wherein the third-party comprises at least one of: another neural network, any other computational system adapted to perform the validation task or, optionally, a physician expert in gastroenterological imagery; and

storing the corrected prediction into the storage component.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein classification network architecture comprises at least two blocks, each having a Dense layer followed by a Dropout layer.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein a last block of the classification component includes a BatchNormalization layer followed by a Dense layer where a depth size is equal to a number of lesions of a type one desires to classify.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein a set of pre-trained neural networks is best performing among the following: VGG16, Inception V3, Xception, EfficientNetB5, EfficientNetB7, Resnet50 and Resnet125.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein a best performing combination is chosen based on overall accuracy and on f1-metrics.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein training of a best performing combination comprises two to four dense layers in sequence, starting with 4096 and decreasing in half up to 512.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein, between a final two layers of a best performing combination there is a dropout layer of 0.1 drop rate.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein training of the samples includes a ratio of training to-validation of 10%-90%.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein third-party validation is done by user-input.

10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein a training dataset includes images in a storage component that were predicted sequentially performing the method of claim 1 .

11 . A portable endoscopic device comprising instructions which, when executed by a processor, cause the computer to carry out the steps of the method of claim 1 .

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 19, 2023
From: SOUSA FERREIRA, JOÃO PEDRO; DA QUINTA E COSTA DE MASCARENHAS SARAIVA, MIGUEL JOSÉ; CASAL CARDOSO, HÉLDER MANUEL; GONÇALVES DE MACEDO, MANUEL GUILHERME; LIMA AFONSO, JOÃO PEDRO; RIBEIRO ANDRADE, ANA PATRICIA; NATAL JORGE, RENATO MANUEL; LAGES PARENTE, MARCO PAULO
To: DIGESTAID - ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DEVELOPMENT, LDA
Reel/Frame 063709/0689 →
Priority Claims (1)
PT 116896 · Nov 19, 2020 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20240020829A1 · Jan 18, 2024
References Cited (15)
US 20110245611A1 · Yeh · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20190148021A1 · Styner · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190180153A1 · Buckler · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20210076960A1 · Fornwalt · 2021 [cited by examiner]
EP 3659143 · 2019 [cited by examiner]
Li, Baopu, and Max Q-H. Meng. “Automatic polyp detection for wireless capsule endoscopy images.” Expert Systems with Applications 39.12 (2012): 10952-10958. (Year: 2012). [cited by examiner]
Sun, Muyi, et al. “Non-local attention and densely-connected convolutional neural networks for malignancy suspiciousness classification of gastric ulcer.” IEEE Access 8 (2020): 15812-15822. (Year: 2020). [cited by examiner]
Liu, Hao, et al. “Hybrid model structure for diabetic retinopathy classification.” Journal of Healthcare Engineering 2020.1 (2020): 8840174. (Year: 2020). [cited by examiner]
Pavel, Zahradn ‘kova’ A, jr. (2019) Automatic assessment of the cardiomyocyte development stages from confocal microscopy images using deep convolutional networks. PLoS (Year: 2019). [cited by examiner]
Aoki, Tomonori, et al. “Automatic detection of erosions and ulcerations in wireless capsule endoscopy images based on a deep convolutional neural network.” Gastrointestinal endoscopy 89.2 (2019): 357-363. (Year: 2019). [cited by examiner]
Patent Cooperation Treaty, Written Opinion and International Search Report issued in PCT/PT2021/050041, Mar. 14, 2022, pp. 1-16. [cited by applicant]
Valerio et al., “Lesions Multiclass Classification in Endoscopic Capsule Frames”, Procedia Computer Science, 2019, pp. 637-645, vol. 164. [cited by applicant]
Wang et al., “A systematic evaluation and optimization of automatic detection of ulcers in wireless capsule endoscopy on a large dataset using deep convolutional neural networks”, Physics in Medicine and Biology, Instit… [cited by applicant]
Yan et al., “Intelligent diagnosis of gastric intestinal metaplasia based on convolutional neural network and limited humber of endoscopic images”, Computers in Biology and Medicine, Oct. 12, 2020, pp. 1-8, vol. 126. [cited by applicant]
Kyriakides et al., “An Introduction to Neural Architecture Search for Convolutional Networks”, arxiv.org, University of Macedonia, May 22, 2020, pp. 1-17. [cited by applicant]