IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,528,130
Granted Patent B2
US 12,528,130 · App. 18/045,723 · Granted Jan 20, 2026

Method for determining a sharpness condition of a saw chain of a chain saw

Inventors: Marco Weber (Backnang, DE); Thomas Lux (Alfdorf, DE); Luis Jaeger (Stuttgart, DE); Siddharth Baburaj (Freiburg im Breisgau, DE)
Assignee: Andreas Stihl AG & Co. KG
B23D63/16G01B5/20G01B5/24G06T7/0002
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,528,130
App. No.
18/045,723
Granted
Jan 20, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method is for determining a sharpness condition of a saw chain of a chain saw. The saw chain includes at least one cutting link having an upper cutting blade. An upper cutting blade image of the upper cutting blade of the cutting link is recorded using an imaging device. An evaluation of the upper cutting blade image is performed using an evaluation unit, which includes an artificial neural network. A sharp condition and a dull condition of the saw chain are defined in the evaluation unit. The saw chain is assigned on the basis of the upper cutting blade image using the artificial neural network to the sharp condition or the dull condition.

Claims (16)

1 . A method for determining a sharpness condition of a saw chain of a chain saw, wherein the saw chain includes at least one cutting link having an upper cutting blade, wherein the upper cutting blade has a width of less than 500 micrometers, wherein an upper cutting blade said to be sharp has a width of the method comprising:

providing a reference saw chain defined by a sharp saw chain having an upper cutting blade having a width of less than 50 μm;

recording an upper cutting blade image of the upper cutting blade of the cutting link via an imaging device;

performing an evaluation of the upper cutting blade image using an evaluation unit, wherein the evaluation unit includes a first artificial neural network, a sharp condition of the saw chain is defined in the evaluation unit, a dull condition of the saw chain is defined in the evaluation unit, and the saw chain is assigned to the sharp condition or the dull condition on a basis of the upper cutting blade image using the first artificial neural network, wherein the first artificial neural network uses a data set of digital images of upper cutting blades of sharp saw chains and of upper cutting blades of dull saw chains in order to decide whether the saw chain is to be assigned to the dull condition or to the sharp condition; wherein a sharp saw chain of the saw chains of the data set supplies at least 80% of the cutting performance of a reference saw chain in identical working conditions; wherein a dull saw chain supplies at most 65% of the cutting performance of the reference saw chain in identical working conditions; the sharp saw chains are assigned to the sharp condition; and, the dull saw chains are assigned to the dull condition, wherein the evaluation unit is configured to output a directive on a basis of the sharpness condition of the saw chain, wherein the directive includes an instruction to resharpen the saw chain; and,

wherein the evaluation unit includes at least one second artificial neural network; the second artificial neural network is a convolutional neural network and is trained on recognition of upper cutting blades in upper cutting blade images; wherein, with the aid of the second artificial neural network before the assignment of the upper cutting blade image to the sharp condition or the dull condition via the first artificial neural network, a region of the upper cutting blade image in which the upper cutting blade is located is selected; and, the upper cutting blade image is cropped to the region.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the upper cutting blade image is recorded under undefined light conditions at an undefined angle.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the upper cutting blade image is transferred in digital form to the evaluation unit.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the upper cutting blade image has a resolution of at least 10 pixels/millimeter.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the upper cutting blade image has a resolution of at most 128 pixels/millimeter.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the probability of success for a correct assignment of the upper cutting blade image to the sharp condition or the unsharp condition is at least 80% when the upper cutting blade image being evaluated has a resolution of at most 128 pixels/millimeter.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the imaging device has an image sensor having at most 12 megapixels, and the image sensor has a maximum size of 7.2 millimeters×5.4 millimeters.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein precisely two conditions for the sharpness condition of the saw chain are defined in the evaluation unit.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the upper cutting blade image is recorded using a flash.

10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein at least two upper cutting blade images of at least two different upper cutting blades of the saw chain are recorded; and, the evaluation unit evaluates the at least two upper cutting blade images to decide whether the saw chain is to be assigned to the dull condition or the sharp condition.

11 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the imaging device and the evaluation unit are integrated together into a single portable apparatus.

12 . The method of claim 1 , wherein both the first artificial neural network for assigning the upper cutting blade image to the sharp condition or to the dull condition and the second artificial neural network for selecting the region of the upper cutting blade image in which the upper cutting blade is located are part of the evaluation unit.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 12, 2022
From: WEBER, MARCO; LUX, THOMAS; JAEGER, LUIS; BABURAJ, SIDDHARTH
To: ANDREAS STIHL AG & CO. KG
Reel/Frame 062053/0562 →
Priority Claims (1)
EP 21202256 · Oct 12, 2021 · regional
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20230115313A1 · Apr 13, 2023
References Cited (31)
US 5115403A · Yoneda · 1992 [cited by examiner]
US 6105446A · Rein · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 12224545B2 · Radtke · 2025 [cited by examiner]
US 20160263674A1 · Laliberte · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160375570A1 · Boeck · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20180272491A1 · Yang · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180275630A1 · Kao · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180278494A1 · Chen · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190143467A1 · Wang · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190227528A1 · Abbott · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190299352A1 · Michiwaki · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200030936A1 · Knudson · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200209831A1 · Chen · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210173378A1 · Rickey · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220379511A1 · Girolami · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20240020638A1 · Adcock · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240190032A1 · Otto · 2024 [cited by examiner]
CN 111383227A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
DE 2727447A1 · 1978 [cited by applicant]
DE 3410149A1 · 1985 [cited by applicant]
EP 0949480A2 · 1999 [cited by applicant]
JP 200537221A · 2005 [cited by applicant]
WO 0107868A1 · 2001 [cited by applicant]
WO 2013102900A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020251535A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
CN111383227A English Translation; Unannounced Invensor; Jul. 7, 2020; G06F18/214. [cited by examiner]
Anonymous, “kriege kette einfach nicht mehr scharf . . . -Motorsaegen-Portal”, Oct. 3, 2017, XP055870396, URL: http://motorsaegen-portal.de/viewtopic.php?f=65&t=102332&start=20, found on Dec. 8, 2021. 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Anonymous, “20171003-195006.jpg”, Oct. 3, 2017, XP055870398, URL:https://www.dropbox.com/s/x7mb3i6jvhux5cx/20171003_195006.jpg?dl=0, found on Dec. 8, 2021. 1 page. [cited by applicant]
Pan, S. et al, “A Survey on Transfer Learning”, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 22, No. 10, Oct. 2020, pp. 1345 to 1359. [cited by applicant]
Ren, S. et al, “Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks”, arXiv: 1506/.01497v3 [cs.CV], Jan. 6, 2016, pp. 1 to 14. [cited by applicant]
Anonymous, “kriege kette einfach nicht mehr scharf . . . -Motorsaegen-Portal”, Oct. 3, 2017, XP055870396, URL: http://motorsaegen-portal.de/viewtopic.php?f=65&t=102332&start=20, found on Dec. 8, 2021,7 pages (pp. 1 to 3… [cited by applicant]