IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,461,195
Granted Patent B2
US 12,461,195 · App. 18/062,618 · Granted Nov 4, 2025

Near-range interference mitigation for automotive radar system

Inventors: Filip Alexandru Rosu (Bucharest, RO); Ryan Haoyun Wu (San Jose, CA)
Assignee: NXP B.V.
G01S7/354G01S7/356G01S13/931G01S2013/93275
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,461,195
App. No.
18/062,618
Granted
Nov 4, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A signal processing system and method includes a first input configured to receive an input signal range profile. The input signal range profile includes near-range interference signals. A second input is configured to receive a reference signal range profile; and a processor is configured to perform steps including: executing a recursive least squares operation to determine coefficient values of a finite impulse response (FIR) filter, wherein the coefficient values are selected to minimize a difference between the input signal range profile and the reference signal range profile when the reference signal range profile is filtered through the FIR filter to generate a filtered reference signal range profile, and subtracting the filtered reference signal range profile from the input signal range profile to remove the near-range interference signals from the input signal range profile.

Claims (83)

1 . An automotive radar system, comprising:

at least one transmitter and at least one receiver, wherein the at least one transmitter and the at least one receiver are configured to transmit and receive radar signals, wherein the at least one transmitter and the at least one receiver are coupled to a vehicle; and

an automotive radar processor configured to:

receiving, from the at least one receiver, a received radar signal;

convert the received radar signal into an input signal range profile, wherein the input signal range profile includes near-range interference signals generated by reflections from a bumper of the vehicle and system component spill-over effects;

determine a reference signal;

convert the reference signal into a reference signal range profile by:

applying a tapering window to the reference signal to generate a tapered reference signal; and

applying a matched filter to the tapered reference signal to generate the reference signal range profile;

execute a recursive least squares operation to determine coefficient values of a finite impulse response (FIR) filter, wherein the coefficient values are selected to minimize an error between the input signal range profile and the reference signal range profile when the reference signal range profile is filtered through the FIR filter;

apply the FIR filter with the coefficient values to the reference signal range profile to determine a filtered reference signal range profile; and

subtract the filtered reference signal range profile from the input signal range profile to remove the near-range interference signals from the input signal range profile.

2 . The automotive radar system of claim 1 , wherein the reference signal has a predetermined value and the automotive radar processor is configured to perform the step of determining the reference signal by retrieving the reference signal from a memory system accessible to the automotive radar processor.

3 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the automotive radar processor is configured to perform the step of executing a fast-time matched filter to perform range compression on the received radar signal before converting the received radar signal into the input signal range profile.

4 . The system of claim 3 , wherein the automotive radar processor is configured to perform the step of executing a slow-time frequency Fourier transform to perform Doppler compression on the received radar signal before converting the received radar signal into the input signal range profile.

5 . The automotive radar system of claim 1 , wherein the tapering window is a Taylor tapering window or a Blackman tailoring window.

6 . The automotive radar system of claim 1 , wherein a number of coefficients n in the FIR filter is at least partially determined by a distance between at least one of the at least one transmitter and the at least one receiver and an edge of the bumper of the vehicle.

7 . The automotive radar system of claim 6 , wherein the number of coefficients n in the FIR filter is determined as a smallest integer that is larger than a ceiling of

N

=

R

e

δ

⁢

r

where N is a number of samples of the input signal range profile, R e is the distance, and δr is a range cell.

8 . The automotive radar system of claim 7 , wherein the number of coefficients n in the FIR filter is fewer than the number of samples of the input signal range profile N divided by

4

⁢

(

n

<

N

4

)

.

9 . The automotive radar system of claim 1 , wherein the automotive radar system is a frequency-modulated continuous-wave (FMCW) radar system.

10 . A signal processing system, comprising:

a first input configured to receive an input signal range profile, the input signal range profile including near-range interference signals;

a second input configured to receive a reference signal range profile; and

a processor configured to:

execute a recursive least squares operation to determine coefficient values of a finite impulse response (FIR) filter, wherein the coefficient values are selected to minimize a difference between the input signal range profile and the reference signal range profile when the reference signal range profile is filtered through the FIR filter to generate a filtered reference signal range profile; and

subtract the filtered reference signal range profile from the input signal range profile to remove the near-range interference signals from the input signal range profile.

11 . The signal processing system of claim 10 , wherein a number of coefficients n in the FIR filter at least partially determined by a distance between at least one a transmitter of a radar system and a receiver of the radar system and an edge of a bumper of a vehicle.

12 . The signal processing system of claim 11 , wherein the number of coefficients n in the FIR filter is determined as a smallest integer that is larger than a ceiling of

N

=

R

e

δ

⁢

r

where N is a number of samples of the input signal range profile, R e is the distance, and δr is a range cell.

13 . The signal processing system of claim 12 , wherein the number of coefficients n in the FIR filter in fewer than the number of samples of the input signal range profile N divided by

4

⁢

(

n

<

N

4

)

.

14 . A method, comprising:

converting a received radar signal into an input signal range profile;

applying a tapering window to a reference signal to generate a tapered reference signal;

applying a fast Fourier transform to the tapered reference signal to generate a reference signal range profile;

executing a recursive least squares operation to determine coefficient values of a finite impulse response (FIR) filter, wherein the coefficient values are selected to minimize a difference between the input signal range profile and the reference signal range profile when the reference signal range profile is filtered through the FIR filter to generate a filtered reference signal range profile; and

subtracting the filtered reference signal range profile from the input signal range profile to remove near-range interference signals from the input signal range profile.

15 . The method of claim 14 , wherein the reference signal has a predetermined value and further comprising retrieving the reference signal from a memory system.

16 . The method of claim 14 , further comprising executing a fast-time frequency Fourier transform to perform range compression on the received radar signal before converting the received radar signal into the input signal range profile.

17 . The method of claim 16 , further comprising executing a slow-time frequency Fourier transform to perform Doppler compression on the received radar signal before converting the received radar signal into the input signal range profile.

18 . The method of claim 14 , wherein the tapering window is a Taylor tapering window or a Blackman tailoring window.

19 . The method of claim 14 , further comprising determining a number of coefficients n in the FIR filter based upon a distance between at least one of a transmitter and a receiver and an edge of a bumper of a vehicle.

20 . The method of claim 19 , further comprising determining the number of coefficients n using a smallest integer that is larger than a ceiling of

N

=

R

e

δ

⁢

r

where N is a number of samples of the input signal range profile, R e is the distance, and δr is a range cell.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 7, 2022
From: ROSU, FILIP ALEXANDRU; WU, RYAN HAOYUN
To: NXP B.V.
Reel/Frame 062005/0612 →
Priority Claims (1)
RO a 2022 00578 · Sep 22, 2022 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20240111020A1 · Apr 4, 2024
References Cited (21)
US 7535410B2 · Suzuki · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 11513187B2 · Stettiner · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20070139200A1 · Yushkov · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20090299184A1 · Walker · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20110037643A1 · Torin · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20120218139A1 · Suzuki et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20170307729A1 · Eshraghi et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180106884A1 · Marr · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180252809A1 · Davis · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20210105019A1 · Gupta · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210149018A1 · Elad et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
CN 113433523A · 2021 [cited by applicant]
EP 3588127A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021177956A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
Rosu et al., “Near-Range Multipath Mitigation Methodology for Multistatic SAR Applications Using Matched-Adaptive Filters,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, May 4, 2022, … [cited by applicant]
Rosu et al., “Deconvolution Method for Eliminating Reference Signal Coupling/Reflections in Bistatic SAR,” 2021 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium IGARSS, 2021, pp. 2715-2718. [cited by applicant]
Rosu et al., “Sub-Resolution Multipath Mitigation in Radar Transponders by Range Compression and Adaptive Filtering,” 2019 International Symposium on Signals, Circuits and Systems (ISSCS), 2019, pp. 1-4. [cited by applicant]
Sornmo et al., “A Method for Evaluation of QRS Shape Features Using a Mathematical Model for the ECG,” in IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. BME-28, No. 10, pp. 713-717, Oct. 1981. [cited by applicant]
Hamilton et al., “Adaptive matched filtering for QRS detection,” Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 1988, pp. 147-148 vol. 1. [cited by applicant]
Widrow et al., “Stationary and nonstationary learning characteristics of the LMS adaptive filter,” in Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 64, No. 8, pp. 1151-1162, Aug. 1976. [cited by applicant]
Melzer et al, Short-Range Leakage Cancelation in FMCW Radar Transceivers Using an Artificial On-Chip Target, Dec. 1, 2015. pp. 1650-1660 , vol. 9, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing. [cited by applicant]