IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,202,755
Granted Patent B2
US 12,202,755 · App. 18/068,997 · Granted Jan 21, 2025

Segregation and treatment of waste water streams for enhanced oil recovery

Inventors: Mohamed Ahmed Soliman (Ras Tanura, SA); Abdulaziz Y. Ammar (Dammam, SA); Ahmed Bu Ali (Dammam, SA); Seung-Hak Choi (Dhahran, SA); Hasan Al Abdulgader (Dammam, SA)
Assignee: Saudi Arabian Oil Company
C02F9/00B01D61/0022B01D61/0023B01D61/005E21B43/20C02F1/04C02F1/445C02F1/463C02F1/4672C02F1/78C02F2103/10C02F2209/10
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,202,755
App. No.
18/068,997
Granted
Jan 21, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Example methods and systems for segregation and treatment of waste water streams for enhanced oil recovery are disclosed. One example method includes generating concentrated solution by treating, using a forward osmosis process, waste water of one or more gas streams from a gas plant associated with one or more gas wells, where draw solution of the forward osmosis process includes produced water from one or more crude oil production traps, and the waste water contains kinetic hydrate inhibitor (KHI). The concentrated solution is treated using an oxidation process to generate oxidized solution by decomposing the KHI in the waste water. The oxidized solution is injected into an oil reservoir through a water injection well for enhanced oil recovery.

Claims (35)

1. A method, comprising:

generating concentrated solution by treating, using a forward osmosis process, waste water of one or more gas streams from a gas plant associated with one or more gas wells, wherein draw solution of the forward osmosis process comprises produced water from one or more crude oil production traps, and the waste water contains kinetic hydrate inhibitor (KHI);

generating oxidized solution by treating, using an oxidation process, the concentrated solution to decompose the KHI in the waste water, wherein the oxidation process comprises a combination of an electrocoagulation process and an electrochemical oxidation process, the electrocoagulation process comprises a plurality of electrocoagulation reactions comprising a plurality of anode side reactions and a plurality of cathode side reactions, and the electrochemical oxidation process comprises at least one of direct oxidation and indirect oxidation; and

injecting the oxidized solution into an oil reservoir through a water injection well for enhanced oil recovery (EOR).

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the draw solution is from a gas oil separation plant (GOSP) associated with the one or more crude oil production traps.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the forward osmosis process comprises a vibration-assisted forward osmosis process.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein generating the concentrated solution comprises monitoring ingress of salt content from the draw solution using total dissolved solids (TDS) of the concentrated solution.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the oxidation process comprises vacuum separation followed by oxidation using electrocoagulation, and the vacuum separation comprises directing the concentrated solution to vacuum distillation.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein generating the concentrated solution by treating, using the forward osmosis process, the waste water of one or more gas streams from the gas plant associated with one or more gas wells comprises passing the waste water through a semi-permeable membrane.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein an osmotic pressure of the produced water is higher than an osmotic pressure of the waste water during the forward osmosis process.

8. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

generating diluted draw solution by treating, using the forward osmosis process, the waste water; and wherein:

injecting the oxidized solution into the oil reservoir through the water injection well for EOR comprises injecting the diluted draw solution and the oxidized solution into the oil reservoir through the water injection well for EOR.

9. A system, comprising:

a forward osmosis unit;

an oxidation unit; and

a pump unit; wherein:

the forward osmosis unit is configured to generate concentrated solution by treating, using a forward osmosis process, waste water of one or more gas streams from a gas plant associated with one or more gas wells, wherein draw solution of the forward osmosis process comprises produced water from one or more crude oil production traps, and the waste water contains kinetic hydrate inhibitor (KHI);

the oxidation unit is coupled to the forward osmosis unit and is configured to generate oxidized solution by treating, using an oxidation process, the concentrated solution to decompose the KHI in the waste water, wherein the oxidation process comprises a combination of an electrocoagulation process and an electrochemical oxidation process, the electrocoagulation process comprises a plurality of electrocoagulation reactions comprising a plurality of anode side reactions and a plurality of cathode side reactions, and the electrochemical oxidation process comprises at least one of direct oxidation and indirect oxidation; and

the pump unit is coupled to both the forward osmosis unit and the oxidation unit and is configured to inject the oxidized solution into an oil reservoir through a water injection well for enhanced oil recovery (EOR).

10. The system of claim 9 , wherein the draw solution is from a gas oil separation plant (GOSP) associated with the one or more crude oil production traps.

11. The system of claim 9 , wherein the forward osmosis process comprises a vibration-assisted forward osmosis process.

12. The system of claim 9 , wherein the forward osmosis unit is further configured to monitor ingress of salt content from the draw solution using total dissolved solids (TDS) of the concentrated solution.

13. The system of claim 9 , wherein the oxidation process comprises vacuum separation followed by oxidation using electrocoagulation, and the vacuum separation comprises directing the concentrated solution to vacuum distillation.

14. The system of claim 9 , wherein the forward osmosis unit is further configured to pass the waste water through a semi-permeable membrane.

15. The system of claim 9 , wherein an osmotic pressure of the produced water is higher than an osmotic pressure of the waste water during the forward osmosis process.

16. The system of claim 9 , wherein the forward osmosis unit is further configured to generate diluted draw solution by treating, using the forward osmosis process, the waste water, and wherein the pump unit is further configured to injecting the diluted draw solution into the oil reservoir through the water injection well for EOR.

17. A method, comprising:

generating concentrated solution by treating, using a forward osmosis process, waste water of one or more gas streams from a gas plant associated with one or more gas wells, wherein draw solution of the forward osmosis process comprises produced water from one or more crude oil production traps, and the waste water contains kinetic hydrate inhibitor (KHI);

generating diluted draw solution by treating, using the forward osmosis process, the waste water;

generating oxidized solution by treating, using an oxidation process, the concentrated solution to decompose the KHI in the waste water; and

injecting the diluted draw solution and the oxidized solution into an oil reservoir through a water injection well for enhanced oil recovery (EOR).

18. The method of claim 17 , wherein the oxidation process comprises an ozonation process of the concentrated solution.

19. The method of claim 17 , wherein the oxidation process comprises vacuum separation followed by oxidation using electrocoagulation, and the vacuum separation comprises directing the concentrated solution to vacuum distillation.

20. The method of claim 17 , wherein an osmotic pressure of the produced water is higher than an osmotic pressure of the waste water during the forward osmosis process.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 15, 2023
From: SOLIMAN, MOHAMED AHMED; AMMAR, ABDULAZIZ Y.; BU ALI, AHMED; CHOI, SEUNG-HAK; AL ABDULGADER, HASAN
To: SAUDI ARABIAN OIL COMPANY
Reel/Frame 062702/0330 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20240199462A1 · Jun 20, 2024
References Cited (54)
US 4632818A · Chen et al. · 1986 [cited by applicant]
US 6451252B1 · Ruan et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 7901578B2 · Pruet · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 7994374B2 · Talley et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8702994B2 · Frost et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8728325B2 · Hussain · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 8980798B2 · Tian et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 8992780B2 · Champion et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9637404B2 · Minnich · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 10384967B2 · Hancock · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10392271B2 · Janson et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 11000778B2 · Rithauddeen et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11040904B2 · Herron · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11691119B2 · Zhang et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20100224561A1 · Marcin · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20100300872A1 · Gutsol et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20130168315A1 · Minier Matar · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20180370834A1 · Sutton-Sharp · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190118114A1 · Rithauddeen et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200398245A1 · Zhang et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20230183588A1 · Al-Qahtani et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20240109034A1 · AlQahtani et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240109776A1 · AlQahtani et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240150203A1 · AlQahtani et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
CA 2764156 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
CA 2921749 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
CN 1386563 · 2002 [cited by applicant]
CN 103043840 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
CN 106277531A · 2017 [cited by examiner]
CN 110127623 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
EP 2770041 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
KR 101189834 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
KR 102202958B1 · 2021 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2013093789 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2013121217 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
Foster, “Plasma-based water Purification: Challenges and Prospects for the Future,” Physics of Plasmas, 2017, 24:055501, 17 pages. [cited by applicant]
Kelland, “A Review of Kinetic Hydrate Inhibitors from an Environmental Perspective,” Energy and Fuels, 2018, 32:12001-12012, 39 pages. [cited by applicant]
Sanito et al., “Degradation of contaminants in plasma technology: An overview,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2022, 424:127390, 20 pages. [cited by applicant]
Sato et al., “Degradation of organic contaminants in water by plasma,” International Journal of Plasma Environmental Science and Technology, Mar. 2009, 3(1):8-14, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Singh et al., “Rapid Removal of Poly- and Perfluorinated Compounds from Investigation-Derived Waste (IDF) in a Pilot-Scale Plasma Reactor,” Environmental Science & Technology, 2019, 29 pages. [cited by applicant]
Wang et al., “Performance Evaluation of Hybrid Gas-Liquid Pulse Discharge Plasma-Induced Degradation of Polyvinyl Alcohol-Containing Wastewater,” Plasma Chem Plasma Process, 2014, 34:1115-1127, 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
Zeghioud et al., “Review on Discharge Plasma for Water Treatment: Mechanism, Reactor Geometries, Active Species and Combined Processes,” Journal of Water Process Engineering, 2020, 38, 101664, 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
Borraccia et al., “Oxygen enrichment in Sulphur plants to reduce the life cycle costs of new-build, large gas plants,” Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition & Conference, Nov. 2016, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
Dang et al., “Research on decomposition of hydrogen sulfide using non-thermal plasma with metal oxide catalysis,” Energy Procedia, 2012, 16:856-862, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
DuPont.com [online], “DuPont Ligasep degasification modules,” Mar. 2020, retrieved on Jul. 14, 2022, retrieved from URL <https://www.dupont.com/content/dam/dupont/amer/us/en/water-solutions/public/documents/en/45-D02249… [cited by applicant]
He et al., “Dielectric Barrier Discharge for Hydrogen Sulphide Waste Gas Decomposition,” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Feb. 2019, 237:22052, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Jarrige et al., “Decomposition of Gaseous Sulfide Compounds in Air by Pulsed Corona Discharge,” Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing, May 2007, 27:241-255, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
Kolbasi, “Oxygen enrichment at Sulphur recovery unit,” Refining Community Presentation, May 2018, 27 pages. [cited by applicant]
Palma et al., “A review about the recent advances in selected nonthermal plasma assisted solid-gas phase chemical processes,” Nanomaterials, Aug. 2020, 10:1596, 56 pages. [cited by applicant]
Papasidero et al., “Improving operability and process understanding of sulfur recovery unit,” Chemical Engineering Transactions, May 2012, 26:237-242, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Paskall et al., “Can oxygen enrichment replace tail gas clean up in sulphur recovery?” Sulphur Recovery, Western Research, 8th edition, 2003, Chapter 8-3, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Paskall et al., “So you don't have a COS/CS2 problem, eh?” Sulphur Recovery, Western Research, 8th edition, 2003, Chapter 2-79, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Reddy et al., “Kinetics of hydrogen sulfide decomposition in a DBD plasma reactor operated at high temperature,” Journal of Energy Chemistry, 2013, 22:382-386, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Xuan et al., “Plasma oxidation of H2S over non-stoichiometric LaxMnO3 perovskite catalysts in a dielectric barrier discharge reactor,” Catalysts, Aug. 2018, 8:317, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]