Routing and regenerator planning in a carrier's core reconfigurable optical network
A multi-layer network planning system can determine a set of regenerator sites (“RSs”) that have been found to cover all paths among a set of nodes of an optical layer of a multi-layer network and can determine a set of candidate RSs in the optical layer for use by the links between a set of nodes of an upper layer, wherein each RS can be selected as a candidate RS for the links. The system can determine a binary path matrix for the links between the set of nodes of the upper layer. The system can determine a min-cost matrix that includes a plurality of min-cost paths. The system can determine a best RS from the set of candidate RSs and can move the best RS from the set of candidate RSs into the set of RSs for the links. The system can then update the binary path matrix.
1. A method comprising:
determining, by a network planning system comprising a processor, a set of regenerator sites in a multi-layer network, wherein the multi-layer network comprises an optical layer and an upper layer, wherein the upper layer utilizes the optical layer to create links between a set of nodes of the upper layer, and wherein the set of regenerator sites have previously been found to cover at least a portion of paths among a set of optical nodes of the optical layer;
determining, by the network planning system, a set of candidate regenerator sites in the optical layer for use by the links between the set of nodes of the upper layer, wherein each regenerator site of the optical layer can be selected as a candidate regenerate site for the links;
selecting, by the network planning system, from the set of candidate regenerator sites, a best regenerator site;
moving, by the network planning system, the best regenerator site from the set of candidate regenerator sites into the set of regenerator sites for the links; and
in response to a failure, adding, by the network planning system, capacity to a subset of surviving links of the upper layer using the optical layer.
2. The method of claim 1 , wherein selecting, by the network planning system, from the set of candidate regenerator sites, the best regenerator site comprises selecting, by the network planning system, from the set of candidate regenerator sites, the best regenerator site based upon a rank function.
3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the upper layer comprises an IP layer; and
wherein selecting, by the network planning system, from the set of candidate regenerator sites, the best regenerator site based upon the rank function comprises selecting, from the set of optical nodes operating in the optical layer, a specific optical node as the best regenerator site, wherein the specific optical node belongs to a minimum cost path of a highest number of node pairs that do not have a valid path.
4. The method of claim 2 , wherein the upper layer comprises an IP layer; and
wherein selecting, by the network planning system, from the set of candidate regenerator sites, the best regenerator site based upon the rank function comprises counting node pairs that provide a valid path as a result of placing a regenerator at a specific optical node of the set of optical nodes operating in the optical layer, wherein the specific optical node has a highest number of node pairs.
5. The method of claim 2 , wherein selecting, by the network planning system, from the set of candidate regenerator sites, the best regenerator site based upon the rank function comprises selecting, by the network planning system, from the set of candidate regenerator sites, the best regenerator site based upon a weighted combination of two rank functions.
6. The method of claim 5 , wherein a first rank function of the two rank functions selects, from the set of optical nodes operating in the optical layer of the multi-layer network, a first specific optical node as the best regenerator site, wherein the first specific optical node belongs to a minimum cost path of a highest number of node pairs that do not have a valid path; and wherein a second rank function of the two rank functions counts node pairs that provide a valid path as a result of placing a regenerator at a second specific optical node of the set of optical nodes operating in the optical layer, wherein the second specific optical node has a highest number of node pairs.
7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the weighted combination is biased towards the second rank function.
8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the failure comprises:
a router failure of a router operating within the upper layer of the multi-layer network; or
an optical fiber failure of an optical fiber operating within the optical layer of the multi-layer network.
9. A network planning system comprising:
a processor; and
a memory comprising instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to perform operations comprising
determining a set of regenerator sites in a multi-layer network, wherein the multi-layer network comprises an optical layer and an upper layer, wherein the upper layer utilizes the optical layer to create links between a set of nodes of the upper layer, and wherein the set of regenerator sites have previously been found to cover at least a portion of paths among a set of optical nodes of the optical layer,
determining a set of candidate regenerator sites in the optical layer for use by the links between the set of nodes of the upper layer, wherein each regenerator site of the optical layer can be selected as a candidate regenerate site for the links,
selecting, from the set of candidate regenerator sites, a best regenerator site,
moving the best regenerator site from the set of candidate regenerator sites into the set of regenerator sites for the links, and
in response to a failure, adding capacity to a subset of surviving links of the upper layer using the optical layer.
10. The network planning system of claim 9 , wherein selecting, from the set of candidate regenerator sites, the best regenerator site comprises selecting, from the set of candidate regenerator sites, the best regenerator site based upon a rank function.
11. The network planning system of claim 10 , wherein the upper layer comprises an IP layer; and wherein selecting, from the set of candidate regenerator sites, the best regenerator site based upon the rank function comprises selecting, from the set of optical nodes operating in the optical layer, a specific optical node as the best regenerator site, wherein the specific optical node belongs to a minimum cost path of a highest number of node pairs that do not have a valid path.
12. The network planning system of claim 10 , wherein the upper layer comprises an IP layer; and wherein selecting, from the set of candidate regenerator sites, the best regenerator site based upon the rank function comprises counting node pairs that provide a valid path as a result of placing a regenerator at a specific optical node of the set of optical nodes operating in the optical layer, wherein the specific optical node has a highest number of node pairs.
13. The network planning system of claim 10 , wherein selecting, from the set of candidate regenerator sites, the best regenerator site based upon the rank function comprises selecting, from the set of candidate regenerator sites, the best regenerator site based upon a weighted combination of two rank functions.
14. The network planning system of claim 13 , wherein a first rank function of the two rank functions selects, from the set of optical nodes operating in the optical layer of the multi-layer network, a first specific optical node as the best regenerator site, wherein the first specific optical node belongs to a minimum cost path of a highest number of node pairs that do not have a valid path; and wherein a second rank function of the two rank functions counts node pairs that provide a valid path as a result of placing a regenerator at a second specific optical node of the set of optical nodes operating in the optical layer, wherein the second specific optical node has a highest number of node pairs.
15. The network planning system of claim 14 , wherein the weighted combination is biased towards the second rank function.
16. A computer-readable storage medium comprising computer-executable instructions that, when executed by a processor of a network planning system, cause the processor to perform operations comprising:
determining a set of regenerator sites in a multi-layer network, wherein the multi-layer network comprises an optical layer and an upper layer, wherein the upper layer utilizes the optical layer to create links between a set of nodes of the upper layer, and wherein the set of regenerator sites have previously been found to cover at least a portion of paths among a set of optical nodes of the optical layer;
determining a set of candidate regenerator sites in the optical layer for use by the links between the set of nodes of the upper layer, wherein each regenerator site of the optical layer can be selected as a candidate regenerate site for the links;
selecting, from the set of candidate regenerator sites, a best regenerator site;
moving the best regenerator site from the set of candidate regenerator sites into the set of regenerator sites for the links; and
in response to a failure, adding capacity to a subset of surviving links of the upper layer using the optical layer.
17. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 16 , wherein selecting, from the set of candidate regenerator sites, the best regenerator site comprises selecting, from the set of candidate regenerator sites, the best regenerator site based upon a rank function.
18. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 17 , wherein the upper layer comprises an IP layer; and wherein selecting, from the set of candidate regenerator sites, the best regenerator site based upon the rank function comprises selecting, from the set of optical nodes operating in the optical layer, a specific optical node as the best regenerator site, wherein the specific optical node belongs to a minimum cost path of a highest number of node pairs that do not have a valid path.
19. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 17 , wherein the upper layer comprises an IP layer; and wherein selecting, from the set of candidate regenerator sites, the best regenerator site based upon the rank function comprises counting node pairs that provide a valid path as a result of placing a regenerator at a specific optical node of the set of optical nodes operating in the optical layer, wherein the specific optical node has a highest number of node pairs.
20. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 17 , wherein selecting, from the set of candidate regenerator sites, the best regenerator site based upon the rank function comprises selecting, from the set of candidate regenerator sites, the best regenerator site based upon a weighted combination of two rank functions; wherein a first rank function of the two rank functions selects, from the set of optical nodes operating in the optical layer of the multi-layer network, a first specific optical node as the best regenerator site, wherein the first specific optical node belongs to a minimum cost path of a highest number of node pairs that do not have a valid path; and wherein a second rank function of the two rank functions counts node pairs that provide a valid path as a result of placing a regenerator at a second specific optical node of the set of optical nodes operating in the optical layer, wherein the second specific optical node has a highest number of node pairs.