IP Library Granted Patent US 12,535,055
Granted Patent B1
US 12,535,055 · App. 18/095,358 · Granted Jan 27, 2026

Systems and methods for optimal phase shift between dynamic control actions for wind turbines

Inventor: Kenneth Brown (Albuquerque, NM)
Assignee: National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC
F03D7/048F03D1/06F03D7/0224F03D7/0276F05B2270/204
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,535,055
App. No.
18/095,358
Granted
Jan 27, 2026
Kind
B1
Abstract

Dynamic wake control (or dynamic induction control) is used to promote wake breakdown and recovery behind a wind turbine that improve wind farm performance/efficiency. Constructive interference is created by simultaneously performing harmonic rotor speed control and harmonic collective pitch control so that the phase of the rotor speed perturbations leads the phase of the collective pitch perturbations by 90-135 degrees.

Claims (25)

1 . A wind farm control system, comprising:

a first control module for controlling rotor speed and collective pitch control of a first wind turbine;

wherein the first control module oscillates rotor speed and collective pitch control at a frequency and an amplitude to excite inherent fluid dynamic instabilities in the wake and decrease wake length; and

a second control module for determining downstream turbine energy efficiency changes at a downstream turbine resulting from periodically changing the rotor speed and collective pitch control between a time period of two set points to excite inherent fluid dynamic instabilities in the wake and decrease wake length;

wherein the downstream turbine energy efficiency changes are used by the first control module to determine the oscillation frequency and amplitude; and

wherein the first controller oscillates the rotor speed and collective pitch provides constructive aerodynamic interference from harmonic actuation of the rotor speed and collective pitch being performed in tandem with the phase of the rotor speed perturbations leads the phase of the collective pitch perturbations by a 90-135 degrees so that synergistic effects of actions at this phase shift reduces the near-wake length of the wind turbine more than either of the individual actions.

2 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the amplitude of the rotor speed change is up to 2 RPM.

3 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the amplitude of the collective pitch change is up to 2.9°.

4 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the first control module receives the RPM of the wind turbine and uses the RPM to determine the amplitude of the oscillation.

5 . The system of claim 1 , wherein another controller determines the frequency and amplitude of the parameter changes based on energy capture and load oscillation upon the blade and/or wind turbine tower and/or wind turbine drivetrain components.

6 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the first wind turbine is upstream from a second wind turbine downstream of the wake.

7 . The control system of claim 1 , further comprising:

an operational control module for controlling wind turbine angle into an incoming wind direction.

8 . A method for controlling wake length generated by a wind turbine, comprising:

oscillating rotor speed and collective pitch control of a wind turbine at a frequency and an amplitude to excite inherent fluid dynamic instabilities in the wake and decrease wake length; and

measuring wake length from a blade of the wind turbine to a wake terminus in a downstream wind direction from the blade and providing the wake length data to a controller that provides control commands to perform the oscillating rotor speed and collective pitch control;

wherein oscillating the rotor speed and collective pitch provides constructive aerodynamic interference from harmonic actuation of the rotor speed and collective pitch being performed in tandem with the phase of the rotor speed perturbations leads the phase of the collective pitch perturbations by a 90-135 degrees so that synergistic effects of actions at this phase shift reduces the near-wake length of the wind turbine more than either of the individual actions.

9 . The method of claim 8 , wherein the amplitude of the rotor speed change is up to 2 RPM.

10 . The method of claim 8 , wherein the amplitude of the collective pitch change is up to 2.9°.

11 . The method of claim 8 , further comprising:

receiving the RPM of the wind turbine and using the RPM to determine the amplitude of oscillation.

12 . The method of claim 8 , further comprising:

determining the frequency and amplitude of the parameter changers based on energy capture and load oscillation upon the blade and/or wind turbine tower and/or wind turbine drivetrain components.

13 . The method of claim 8 , further comprising:

controlling wind turbine angle into an incoming wind direction.

Assignments (3)
CONFIRMATORY LICENSE Recorded Apr 29, 2026
From: NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS OF SANDIA, LLC
To: NNSA
Reel/Frame 074518/0799 →
CONFIRMATORY LICENSE Recorded Apr 20, 2023
From: NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS OF SANDIA, LLC
To: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Reel/Frame 063388/0361 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 28, 2023
From: BROWN, KENNETH
To: NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS OF SANDIA, LLC
Reel/Frame 063128/0047 →
Continuity (1)
Provisional Application 63298144 · Jan 10, 2022
References Cited (22)
US 9835138B2 · Westergaard · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 10612519B2 · Franke · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10815967B2 · Geisler · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20130103202A1 · Bowyer · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20220412310A1 · Van Wingerden · 2022 [cited by examiner]
Zayas, J., “Wind Overview” 2014 Sandia's Wind Turbine Blade Workshop, Aug. 26, 2014, 32 pages. [cited by applicant]
Nygaard, N. G., “Wakes in very large wind farms and the effect of neighboring wind farms,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series (2014) 524:012162, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
El-Asha, S. et al., “Quantification of power losses due to wind turbine wake interactions through SCADA, meterological and wind LiDAR data,” Wind Energy (2017) 20:1823-1839. [cited by applicant]
Herges, T. G. et al., “Detailed analysis of a waked turbine using a high-resolution scanning lidar,” IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series (2018) 1037:072009, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Andersen, S. J. et al., “Comparison between PIV measurements and computations of the near-wake of an actuator disc,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series (2014) 524:012173, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Sorensen, J. N. et al., “Simulation of wind turbine wakes using the actuator line technique,” Philosophical Transactions A (2015) 373:20140071, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ignarolo, L. E. M. et al., “Tip-vortex instability and turbulent mixing in wind-turbine wakes,” J. Fluid Mech. (2015) 781:467-493. [cited by applicant]
Munters, WI. et al., Towards practical dynamic induction control of wind farms: analysis of optimally controlled wind- jarm boundary layers and sinusoidal induction control of first-row turbines, Wind Energ. Sci. (2018)… [cited by applicant]
Yilmaz, A. E. et al., “Optimal dynamic induction control of a pair of inline wind turbines,” Phys. Fluids (2018) 30:085106, 21 pages. [cited by applicant]
Houck, D. R. et al., “Can you accelerate wind turbine wake decay with unsteady operation?” AIAA SciTech Forum (2019) San Diego, CA, Jan. 7-11, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
Wang, C. et al., “Effects of dynamic induction control on power and loads, by LES-ALM simulations and wind tunnel experiments,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series (2020) 1618:022036, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Bhagwat, M. J. et al., “Stability Analysis of Helicopter Rotor Wakes in Axial Flight,” Journal of the American Helicopter Society (2000) 45(3):165-178. [cited by applicant]
Ivanell, S. et al., “Stability analysis of the tip vortices of a wind turbine,” Wind Energy (2010) 13:705-715. [cited by applicant]
Odemark, Y. et al., “The stability and development of tip and root vortices behind a model wind turbine,” Exp. Fluids (2013) 54:1591, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
Quaranta, H. U. et al., “Long-wave instability of helical vortex,” J. Fluid Mech. (2015) 780:687-716. [cited by applicant]
Marten, D et al., “Predicting Wind Turbine Wake Breakdown Using a Free Vortex Wake Code,” AIAA Journal (2020) 58(11):4672-4685. [cited by applicant]
Brown, K. et al., “Rapidly Recovering Wind Turbine Wakes with Dynamic Pitch and Rotor Speed Control,” AIAA SciTech Forum (2021) Jan. 11-15 & 19-21, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]