IP Library Granted Patent US 12,186,588
Granted Patent B2
US 12,186,588 · App. 18/102,642 · Granted Jan 7, 2025

Knowledge based multi-criteria optimization for radiotherapy treatment planning

Inventors: Janne Nord (Espoo, FI); Esa Kuusela (Espoo, FI); Joakim Pyyry (Helsinki, FI); Jarkko Peltola (Tuusula, FI); Martin Sabel (Hagendorn, CH)
Assignee: SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS INTERNATIONAL AG
A61N5/1031A61N5/1038G16H20/40A61N2005/1041A61N2005/1074
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,186,588
App. No.
18/102,642
Granted
Jan 7, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method of generating a treatment plan for treating a patient with radiotherapy, the method includes obtaining a plurality of sample plans, which are generated by use of a knowledge base comprising historical treatment plans and patient data. The method also includes performing a multi-criteria optimization based on the plurality of sample plans to construct a Pareto frontier, where the plurality of sample plans are evaluated with at least two objectives measuring qualities of the plurality of sample plans such that treatment plans on the constructed Pareto frontier are Pareto optimal with respect to the objectives. The method further includes identifying a treatment plan by use of the constructed Pareto frontier.

Claims (46)

1. A method of generating a treatment plan for treating a patient with radiotherapy, the method comprising:

identifying a plurality of organs at risk for a planning target volume;

obtaining a plurality of sample plans, wherein the plurality of sample plans are generated by use of a knowledge base comprising historical treatment plans and patient data;

performing a multi-criteria optimization, based on the plurality of sample plans, to construct a Pareto frontier, wherein the plurality of sample plans are evaluated with at least two objectives measuring qualities of the plurality of sample plans, wherein the performing the multi-criteria optimization to construct the Pareto frontier comprises using a confidence level associated with a predicted sample plan, wherein treatment plans on the constructed Pareto frontier are Pareto optimal with respect to the objectives, wherein the performing the multi-criteria optimization further comprises generating a Pareto frontier with one organ at risk at a time of the plurality of organs at risk;

receiving a selected tradeoff point on the constructed Pareto frontier;

utilizing a minimum Euclidean distance criterion such that a point on the constructed Pareto frontier closest to the selected trade off point is an identified treatment plan; and

generating the identified treatment plan by use of the constructed Pareto frontier, wherein said generating the identified treatment plan by use of the constructed Pareto frontier comprises generating (i) a combinational treatment plan comprising a combination of sample plans and (ii) a machine deliverable control point sequence corresponding to the combinational treatment plan, wherein the control point sequence is a sequence that can be delivered by a treatment machine.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein a sample plan of the plurality of sample plans is selected from training plans of the knowledge base.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein a sample plan of the plurality of sample plans is generated utilizing an estimation model of the knowledge base, wherein the estimation model is constructed by use of training plans of the knowledge base.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the performing the multi-criteria optimization further comprises each of the plurality of sample plans is evaluated with a value related to a Tumor Control Probability (TCP).

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein said generating the identified treatment plan by use of the constructed Pareto frontier is performed by adjusting plan metrics of the plurality of sample plans.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the objectives are selected from plan quality metrics of the plurality of sample plans.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising updating the knowledge base with the generated identified treatment plan.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein generating the machine deliverable control point sequence corresponding to the combinational treatment plan comprises:

combining a plurality of fluences associated with the plurality of sample plans to form combined fluences; and

transforming the combined fluences into a machine deliverable control point sequence using a leaf sequencing algorithm.

9. A system for generating a treatment plan for treating a patient with radiotherapy, the system comprising:

a memory that stores machine-readable instructions; and

a processor communicatively coupled to the memory, the processor operable to execute the instructions to

identify a plurality of organs at risk for a planning target volume;

obtain a plurality of sample plans, wherein the plurality of sample plans are generated by use of a knowledge base, the knowledge base comprising historical treatment plans and patient data;

perform a multi-criteria optimization, based on the plurality of sample plans, to construct a Pareto frontier, wherein the plurality of sample plans are evaluated with at least two objectives measuring qualities of the plurality of sample plans, wherein the perform the multi-criteria optimization to construct the Pareto frontier comprises use of a confidence level associated with a predicted sample plan, wherein treatment plans on the constructed Pareto frontier are Pareto optimal with respect to the objectives, wherein the perform the multi-criteria optimization further comprises generate a Pareto frontier with one organ at risk at a time of the plurality of organs at risk;

receive a selected tradeoff point on the constructed Pareto frontier;

utilize a minimum Euclidean distance criterion such that a point on the constructed Pareto frontier closest to the selected trade off point is an identified treatment plan; and

generate the identified treatment plan by use of the constructed Pareto frontier, wherein said generate the identified treatment plan by use of the constructed Pareto frontier comprises generate (i) a combinational treatment plan comprising a combination of sample plans and (ii) a machine deliverable control point sequence corresponding to the combinational treatment plan, wherein the control point sequence is a sequence that can be delivered by a treatment machine.

10. The system of claim 9 , further comprising a displaying device, wherein at least a portion of the constructed Pareto frontier is presented on the displaying device.

11. The system of claim 9 , wherein a sample plan of the plurality of sample plans is selected from training plans of the knowledge base.

12. The system of claim 9 , wherein a sample plan of the plurality of sample plans is generated utilizing an estimation model of the knowledge base, wherein the estimation model is constructed by use of training plans of the knowledge base.

13. The system of claim 9 , wherein the perform the multi-criteria optimization further comprises each of the plurality of sample plans is evaluated with a value related to a Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP).

14. The system of claim 9 , wherein said generate the identified treatment plan by use of the constructed Pareto frontier is performed by adjusting plan metrics of the plurality of sample plans.

15. The system of claim 9 , wherein the objectives are selected from plan quality metrics of the plurality of sample plans.

16. The system of claim 9 , wherein the processor is further operable to update the knowledge base with the generated identified treatment plan.

17. The system of claim 9 , wherein the generate the machine deliverable control point sequence corresponding to the combinational treatment plan comprises:

combine a plurality of fluences associated with the plurality of sample plans to form combined fluences; and

transform the combined fluences into a machine deliverable control point sequence using a leaf sequencing algorithm.

18. A non-transitory computer readable storage medium having embedded therein program instructions, when executed by one or more processors of a device, causes the device to execute a process for generating a treatment plan for treating a patient with radiotherapy, the process comprising:

identifying a plurality of organs at risk for a planning target volume;

obtaining a plurality of sample plans, wherein the plurality of sample plans are generated by use of a knowledge base, the knowledge base comprising historical treatment plans and patient data;

performing a multi-criteria optimization, based on the plurality of sample plans, to construct a Pareto frontier, wherein the plurality of sample plans are evaluated with at least two objectives measuring qualities of the plurality of sample plans, wherein the performing the multi-criteria optimization to construct the Pareto frontier comprises using a confidence level associated with a predicted sample plan, wherein treatment plans on the constructed Pareto frontier are Pareto optimal with respect to the objectives, wherein the performing the multi-criteria optimization further comprises generating a Pareto frontier with one organ at risk at a time of the plurality of organs at risk;

receiving a selected tradeoff point on the constructed Pareto frontier;

utilizing a minimum Euclidean distance criterion such that a point on the constructed Pareto frontier closest to the selected trade off point is an identified treatment plan; and

generating the identified treatment plan by use of the constructed Pareto frontier, wherein said generating the identified treatment plan by use of the constructed Pareto frontier comprises generating (i) a combinational treatment plan comprising a combination of sample plans and (ii) a machine deliverable control point sequence corresponding to the combinational treatment plan, wherein the control point sequence is a sequence that can be delivered by a treatment machine.

19. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 18 , wherein the performing the multi-criteria optimization further comprises each of the plurality of sample plans is evaluated with at least one of an Equivalent Uniform Dose (EUD) for a planning target volume (PTV), an EUD for an Organ at Risk (OAR), Dose Volume Indices (DVI), a Heterogeneity Index (HI), or a value related to a Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP).

20. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 18 , wherein generating the machine deliverable control point sequence corresponding to the combinational treatment plan comprises:

combining a plurality of fluences associated with the plurality of sample plans to form combined fluences; and

transforming the combined fluences into a machine deliverable control point sequence using a leaf sequencing algorithm.

Assignments (2)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Sep 23, 2024
From: VARIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL AG
To: SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS INTERNATIONAL AG
Reel/Frame 069115/0955 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 19, 2024
From: NORD, JANNE; KUUSELA, ESA; PYYRY, JOAKIM; PELTOLA, JARKKO; SABEL, MARTIN
To: VARIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL AG
Reel/Frame 068630/0311 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation 14852024 · Sep 11, 2015
Related Publication 20230173303A1 · Jun 8, 2023
References Cited (24)
US 11565126B2 · Nord et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20030233123A1 · Kindlein · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20090037150A1 · Craft · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20110006215A1 · Van Heteren et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110301977A1 · Belcher · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20120014507A1 · Wu · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20120136194A1 · Zhang · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20130197878A1 · Fiege · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20140350322A1 · Schulte et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150202464A1 · Brand et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160129282A1 · Yin · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20180043182A1 · Wu et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
EP 2899659A1 · 2015 [cited by examiner]
WO 2014205128A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
Kaliszewski et al., Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization for Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy, 2015, Multiple Criteria Decision Making, vol. 10, pp. 82-92. (Year: 2015). [cited by examiner]
Wang et al., Patient feature based dosimetric Pareto front prediction in esophageal cancer radiotherapy, Feb. 2015, Medical Physics, vol. 42, Iss. 2, pp. 1005-1011. (Year: 2015). [cited by examiner]
Craft et al., “Deliverable navigation for multicriteria step and shoot IMRT treatment planning”, Dec. 6, 2012, Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine, Physics in Medicine and Biology, pp. 87-102. (Year: 2012). [cited by applicant]
Ghandour et al., “Volumetric-modulated arc therapy planning using multicriteria optimization for localized prostate cancer”, Jan. 23, 2015, Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 258-269. (Year… [cited by applicant]
Marleen Balvert, et al: “A Framework for Inverse Planning of Beam-on Times for 3D Small Animal Radiotherapy Using Interactive Multi-Objective Optimisation”, Physics in Medicine and Biology, Institute of Physics Publishi… [cited by applicant]
Wang Jiazhou, et al.: “Patient Feature Based Dosimetric Pareto Front Prediction in Esophageal Cancer Radiotherapy”, Medical Physics, AIP, Melville, NY, US. vol. 42, No. 2, Jan. 29, 2015, pp. 1005-1011. [cited by applicant]
Zarepisheh Masaoud et al,: “A Multicriteria Framework With Voxel-Dependent Parameters for Radiotherapy Treatment Plan Optimization”, Medical Physics, AIP, Melville, NY, US, vol. 41, No. 4, Mar. 19, 2014, pp. 041705-1 to… [cited by applicant]
Masoud Zarepisheh et al,: “A DVH-Guided IMRT Optimization Algorithm for Automatic Treatment Planning and Adaptive Radiotherapy Replanning”, Medical Physics, vol. 41, No. 6, Jun. 1, 2014, pp. 061711-1 to 061711-14. [cited by applicant]
Craft David et al., “An Approach for Practical Multiobjective IMRT Treatment Planning”, International Journal of Radiation: Incology Biology Physics, vol. 69, No. 5, Aug. 1, 2007, pp. 1600-1607. [cited by applicant]
Thieke et al,: “A New Concept for Interactive Radiotherapy Planning with Multicriteria Optimization: First Clinical Evaluation”, Radiotherapy and Oncology, Elsevier, Ireland, vol. 85, No. 2, Nov. 1, 2007. pp. 292-298. [cited by applicant]