IP Library Granted Patent US 12,348,807
Granted Patent B2
US 12,348,807 · App. 18/130,853 · Granted Jul 1, 2025

Affinity profile system and method

Inventors: Peter Docherty (Glasgow, GB); Christopher McGuire (Glasgow, GB); Edward Young (Glasgow, GB)
Assignee: THINKANALYTICS LTD.
H04N21/25891G06Q30/0269H04N21/252H04N21/25841H04N21/2668H04N21/44222H04N21/4532H04N21/4661H04N21/4665H04N21/4667H04N21/4668H04N21/482H04N21/8126
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,348,807
App. No.
18/130,853
Granted
Jul 1, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A computer-implemented method of using affinity profiles to determine at least one audience category that is expected to consume a selected item of content, the method comprises: obtaining affinity profiles for a plurality of users of a content distribution system, wherein each affinity profile comprises at least one selected affinity category or affinity category score, and the affinity categories are selected from a stored set of affinity categories, each representing a user's affinity for a respective subject area; determine an audience that is expected to consume the selected item of content based on the affinity profiles of the users.

Claims (51)

1. A computer-implemented method of using affinity profiles to determine at least one audience category that is expected to consume a selected item of content, the method comprising:

obtaining affinity profiles for a plurality of users of a content distribution system,

wherein each affinity profile comprises at least one selected affinity category or affinity category score,

wherein the affinity categories are selected from a stored set of affinity categories, and

wherein each of the affinity categories represent a user's affinity for a respective subject area;

monitoring consumption of the selected item of content to determine which of the users consumed the selected item of content; and

determining an audience that is expected to consume the selected item of content based on the affinity profiles of the users, by:

defining a bespoke user segment comprising the users that were determined to have consumed the selected item of content; and

categorizing each user into one or more of a plurality of user segments based on their affinity profile; and

determining the audience that is expected to consume the selected item of content based on the user segments to which the users in the bespoke user segment, who consumed the selected item of content, belong.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining expected audiences for a plurality of items of content for which to include advertisements as part of an advertising campaign for a product or service thereby to target at least a sub-set of a desired target audience for the advertisements.

3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

for each of a plurality of user devices, monitoring user activity including identifying content selected for viewing by the users of the user devices;

obtaining metadata concerning the selected items of content, the metadata representing at least some properties of the selected items of content;

generating or updating user records for the users, the user records comprising or representing at least one of the user activity or the associated content metadata;

processing the user records to generate the affinity profiles for the users based on the user records.

4. The method of claim 3 ,

wherein the item of content is provided to user devices of the users using a content distribution system,

wherein each user device displays an electronic programme guide (EPG) or other user interface that is operable by a user to select one or more items of television or other content,

wherein, in response to the selections, the distribution system distributes the selected items of television content or other content to the user devices for viewing by the users during content viewing sessions,

wherein the user interface is operable by a user to select one or more items of content of content types other than television content,

wherein the obtaining of metadata, the generating or updating of the user record, and the processing of the user record to generate the affinity profile are performed using the content metadata obtained for both selected items of television content and selected items of content of the other content types, and

wherein the other content types comprise at least one of computer games, books, music, spoken word content, other audio content, newspapers, or magazines.

5. The method of claim 3 , wherein the metadata concerning the selected items of content is obtained from a stored ontology that includes at least 10,000 features that can be used as meta data to represent items of content.

6. The method of claim 3 , wherein the processing of the user record to generate an affinity profile comprises applying a mapping process to map between the metadata in the user record and the affinity categories, the mapping process including applying weightings or confidence scores for mappings between metadata in the user record and items in the affinity categories.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the item of content is provided to user devices of the users using a content distribution system, wherein each user device displays an electronic programme guide (EPG) or other user interface that is operable by a user to select one or more items of television or other content, and in response to the selections the distribution system distributes the selected items of television content or other content to the user devices for viewing by the users during content viewing sessions.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining of the audience for the selected item of content comprises providing at least one of the affinity profiles or user records of the users as inputs to a machine learning model that is trained to output an audience based on at least one of the affinity profiles or user records of the users.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the obtaining of the affinity profile is independent of, or is performed without taking into account, data representing socio-economic or demographic status of the users.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein at least one of a), b) or c):

a) the user record for each user does not include any data representing socio-economic or demographic status of the user;

b) the user record for each user is anonymous; or

c) the obtaining of metadata, the generating or updating of user records, and the processing of the user records to generate affinity profiles are performed by processing circuitry that does not have access to at least one of or all of data representing socio-economic or demographic status of the users or identity of the users.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the stored set of affinity categories comprises at least 100 affinity categories or sub-categories.

12. The method of claim 1 , wherein the user record comprises or represent user activity for different time windows during a day or week, and the method comprises generating different affinity profiles for the user for the different time windows.

13. The method of claim 1 , wherein the affinity profile for each user comprises a set of scores, each score being for a respective one of the affinity categories.

14. The method of claim 1 ,

wherein each user is a user account, a plurality of individuals may have access to at least one of the user account or wherein a plurality of user devices may be associated with the user account, and

wherein the affinity profile for the user account is based on at least one of selection of content by the plurality of individuals or using the plurality of user devices.

15. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising selecting additional television content or other content to push to the user based on the determined affinity profile for the user.

16. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising outputting the affinity profiles for at least one of the plurality of users and/or the audience category, via an API or operator interface thereby making the affinity profiles available to a third party external to the content distribution system.

17. A non-transitory computer-readable medium that comprises computer-readable instructions that are executable to perform a method according to claim 1 .

18. A system comprising processing circuitry configured to:

obtain affinity profiles for a plurality of users of a content distribution system,

wherein each affinity profile comprises at least one selected affinity category or affinity category score,

wherein the affinity categories are selected from a stored set of affinity categories, and

wherein each of the affinity categories represent a user's affinity for a respective subject area;

monitor consumption of the selected item of content to determine which of the users consumed the item of content;

determine an audience category that is expected to consume the selected item of content based on the affinity profiles of the users that were determined to have consumed the content, by:

defining a bespoke user segment comprising the users that were determined to have consumed the selected item of content; and

categorizing each user into one or more of a plurality of user segments based on their affinity profile; and

determining the audience that is expected to consume the selected item of content based on the user segments to which the users in the bespoke user segment, who consumed the selected item of content, belong.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 6, 2023
From: DOCHERTY, PETER; MCGUIRE, CHRISTOPHER; YOUNG, EDWARD
To: THINKANALYTICS LTD.
Reel/Frame 063865/0490 →
Priority Claims (1)
GB 2218177 · Dec 2, 2022 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20240187695A1 · Jun 6, 2024
References Cited (85)
US 6567814B1 · Bankier et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 7805129B1 · Issa et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8490136B2 · Cox et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8924993B1 · Niebles Duque et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9148706B1 · Shin · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9301016B2 · Archibong et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9699491B1 · Docherty et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9756390B1 · Docherty et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9906837B1 · Docherty et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9973797B1 · Docherty et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10091555B1 · Docherty et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10212468B1 · Sahyoun et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10289739B1 · Docherty et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10356035B1 · Gravino et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10412454B2 · Docherty et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10756919B1 · Kerzner et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10820027B2 · Galuten · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11212584B2 · Docherty et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11343573B2 · Docherty et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11528531B1 · Davis et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11902622B2 · Bress et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20030106064A1 · Plourde, Jr. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20070157222A1 · Cordray et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080304812A1 · Jin · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20100005492A1 · Takano et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100070507A1 · Mori · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100191689A1 · Cortes et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110243529A1 · Oryoji et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120221952A1 · Chavez · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20140029839A1 · Mensink et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140149344A1 · Pudipeddi et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140279756A1 · Whitman · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150081604A1 · Duque et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150082330A1 · Yun et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150100987A1 · Whitman et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150269488A1 · Galai et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150304727A1 · Vandichalrajan · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160247201A1 · Pool et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160274744A1 · Neumann et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170017649A1 · Srinivasaraghavan · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170142462A1 · Uhrich · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170311015A1 · Docherty et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180157981A1 · Albertson et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180376190A1 · Kaufman et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190149879A1 · Siddiq et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190272358A1 · McCoskey et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190303420A1 · Bourothu · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190373332A1 · Kim · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200137438A1 · Whitman et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200137450A1 · Mishra et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200221184A1 · Skliba et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200252690A1 · Docherty et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210306688A1 · Bress et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220019689A1 · Lau et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20240397154A1 · Bloch et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
EP 1317143 · 2003 [cited by applicant]
EP 2207348 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
GB 2574581 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 0115449 · 2001 [cited by applicant]
WO 0227526 · 2002 [cited by applicant]
WO 2008042242 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
WO 2013130834 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO 2013186061 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated May 21, 2024 in U.S. Appl. No. 18/130,833. [cited by applicant]
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated May 17, 2024 in U.S. Appl. No. 18/130,850. [cited by applicant]
USPTO; Final Office Action dated Jul. 5, 2024 in U.S. Appl. No. 18/130,857. [cited by applicant]
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 20, 2024 in U.S. Appl. No. 18/130,866. [cited by applicant]
Hyvönen et al., “Application of Ontology Techniques to View-Based Semantic Search and Browsing”. In: Bussler, C. J., Davies, J., Fensel, D., Studer, R. (eds) The Semantic Web: Research and Applications. ESWS 2004. Lectu… [cited by applicant]
ISA; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 29, 2024 in PCT/GB2023/053117. [cited by applicant]
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 14, 2024 in U.S. Appl. No. 18/130,857. [cited by applicant]
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 29, 2024 in U.S. Appl. No. 18/130,815. [cited by applicant]
USPTO; Final Office Action dated Sep. 30, 2024 in U.S. Appl. No. 18/130,850. [cited by applicant]
USPTO; Advisory Action dated Oct. 23, 2024 in U.S. Appl. No. 18/130,833. [cited by applicant]
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 30, 2024 in U.S. Appl. No. 18/130,861. [cited by applicant]
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 2, 2024 in U.S. Appl. No. 18/130,822. [cited by applicant]
USPTO; Final Office Action dated Sep. 6, 2024 in U.S. Appl. No. 18/130,833. [cited by applicant]
USPTO; Advisory Action dated Nov. 13, 2024 in U.S. Appl. No. 18/130,833. [cited by applicant]
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 6, 2024 in U.S. Appl. No. 18/130,868. [cited by applicant]
USPTO; Final Office Action dated Jan. 10, 2025 in U.S. Appl. No. 18/130,868. [cited by applicant]
USPTO; Final Office Action dated Jan. 27, 2025 in U.S. Appl. No. 18/130,815. [cited by applicant]
USPTO; Final Office Action dated Jan. 29, 2025 in U.S. Appl. No. 18/130,822. [cited by applicant]
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 23, 2025 in U.S. Appl. No. 18/130,833. [cited by applicant]
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 31, 2025 in U.S. Appl. No. 18/130,857. [cited by applicant]
USPTO; Final Office Action dated Jan. 28, 2025 in U.S. Appl. No. 18/130,866. [cited by applicant]
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 5, 2025 in U.S. Appl. No. 18/130,850. [cited by applicant]
Cited By (4)
US 12,542,941 US 12,610,097 US 12,610,098 US 12,610,099