IP Library Granted Patent US 12,384,023
Granted Patent B2
US 12,384,023 · App. 18/137,265 · Granted Aug 12, 2025

Reconfigurable modular soft robots and methods of designing the same

Inventors: Vishesh Vikas (Tuscaloosa, AL); Caitlin Freeman (Memphis, TN); Michael Maynard (Birmingham, AL)
Assignee: The Board of Trustees of The University of Alabama
B25J9/1075B25J18/06
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,384,023
App. No.
18/137,265
Filed
Apr 20, 2023
Granted
Aug 12, 2025
Kind
B2
Art Unit
3618
USPC
74/490.04
Abstract

Various implementations include a modular soft robot including a base, an arm coupled to the base, and an actuator. The arm includes a first surface and a second surface opposite and spaced apart from the first surface. The first surface defines a plurality of channels, each channel comprising a proximal end at the first surface and a distal end spaced apart from the proximal end. Each channel has a longitudinal axis extending therethrough. The actuator is configured to deform the arm.

Claims (28)

1. A modular soft robot comprising:

a base; and

an arm coupled to the base such that the arm is longitudinally bisected by a central plane that extends through and bisects the base and the arm, the arm comprising a first surface and a second surface opposite and spaced apart from the first surface, wherein the first surface defines a plurality of channels, each channel comprising a proximal end at the first surface and a distal end spaced apart from the proximal end, wherein each channel has a longitudinal axis extending therethrough, wherein a shape of the arm as viewed in a plane parallel to the central plane is defined by a module-topology curve, the module-topology curve being an odd function with constraints at edges of a platonic solid;

wherein an actuator is configured to deform the arm.

2. The robot of claim 1 , wherein the actuator is a motor tendon actuator at least partially disposed within the arm adjacent the base.

3. The robot of claim 1 , wherein the actuator deforms the arm between a flat configuration and a curved configuration, wherein in the flat configuration, each channel has a first width at the distal end of the channel, and in the curved configuration, each channel has a second width at the distal end of the channel, wherein the first width is greater than the second width.

4. The robot of claim 1 , wherein the arm comprises a plurality of arms.

5. The robot of claim 1 , wherein each of the plurality of channels is defined by two adjacent protrusions that extend from the first surface, the protrusions having an end surface separated apart from the first surface.

6. The robot of claim 5 , wherein the protrusions are integrally formed with the first surface.

7. The robot of claim 5 , wherein each protrusion has a first edge and a second edge, wherein the first edge of each protrusion lies within a first plane that intersects the first surface at a first angle that is greater than 0° and less than or equal to 90°, and the second edge of each protrusion lies within a second plane that intersects the first surface at a second angle that is greater than 0° and less than or equal to 90°, and wherein the first angle and the second angle are different.

8. The robot of claim 7 , wherein each channel has a right trapezoidal cross-sectional shape as viewed through a plane that is perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the respective channel.

9. A system of modular soft robots comprising:

a plurality of modular soft robots including the modular soft robot of claim 1 ,

wherein the actuator is configured to deform the arm of the modular soft robot between a flat configuration and a curved configuration,

wherein, in the flat configuration, each channel of the modular soft robot has a first width at the distal end of the channel, and in the curved configuration, each channel of the modular soft robot has a second width at the distal end of the channel, wherein the first width is greater than the second width,

wherein each of the plurality of modular soft robots are rotationally symmetric relative to each other, and

wherein the plurality of modular soft robots in the curved configuration are reconfigurable to create a three-dimensional shape different from the shape of the modular soft robot alone.

10. The system of claim 9 , wherein the plurality of modular soft robots in the flat configuration are reconfigurable relative to each other to create a two-dimensional shape different from the shape of the modular soft robot alone.

11. The system of claim 9 , wherein the three-dimensional shape is a sphere.

12. The system of claim 11 , wherein each of the plurality of modular soft robots correspond to a platonic solid, the platonic solid having a number of faces and a number of edges per face, wherein the number of faces of the platonic solid correlates to the number of modular robots that are arrangeable relative to each other to form the sphere, and wherein the number of edges per face of the platonic solid correlates to a number of arms of each of the modular soft robots.

13. The system of claim 12 , wherein the platonic solid is a tetrahedron, a cube, an octahedron, a dodecahedron, or an icosahedron.

14. The system of claim 13 , wherein a topology curve plane is the plane passing through the edges of the platonic solid and normal to the plane along a vector joining a center of the edge and a center of a circumscribing sphere.

15. The system of claim 14 , wherein a module topology curve is drawn on the topology curve planes of all the edges of the face of the platonic solid,

wherein a curved configuration topology is obtained through orthographic projection of the module topology curves drawn on the topology curve planes onto the circumscribing sphere,

wherein a tangent plane is a plane tangent to the sphere with the normal to the plane along the vector joining the center of the circumscribing sphere and a center of the face of the platonic solid, and

wherein a planar configuration topology is obtained by projecting the curved configuration topology onto the tangent plane.

16. The system of claim 9 , wherein the plurality of modular soft robots comprises a first plurality of modular soft robots having a first number of arms and a second plurality of modular soft robots having a second number of arms, the second number of arms being different from the first number of arms.

17. The system of claim 16 , wherein, in the flat configuration, each of the first plurality of modular soft robots and the second plurality of modular soft robots are reconfigurable relative to each other to create a two-dimensional shape different from the shape of each robot alone.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 18, 2025
From: VIKAS, VISHESH; FREEMAN, CAITLIN; MAYNARD, MICHAEL
To: THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA
Reel/Frame 071453/0001 →
CONFIRMATORY LICENSE Recorded Jun 18, 2025
From: UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA IN TUSCALOOSA
To: NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Reel/Frame 071684/0529 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63333063 · Apr 20, 2022
Related Publication 20230364777A1 · Nov 16, 2023
References Cited (38)
US 4580551A · Siegmund · 1986 [cited by examiner]
US 4911148A · Sosnowski · 1990 [cited by examiner]
US 5381782A · DeLaRama · 1995 [cited by examiner]
US 6012494A · Balazs · 2000 [cited by examiner]
US 6481513B2 · Buehler et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 8789630B2 · Galloway et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 10080576B2 · Romo · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 10765487B2 · Ho · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 11648663B2 · Lessing · 2023 [cited by examiner]
CN 201204019Y · 2009 [cited by applicant]
CN 100554067C · 2009 [cited by applicant]
CN 111015720A · 2020 [cited by examiner]
JP 2012213478A · 2012 [cited by examiner]
WO 2010042094A1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2021244940A1 · 2021 [cited by examiner]
Stefano Mintchev, et al.; Adaptive Morphology: A Design Principle for Multimodal and Multifunctional Robots; IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine; pp. 42-54; Sep. 2016. [cited by applicant]
Dimitri A. Schreiber, et al.; ARCSnake: An Archimedes' Screw-Propelled, Reconfigurable Serpentine Robot for Complex Environments; 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA); May 2020. [cited by applicant]
Dylan S. Shah, et al.; Gaining Environments through Shape Change; Nature Machine Intelligence, vol. 2 (2020). [cited by applicant]
Joran W. Booth, Dylan Shah, Jennifer C. Case, et al. OmniSkins: Robotic skins that turn inanimate objects into multifunctional robots. Science Robotics, 3(22):eaat1853, Sep. 2018. Publisher: American Association for the… [cited by applicant]
Kelly Delp and Bill Thurston. Playing With Surfaces: Spheres, Monkey Pants, and Zippergons. In Reza Sarhangi and Carlo H. Séquin, editors, Proceedings of Bridges 2011: Mathematics, Music, Art, Architecture, Culture, pp.… [cited by applicant]
Levi H Dudte, Etienne Vouga, Tomohiro Tachi, and L Mahadevan. Programming curvature using origami tessellations. Nature materials, 15(5):583-588, 2016. [cited by applicant]
H. Kurokawa, A. Kamimura, E. Yoshida, et al. M-Tran II: metamorphosis from a four-legged walker to a caterpillar. In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), vol. 3, pp. 2454-2459 vol.… [cited by applicant]
Sen W. Kwok, Stephen A. Morin, Bobak Mosadegh, et al. Magnetic Assembly of Soft Robots with Hard Components. Advanced Functional Materials, 24(15):2180-2187, 2014. _eprint:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002… [cited by applicant]
Cecilia Laschi, Barbara Mazzolai, and Matteo Cianchetti. Soft robotics: Technologies and systems pushing the boundaries of robot abilities. Sci. Robot., 1(1):eaah3690, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Woo Ho Lee and A. C. Sanderson. Dynamic rolling locomotion and control of modular robots. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 18(1):32-41, Feb. 2002. [cited by applicant]
V. Radhakrishnan. Locomotion: Dealing with friction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95(10):5448-5455, May 1998. [cited by applicant]
Daniela Rus and Michael T. Tolley. Design, fabrication and control of soft robots. Nature, 521(7553):467-475, May 2015. [cited by applicant]
M. Sasso, G. Palmieri, G. Chiappini, et al. Characterization of hyperelastic rubber-like materials by biaxial and uniaxial stretching tests based on optical methods. Polymer Testing, 27(8):995-1004, Dec. 2008. [cited by applicant]
Jimmy Sastra, Sachin Chitta, and Mark Yim. Dynamic Rolling for a Modular Loop Robot. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 28(6):758-773, Jun. 2009. [cited by applicant]
Robert F. Shepherd, Filip Ilievski,Wonjae Choi, et al. Multigait soft robot. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(51):20400-20403, Dec. 2011. [cited by applicant]
T. Umedachi, V. Vikas, and B. A. Trimmer. Softworms: the design and control of non-pneumatic, 3D-printed deformable robots. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 11(2):025001, 2016. [cited by applicant]
V. Vikas, E. Cohen, R. Grassi, et al. Design and Locomotion Control of a Soft Robot Using Friction Manipulation and Motor-Tendon Actuation. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 32(4):949-959, Aug. 2016. [cited by applicant]
Michael Wehner, Brendan Quinlivan, Patrick M Aubin, et al. A lightweight soft exosuit for gait assistance. In 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 3362-3369, May 2013. ISSN: 1050-4729. [cited by applicant]
Matheus S. Xavier, Andrew J. Fleming, and Yuen K. Yong. Finite Element Modeling of Soft Fluidic Actuators: Overview and Recent Developments. Advanced Intelligent Systems, n/a(n/a):2000187. _eprint: https://onlinelibrary… [cited by applicant]
Jane Yen and Carlo Séquin. Escher sphere construction kit. In Proceedings of the 2001 symposium on Interactive 3D graphics, I3D '01, pp. 95-98, New York, NY, USA, Mar. 2001. Association for Computing Machinery. [cited by applicant]
Mark Yim, Wei-Min Shen, Behnam Salemi, et al. Modular self-reconfigurable robot systems [grand challenges of robotics]. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 14(1):43-52, 2007. [cited by applicant]
Mark Yim, Paul White, Michael Park, et al. Modular self-reconfigurable robots. In Encyclopedia of complexity and systems science, pp. 5618-5631. Springer, 2009. [cited by applicant]
Jun Zou, Yangqiao Lin, Chen Ji, et al. A Reconfigurable Omnidirectional Soft Robot Based on Caterpillar Locomotion. Soft Robotics, 5(2):164-174, Apr. 2018. Publisher: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers. [cited by applicant]