METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR FLIGHT PATH CONTROL OF AN AIRCRAFT
A method for flight path control of an aircraft in which boundaries of an airspace authorized for a mission of the aircraft are defined, which boundaries a) include a hard boundary, which delimits an area forbidden to the aircraft, and b1) a warning boundary, at which safety measures are initiated when reached by the aircraft, and/or b2) a soft boundary, at which emergency measures are initiated. To calculate a location of the warning and/or soft boundary, parameters of an actual flight status of the aircraft, such as speed, altitude, path angle or other factors, for example wind and/or weather conditions, are continuously determined and dynamically taken into consideration by a computer-assisted flight path controller of the aircraft and/or by an external controller. The aircraft-located and/or external controller subsequently checks whether the aircraft presently or in future infringes the mentioned boundaries at its current position.
1 . A method for flight path control of an aircraft ( 1 ), in which boundaries of an airspace authorized for a mission of the aircraft ( 1 ) are defined, said boundaries
a) comprise at least one hard boundary ( 4 a ), which delimits an area forbidden to the aircraft ( 1 ), and at least one of
b1) a warning boundary ( 2 a ), at which safety measures are initiated when the warning boundary is reached by the aircraft ( 1 ), or
b2) a soft boundary ( 3 a ), at which emergency measures are initiated when the soft boundary is reached by the aircraft ( 1 ),
the method comprising:
calculating a location of at least one of the warning boundary ( 2 a ) or the soft boundary ( 3 a ) by dynamically taking into consideration parameters of an actual flight status of the aircraft ( 1 ), including at least one of a current speed, a current altitude, a current path angle (φ), or environmental factors that are continuously determined using at least one of a computer-assisted flight path controller of the aircraft ( 1 ) or an external, computer-assisted flight path controller; and
subsequently checking whether the aircraft ( 1 ) presently or in future infringes at least one of the warning, soft, or hard boundaries ( 2 a - 4 a ) at a current position having the mentioned parameters using the at least one of the computer-assisted flight path controller of the aircraft ( 1 ) or the external, computer-assisted flight path controller.
2 . The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein at least one of a distance (d risk ) between the hard boundary ( 4 a ) and the soft boundary ( 3 a ) or a distance (d cont ) between the soft boundary ( 3 a ) and the warning boundary ( 2 a ) at a location within the airspace is dynamically dependent on the current speed of the aircraft ( 1 ).
3 . The method as claimed in claim 2 , wherein the distance (d cont , d risk ) becomes greater with increasing the current speed of the aircraft ( 1 ).
4 . The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein at least one of a
distance (d risk ) between the hard boundary ( 4 a ) and the soft boundary ( 3 a ) or a distance (d cont ) between the soft boundary ( 3 a ) and the warning boundary ( 2 a ) at a location within the airspace is dynamically dependent on the current flight direction of the aircraft ( 1 ) relative to the warning, soft, and hard boundaries ( 2 a - 4 a ).
5 . The method as claimed in claim 4 , further comprising setting the warning and the soft boundaries ( 2 a , 3 a ), which are in a flight direction (FR), at a greater distance from a current location of the aircraft ( 1 ) than the warning and the soft boundaries ( 2 a , 3 a ), which are parallel to or counter to the flight direction (FR).
6 . The method as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising defining the warning, soft, and hard boundaries ( 2 a - 4 a ) by the steps of:
i) initially defining a course of the hard boundary ( 4 a );
ii) calculating distances d cont and d risk in dependence on the flight status;
iii) then defining a course of the soft boundary ( 3 a ) and the warning boundary ( 2 a ) in that the course of the hard boundary ( 4 a ) is reproduced at a distance d risk to define the soft boundary ( 3 a ) and the course of the soft boundary ( 3 a ) is reproduced at a distance d cont to define the warning boundary ( 2 a ).
7 . The method as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising calculating a probability of infringement of at least one of the warning, soft, and hard boundaries ( 2 a - 4 a ) at a specific point by the aircraft ( 1 ) taking into consideration an angle difference (φ) between the relevant one of the warning, soft, and hard boundaries ( 2 a - 4 a ) and a current flight direction (FR) of the aircraft ( 1 ), wherein the probability decreases with increasing angle difference (φ) in relation to the current flight direction (FR), which probability is used for the dynamic calculation of a location of at least one of the warning boundary ( 2 a ) or the soft boundary ( 3 a ).
8 . The method as claimed in claim 7 , wherein to calculate the warning and soft boundaries ( 2 a , 3 a ), a Euclidean distance (d) to a linear boundary section is described as a piecemeal continuous function of the angle difference (φ) between the current flight direction (FR) and a respective point on a boundary section, wherein resulting distance functions are scaled using a weighting function (ƒ weight ), said weighting function (ƒ weight ) depicts a probability of an abrupt direction change of the aircraft ( 1 ) as a function of the angle difference (φ), from which new distance values (d DW∘D ) result, which take into consideration both the Euclidean distance (d) and the probability that the warning or soft boundary ( 2 a , 3 a ) will be infringed at the respective point.
9 . The method as claimed in claim 8 , further comprising defining the warning, soft, and hard boundaries ( 2 a - 4 a ) by the steps of:
i) initially defining a course of the hard boundary ( 4 a );
ii) calculating distances d cont and d risk in dependence on the flight status;
iii) then defining a course of the soft boundary ( 3 a ) and the warning boundary ( 2 a ) in that the course of the hard boundary ( 4 a ) is reproduced at a distance d risk to define the soft boundary ( 3 a ) and the course of the soft boundary ( 3 a ) is reproduced at a distance d cont to define the warning boundary ( 2 a ); and
searching the new distance values (d DW∘D ) for a minimum and then comparing said minimum to the distances d cont and d risk .
10 . The method as claimed in claim 8 , wherein a Gaussian bell curve is used as the weighting function (ƒ weight ).
11 . The method as claimed in claim 8 , wherein the weighting function (ƒ weight ) is derived based on empirical data, said data depicting physical capabilities of the aircraft ( 1 ) for direction change in an extreme case.
12 . The method as claimed in claim 8 , further comprising weighting the distance (d DW∘D ) based on the flight direction (FR) to the warning, soft, and hard boundaries ( 2 a - 4 a ) as a foundation for a decision about an initiation of control measures for the aircraft ( 1 ).
13 . A flight path control system of an aircraft ( 1 ), said flight path control system is configured to define boundaries ( 2 a - 4 a ) of an airspace authorized for a mission of the aircraft ( 1 ), said boundaries
a) comprise a hard boundary ( 4 a ) which delimits an area forbidden to the aircraft ( 1 ) and at least one of
b1) a warning boundary ( 2 a ), at which safety measures are initiated when the warning boundary is reached by the aircraft ( 1 ), or
b2) a soft boundary ( 3 a ), at which emergency measures are initiated when the soft boundary is reached by the aircraft ( 1 ),
the flight path control system comprising at least one of a computer-assisted flight path controller of the aircraft ( 1 ) or an external, computer-assisted flight path controller configured for calculating a location of at least one of the warning boundary ( 2 a ) or the soft boundary ( 3 a ), to continuously determine and dynamically take into consideration parameters of an actual flight status of the aircraft ( 1 ), including at least one of a current speed, a current altitude, a current path angle, or environmental factors, and
the at least one of the computer-assisted flight path controller of the aircraft ( 1 ) or the external, computer-assisted flight path controller is further configured to check whether the aircraft ( 1 ) presently or in future infringes at least one of the warning, soft, or hard boundaries ( 2 a - 4 a ) at a current position and to initiate corresponding control measures for the aircraft ( 1 ) if necessary.
14 . The flight path control system as claimed in claim 13 , wherein the at least one of the computer-assisted flight path controller of the aircraft ( 1 ) or the external, computer-assisted flight path controller is further configured to dynamically determine at least one of a distance (d risk ) between the hard boundary ( 4 a ) and the soft boundary ( 3 a ) or a distance (d cont ) between the soft boundary ( 3 a ) and the warning boundary ( 2 a ) at a location within the airspace depending on the current speed of the aircraft ( 1 ).
15 . An aircraft ( 1 ), comprising the flight path control system as claimed in claim 13 .