IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,379,514
Granted Patent B2
US 12,379,514 · App. 18/145,115 · Granted Aug 5, 2025

System and method for elastic full waveform inversion and imaging

Inventors: Zedong Wu (Katy, TX); Zhiyuan Wei (Sugarland, TX); Zhigang Zhang (Houston, TX); Jiawei Mei (Katy, TX); Rongxin Huang (Katy, TX); Ping Wang (Sugarland, TX)
Assignee: CGG SERVICES SAS
G01V1/282G01V1/303G01V2210/614
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,379,514
App. No.
18/145,115
Granted
Aug 5, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for seismic imaging of a subsurface using a full waveform inversion, FWI, includes the steps of obtaining an initial P-velocity model that describes how a seismic wave propagates through the subsurface, generating an S-velocity model based on the initial P-velocity model, generating an elastic synthetic dataset p based on the initial P-velocity model and the S-velocity model, receiving a recorded seismic dataset d of the subsurface, updating the P-velocity model based on a comparison between the synthetic dataset p and the recorded seismic dataset d, updating a reflectivity at various locations in the subsurface based on the updated P-velocity model, and generating an image of the subsurface based on the reflectivity.

Claims (67)

1. A method for seismic imaging of a subsurface using a full waveform inversion, FWI, the method comprising:

obtaining an initial P-velocity model that describes how a seismic wave propagates through the subsurface;

generating an S-velocity model based on the initial P-velocity model;

generating an elastic synthetic dataset p based on the initial P-velocity model and the S-velocity model;

receiving a recorded seismic dataset d of the subsurface;

updating the P-velocity model based on a comparison between the synthetic dataset p and the recorded seismic dataset d;

updating a reflectivity at various locations in the subsurface based on the updated P-velocity model; and

generating an image of the subsurface based on the reflectivity.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

updating the S-velocity model based on the updated P-velocity model and updated reflectivity,

wherein the synthetic dataset p includes pressures.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the elastic synthetic dataset p is calculated based on Hooke's law, which links a stress vector describing the subsurface to a strain vector that describes the subsurface.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the elastic synthetic dataset p is calculated based on (1) a stress vector describing the subsurface and (2) a strain vector describing the subsurface.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the elastic synthetic dataset p is calculated based on an elastic wave equation.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the elastic synthetic dataset p is equal to an average of the first three diagonal terms of the stress vector for the subsurface.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

updating the initial P-velocity model with a cost function based on time-shifts between the elastic synthetic dataset p and the recorded seismic dataset d.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein the cost function is a sum of squared time-shifts multiplied by weighs c, respectively, for all sources r and all sensors s for given windows w, which are frequency-dependent time windows.

9. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

generating an adjoint source dataset using the cost function;

calculating a gradient using the adjoint source dataset; and

updating the initial P-velocity model based on the gradient.

10. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

measuring time-shifts between the elastic synthetic dataset p and the recorded seismic dataset d;

calculating correlation coefficients between the elastic synthetic dataset p and the measured dataset d;

applying the correlation coefficients to weight the measured time-shifts;

generating an adjoint source dataset based on weighted time-shifts;

calculating a gradient using the adjoint source dataset; and

updating the initial P-velocity model based on the gradient.

11. A computing device for seismic imaging of a subsurface using a full waveform inversion, FWI, the computing device comprising:

an interface configured to receive an initial P-velocity model that describes how a seismic wave propagates through the subsurface; and

a processor connected to the interface and configured to,

generate an S-velocity model based on the initial P-velocity model;

generate an elastic synthetic dataset p based on the initial P-velocity model and the S-velocity model;

receive a recorded seismic dataset d of the subsurface;

update the P-velocity model based on a comparison between the elastic synthetic dataset p and the recorded seismic dataset d;

update a reflectivity at various locations in the subsurface based on the updated P-velocity model; and

generate an image of the subsurface based on the reflectivity.

12. The computing device of claim 11 , wherein the processor is further configured to,

update the S-velocity model based on the updated P-velocity model and the updated reflectivity,

wherein the elastic synthetic dataset p includes pressures.

13. The computing device of claim 11 , wherein the elastic synthetic dataset p is calculated based on the Hooke's law, which links a stress vector describing the subsurface to a strain vector that describes the subsurface.

14. The computing device of claim 11 , wherein the elastic synthetic dataset p is calculated based on (1) a stress vector describing the subsurface and (2) a strain vector describing the subsurface.

15. The computing device of claim 11 , wherein the elastic synthetic dataset p is calculated based on an elastic wave equation.

16. The computing device of claim 11 , wherein the elastic synthetic dataset p is equal to an average of the first three diagonal terms of the stress vector for the subsurface.

17. The computing device of claim 11 , wherein the processor is further configured to:

update the initial P-velocity model with a cost function based on time-shifts between the elastic synthetic dataset p and the recorded seismic dataset d,

wherein the cost function is a sum of squared time-shifts multiplied by weighs c, respectively, for all sources r and all sensors s for given windows w, which are frequency-dependent time windows.

18. The computing device of claim 11 , wherein the processor is further configured to:

generate an adjoint source dataset using the cost function;

calculate a gradient using the adjoint source dataset; and

update the initial P-velocity model based on the gradient.

19. The computing device of claim 11 , wherein the processor is further configured to:

measure time-shifts between the elastic synthetic dataset p and the recorded seismic dataset d;

calculate correlation coefficients between the elastic synthetic dataset p and the measured dataset d;

apply the correlation coefficients to weight the measured time-shifts;

generate an adjoint source dataset based on weighted time-shifts;

calculate a gradient using the adjoint source dataset; and

update the initial P-velocity model based on the gradient.

20. A non-transitory computer readable medium including computer executable instructions, wherein the instructions, when executed by a processor, implement a method of seismic imaging of a subsurface using a full waveform inversion, FWI, the medium comprising instructions for:

obtaining an initial P-velocity model that describes how a seismic wave propagates through the subsurface;

generating an S-velocity model based on the initial P-velocity model;

generating an elastic synthetic dataset p based on the initial P-velocity model and the S-velocity model;

receiving a recorded seismic dataset d of the subsurface;

updating the P-velocity model based on a comparison between the synthetic dataset p and the recorded seismic dataset d;

updating a reflectivity at various locations in the subsurface based on the updated P-velocity model; and

generating an image of the subsurface based on the reflectivity.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 22, 2022
From: WU, ZEDONG; WEI, ZHIYUAN; ZHANG, ZHIGANG; MEI, JIAWEI; HUANG, RONGXIN; WANG, PING
To: CGG SERVICES SAS
Reel/Frame 062180/0487 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63319697 · Mar 14, 2022
Related Publication 20230288590A1 · Sep 14, 2023
References Cited (17)
US 8379482B1 · Khare · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 8843353B2 · Posamentier · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 10816687B2 · Sain · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 11048001B2 · Zhang et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
Albert Tarantola, “Inversion of seismic reflection data in the acoustic approximation,” Geophysics, Aug. 1984, vol. 49, No. 8, pp. 1259-1266. [cited by applicant]
Bertram Nolte et al., “Salt velocity model building with FWI on OBN data: Example from Mad Dog, Gulf of Mexico,” SEG International Exposition and 89th Annual Meeting, 2019, pp. 1275-1279. [cited by applicant]
Óscar Calderon Agudo et al., “Mitigating elastic effects in marine 3-D full-waveform inversion,” Geophysical Journal International, 2020, vol. 220, pp. 2089-2104. [cited by applicant]
Peter Mora et al., “Elastic versus acoustic inversion for marine surveys,” Geophysical Journal International, Apr. 2018, vol. 214, pp. 596-622. [cited by applicant]
Ping Wang et al., “Full-waveform inversion for salt: A coming of age,” The Leading Edge, Mar. 2019, pp. 204-213. [cited by applicant]
R.-E. Plessix, “A review of the adjoint-state method for computing the gradient of a functional with geophysical applications,” Geophysics Journal International, 2006, vol. 167, pp. 495-503. [cited by applicant]
René-Édouard Plessix et al., “Low-frequency, long-offset elastic waveform inversion in the context of velocity model building,” The Leading Edge, May 2021, pp. 342-347. [cited by applicant]
Rongxin Huang et al., “Full-waveform inversion for full-wavefield imaging: Decades in the making,” The Leading Edge, May 2021, pp. 324-334. [cited by applicant]
Scott Michell et al., “Automatic Velocity Model Building with Complex Salt: Can Computers Finally Do an Interpreter's Job?,” SEG International Exposition and 87th Annual Meeting, 2017, pp. 5250-5254. [cited by applicant]
Xukai Shen et al., “Salt model building at Atlantis with Full Waveform Inversion,” SEG International Exposition and 87th Annual Meeting, 2017, pp. 1507-1511. [cited by applicant]
Zhigang Zhang et al., “Correcting for salt misinterpretation with full-waveform inversion,” SEG International Exposition and 88th annual Meeting, 2018, pp. 1143-1147. [cited by applicant]
Llya Tsvankin, “Anisotropic parameters and P-wave velocity for orthorhombic media,” Geophysics, Jul.-Aug. 1997, vol. 62, No. 4, pp. 1292-1309. [cited by applicant]
Zhigang Zhang et al., “FWI Imaging: Full-wavefield imaging through full-waveform inversion,” 2020 Society of Exploration Geophysicists SEG International Exposition and 90th Annual Meeting, 2020, pp. 656-660. [cited by applicant]