IP Library Granted Patent US 12,493,693
Granted Patent B2
US 12,493,693 · App. 18/148,193 · Granted Dec 9, 2025

Systems and methods for selecting client backup files for maliciousness analysis

Inventors: Dinil Mon Divakaran (Singapore, SG); Candid Wüest (Bassersdorf, CH); Serg Bell (Costa del Sol, SG); Stanislav Protasov (Singapore, SG)
Assignee: Acronis International GmbH
G06F21/565G06F11/1448G06F21/53G06F21/554G06F2201/84G06F2221/033
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,493,693
App. No.
18/148,193
Granted
Dec 9, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Disclosed herein are systems and methods for selecting files for malware analysis. In one aspect, a method may include identifying, in a cloud network, a backup of a client machine; extracting, from the backup, at least one file of a given file type; determining whether to include the at least one file in a sandbox of the cloud network by performing a static analysis of the at least one file; selecting the at least one file for inclusion in the sandbox based on the static analysis; monitoring, for a period of time, a behavior of the at least one file in the sandbox by performing a dynamic analysis of the at least one file; and in response to determining that the at least one file is malicious based on the dynamic analysis, performing a remediation action on the at least one file.

Claims (56)

1 . A method for selecting files for malware analysis, the method comprising:

identifying, in a cloud network, a backup of a client machine;

extracting, from the backup, at least one file of a given file type;

determining whether to include the at least one file in a sandbox of the cloud network by performing a static analysis of the at least one file, wherein the static analysis comprises determining a likelihood of the at least one file being malicious and comparing the likelihood to a threshold likelihood;

in response to determining that the likelihood exceeds the threshold likelihood, selecting the at least one file for inclusion in the sandbox, wherein the sandbox is a software environment that isolates the at least one file from other files in the backup;

monitoring, for a period of time, a behavior of the at least one file in the sandbox by performing a dynamic analysis of the at least one file, wherein the dynamic analysis comprises classifying a given file as malicious or non-malicious;

when determining that the at least one file is malicious based on the dynamic analysis, performing a remediation action on the at least one file; and

when determining that the at least one file is not classified as malicious over the period of time based on the dynamic analysis, removing the at least one file from the sandbox.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the remediation action comprises one or more of:

removing the at least one file from the backup;

quarantining the at least one file in the backup;

removing the at least one file from the client machine; and

quarantining the at least one file in the client machine and triggering a threat investigation process.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the given file type is one of a script and an executable, wherein the threshold likelihood is different for each file type, and wherein the given file type is determined using one or more of magic numbers, file name extensions, rules, heuristics, and inferences of a trained machine learning algorithm.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the likelihood of the at least one file being malicious comprises:

determining whether one or more rules of a plurality of rules indicate that the at least one file is malicious; and

calculating the likelihood based on a weight of the one or more rules.

5 . The method of claim 4 , wherein the plurality of rules query features present in the at least one file and classify whether the features are associated with potentially-malicious files, wherein the features include whether the at least one file was downloaded from a blacklisted website, whether the at least one file has been modified a threshold number of times in a small period of time, whether the at least one file has changed a system setting, and/or whether a hash value of the at least one file matches a known malware hash.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the likelihood of the at least one file being malicious comprises:

executing a first machine learning algorithm configured to output a classification of whether the at least one file is to be included in the sandbox and a confidence score of the classification, wherein the confidence score is the likelihood, wherein the first machine learning algorithm is trained to make the classification based on features including operation codes (opcodes), byte sequences, Portable Executable (PE) header, and file size of input files.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein classifying the given file as malicious or non-malicious comprises executing a malware scanner that compares the at least one file to virus definitions.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein classifying the given file as malicious or non-malicious comprises executing a second machine learning algorithm configured to classify the at least one file as malicious or non-malicious, and wherein the second machine learning algorithm is trained based on a training dataset comprising features of labelled files in a plurality of sandboxes.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein in response to determining that the at least one file is not classified as malicious over the period of time based on the dynamic analysis, dissolving the sandbox.

10 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising generating a different sandbox for each backup in a backup archive, wherein the different sandbox is dissolved after a predetermined period of time.

11 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the threshold likelihood is adjusted based on an amount of resources in the cloud network.

12 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the sandbox includes files originating from backups of a plurality of client machines.

13 . A system for selecting files for malware analysis, comprising:

a memory storing instructions; and

a hardware processor communicatively coupled with the memory and configured to execute the instructions to:

identify, in a cloud network, a backup of a client machine;

extract, from the backup, at least one file of a given file type;

determine whether to include the at least one file in a sandbox of the cloud network by performing a static analysis of the at least one file, wherein the static analysis comprises determining a likelihood of the at least one file being malicious and comparing the likelihood to a threshold likelihood;

in response to determining that the likelihood exceeds the threshold likelihood, select the at least one file for inclusion in the sandbox, wherein the sandbox is a software environment that isolates the at least one file from other files in the backup;

monitor, for a period of time, a behavior of the at least one file in the sandbox by performing a dynamic analysis of the at least one file, wherein the dynamic analysis comprises classifying a given file as malicious or non-malicious;

when determining that the at least one file is malicious based on the dynamic analysis, perform a remediation action on the at least one file; and

when determining that the at least one file is not classified as malicious over the period of time based on the dynamic analysis, remove the at least one file from the sandbox.

14 . The system of claim 13 , wherein the remediation action comprises one or more of:

removing the at least one file from the backup;

quarantining the at least one file in the backup;

removing the at least one file from the client machine; and

quarantining the at least one file in the client machine and triggering a threat investigation.

15 . The system of claim 13 , wherein the given file type is one of a script and an executable, wherein the threshold likelihood is different for each file type, and wherein the given file type is determined using one or more of magic numbers, file name extensions, rules, heuristics, and inferences of a trained machine learning algorithm.

16 . The system of claim 13 , wherein the hardware processor is configured to determine the likelihood of the at least one file being malicious by:

determining whether one or more rules of a plurality of rules indicate that the at least one file is malicious; and

calculating the likelihood based on a weight of the one or more rules.

17 . The system of claim 16 , wherein the plurality of rules query features present in the at least one file and classify whether the features are associated with potentially-malicious files, wherein the features include whether the at least one file was downloaded from a blacklisted website, whether the at least one file has been modified a threshold number of times in a small period of time, whether the at least one file has changed a system setting, and/or whether a hash value of the at least one file matches a known malware hash.

18 . The system of claim 13 , wherein the hardware processor is configured to determine the likelihood of the at least one file being malicious by:

executing a first machine learning algorithm configured to output a classification of whether the at least one file is to be included in the sandbox and a confidence score of the classification, wherein the confidence score is the likelihood, wherein the first machine learning algorithm is trained to make the classification based on features including operation codes (opcodes), byte sequences, Portable Executable (PE) header, and file size of input files.

19 . A non-transitory computer readable medium storing thereon computer executable instructions for selecting files for malware analysis, the instructions, when executed comprise:

identifying, in a cloud network, a backup of a client machine;

extracting, from the backup, at least one file of a given file type;

determining whether to include the at least one file in a sandbox of the cloud network by performing a static analysis of the at least one file, wherein the static analysis comprises determining a likelihood of the at least one file being malicious and comparing the likelihood to a threshold likelihood;

in response to determining that the likelihood exceeds the threshold likelihood, selecting the at least one file for inclusion in the sandbox, wherein the sandbox is a software environment that isolates the at least one file from other files in the backup;

monitoring, for a period of time, a behavior of the at least one file in the sandbox by performing a dynamic analysis of the at least one file, wherein the dynamic analysis comprises classifying a given file as malicious or non-malicious;

when determining that the at least one file is malicious based on the dynamic analysis, performing a remediation action on the at least one file; and

when determining that the at least one file is not classified as malicious over the period of time based on the dynamic analysis, removing the at least one file from the sandbox.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 11, 2025
From: MON DIVAKARAN, DINIL; WÜEST, CANDID; BELL, SERG; PROTASOV, STANISLAV
To: ACRONIS INTERNATIONAL GMBH
Reel/Frame 072853/0226 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20240220619A1 · Jul 4, 2024
References Cited (14)
US 9104870B1 · Qu et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 12259982B2 · Waldspurger · 2025 [cited by examiner]
US 20110154431A1 · Walsh · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20150288720A1 · Touboul · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20210182397A1 · Karnik · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20230022044A1 · Lewis · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230205880A1 · Ulasen · 2023 [cited by examiner]
CN 103842965A · 2014 [cited by applicant]
Dinil Mon Divakaran, Yung Siang Liau, and Vrizlynn LL Thing. “Accurate in-network file-type classification.” Proceedings of the Singapore Cyber-Security Conference (SG-CRC), 2016. pp. 139-146. [cited by applicant]
R. Khakpour and A. X. Liu, “An Information-theoretical Approach to High-speed Flow Nature Identification,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 2013. pp. 1-14. [cited by applicant]
Hendler, Danny, Shay Kels, and Amir Rubin. “Detecting malicious Powershell commands using deep neural networks.” In Proc. Asia conference on computer and communications security (ACM ASIACCS), Apr. 14, 2018. pp. 1-19. [cited by applicant]
Li, Zhenyuan, Qi Alfred Chen, Chunlin Xiong, Yan Chen, Tiantian Zhu, and Hai Yang. “Effective and light-weight deobfuscation and semantic-aware attack detection for Powershell scripts.” In Proc. ACM SIGSAC Conference on… [cited by applicant]
Or-Meir, Ori, Nir Nissim, Yuval Elovici, and Lior Rokach. “Dynamic malware analysis in the modern era—A state of the art survey.” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 52, No. 5, Article 88, Sep. 2019. pp. 1-48. [cited by applicant]
Shijo, P. V., and A. J. P. C. S. Salim. “Integrated static and dynamic analysis for malware detection.” Procedia Computer Science 46, 2015. pp. 804-811. [cited by applicant]