IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,383,346
Granted Patent B2
US 12,383,346 · App. 18/153,855 · Granted Aug 12, 2025

Automatic detection of tracking array motion during navigated surgery

Inventors: Claire Baegert (Grenoble, FR); Adrien Anxionnat (Allemond, FR)
Assignee: DEPUY IRELAND UNLIMITED COMPANY
A61B34/20A61B2034/2055A61B2034/2065
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,383,346
App. No.
18/153,855
Granted
Aug 12, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system and method for detecting movement of a first navigation array relative to a bone during computer-assisted surgery, including: monitoring a location of a landmark on the bone using the first navigation array, wherein the landmark is at a first end of the bone and the first navigation array is adjacent to a second end of the bone; determining that the location of the landmark has moved a distance greater than a threshold value; and indicating suspicious activity when the distance is greater than the threshold value.

Claims (61)

1. A method of detecting movement of a first navigation array relative to a bone during computer-assisted surgery, comprising:

monitoring a location of a landmark on the bone using the first navigation array, wherein the landmark is at a first end of the bone and the first navigation array is adjacent to a second end of the bone;

determining that the location of the landmark has moved a distance greater than a threshold value;

indicating suspicious activity when the distance is greater than the threshold value;

monitoring the location of a second navigation array;

analyzing a similarity of a motion of the second navigation array and the landmark when suspicious activity is indicated; and

determining that the suspicious activity is camera motion when the motion of the second navigation array and the landmark are similar.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein analyzing the similarity of the motion of the second

navigation array and the landmark includes:

monitoring a frame-to-frame movement of the landmark and the second navigation array; and

comparing the frame-to-frame movement of the landmark to the frame-to-frame movement of the second navigation array.

3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

computing bone motion information;

computing landmark metrics based upon the computed bone motion information; and

analyzing landmark metrics to determine whether bone motion information indicates that the suspicious activity is array motion.

4. The method of claim 2 , further comprising:

analyzing landmark metrics based upon bone motion information to determine whether bone motion information indicates that the suspicious activity is bone motion.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the computer-assisted surgery is a knee surgery and the landmark is a hip center.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the landmark is at a location that moves less than a threshold value during the computer-assisted surgery.

7. A method of detecting movement of a first navigation array relative to a bone during computer-assisted surgery, comprising:

monitoring a location of a landmark on the bone using the first navigation array, wherein the landmark is at a first end of the bone and the first navigation array is adjacent to a second end of the bone;

determining that the location of the landmark has moved a distance greater than a threshold value;

indicating suspicious activity when the distance is greater than the threshold value;

monitoring the location of a second navigation array; and

analyzing, using a machine learning model, a similarity of a motion of the second navigation array and the landmark and determining that the suspicious activity is camera motion when the motion of the second navigation array and the landmark are similar.

8. The method of claim 7 , further comprising:

computing bone motion information;

computing landmark metrics based upon the computed bone motion information; and

analyzing, using a machine learning model, landmark metrics to determine whether bone motion information indicates that the suspicious activity is array motion or is bone motion.

9. A method of detecting movement of a first navigation array relative to a bone during computer-assisted surgery, comprising:

registering a location of a landmark on the bone relative to the first navigation array;

monitoring the location of the landmark on the bone by modeling the motion of the bone using the first navigation array, wherein the landmark is at a first end of the bone and the first navigation array is adjacent to a second end of the bone;

determining that the location of the landmark has moved a distance greater than a threshold value; and

indicating suspicious activity when the distance is greater than the threshold value;

registering a location of a landmark on the bone relative to a second navigation array;

monitoring the location of a second navigation array;

analyzing a similarity of a motion of the second navigation array and the landmark when suspicious activity is indicated; and

determining that the suspicious activity is camera motion when the motion of the second navigation array and the landmark are similar.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein analyzing the similarity of the motion of the second navigation array and the landmark includes:

monitoring a frame-to-frame movement of the landmark and the second navigation array; and

comparing the frame-to-frame movement of the landmark to the frame-to-frame movement of the second navigation array.

11. The method of claim 9 , further comprising:

computing bone motion information;

computing landmark metrics based upon the computed bone motion information; and

analyzing landmark metrics to determine whether bone motion information indicates that the suspicious activity is array motion.

12. The method of claim 10 , further comprising:

analyzing landmark metrics based upon bone motion information to determine whether bone motion information indicates that the suspicious activity is bone motion.

13. The method of claim 9 , wherein the computer-assisted surgery is a knee surgery and the landmark is a hip center.

14. The method of claim 9 , wherein the landmark is at a location that moves less than a threshold value during the computer-assisted surgery.

15. A method of detecting movement of a first navigation array relative to a bone during computer-assisted surgery, comprising:

registering a location of a landmark on the bone relative to the first navigation array;

monitoring the location of the landmark on the bone by modeling the motion of the bone using the first navigation array, wherein the landmark is at a first end of the bone and the first navigation array is adjacent to a second end of the bone;

determining that the location of the landmark has moved a distance greater than a threshold value; and

indicating suspicious activity when the distance is greater than the threshold value;

registering a location of a landmark on the bone relative to a second navigation array;

monitoring the location of a second navigation array; and

analyzing, using a machine learning model, a similarity of a motion of the second navigation array and the landmark and determining that the suspicious activity is camera motion when the motion of the second navigation array and the landmark are similar.

16. The method of claim 15 , further comprising:

computing bone motion information;

computing landmark metrics based upon the computed bone motion information; and

analyzing, using a machine learning model, landmark metrics to determine whether bone motion information indicates that the suspicious activity is array motion of the second navigation array or is bone motion.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 11, 2023
From: BAEGERT, CLAIRE; ANXIONNAT, ADRIEN
To: DEPUY IRELAND UNLIMITED COMPANY
Reel/Frame 063288/0611 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20240238046A1 · Jul 18, 2024
References Cited (27)
US 7643862B2 · Schoenefeld · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 9452023B2 · Boillot · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 11109777B2 · Stein · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11123253B2 · Anderson · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11141227B2 · Shoham · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11191594B2 · Morgan · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11224443B2 · Amiot · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11229520B2 · Fanson · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11298196B2 · Crawford · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20050109855A1 · McCombs · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20070016009A1 · Lakin · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20200069372A1 · Dufour · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210128250A1 · Chav · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210186711A1 · van der Walt · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210369349A1 · Haider · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220008136A1 · Cameron · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220047335A1 · Morgan · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220096166A1 · Couture · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220125517A1 · Zimmermann · 2022 [cited by applicant]
AU 2020201097A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
EP 3878393A2 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
EP 3936075A2 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020185930A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2022238437A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
Brainlab, “Knee3 Surgical Technique”, pp. 1-58, 2015 (Year: 2015). [cited by examiner]
International Search Report & Written Opinion mailed on Mar. 27, 2024 for PCT/EP2024/050464. [cited by applicant]
Gary W. Doan et. al, “Image-Free Robotic-Assissted Total Knee Arthroplasty Improves Implant Alignment Accuracy: A Cadaveric Study”, The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2022, pp. 795-801, vol. 37. [cited by applicant]