Vehicle collision alert system and method for detecting driving hazards
An impairment analysis (“IA”) computer system for alerting a first driver of a first vehicle to a driving hazard posed by a second vehicle operated by a second driver is provided. The IA computer system is associated with the first vehicle, and includes at least one processor in communication with at least one memory device. The at least one processor is programmed to: (i) receive second vehicle data including second driver data and second vehicle condition data, where the second vehicle data is collected by a plurality of sensors included on the first vehicle; (ii) analyze the second vehicle data by applying a baseline model to the second vehicle data; (iii) determine that the second vehicle poses a driving hazard to the first vehicle based upon the analysis; and/or (iv) generate an alert signal based upon the determination that the second vehicle poses a driving hazard to the first vehicle.
1. An impairment analysis (IA) computer system for alerting a first vehicle of a driving hazard posed by a second vehicle, the IA computer system comprising at least one processor in communication with at least one memory, wherein the at least one processor is configured to:
receive second vehicle data associated with the second vehicle, the second vehicle data comprising second vehicle engine data;
apply a baseline model retrieved from the at least one memory to the second vehicle data, wherein the baseline model includes standard engine operation conditions data associated with the second vehicle;
determine that the second vehicle is a potential driving hazard to the first vehicle based on the application of the baseline model to the second vehicle data; and
cause an alert to be presented to a driver of the first vehicle in response to determining that the second vehicle is a potential driving hazard to the first vehicle.
2. The IA computer system of claim 1 , wherein the at least one processor is configured to receive the second vehicle data from a plurality of sensors associated with the first vehicle.
3. The IA computer system of claim 1 , wherein the at least one processor is configured to receive the second vehicle data, wherein the second vehicle data comprises driver data associated with a driver of the second vehicle, and wherein the driver data comprises at least one of head orientation, body posture, eye movement, or driver behavior information.
4. The IA computer system of claim 1 , wherein the at least one processor is configured to cause the alert to be presented as at least one of an auditory signal, a visual signal, or a haptic signal.
5. The IA computer system of claim 1 , wherein the standard engine operation conditions data comprises parameters associated with normal operation of an engine of the second vehicle, and wherein the at least one processor is configured to determine that the second vehicle engine data exceeds a threshold included in the parameters based on the application of the baseline model to the second vehicle data.
6. The IA computer system of claim 1 , wherein the at least one processor is configured to identify at least one of lane drift or speed deviation of the second vehicle based on the second vehicle data.
7. The IA computer system of claim 1 , wherein the at least one processor is configured to cause a second alert to be presented to at least one driver of at least one vehicle nearby the first vehicle.
8. The IA computer system of claim 1 , wherein the at least one processor is configured to transmit the second vehicle data to an insurance computing device configured to update an insurance policy based on the second vehicle data.
9. The IA computer system of claim 1 , wherein the at least one processor is configured to cause a collision avoidance action to be performed, wherein the collision avoidance action is performed by at least one of an automated braking system or an automated steering system.
10. At least one non-transitory computer-readable storage medium with instructions stored thereon for alerting a first vehicle of a driving hazard posed by a second vehicle, wherein the instructions, in response to execution by at least one processor, cause the at least one processor to:
receive second vehicle data associated with the second vehicle, the second vehicle data comprising second vehicle engine data;
apply a baseline model retrieved from the at least one non-transitory computer-readable storage medium to the second vehicle data, wherein the baseline model includes standard engine operation conditions data associated with the second vehicle;
determine that the second vehicle is a potential driving hazard to the first vehicle based on the application of the baseline model to the second vehicle data; and
cause an alert to be presented to a driver of the first vehicle in response to determining that the second vehicle is a potential driving hazard to the first vehicle.
11. The at least one non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 10 , wherein the instructions further cause the at least one processor to receive the second vehicle data from a plurality of sensors associated with the first vehicle.
12. The at least one non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 10 , wherein the instructions further cause the at least one processor to receive the second vehicle data, wherein the second vehicle data comprises driver data associated with a driver of the second vehicle, and wherein the driver data comprises at least one of head orientation, body posture, eye movement, or driver behavior information.
13. The at least one non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 10 , wherein the instructions further cause the at least one processor to cause the alert to be presented as at least one of an auditory signal, a visual signal, or a haptic signal.
14. The at least one non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 10 , wherein the standard engine operation conditions data comprises parameters associated with normal operation of an engine of the second vehicle, and wherein the instructions further cause the at least one processor to determine that the second vehicle engine data exceeds a threshold included in the parameters based on the application of the baseline model to the second vehicle data.
15. The at least one non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 10 , wherein the instructions further cause the at least one processor to identify at least one of lane drift or speed deviation of the second vehicle based on the second vehicle data.
16. The at least one non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 10 , wherein the instructions further cause the at least one processor to cause a second alert to be presented to at least one driver of at least one vehicle nearby the first vehicle.
17. The at least one non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 10 , wherein the instructions further cause the at least one processor to transmit the second vehicle data to an insurance computing device configured to update an insurance policy based on the second vehicle data.
18. The at least one non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 10 , wherein the instructions further cause the at least one processor to cause a collision avoidance action to be performed, wherein the collision avoidance action is performed by at least one of an automated braking system or an automated steering system.
19. A computer-implemented method for alerting a first vehicle of a driving hazard posed by a second vehicle, the computer-implemented method implemented by at least one processor in communication with at least one memory, the computer-implemented method comprising:
receiving second vehicle data associated with the second vehicle, the second vehicle data comprising second vehicle engine data;
applying a baseline model retrieved from the at least one memory to the second vehicle data, wherein the baseline model includes standard engine operation conditions data associated with the second vehicle;
determining that the second vehicle is a potential driving hazard to the first vehicle based on the application of the baseline model to the second vehicle data; and
causing an alert to be presented to a driver of the first vehicle in response to determining that the second vehicle is a potential driving hazard to the first vehicle.
20. The computer-implemented method of claim 19 , wherein the standard engine operation conditions data comprises parameters associated with normal operation of an engine of the second vehicle, and wherein the computer-implemented method further comprises determining that the second vehicle engine data exceeds a threshold included in the parameters based on the application of the baseline model to the second vehicle data.