IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,246,188
Granted Patent B2
US 12,246,188 · App. 18/155,803 · Granted Mar 11, 2025

Selection of probability thresholds for generating cardiac arrhythmia notifications

Inventors: Siddharth Dani (Minneapolis, MN); Tarek D. Haddad (Minneapolis, MN); Donald R. Musgrove (Minneapolis, MN); Andrew Radtke (Minneapolis, MN); Niranjan Chakravarthy (Singapore, SG); Rodolphe Katra (Blaine, MN); Lindsay A. Pedalty (Minneapolis, MN)
Assignee: Medtronic, Inc.
A61N1/3956A61N1/36592G16H10/60G16H40/63G16H50/20G16H50/50
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,246,188
App. No.
18/155,803
Filed
Jan 18, 2023
Granted
Mar 11, 2025
Kind
B2
Examiner
XIAO, DI
Art Unit
2178
USPC
607/5
Abstract

Techniques are disclosed for monitoring a patient for the occurrence of a cardiac arrhythmia. A computing system generates sample probability values by applying a machine learning model to sample patient data. The machine learning model determines a respective probability value that indicates a probability that the cardiac arrhythmia occurred during each respective temporal window. The computing system outputs a user interface comprising graphical data based on the sample probability values and receives, via the user interface, an indication of user input to select a probability threshold for a patient. The computing system receives patient data for the patient and applies the machine learning model to the patient data to determine a current probability value. In response to the determination that the current probability exceeds the probability threshold for the patient, the computing system generates an alert indicating the patient has likely experienced the occurrence of the cardiac arrhythmia.

Claims (104)

1. A method comprising:

generating, by a computing system that comprises processing circuitry and one or more storage media, a set of sample probability values by applying a machine learning model to a sample set of patient data, wherein:

the machine learning model is trained using patient data for a plurality of patients,

the sample set comprises a plurality of temporal windows, and

for each respective temporal window of the plurality of temporal windows, the machine learning model is configured to determine a respective probability value in the set of sample probability values that indicates a probability that a cardiac arrhythmia occurred during the respective temporal window;

generating, by the computing system, graphical data based on the sample probability values;

outputting, by the computing system, a user interface for display on a display device, the user interface comprising the graphical data;

receiving, by the computing system, via the user interface, an indication of user input to select a probability threshold for a patient;

receiving, by the computing system, patient data for the patient, wherein the patient data for the patient is collected by one or more medical devices;

applying, by the computing system, the machine learning model to the patient data for the patient to determine a current probability value that indicates a probability that the patient has experienced an occurrence of the cardiac arrhythmia;

determining, by the computing system, that the current probability value exceeds the probability threshold for the patient;

in response to determining that the current probability value is greater than or equal to the probability threshold for the patient, generating, by the computing system, a notification indicating that the patient has likely experienced the occurrence of the cardiac arrhythmia; and

presenting, by the computing system, data indicating an anticipated review burden versus an anticipated diagnostic yield for the probability threshold for the patient.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

generating the graphical data comprises generating, by the computing system, a receiver operating curve (ROC), wherein generating the ROC comprises:

for each evaluation probability threshold of a plurality of evaluation probability thresholds:

determining, by the computing system, a sensitivity value for the respective evaluation probability threshold as a ratio of: (i) a total number of sample probability values in the set of sample probability values that are greater than or equal to the respective evaluation probability threshold to (ii) a total number of the temporal windows in the sample set that actually contain occurrences of the cardiac arrhythmia that actually occurred in the sample set;

determining, by the computing system, a specificity value for the respective probability value as a ratio of: (i) a total number of the sample probability values that are not greater than or equal to the respective evaluation probability threshold to (ii) a total number of the temporal windows in the sample set that do not actually contain occurrences of the cardiac arrhythmia; and

determining, by the computing system, a point on the ROC that corresponds to the respective probability value, wherein the point on the ROC that corresponds to the respective probability value is based on the sensitivity value for the respective evaluation probability threshold and the specificity value for the respective evaluation probability threshold; and

receiving the indication of user input to select the probability threshold for the patient comprises: receiving, by the computing system, an indication of user input to select a point on the ROC that corresponds to the probability threshold for the patient.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

generating the graphical data comprises:

generating, by the computing system, a graph that maps the sample probability values against time; and

generating, by the computing system, a threshold indicator; and

receiving the indication of user input comprises receiving, by the computing system, an indication of user input to position the threshold indicator at a location in the graph corresponding to the probability threshold for the patient.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the threshold indicator comprises a threshold bar superimposed on the graph and oriented parallel to a time axis of the graph.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein receiving the patient data for the patient comprises receiving, by the computing system, cardiac electrical waveform data for the patient.

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising receiving, by the computing system, an indication of user input to update the probability threshold for the patient.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the medical devices include a wearable medical device or an implantable medical device (IMD).

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

the cardiac arrhythmia is a first cardiac arrhythmia in a plurality of cardiac arrhythmias, and

the method comprises, for each respective cardiac arrhythmia of the plurality of cardiac arrhythmias:

generating, by the computing system, a respective set of sample probability values by applying a respective machine learning model to a respective sample set of patient data, wherein:

the respective machine learning model is trained using patient data for the plurality of patients,

the respective sample set comprises a respective plurality of temporal windows, and

for each respective temporal window of the respective plurality of temporal windows, the respective machine learning model is configured to determine a respective probability value in the respective set of sample probability values that indicates a probability that the respective cardiac arrhythmia occurred during the respective temporal window;

generating, by the computing system, respective graphical data based on the respective set of sample probability values;

outputting, by the computing system, the user interface for display on the display device such that the user interface comprises the respective graphical data;

receiving, by the computing system, via the user interface, an indication of user input to select a respective probability threshold for the patient;

applying, by the computing system, the machine learning model to the patient data to determine a respective probability value that indicates a probability that the patient has experienced an occurrence of the respective cardiac arrhythmia;

determining, by the computing system, that the respective probability value exceeds the respective probability threshold; and

in response to determining that the respective probability value is greater than or equal to the respective probability threshold, generating, by the computing system, a notification indicating that the patient has likely experienced the occurrence of the respective cardiac arrhythmia.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the patient is a first patient, the patient data for the patient is first patient data, the current probability value is a first current probability value, and the one or more medical devices are one or more first medical devices, and the method further comprises:

receiving, by the computing system, second patient data for a second patient, wherein the second patient data is collected by one or more second medical devices;

applying, by the computing system, the machine learning model to the second patient data to determine a second current probability value that indicates a probability that the second patient has experienced an occurrence of the cardiac arrhythmia;

determining, by the computing system, that the second current probability value exceeds a default probability threshold, wherein the default probability threshold is set to maximize diagnostic yield; and

in response to determining that the second current probability value is greater than or equal to the default probability threshold, generating, by the computing system, a second notification indicating that the second patient has likely experienced the occurrence of the cardiac arrhythmia.

10. A computing system comprising:

one or more processing circuits; and

one or more storage media storing instructions that, when executed by the one or more processing circuits, cause the one or more processing circuits to:

generate a set of sample probability values by applying a machine learning model to a sample set of patient data, wherein:

the machine learning model is trained using patient data for a plurality of patients,

the sample set comprises a plurality of temporal windows, and

for each respective temporal window of the plurality of temporal windows, the machine learning model is configured to determine a respective probability value in the set of sample probability values that indicates a probability that a cardiac arrhythmia occurred during the respective temporal window;

generate graphical data based on the sample probability values;

output a user interface for display on a display device, the user interface comprising the graphical data;

receive, via the user interface, an indication of user input to select a probability threshold for a patient;

receive patient data for the patient, wherein the patient data for the patient is collected by one or more medical devices;

apply the machine learning model to the patient data for the patient to determine a current probability value that indicates a probability that the patient has experienced an occurrence of the cardiac arrhythmia;

determine that the current probability value exceeds the probability threshold for the patient;

in response to determining that the current probability value is greater than or equal to the probability threshold for the patient, generate a notification indicating that the patient has likely experienced the occurrence of the cardiac arrhythmia; and

present data indicating an anticipated review burden versus an anticipated diagnostic yield for the probability threshold for the patient.

11. The computing system of claim 10 , wherein:

the one or more processing circuits are configured such that, as part of generating the graphical data, the one or more processing circuits generate a receiver operating curve (ROC), wherein, the one or more processing circuits are configured such that, as part of generating the ROC, the one or more processing circuits:

for each evaluation probability threshold of a plurality of evaluation probability thresholds:

determine a sensitivity value for the respective evaluation probability threshold as a ratio of: (i) a total number of sample probability values in the set of sample probability values that are greater than or equal to the respective evaluation probability threshold to (ii) a total number of the temporal windows in the sample set that actually contain occurrences of the cardiac arrhythmia that actually occurred in the sample set;

determine a specificity value for the respective probability value as a ratio of: (i) a total number of the sample probability values that are not greater than or equal to the respective evaluation probability threshold to (ii) a total number of the temporal windows in the sample set that do not actually contain occurrences of the cardiac arrhythmia; and

determine a point on the ROC that corresponds to the respective probability value, wherein the point on the ROC that corresponds to the respective probability value is based on the sensitivity value for the respective evaluation probability threshold and the specificity value for the respective evaluation probability threshold; and

the one or more processing circuits are configured such that, as part of receiving the indication of user input to select the probability threshold for the patient, the one or more processing circuits receive an indication of user input to select a point on the ROC that corresponds to the probability threshold for the patient.

12. The computing system of claim 10 , wherein:

the one or more processing circuits are configured such that, as part of generating the graphical data, the one or more processing circuits:

generate a graph that maps the sample probability values against time; and

generate a threshold indicator; and

the one or more processing circuits are configured such that, as part of receiving the indication of user input, the one or more processing circuits receive an indication of user input to position the threshold indicator at a location in the graph corresponding to the probability threshold for the patient.

13. The computing system of claim 12 , wherein the threshold indicator comprises a threshold bar superimposed on the graph and oriented parallel to a time axis of the graph.

14. The computing system of claim 10 , wherein the one or more processing circuits are configured such that, as part of receiving the patient data for the patient, the one or more processing circuits are configured to receive cardiac electrical waveform data for the patient.

15. The computing system of claim 10 , wherein the one or more processing circuits are further configured to receive an indication of user input to update the probability threshold for the patient.

16. The computing system of claim 10 , wherein the one or more medical devices comprises a wearable medical device or an implantable medical device (IMD).

17. The computing system of claim 10 , wherein:

the cardiac arrhythmia is a first cardiac arrhythmia in a plurality of cardiac arrhythmias, and

the one or more processing circuits are configured to, for each respective cardiac arrhythmia of the plurality of cardiac arrhythmias:

generating, by the computing system, a respective set of sample probability values by applying a respective machine learning model to a respective sample set of patient data, wherein:

the respective machine learning model is trained using patient data for the plurality of patients,

the respective sample set comprises a respective plurality of temporal windows, and

for each respective temporal window of the respective plurality of temporal windows, the respective machine learning model is configured to determine a respective probability value in the respective set of sample probability values that indicates a probability that the respective cardiac arrhythmia occurred during the respective temporal window;

generating, by the computing system, respective graphical data based on the respective set of sample probability values;

outputting, by the computing system, the user interface for display on the display device such that the user interface comprises the respective graphical data;

receiving, by the computing system, via the user interface, an indication of user input to select a respective probability threshold for the patient;

applying, by the computing system, the machine learning model to the patient data for the patient to determine a respective probability value that indicates a probability that the patient has experienced an occurrence of the respective cardiac arrhythmia;

determining, by the computing system, that the respective probability value exceeds the respective probability threshold; and

in response to determining that the respective probability value is greater than or equal to the respective probability threshold, generating, by the computing system, a notification indicating that the patient has likely experienced the occurrence of the respective cardiac arrhythmia.

18. One or more non-transitory computer-readable data storage media having instructions stored thereon that, when executed by one or more processing circuit of a computing system, cause the one or more processing circuits to:

generate a set of sample probability values by applying a machine learning model to a sample set of patient data, wherein:

the machine learning model is trained using patient data for a plurality of patients,

the sample set comprises a plurality of temporal windows, and

for each respective temporal window of the plurality of temporal windows, the machine learning model is configured to determine a respective probability value in the set of sample probability values that indicates a probability that a cardiac arrhythmia occurred during the respective temporal window;

generate graphical data based on the sample probability values;

output a user interface for display on a display device, the user interface comprising the graphical data;

receive, via the user interface, an indication of user input to select a probability threshold for a patient;

receive patient data for the patient, wherein the patient data for the patient is collected by one or more medical devices;

apply the machine learning model to the patient data for the patient to determine a current probability value that indicates a probability that the patient has experienced an occurrence of the cardiac arrhythmia;

determine that the current probability value exceeds the probability threshold for the patient;

in response to determining that the current probability value is greater than or equal to the probability threshold for the patient, generate a notification indicating that the patient has likely experienced the occurrence of the cardiac arrhythmia; and

present data indicating an anticipated review burden versus an anticipated diagnostic yield for the probability threshold for the patient.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 23, 2023
From: DANI, SIDDHARTH; HADDAD, TAREK D.; MUSGROVE, DONALD R.; RADTKE, ANDREW; CHAKRAVARTHY, NIRANJAN; KATRA, RODOLPHE; PEDALTY, LINDSAY A.
To: MEDTRONIC, INC.
Reel/Frame 062459/0472 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 16850833 · Apr 16, 2020
Provisional Application 62843707 · May 6, 2019
Related Publication 20230149726A1 · May 18, 2023
References Cited (171)
US 4458691A · Netravali · 1984 [cited by applicant]
US 6212428B1 · Hsu et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6308094B1 · Shusterman et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6594523B1 · Levine · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 8103346B2 · Mass et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8521281B2 · Patel et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 9149637B2 · Warren et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9183351B2 · Shusterman · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9483529B1 · Pasoi et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9585590B2 · McNair · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9743890B2 · Lord et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9775559B2 · Zhang et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10368746B2 · Huelskamp et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10463269B2 · Boleyn et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10744334B2 · Perschbacher et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10888282B2 · Ong et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11311230B2 · Sullivan et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11355244B2 · Haddad et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11443852B2 · Chakravarthy et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11723577B2 · Pedalty et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20020016550A1 · Sweeney et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020123768A1 · Gilkerson et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20060247709A1 · Gottesman et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20090259269A1 · Brown · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100179444A1 · O'Brien et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100217141A1 · Ostrow · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100268103A1 · McNamara et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100280841A1 · Dong et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100312130A1 · Zhang et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100312131A1 · Naware et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110270109A1 · Zhang et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120004563A1 · Kim et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120209126A1 · Amos et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130231947A1 · Shusterman · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130274524A1 · Dakka et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130274624A1 · Mahajan et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140142448A1 · Bae et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140257063A1 · Ong et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140378856A1 · Koike et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150065894A1 · Airaksinen et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150164349A1 · Gopalakrishnan et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150216435A1 · Bokan et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150265217A1 · Penders et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160008615A1 · Stahmann et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160022164A1 · Brockway et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160022166A1 · Stadler · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160135706A1 · Sullivan et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160192853A1 · Bardy et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160220137A1 · Mahajan et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160232280A1 · Apte et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170095673A1 · Ludwig et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170105683A1 · Xue · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170156592A1 · Fu · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170196458A1 · Ternes et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170265765A1 · Baumann et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170290550A1 · Perschbacher et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170347894A1 · Bhushan et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170354365A1 · Zhou · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180008976A1 · Okazaki · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180089763A1 · Okazaki · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180146874A1 · Walker et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180146929A1 · Joo et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180206721A1 · Zhang · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180233227A1 · Galloway et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180272147A1 · Freeman et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180279891A1 · Miao et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180310892A1 · Perschbacher et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190008461A1 · Gupta et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190029552A1 · Perschbacher et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190038148A1 · Valys et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190038149A1 · Gopalakrishnan et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190090774A1 · Yang et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190122097A1 · Shibahara et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190130554A1 · Rothberg et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190209022A1 · Sobol et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190216350A1 · Sullivan et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190231207A1 · Perschbacher et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190272920A1 · Teplitzky · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190275335A1 · Volpe et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190328251A1 · Jin · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190343415A1 · Saha · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190365342A1 · Ghaffarzadegan et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190378620A1 · Saren · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200100693A1 · Velo · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200108260A1 · Haddad et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200178825A1 · Weijia et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200288997A1 · Shute et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200352462A1 · Pedalty et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200352466A1 · Chakravarthy et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200352521A1 · Chakravarthy et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200353271A1 · Dani et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200357517A1 · Haddad et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200357518A1 · Musgrove et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200357519A1 · Chakravarthy et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210137384A1 · Robinson et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210169736A1 · Wijshoff et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210204858A1 · Attia et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210338134A1 · Chakravarthy et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210338138A1 · Pedalty et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210343416A1 · Chakravarthy et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210345865A1 · Spillinger et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210358631A1 · Haddad et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20230329624A1 · Pedalty et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
CN 106572807A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
CN 106573149A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
CN 106725428A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
CN 107408144A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
CN 107822622A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
CN 108030488A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
CN 108577823A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
EP 1218060B1 · 2004 [cited by applicant]
EP 2427105A1 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
JP 2013524865A · 2013 [cited by applicant]
JP 2012532633A · 2013 [cited by applicant]
JP 2014100473A · 2014 [cited by applicant]
JP 2018503885A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 0124876A1 · 2001 [cited by applicant]
WO 2010129447A1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO 2011008550A1 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO 2013160538A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO 2015200527A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017072250A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017091736A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018119316A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018162901A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019075035A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020049267A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
“Classify ECG Signals Using Long Short-Term Memory Networks,” MATLAB, retrieved from https://www.mathworks.com/help/signal/examples/classify-ecg-signals-using-long-short-term-Memory-networks.html, Nov. 2, 2018, 19 pp. [cited by applicant]
“Visualize Features of a Convolutional Neural Network,” MATLAB & Simulink, Mar. 15, 2018, 9 pp. [cited by applicant]
“Visualize Features of a Convolutional Neural Network,” MATLAB & Simulink, retrieved from https://www.mathworks.com/help/deeplearning/examples/visualize-features-of-a-convolutional-neural-network.html, Sep. 11, 2019, 7 … [cited by applicant]
Andersen et al., “A Deep Learning Approach for Real-Time Detection of Atrial Fibrillation,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 114, Aug. 14, 2018, pp. 465-473. [cited by applicant]
Anonymous, “Receiver Operating Characteristic-Wikipedia,” Mar. 20, 2019, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Receiver_operating_characteristic&oldis-888671034#History, 12 pp. [cited by applicant]
Arrobo et al., “An Innovative Wireless Cardiac Rhythm Management (iCRM) System,” Computer Science, 2014 Wireless Telecommunications Symposium, Jun. 2014, 5 pp. [cited by applicant]
Bresnick, “Machine Learning Algorithm Outperforms Cardiologists Reading EKGs”, Health IT Analytics, Jul. 12, 2017, 5 pp. [cited by applicant]
Chen et al., “Electrocardiogram Recognization Based on Variational AutoEncoder,” Machine Learning and Biometrics, IntechOpen, Aug. 29, 2018, pp. 71-90. [cited by applicant]
Fawaz et al., “Deep learning for time series classification: a review,” Irirmas, Universite Haute Alsace, Dec. 7, 2018, 53 pp. [cited by applicant]
Habibzadeh et al., “On Determining the Most Appropriate Test Cut-Off Value: the Case of Tests with Continuous Results,” Biochemia Medica, Oct. 15, 2016, pp. 297-307. [cited by applicant]
Isin et al., “Cardiac Arrhythmia Detection Using Deep Learning,” Procedia Computer Science vol. 120, 2017 (Applicant points out, in accordance with MPEP 609.04(a), that the year of publication, 2017, is sufficiently ear… [cited by applicant]
Kelwade et al., “Prediction of Cardiac Arrhythmia using Artificial Neural Network,” International Journal of Computer Applications (0975-8887), vol. 115—No. 20, Apr. 2015, 6 pp. [cited by applicant]
Lau et al., “Connecting the Dots: From Big Data to Healthy Heart,” Circulation, vol. 134, No. 5, Aug. 2, 2017, 5 pp. [cited by applicant]
Madani et al., “Fast and Accurate View Classification of Echocardiograms Using Deep Learning,” Nature Partner Journals, vol. 1, No. 6, Mar. 21, 2018, 8 pp. [cited by applicant]
Schirrmeister et al., “Deep Learning with Convolutional Neural Networks for Brain Mapping and Decoding of Movement-Related Information from the Human EEG,” Cornell University Library, Mar. 16, 2017, 58 pp. [cited by applicant]
Schwab et al., “Beat by Beat: Classifying Cardiac Arrhythmias with Recurrent Neural Networks,” 2017 Computing in Cardiology (CinC), vol. 44, Oct. 24, 2017, 4 pp. [cited by applicant]
Swerdlow et al., “An Innovative Wireless Cardiac Rhythm Management (iCRM) System,” Advances in Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, vol. 7, No. 6, Dec. 2014, pp. 1237-1261. [cited by applicant]
Swerdlow et al., “Troubleshooting Implanted Cardioverter Defibrillator Sensing Problems I,” Advances in Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, vol. 7, No. 6, Dec. 2014, pp. 1237-1261. [cited by applicant]
Wartzek et al., “ECG on the Road: Robust and Unobtrusive Estimation of Heart Rate,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 58, No. 11, Nov. 2011, pp. 3112-3120. [cited by applicant]
Witten et al., “Data mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques,” Third Edition, Morgan Kaufmann, Feb. 3, 2011, 665 pp. [cited by applicant]
Prosecution History from U.S. Appl. No. 16/832,732, dated Mar. 2, 2022 through Jan. 13, 2023, 91 pp. [cited by applicant]
Prosecution History from U.S. Appl. No. 16/845,996, dated Aug. 16, 2022 through Jan. 9, 2023, 68 pp. [cited by applicant]
Prosecution History from U.S. Appl. No. 16/850,833 dated Jun. 23, 2022 through Oct. 19, 2022, 53 pp. [cited by applicant]
Prosecution History from U.S. Appl. No. 17/389,831, now issued U.S. Pat. No. 11,355,244, dated Sep. 10, 2021 through Apr. 25, 2022, 56 pp. [cited by applicant]
Response to Final Office Action dated Aug. 31, 2023 from U.S. Appl. No. 16/832,732, filed Nov. 27, 2023, 19 pp. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/479,228, filed Oct. 2, 2023, naming inventors Haddad et al. [cited by applicant]
Response to Office Action dated Jan. 9, 2023 from U.S. Appl. No. 16/845,996, filed Apr. 10, 2023, 11 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Response to Office Action dated Jan. 13, 2023 from U.S. Appl. No. 16/832,732, filed Apr. 12, 2023, 19 pp. [cited by applicant]
Advisory Action from U.S. Appl. No. 16/832,732 dated Dec. 14, 2023, 3 pp. [cited by applicant]
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 16/832,732 dated Mar. 14, 2024, 14 pp. [cited by applicant]
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 16/832,732 dated Aug. 31, 2023, 18 pp. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/309,309, filed Apr. 28, 2023, naming inventors Haddad et al. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/320,522, filed May 19, 2023, naming inventors Chakravarthy et al. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/331,756, filed Jun. 8, 2023, naming inventors Chakravarthy et al. [cited by applicant]
Hao et al., “Application of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in patients with tachyventricular fatal arhythmias”, vol. 26, No. 23, The Journal of Practical Medicine, Dec. 10, 2010, 4 pp., Translation provided for … [cited by applicant]
Corrected Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 16/845,996 dated Jun. 2, 2023, 2 pp. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowability from U.S. Appl. No. 16/845,996 dated May 23, 2023, 10 pp. [cited by applicant]
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 16/832,732 dated Jul. 5, 2024, 13 pp. [cited by applicant]
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 18/479,228 dated Jun. 20, 2024, 20 pp. [cited by applicant]
Response to Office Action dated Mar. 14, 2024 from U.S. Appl. No. 16/832,732, filed May 20, 2024, 17 pp. [cited by applicant]
Advisory Action from U.S. Appl. No. 16/832,732 dated Sep. 9, 2024, 3 pp. [cited by applicant]
Response to Final Office Action dated Jul. 5, 2024 from U.S. Appl. No. 16/832,732, filed Aug. 29, 2024, 18 pp. [cited by applicant]
Response to Office Action dated Jun. 20, 2024 from U.S. Appl. No. 18/479,228, filed Sep. 19, 2024, 8 pp. [cited by applicant]
Response to Office Action dated Nov. 7, 2024 from U.S. Appl. No. 16/832,732, filed Jan. 27, 2025, 15 pp. [cited by applicant]