IP Library Granted Patent US 12,420,819
Granted Patent B2
US 12,420,819 · App. 18/159,680 · Granted Sep 23, 2025

Increasing operator confidence of an active driving automation system by modifying longitudinal vehicle dynamics

Inventors: Manuel Ludwig Kuehner (Mountain View, CA); Hiroshi Yasuda (San Francisco, CA); Andrea Michelle Rios Lazcano (Brussels, BE)
Assignee: TOYOTA JIDOSHA KABUSHIKI KAISHA
B60W50/14B60W30/16B60W60/0013B60W2720/106
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,420,819
App. No.
18/159,680
Granted
Sep 23, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems and methods are provided to notify an operator of an active and correctly operating driving automation system. More specifically, the notification is executed through modulation of longitudinal vehicle dynamics based on cruising speed or following distance to a leading vehicle.

Claims (26)

1. A method of notifying an operator of a vehicle employing a driving automation system, the method comprising:

determining an offsetting longitudinal control signal to control the vehicle to deviate from a reference trajectory by a level of error sufficient to induce generation of a correction control signal to correct the vehicle's deviation from the reference trajectory, wherein determining the offsetting longitudinal control signal comprises generating a random direction and a random magnitude for the offsetting longitudinal control signal; and

executing the offsetting longitudinal control signal followed by the correction control signal to modulate longitudinal vehicle dynamics of the vehicle, wherein inertial forces generated by modulating the longitudinal vehicle dynamics in response to the correction control signal notify the operator that the driving automation system is in an active state.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the offsetting longitudinal control signal includes at least one instance of acceleration or deceleration of the vehicle.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the reference trajectory includes at least one of a vehicle speed or a following distance to a leading vehicle.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the offsetting longitudinal control signal controls the vehicle to deviate from the reference trajectory by undershooting and overshooting the reference trajectory by the level of error.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the method is executed periodically based on some passage of one of time, distance, or combination of both.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the offsetting longitudinal control signal is based on vehicle sensor information.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein in response to a toggle switch signaling for a perpetual operating condition, the correction control signal instructs the vehicle to follow another trajectory that overshoots the reference trajectory.

8. A control system for a vehicle employing a driving automation system, the control system comprising: a controller for longitudinal vehicle dynamics of the vehicle; a processor; and a memory coupled to the processor to store instructions, which when executed by the processor, cause the processor to perform operations, the operations comprising;

determining an offsetting longitudinal control signal to control the vehicle to deviate from a reference trajectory by a level of error sufficient to induce generation of a correction control signal to correct the vehicle's deviation from the reference trajectory, wherein determining the offsetting longitudinal control signal comprises generating a random direction and a random magnitude for the offsetting longitudinal control signal; and

executing the offsetting longitudinal control signal followed by the correction control signal to modulate longitudinal vehicle dynamics of the vehicle, wherein inertial forces generated by modulating the longitudinal vehicle dynamics in response to the correction control signal notify the operator that the driving automation system is in an active state.

9. The control system of claim 8 , wherein the offsetting longitudinal control signal includes at least one instance of acceleration or deceleration of the vehicle.

10. The control system of claim 8 , wherein the reference trajectory includes at least one of a vehicle speed or a following distance to a leading vehicle.

11. The control system of claim 8 , wherein the offsetting longitudinal control signal controls the vehicle to deviate from the reference trajectory deviates by undershooting and overshooting the reference trajectory by the level of error.

12. The control system of claim 8 , wherein the operations are executed periodically based on some passage of one of time, distance, or combination of both.

13. The control system of claim 8 , wherein determining the offsetting longitudinal control signal is based on vehicle sensor information.

14. The control system of claim 8 , wherein the system further comprises a toggle switch and in response to a toggle switch signaling for a perpetual operating condition, the correction control signal instructs the vehicle to follow another trajectory that overshoots the reference trajectory.

15. A non-transitory machine-readable medium having instructions stored therein, which when executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform operations, the operations comprising:

determining an offsetting longitudinal control signal to control the vehicle to deviate from a reference trajectory by a level of error sufficient to induce generation of a correction control signal to correct the vehicle's deviation from the reference trajectory, wherein determining the offsetting longitudinal control signal comprises generating a random direction and a random magnitude for the offsetting longitudinal control signal; and

executing the offsetting longitudinal control signal followed by the correction control signal to modulate longitudinal vehicle dynamics of the vehicle, wherein inertial forces generated by modulating the longitudinal vehicle dynamics in response to the correction control signal notify the operator that the driving automation system is in an active state.

16. The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the offsetting longitudinal control signal includes at least one instance of acceleration or deceleration of the vehicle.

17. The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the reference trajectory includes at least one of a vehicle speed or a following distance to a leading vehicle.

18. The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the offsetting longitudinal control signal controls the vehicle to deviate from the reference trajectory by undershooting and overshooting the reference trajectory by the level of error.

19. The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the operations are executed periodically based on some passage of one of time, distance, or combination of both.

20. The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein determining the offsetting longitudinal control signal is based on vehicle sensor information.

Assignments (4)
CORRECTION BY DECLARATION TO UPDATE THE OWNERSHIP Recorded Mar 28, 2024
From: WOVEN ALPHA, INC.
To: TOYOTA JIDOSHA KABUSHIKI KAISHA
Reel/Frame 066934/0749 →
MERGER AND CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jun 26, 2023
From: WOVEN ALPHA, INC.; WOVEN BY TOYOTA, INC.
To: WOVEN BY TOYOTA, INC.
Reel/Frame 064063/0786 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 15, 2023
From: WOVEN ALPHA, INC.
To: TOYOTA JIDOSHA KABUSHIKI KAISHA
Reel/Frame 062993/0572 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 25, 2023
From: KUEHNER, MANUEL LUDWIG; YASUDA, HIROSHI; LAZCANO, ANDREA MICHELLE RIOS
To: WOVEN ALPHA, INC.
Reel/Frame 062489/0672 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20240246553A1 · Jul 25, 2024
References Cited (19)
US 5014200A · Chundrlik · 1991 [cited by examiner]
US 5454442A · Labuhn · 1995 [cited by examiner]
US 6233515B1 · Engelman · 2001 [cited by examiner]
US 9308914B1 · Sun · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 11318958B2 · Qin · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20050055150A1 · Uhler · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20070276577A1 · Kuge · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20100179741A1 · Pelosse · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20150175162A1 · Nakadori · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160214480A1 · Solyom · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170137029A1 · Dynes · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180281791A1 · Fukaya · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180345964A1 · Fujii · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20200298877A1 · Takamatsu · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200387167A1 · Sujan · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210276571A1 · Breton · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220402487A1 · He · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20240190432A1 · Alenius · 2024 [cited by examiner]
CN 112810609A · 2021 [cited by applicant]