IP Library Granted Patent US 12,359,814
Granted Patent B2
US 12,359,814 · App. 18/164,491 · Granted Jul 15, 2025

Reducing noise from a combustor of a gas turbine engine

Inventors: Justin M Locke (Tolland, CT); Dennis M Moura (South Windsor, CT); Duane C McCormick (Colchester, CT); Scott A Liljenberg (Wethersfield, CT); Theodore R Strickland (Madison, CT); William Proscia (Marlborough, CT)
Assignee: RTX CORPORATION
F23R3/28F23D11/38F23K5/06F23R3/06F23R3/12F23R3/14F23R3/346F23R3/50F23R2900/00014F23R2900/03042
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,359,814
App. No.
18/164,491
Granted
Jul 15, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method of reducing noise from a combustor of a gas turbine engine includes the steps of establishing a maximum noise limit that may be for a particular frequency range. A primary fuel flow percentage, which may be emitted from a fuel nozzle arrangement having various groupings of simplex and duplex nozzles, is then established. An immersion depth measured between an aft rim of a swirler and a distal tip of the fuel nozzles may then be reduced thereby reducing the noise amplitude.

Claims (21)

1. A method of designing a low noise turbine engine combustor comprising the steps of:

establishing a maximum noise limit;

establishing a primary fuel flow percentage;

for each fuel nozzle of a plurality of fuel nozzles, reducing an immersion depth measured between an aft rim of an associated swirler of a plurality of swirlers and a distal tip of the fuel nozzle, wherein the fuel nozzle projects along a centerline C of the fuel nozzle and into a surrounding, cone-shaped, cavity defined by the swirler, the surrounding, cone-shaped, cavity converging toward the centerline C in a downstream direction, the swirler spanning axially with respect to centerline C and between a forward rim and the aft rim of the swirler, wherein the plurality of fuel nozzles comprises a plurality of duplex fuel nozzles and a plurality of simplex fuel nozzles, the plurality of duplex fuel nozzles being structurally different from the plurality of simplex fuel nozzles, wherein the plurality of fuel nozzles of the low noise turbine engine combustor comprise four nozzle groupings that are circumferentially disposed relative to an axis, wherein a first nozzle grouping and a third nozzle grouping each comprise six of the plurality of duplex fuel nozzles, and wherein a second nozzle grouping and a fourth nozzle grouping each comprise three of the plurality of simplex fuel nozzles that are circumferentially located between the first nozzle grouping and the third nozzle grouping; and

ending the reducing in response to the noise generated dropping below the maximum noise limit.

2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the primary fuel flow percentage is established for low engine power conditions.

3. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the primary fuel flow percentage is about less than twenty-five percent.

4. The method according to claim 1 , comprising a further step of increasing the primary fuel flow percentage to further reduce the combustor noise.

5. The method according to claim 1 , wherein reducing the immersion depth at least partially desensitizes the combustor against other noise producing factors including the primary fuel flow.

6. The method according to claim 1 , wherein reducing the immersion depth results in the immersion depth being less than 0.500 inches.

7. The method according to claim 1 , wherein reducing the immersion depth results in the immersion depth being less than 0.350 inches.

8. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the primary fuel flow comes from the duplex nozzles.

9. A method of reducing noise from a combustor of a gas turbine engine operating at low power conditions comprising the steps of:

establishing a primary fuel flow percentage;

for each fuel nozzle of a plurality of fuel nozzles, reducing an immersion depth measured between an aft rim of an associated swirler of a plurality of swirlers and a distal tip of the fuel nozzle, wherein the fuel nozzle projects along a centerline C of the fuel nozzle and into a surrounding, cone-shaped, cavity defined by the swirler, the surrounding, cone-shaped, cavity converging toward the centerline C in a downstream direction, the swirler spanning axially with respect to centerline C and between a forward rim and the aft rim of the swirler, wherein the plurality of fuel nozzles comprises a plurality of duplex fuel nozzles and a plurality of simplex fuel nozzles, the plurality of duplex fuel nozzles being structurally different from the plurality of simplex fuel nozzles, wherein the plurality of fuel nozzles of the low noise turbine engine combustor comprise four nozzle groupings that are circumferentially disposed relative to an axis, wherein a first nozzle grouping and a third nozzle grouping each comprise six of the plurality of duplex fuel nozzles, and wherein a second nozzle grouping and a fourth nozzle grouping each comprise three of the plurality of simplex fuel nozzles that are circumferentially located between the first nozzle grouping and the third nozzle grouping; and

ending the reducing in response to the noise generated dropping below a maximum noise limit.

10. The method according to claim 9 , wherein the primary fuel flow percentage is about less than twenty-five percent.

11. The method according to claim 9 , wherein the primary fuel flow flows from the duplex nozzles.

12. The method according to claim 9 , wherein reducing the immersion depth at least partially desensitizes the combustor against other noise producing factors including primary fuel flow.

13. The method according to claim 9 , wherein reducing the immersion depth results in the immersion depth being less than 0.500 inches.

14. The method according to claim 9 , wherein the combustor noise is measured for tones falling between a range of about 200 Hz to 400 Hz.

Assignments (3)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jul 27, 2023
From: RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
To: RTX CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 064402/0837 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 3, 2023
From: LOCKE, JUSTIN M; MOURA, DENNIS; MCCORMICK, DUANE; LILJENBERG, SCOTT A; STRICKLANT, THEODORE; PROSCIA, WILLIAM
To: UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 062590/0314 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Feb 3, 2023
From: UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
To: RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 062664/0970 →
Continuity (2)
Division 15177825 · Jun 9, 2016
Related Publication 20240102655A1 · Mar 28, 2024
References Cited (28)
US 4297093A · Morimoto et al. · 1981 [cited by applicant]
US 5943866A · Lovett · 1999 [cited by examiner]
US 6935117B2 · Cowan · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20080072605A1 · Hagen et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090165436A1 · Herbon · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20100089066A1 · Mina · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20130125556A1 · Hoke et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130199200A1 · Hoke et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140083111A1 · Gregg · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140090394A1 · Low et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150219336A1 · Crothers · 2015 [cited by examiner]
DE 10205839 · 2003 [cited by applicant]
EP 2423598 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
EP 2597285 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO 2007113130 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
EP Search Report dated Oct. 25, 2017 in EP Application No. 17174828.8. [cited by applicant]
European Office Action, European Office Action dated Nov. 8, 2018 in Application No. 17174828.8. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, European Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings dated Dec. 9, 2019 in Application No. 17174828.8. [cited by applicant]
USPTO; Requirement for Restriction dated Nov. 6, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/177,825. [cited by applicant]
USPTO; First Action Interview Pre-Interview Office Action dated Feb. 27, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/177,825. [cited by applicant]
USPTO; First Action Interview Office Action dated Mar. 29, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/177,825. [cited by applicant]
USPTO; Final Office Action dated Jul. 30, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/177,825. [cited by applicant]
USPTO; Advisory Action dated Sep. 17, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/177,825. [cited by applicant]
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 22, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/177,825. [cited by applicant]
USPTO; Final Office Action dated May 1, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/177,825. [cited by applicant]
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 22, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/177,825. [cited by applicant]
USPTO; Advisory Action dated Mar. 10, 2021 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/177,825. [cited by applicant]
USPTO; Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 7, 2022 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/177,825. [cited by applicant]